
EXCLUSIVE Britain's richest plumber Charlie Mullins blasts new American owners of his former firm after they axed popular apprenticeship scheme
Mr Mullins, himself a former apprentice plumber, founded Pimlico in 1979 before growing the company into a £50million-a-year plumbing, heating and electrical services giant.
The 72-year-old eventually sold the London firm to the tune of £140million to Neighborly, which is owned by private equity firm KKR, in 2021.
But now he has hit out at the firm's new bosses for their recent move to get rid of their apprenticeship programme, which has trained more than a thousand youngsters since it first launched.
Mr Mullins has since revealed he regrets handing over the reigns of the company to the US private equity firm and has offered to fund a legal case by the 16 apprentices who are losing their jobs.
Trainees, some of whom were just months away from the point they should have become fully qualified, were offered just half a week's pay for each year of employment, MailOnline has been told - with one saying they'd received just £700.
Fabio, a 20-year-old plumbing and heating engineer, revealed he was just months away from completing his scheme when he was laid off.
He said Pimlico offered him half a week's pay for each year he had been with them, which would have amounted to between £600 and £700.
'We were working one day when we got a text and were told that our jobs were at risk,' he said.
'Everyone was really stressed out about it and been rushing to try and sort other work. No one in my college or anyone I've spoken to have heard of anything like this happening before.'
Twenty-two-year-old Luke, who is also set to begin with WeFix in June, revealed he had only two months left before he was due to finish his apprenticeship when the possibility of redundancies were announced by Pimlico in April.
'I was actually on annual leave the day they scheduled the in office meeting to let everyone know, but I did receive a phone call from my manager after the meeting had finished,' he said.
'It was definitely a shock,' he added: 'It wasn't a good situation but what I've ever really done is just to try and make the best out of a bad situation, and turn a negative into a positive.'
The apprentice, who had been working for Pimlico for three years described the situation as 'frustrating' as he was only a couple months away from sitting his final exam.
He said he was mainly concerned from a 'financial' perspective as he had completed over 75 percent of his apprenticeship, meaning under government guidance he would still be able to complete his qualification without an employer.
Explaining his worries and fears, he added: 'It was more from a financial standpoint and for future building that I did go out and seek employment.'
Describing the moment, the redundancies were confirmed on May 2, he said: 'It wasn't as bad as it was when I received the initial news of the proposed redundancy because, I naturally decided okay I'm going to set plans for my future.
'I knew where I stood. I think the more worrying part of the whole situation was not knowing whether you were are being made redundant or not. When you kind of didn't know whether you were coming or going, that was a bit stressful.'
Reflecting on his decision to apply to WeFix, he said: 'it's a suiting company. They work in the areas that I've always been used to, and I just saw it as why would I apply anywhere else?
'It was just probably going to be the best fit for me.'
Apprentices were first told they were at risk of losing their jobs during a meeting in April.
Afterwards a document later circulated largely laying blame on 'increased operating costs' resulting from the increase to National Insurance contributions and the minimum wage.
It also cited high energy costs and business rates, as well as the UK's downgraded GDP growth forecast from 1.7 per cent to 1 per cent.
'In summary, current economic conditions, government policy changes, and increased operating costs are all impacting Pimlico financially, hence the proposal to close the apprenticeship programme,' the document stated.
Mr Mullins left school aged 15 with no qualifications before becoming an apprentice and starting his own business from a Pimlico estate agent's basement.
The company became known for providing services London's rich and famous it went on to boast annual sales of £50million.
Glitzy clients have included Liam Gallagher, Daniel Craig, Dame Helen Mirren, Joanna Lumley, Jonathan Ross and Chelsea footballers.
He has now set up a new home services company, WeFix, and taken on several of the apprentices who were made redundant.
Mr Mullins accused Pimlico's new American owners of 'greed' and 'destroying youngsters' futures'.
'This is all about bottom line. And I'm sure that there will be a saving for them, but the future loss will be colossal.
'Without my apprenticeship there would have be no Pimlico and a lot of the guys we took on have gone on to run their own businesses too. So I've always been a big advocate for apprenticeships.
'It's damaging to them as a business and damaging to the apprentices who have put all this time and effort in.'
The entrepreneur disputed the claim by management that they had been forced to lay off the apprentices due to rising costs.
'They say it's because NI and the minimum wage have gone up. I'm not disputing that it makes things harder but you don't necessarily cut down on people who are already in the company, particularly when many are towards the end of their programme.
'These people are the company's future. It's also demoralised a lot of other staff, some of whom encouraged their relatives to join up who are now being laid off.
'We took on apprentices within our first year of operation in 1979 and over 1,200 have gone through it. We're not in a position to take all 16 of them on but we're only taking a few.
Mr Mullins has previously insisted it was a mistake to sell Pimlico to Neighborly, and repeated this claim today.
'I had other buyers but I picked them on the basis that they were the biggest, so I thought they would be a good outfit. I think this is about preparing the company for a sale.
'I wouldn't have sold it to them if I'd have known this was going to happen. I've learned in business now that many of these American companies aren't interested in anything apart from the bottom line.
'If these people want to get together and take legal action I will happily finance that.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
10 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says US is close to reaching a trade deal with China
TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday his administration was close to reaching a trade deal with China, but gave no other details. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters at the start of a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland.


Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
UK could save £5bn if Bailey changes course on debt sales
Taxpayers would save up to £5bn next year if Andrew Bailey overhauls the Bank of England's controversial programme of bond sales, analysts have calculated. Deutsche Bank has said Rachel Reeves would be spared from transferring billions of pounds to Threadneedle Street if it stopped selling long-term debt amid a dramatic drop in bond prices. The Bank is currently unwinding the stockpile of gilts it amassed during the financial crisis and lockdown, when it created almost £900bn to boost the economy. When interest rates were at record lows of 0.1pc during the pandemic, the Bank earned far more on its returns from government bonds than it had to pay in interest to commercial banks. However, this reversed dramatically once interest rates started to rise. The Bank is now also actively selling gilts back to the market as part of so-called quantitative tightening (QT), crystallising billions of pounds of losses for the taxpayer.


The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Starmer faces task of persuading Trump to take different path on Gaza crisis
Moments after Air Force One touched down at Prestwick on Friday, for a trip in which politics will take as big a billing as golf, Donald Trump was asked about his relationship with Keir Starmer. 'I like your prime minister. He's slightly more liberal than I am, as you've probably heard. But he's a good man,' the US president told reporters. At a time when the UK wants Trump's ear on numerous weighty issues, his response to questions about the 'special relationship' will have given Downing Street some reassurance. But it has been hard won. Starmer has been clear since before Trump's re-election that he would work with him if it was in Britain's national interest. There have been uncomfortable moments, but so far his decision to align himself with the US president has broadly paid off. Most notable was the economic deal agreed by the two leaders which slashes some of Trump's tariffs on cars, aluminium and steel, and which – even though it is not yet fully implemented – the UK government hopes will be a first step towards a closer trading relationship. Starmer, along with other western allies, has also helped encourage Trump to shift his position on Ukraine. After initially siding with Vladimir Putin and appearing to blame Volodymyr Zelenskyy for the invasion, the US president now declares himself 'very unhappy' with his Russian counterpart. The prime minister now faces his toughest diplomatic task of all: trying to persuade Trump to take a different path on the humanitarian crisis in the Middle East. Even getting the issue on the agenda will not have been straightforward, with the White House not regarding Gaza as a priority. Trump is the only international leader whom the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, listens to – and even then, not all of the time – so getting the US president's ear at this precise moment is an opportunity not to be squandered. With international fury over the situation on the ground in Gaza growing, Starmer has also been under pressure domestically – from his cabinet, Labour MPs and increasingly the public – to take further action against Israel. Government advisers are defensive – citing what the UK has already done to hold Israel to account since Labour came to power – and promising further action will follow, even if it is not clear what that might constitute. They point to the UK restoring funding to the UN agency Unrwa, sanctioning far-right Israeli ministers and those who committed settler violence, breaking off trade negotiations with Israel, backing the legitimacy of the international criminal court and restricting arms licences to Israel (though not preventing them entirely). Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The initial urgency is around humanitarian aid, with mass starvation spreading across Gaza, and Starmer will be hoping to persuade Trump that the situation on the ground will only worsen unless the Israelis fully lift their blockade of almost all aid into the territory. The longer-term prize, however, would be a ceasefire. Starmer will press Trump to revive ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas, after the US and Israel withdrew their negotiation teams from Qatar last week. Getting them back round the table to agree a 60-day break from fighting is a prerequisite to a more permanent cessation of violence. The window of opportunity is narrow: the Israeli parliament is not sitting until October, which gives Netanyahu the cover he would need to agree a deal. But Starmer knows Trump is the only international figure who can put pressure on him to do so. Only at that point does Starmer feel the UK could follow France and formally recognise a Palestine state. No 10 insiders insist it is a 'matter of when, not if' and David Lammy, the foreign secretary, will be at a UN conference this week to establish a pathway to formal recognition. To the deep frustration of many in his party, the prime minister last week rejected a call to follow France in recognising Palestine amid concerns the move would be largely symbolic without a ceasefire in place, and that issue could overshadow the talks with Trump. But that means that even more rides on Monday's meeting with the US president. It will be a test of whether the energy put into maintaining a good relationship with Trump has been worth it. And it will also show how far Starmer really is prepared to push to help bring an end to the catastrophe in Gaza.