
Grizzly bears, 32k troops & one reclusive emperor… inside isolated ‘last resort' base where Trump will host Putin
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will sit down "one-on-one" at the Elmendorf-Richardson base in Alaska on Friday - the Russian's chance to prove he wants peace.
11
11
The base, near Anchorage, is bristling with troops from the US Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps - as well as National Guardsmen and Reserves.
In all, over 32,000 military personnel and their families live there - ten percent of the population of Anchorage, Alaska's largest city - alongside grizzly bears, moose and wolves.
It played a "particularly important" role in defending the US against the Soviet Union during the cold war, according to the Library of Congress.
The White House apparently wanted to avoid the sight of a Russian leader being welcomed into a US military setting - but concluded there was no other option.
Elmendorf-Richardson is reportedly considered the only site in Alaska which could be locked down to the required level of security for the high-stakes meeting.
Putin will fly the nine hours from Moscow and Trump the seven-and-a-half from Washington, with ample room on the runway for both their presidential aircrafts.
This will not be the first crucial coming together of world leaders at Elmendorf-Richardson.
In 1971, President Nixon held an historic 30-minute discussion with Emperor Hirohito of Japan.
It marked the first occasion that a reigning Japanese monarch had "stepped foot on foreign soil," according to Nixon.
Putin's visit is likely to last longer than Hirohito's, who was only in Alaska for 100 minutes, though proceedings are not expected to roll over into Saturday.
First time a reigning Japanese Emperor had set foot on foreign soil
Trump is reportedly planning to arrive and leave on Friday in order to emphasise the limited timescale.
That could also be because there "nowhere to stay" at the base, according to a Republican speaking to The Times.
Joe Biden also picked Anchorage to backdrop a meeting with the Chinese in 2021.
But Trump will be hoping for a better result after that one turned sour - with the Chinese delegation accusing the Americans of 'condescension and hypocrisy'.
11
11
11
Alaska was selected as the general location for the meeting before officials knew exactly where it would happen.
America's largest state is a strategic spot, lying at the intersection between North America and Russia.
You can even see Russian territory from Alaskan soil - if you stand on the island of Little Diomede and look out to Big Diomede.
And it's a very long way from Europe and its leaders - whom Putin would much rather forget about.
It also means Russian power is making a return to the territory once owned by the Tsardom.
Putin's distant predecessor, Tsar Alexander II, sold Alaska to America in 1867 for $7.2 million — or two cents per acre.
Vladimir Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said: "It seems entirely logical for our delegation to simply fly across the Bering Strait, and for such an important and anticipated summit of the leaders of the two countries to be held in Alaska."
11
11
11
Security expert Hamish de Bretton-Gordon explained why Alaska was indeed a logical choice - and a crucial one for Putin.
The Russian leader was slapped with an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2023 so would in theory be cuffed if he were to visit any of 125 countries around the world - including the UK, France, Germany and Canada.
The United States, however, is among the minority of countries which does not recognise the rule of the ICC - alongside Russia, China, Pakistan and a handful of others.
This means that, unlike most nations, the US is not bound to arrest Putin when he visits.
De Bretton-Gordon said: "He can roam around the world, in theory, in any countries that are not members of the ICC.
"A warrant from the ICC means nothing in those countries that are not signatories to it.
"And the Americans aren't, so - he can go to Alaska.
"That is the loophole. He can operate exactly how he sees fit. He wouldn't have gone anywhere where potentially he could be arrested."
11
De Bretton-Gordon added: "President Putin is absolutely fixated about his own security, and his desire not to wander out of friendly airspace.
"There's not much of that to Alaska - he will only be in international airspace for a few miles."
Mike Dunleavy, the Republican governor there since 2018, posted on X: 'Alaska is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia, with the Arctic to our north and the Pacific to our south.
'A mere two miles separating Russia from Alaska, no other place plays a more vital role in our national defence, energy security, and Arctic leadership.'
A 'listening exercise', says the White House
By Sayan Bose, foreign news reporter
DONALD Trump and Vladimir Putin's historic one-on-one meeting will be a "listening exercise", the White House has said.
Friday's summit comes as Volodymyr Zelensky revealed the Russians want Ukraine to withdraw from its eastern Donetsk region as part of a ceasefire deal.
Speaking at a news briefing in Kyiv, Zelensky said Russia's position was conveyed to him by US officials ahead of Friday's summit.
He reiterated that Ukraine would not withdraw from territories it controls because it was unconstitutional and would only serve as a springboard for a future Russian invasion.
Trump's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, also hinted that the President might travel to Russia after he misspoke yesterday and said he was considering it.
Not ruling out a possible trip, she said: "Perhaps there are plans."
This would mean giving up the remaining 30 per cent of the Donetsk region and would leave almost the entirety of the Donbas in Russia's bloody hands.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Do you have faith Donald Trump can end the war in Ukraine? Vote in our poll
Ahead of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's crucial 'one-on-one' talks in Alaska tomorrow, we're asking Mirror readers if they think the US President can end the war in Ukraine - vote in our poll Donald Trump has warned Russian leader Vladimir Putin that he faces severe consequences if he walks away from the summit in Alaska on Friday without a stop to the war in Ukraine - and we want to hear your thoughts. It comes after Keir Starmer said yesterday there is a "viable" chance of reaching a ceasefire in the Ukraine war as a result of the US President's work. Following virtual calls with Trump, Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders, the PM said Britain stands ready to "increase pressure" on Russia if necessary. Briefing the Coalition of the Willing after the calls, Starmer said: "As I've said personally to President Trump, for three and a bit years this conflict has been going on and we haven't got anywhere near the prospect of actually a viable solution, a viable way, of bringing it to a ceasefire. And now we do have that chance because of the work that the President has put in." It comes after Putin warned of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. However, Kyiv believes Putin is bluffing about his willingness to end the bloodshed. In a joint briefing in Berlin with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Zelensky said: "I told the US president and all our European colleagues that Putin is bluffing. He is trying to apply pressure before the meeting in Alaska along all parts of the Ukrainian front. Russia is trying to show that it can occupy all of Ukraine." After the talks, Zelensky said Trump supports providing security guarantees for Ukraine if there is a peace agreement. He said: "There should be security guarantees. President Trump said that he supports this and about America's readiness to take part." The Ukrainian President said he hoped the primary focus of the Alaska talks would be an immediate ceasefire, with any discussions on territorial issues to be addressed at a meeting involving all three leaders. Trump warned there will be "very severe consequences" if Putin refuses to stop the killing. When pushed on what these consequences would be, he said: "I don't have to say." He added: "If I do not get the necessary answers during the meeting with Putin, there will be no next meeting." Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Nato's Secretary-General, Mark Rutte, said after a separate call with Trump, Zelensky and European leaders: "We are united in pushing to end this terrible war. The ball is now in Putin's court." Despite the impending Trump-Putin showdown, Russia's military continued strikes on Ukraine last night. With just hours until the US and Russian leaders meet for crucial talks, we want to know if you think Trump can end the war in Ukraine? Vote in our poll HERE to have your say.


Daily Record
7 minutes ago
- Daily Record
BBC Breakfast viewers baffled and slam 'there's no need' after unusual moment in live broadcast
BBC Breakfast viewers were left scratching their heads as they watched business correspondent Ben Boulos report live from a wind farm in North Lincolnshire. BBC Breakfast viewers expressed the same issue as they tuned into Thursday's morning programme, stating: "There's no need". On Thursday August 14, Charlie Stayt and Naga Munchetty were seated on the red sofa to deliver the day's news. Reading the headlines from the UK and further afield, sports updates were provided by Mike Bushell in the studio, while Scots star Carol Kirkwood gave weather forecasts. In one segment, Charlie and Naga spoke with education correspondent Vanessa Clarke. Clarke was at a college in Middlesbrough where A-Level students were receiving their results. The programme also covered the situation in Ukraine ahead of the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday. In another part of the show, business correspondent Ben Boulos broadcasted live from a wind farm in North Lincolnshire, discussing changes in the UK economy, as reported by the Mirror. "This isn't just any old wind farm, this is England's largest onshore wind farm," revealed Ben. He explained the visit to the site: "The reason we've come here is because the government hopes that renewable energy sites like this can power not just our homes and our workplaces, but also potentially power some economic growth as well." Ben then spoke with Sam Peacock, Managing Director of Corporate Affairs at SSE, and John McHale, Managing Director of ActionCOACH Lincolnshire, about the impact of wind farms. Later on in the show, Ben returned to the screen to present the latest business figures, revealing that the economy had grown by 0.3% in the second quarter of this year. However, BBC viewers were quick to express their confusion at Ben donning a hard hat and thick gloves in an empty field, with many remarking on the "strange" detail. "Why are they wearing hard hats in the middle of a field?" one viewer questioned on Twitter. "There is literally no need for all the ppe standing in a field ffs," another commented, while a third observed: "Hard hats and goggles on a wind farm? Ok." A fourth spectator remarked: "A hi viz and padded jacket? We have a heat wave," with another similarly noting: "Why are they wearing gloves stood in the middle of a field." Meanwhile earlier this week, weather icon Carol surprised her colleagues after revealing the roles she held before joining the BBC team. During Monday's show, Jon asked Carol about the jobs she had when she was younger to earn some extra money during the summer holidays. She replied: "Yes, I did. I worked as a housemaid, as a waitress, as a receptionist, all these things!". Humorously claiming she had done 'everything', Carol also shared that she had been a postwoman. Clearly surprised, Jon responded: "A post woman? ! You didn't used to predict the weather for your neighbours? That kind of thing?". She retorted: "No, but you know, you used to go in the mornings, you'd smell toast, bacon, sausages. Ooh, it'd make you hungry!".


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK ‘scales back' plans for 30,000-troop reassurance force in Ukraine
The UK has reportedly scaled back its plans to put troops in Ukraine, now offering a smaller 'reassurance force' to support peace efforts in the region. While a 30,000-strong group from countries that make up the coalition of the willing – a group of countries which have pledged support for Ukraine against Russia's aggression – had initially been floated, military chiefs are now said to have dropped the idea, instead favouring a smaller, 'more realistic' operation. It comes as Sir Keir Starmer prepares to welcome Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to No 10 on Thursday morning, as Europe rallies behind Ukraine. It comes amid fears the country could be shut out of any peace talks when Donald Trump and Russia's President Putin hold a historic summit on the future of the war in Alaska on Friday. The PM joined Donald Trump and European allies on a call to discuss the future of Ukraine on Wednesday, where he praised the US president's work to bring forward a 'viable' chance of an end to the devastating conflict. While Sir Keir had been in favour of a bigger coalition of the willing force, The Times reported that some European nations were concerned that such a large deployment to protect key Ukrainian sites was too risky. It is thought that the scaled-back force would not be sent to the frontline, instead providing logistical support, armament and training experts to support the regeneration of Ukraine's own forces. However, the role the US is expected to play is still unclear. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, Sir Keir said: 'We're ready to support this, including from the plans we've already drawn up to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased. 'It is important to remind colleagues that we do stand ready also to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary.' The PM said Friday's talks were 'hugely important', adding: 'As I've said personally to President Trump for the three-and-a-bit years this conflict has been going on, we haven't got anywhere near a prospect of actually a viable solution, a viable way of bringing it to a ceasefire. 'And now we do have that chance, because of the work that the president has put in.' But concerns have been raised over Mr Zelensky's exclusion from Friday's meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Putin. Sir Keir and European leaders have repeatedly stated that discussions about Ukraine should not take place without it, amid concerns that the country is being sidelined. Asked if he decided not to invite Mr Zelensky to the meeting, Mr Trump said 'no, just the opposite', before adding that a second meeting with the Ukrainian president could take place afterwards. Mr Trump has threatened Russia with "severe consequences" if a ceasefire is rejected by its leader. At the weekend, the US president suggested a truce could involve some "swapping" of land. Putin is expected to use the summit to demand that Ukraine cede parts of the Donbas region, which it still controls. On Saturday, Mr Zelensky rejected any proposal that would compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity, something that is forbidden by the country's constitution.