Louisiana students might qualify for TOPS with conservative-backed ACT alternative
Rep. Raymond Crews. (LAI photo)
Louisiana high school students might soon be able to take a conservative alternative to the ACT exam to qualify for the state's popular college scholarship program.
State lawmakers quietly approved an amendment to a bill Monday that would make results from the Classical Learning Test acceptable to qualify for the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students, which provides tuition assistance for qualifying Louisiana students.
Conservative educators are the chief proponents of the Classical Learning Test, which evaluates students on math, writing and grammar with an emphasis on classic literature and historic documents. Its supporters frequently tout that the exam emphasizes texts that 'shaped Western culture.'
The test has been embraced by conservative lawmakers in Oklahoma, Florida and Arkansas. and has the support of the conservative Cato Institution and Heritage Foundation.
Oklahoma lawmakers extensively debated embracing the test to qualify for their version of TOPS, with Democrats arguing it doesn't meet the same academic rigor and anti-cheating measures as the ACT.
In Louisiana, only Louisiana Christian University and the University of New Orleans Honors College accept the test for admissions, according to the CLT website.
The change to TOPS acceptance standard was made through an amendment to House Bill 77 by Rep. Chris Turner, R-Ruston, which creates a new level of TOPS awards for high-achieving students. There was no debate on the amendment and it passed without objection. The House approved Turner's bill in a 91-4 vote.
Rep. Raymond Crews, R-Bossier City, sponsored the amendment. Crews said Jeremy Tate, founder and CEO of Classical Learning Initiatives, which created and administers the test, asked him to do so.
Crews said he had not heard of the Classical Learning Test before Tate brought it to him, and he did not know that Tate was associated with the test.
Turner's bill was also amended on the House floor to allow students who leave the state for their undergraduate education to use their TOPS awards if they return to Louisiana to attend medical school.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
44 minutes ago
- Politico
The tax break that even fiscal hawks don't want to end
Presented by Editor's note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day's biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. Quick Fix As Senate fiscal hawks prepare to blow up the House GOP's 'big beautiful bill' for fueling the deficit, there's one item they won't touch: a politically popular business tax deduction that has been widely criticized for lacking broad economic benefit. The deduction for qualified 'pass-through' business income, which is not subject to corporate taxes but instead individual income tax, was included in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The vast majority of businesses in the U.S. are pass-through entities — sole proprietorships, partnerships, and LLCs among others — and it's estimated that 43 percent of the workforce was employed by them, as of 2021. The House megabill would slightly increase the so-called Section 199a deduction, which is set to expire at the end of the year, and make it permanent. But doing so would amount to a fairly significant government revenue hit –– almost $820 billion over 10 years, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. The resistance to ending the deduction illustrates how difficult it will be to scale back the megabill while negotiations take place over the 1,000-page reconciliation package, even for an item that critics say offers few economic gains. Tax policy experts and economists argue that the program primarily rewards the wealthiest business owners. But even for the most fiscally minded Republicans, the political stakes are too high to consider a world without the deduction. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), one of the Senate's most vocal critics of the House GOP megabill, said he's not concerned about the federal revenue decrease the deduction is estimated to cause. 'I've said repeatedly I would just extend current tax law, because had we been smart enough back in 2017 to use current policy, none of this would have expired already, and we need to return that kind of certainty,' said Johnson, who pushed for the deduction in the original TCJA. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, another Republican who has been critical of the megabill, said he still supports the small business deduction. And Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said the deduction 'is a very important part of the bill' that he believes will be included when it's passed and would be part of 'a major win.' The House bill would allow individuals, trusts and estates to deduct up to 23 percent of qualified business income from taxable income, up from the current 20 percent threshold. Tax policy experts said they expect Congress to make the measure permanent but were surprised at the increase in the deduction. The White House is also backing it. And the small business lobby is confident the deduction will be enshrined in a final reconciliation bill. Even with overwhelming political support, critics across the small business and economic policy universe say the provision is costly, susceptible to tax avoidance, and won't stimulate the economy. 'Frankly, to me, it sort of just seems like an extra tax break for certain types of taxpayers that doesn't seem particularly warranted from a policy perspective,' said Miles Johnson, a senior attorney adviser at the Tax Law Center at NYU Law. Samantha Jacoby, the deputy director of federal tax policy at the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said there aren't any advantages to increasing and making permanent the pass-through deduction. The policy has 'created a big wedge' between business owners and employees who are now paying a higher tax rate than their employers. 'Despite being almost universally panned by economists and other tax policy experts,' the influence of politically powerful businesses located in every district is part of the reason the provision is popular and pervasive among Republicans, Jacoby said. Economic growth is one of the main arguments for proponents of the deduction, but policy experts disagree. Economists say there's a lack of evidence from the original deduction that there was any boost to real economic activity or employment that came from the pass-through business rate cut. 'I would categorize 199A as a business tax cut that is not pro-growth,' said Kyle Pomerleau, a federal tax policy senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. 'It is a policy that I think generally loses a lot of revenue for no good reason.' IT'S THURSDAY — Any small business, insurance or financial services tips please send to your MM host at khapgood@ And, as always, send your tips, suggestions and personnel moves to Sam at ssutton@ Driving the day The SEC's Investment Management Division hosts a conference on 'Emerging Trends in Asset Management' with speakers including Commissioner Hester Peirce beginning at 9 a.m. … The SEC meets at 10 a.m. … House Small Business holds a hearing on 'How Private Equity Empowers Main Street' at 10 a.m. … House Financial Services holds a hearing on data privacy at 10 a.m. … Fed Governor Adriana Kugler speaks at the Economic Club of New York at noon.. The Urban Institute holds a virtual discussion on 'rent reporting as a pathway to credit building' at 12:30 p.m. … The Peterson Institute for International Economics holds a virtual discussion on industrial policy for Asia and the Pacific at 5 p.m. … In The Economy First in MM: New research from the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, which has members in the finance, business, law, accounting and academic worlds, found no effect on consumer prices across sectors from having competing firms with common investors. The study looked at 52 industries, representing the majority of GDP, over a 24-year period (2000-2023), per our Victoria Guida. The finding comes as some Republican state attorneys general are alleging in a lawsuit that Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street have violated antitrust laws by colluding to reduce coal production. The market's mixed — Bonds rallied and stocks finished mixed after weak economic data boosted investors' confidence that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates in the coming months. Services activity unexpectedly contracted in May, according to the Institute for Supply Management purchasing managers index, while ADP data showed 37,000 jobs were created, the slowest pace of private-sector hiring in more than two years, the Wall Street Journal reports. Department of Labor staffing shortage raises CPI concerns — Some economists are beginning to question the accuracy of recent U.S. inflation data after the federal government said staffing shortages hampered its ability to conduct a massive monthly survey, the Journal reports. What small businesses are saying — As the Senate mulls changes to the 'big, beautiful bill,' small businesses are raising red flags about the uncertainty pertaining to both taxes and trade. More than 90 percent said that certainty and predictability in the federal tax code are important to their financial planning, according to the latest Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses Voices survey. More than 35 percent said they were feeling negative effects from tariffs and another 38 percent said they expect to feel the effects of those policies in the future. Fifty-one percent said they would be unable to take out a loan at current interest rates. TRADE CORNER More Carney-Trump negotiations on steel and aluminum — Ontario Premier Doug Ford is urging Canada's prime minister to retaliate against the United States after it doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. But Prime Minister Mark Carney is holding off, arguing that he's close to striking a new trade deal with President Donald Trump, Mickey Djuric reports. On The Hill Senate Banking's planned megabill cuts — Senate Banking Committee Republicans are preparing to propose provisions that would change Federal Reserve employees' pay scale and zero out the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's funding as part of the Senate version of the GOP megabill, according to a committee staff memo obtained by POLITICO, Jasper Goodman reports. The big, beautiful national debt — Trump is pursuing an agenda that would add trillions of dollars to the soaring national debt, ignoring warnings from Wall Street, Republican deficit hawks and his outgoing cost-cutting champion, The Post reports. CRYPTO CORNER JP Morgan to take crypto as collateral — JPMorgan Chase & Co. plans to let trading and wealth management clients use some cryptocurrency-linked assets as collateral for loans, a major step by the largest U.S. bank to make inroads into an industry that Trump has pledged to support, Bloomberg reports. Pro-crypto dems look to delay market structure markup — House Financial Services Democrats who are open to backing GOP-led cryptocurrency legislation are pressing committee Chair French Hill (R-Ark.) to delay a vote on his sweeping market structure bill, saying they need more time to negotiate changes, Jasper reports. At the regulators SEC opens the door — The SEC is weighing an overhaul to decades-old rules outlining what types of foreign companies trading in the U.S. should be subject to a lighter-touch reporting regime, our Declan Harty reports. Fed's top bank cop gets confirmed — The Senate on Wednesday confirmed Trump's pick to serve as the Fed's top official overseeing banks, installing a key regulator who is poised to advance the administration's financial deregulatory agenda, per Michael Stratford. Senators voted 48-46, along party lines, to confirm Fed Gov. Michelle Bowman as the central bank's vice chair for supervision. Atkins eyes long-time trading executive for SEC — Chair Paul Atkins is eyeing Jamie Selway, a former Wall Street executive who has advised cryptocurrency firms, to lead his trading and markets division, according to two people familiar with the matter who were granted anonymity to discuss the still-private deliberations, Declan reports. The AIC's private credit pitch — The American Investment Council released a new report by EY that estimates private credit investments have supported companies with more than 811,000 employees — more than 200,000 of whom are in the manufacturing sector. Jobs report Rustin Finkler joined Early Warning Services as a director for public affairs communications this week. Prior to joining EWS, Rustin was a managing director at Vision360 Partners, a public relations firm, where he worked on public affairs and communication plans for clients like the Consumer Bankers Association. He is also a Penta Group alum. Kari Heerman will join the Brookings Institution's economic studies program as a senior fellow and director of trade and economic statecraft on Aug. 11. Heerman, who was previously acting chief economist at the State Department, will lead a new effort to expand and coordinate cross-program work already being done at Brookings.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NATO agrees on largest armament programme in decades
NATO has agreed on the largest rearmament programme since the Cold War, sources close to the talks told dpa on Thursday. It provides for a huge expansion of deterrence and defence capacities in the coming years, as Russia continues to pose a major threat to the Western military alliance. The top priorities are long-range weapons systems, air defence and mobile land forces, according to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. The rearmament programme entails specific targets for different military capabilities. Individual NATO countries are given precise instructions on what they have to contribute to joint deterrence and defence in the near future. The required capabilities were defined based on new defence plans. These also take into account assessments by intelligence services' that Russia could be ready to attack a NATO ally in just a few years, despite Moscow's ongoing war against Ukraine.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Vought grilled over DOGE, spending cuts in House hearing
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought was grilled by both sides of the aisle over the administration's sweeping cost-cutting plans as he testified before House appropriators Wednesday afternoon. Vought faced a wide-ranging list of questions during a budget hearing, as lawmakers pressed him over President Trump's latest spending cut requests, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), along with a major tax package of the president's priorities making its way through Congress. One area of bipartisan interest was leadership at DOGE, an effort Trump previously tapped tech billionaire Elon Musk for. Vought said the administration was 'in the midst of, with the last week or so, of establishing the leadership on an ongoing basis' following the exit of Musk. Other top officials at the department have also departed in recent days, including Steve Davids, whom Vought noted previously led the effort. He added that he partly thinks 'the vision for DOGE' is that it 'go and be far more institutionalized' at actual agencies and working 'almost as in-house consultants as a part of the agency's leadership. The OMB chief also faced questions over the president's budget request for fiscal 2026, which lawmakers have noted is incomplete. 'Where's the budget?' Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), a spending cardinal asked him. 'We believe you have the budget,' Vought responded, after the White House released a 1,000-page budget document last Friday detailing more of its demands. 'We have a skinny budget,' Womack said. 'You have the skinny budget, discretionary budget in full,' the OMB director replied, which he said allows the House' funding 'to get the appropriations process moving forward.' Vought added that the administration has been focused at the same time on getting the president's tax plan to his desk, after it recently passed the House and faces changes in the Senate. He also faced heat from Democrats over other components of that plan, including reforms to Medicaid that Republicans have attached to the proposed tax cuts as an effort to save hundreds of billions of federal dollars over the next decade. 'The bill that you just said the White House supports is going to add, depending [on] who you talk to, 2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the national debt,' Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said. 'It's going to make somewhere between 11 and 16 million people lose their health care. 'I know you said on a Sunday morning show, no one will lose coverage as a result of this bill is that still your standing?' the lawmaker asked. Vought responded that the bill does 'not lead to less coverage for Medicaid beneficiaries.' They both went back and forth over the bill's impact on the program before Pocan needled Vought on the fiscal impact of the bill. The budget chief said, 'the bill will not increase the debt,' however, federal budget analysts estimate it would add more than $2 trillion to the nation's deficits in roughly a decade. Another notable moment from the hearing came when Vought was questioned by a Republican about proposed cuts to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) pursued as part of the Trump administration's latest rescissions request. He defended the reductions as targeting items like 'teaching young children how to make environmentally friendly reproductive health decisions' and efforts he claimed were aimed at strengthening 'the resilience of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer global movements.' Rep. Mark Alford (R-Mo.) raised the question of PEPFAR cuts, later pressed Vought about whether prevention efforts would be impacted by the proposed reductions. 'Aside from the crazy woke programs, which I agree should be stripped,' Alford asked, 'is there any other prevention program, not treatment, but prevention program listed in this rescission package which is not of a woke nature?' Vought said in response that the administration seeks to scale 'down the program as it pertains to the types of organizations that are providing the examples of the waste, fraud and abuse.' But, he added, 'the prevention itself is where an analytical look needs to be done.' 'There's life saving treatment after you already have HIV, but there are prevention programs that PEPFAR does, which are not of the woke nature, which can prevent someone from getting HIV,' Alford countered. 'Are those programs going to survive?' 'It is something that our budget will be very trim on because we believe that many of these nonprofits are not geared toward the viewpoints of the administration, and we're $37 trillion in debt,' Vought said. 'So, at some point, the continent of Africa needs to absorb more of the burden of providing this healthcare.' Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, additionally grilled the budget chief at one point over the administration's takedown of a public website that showed how funding is apportioned to federal agencies. 'Your predecessor did comply with the law for over two years, and you followed this law for two months. What happened?' DeLauro asked Vought. 'Why did the website come down? Why do we not know what is happening? Why are we going back to those days of secret decisions being made by you and whomever else in terms of the spending of the dollars that we constitutionally enacted?' Vought responded that the administration 'had constitutional concerns with the provision' and 'it's something that degraded our ability to manage taxpayer resources.' DeLauro told the OMB director shortly after that she thought the 'level of your honesty on your claims [really] shines through on this topic' and accused him of making 'up constitutional issues.' 'We have no way of knowing if you are carrying out what we have lawfully required the executive branch to do,' the Connecticut Democrat said. 'That is our responsibility, and your responsibility is to carry out what it is that we have appropriated here.' 'You just can't pick and choose whatever the hell you want,' she added.
