Attorneys get more time to argue over contested copper mine on land sacred to Apaches
A U.S. district judge in Arizona has opened the door for the next round of legal wrangling as environmentalists and some Native Americas seek to stop the federal government from transferring land in Arizona for a massive copper mining project.
Judge Dominic Lanza in a ruling issued Monday denied motions that sought to halt the transfer pending the outcome of the case. However, he did preclude the U.S. Forest Service from proceeding with the land exchange until 60 days after the agency issues a required environmental review.
Lanza said that would give the parties more time to analyze the environmental report and file amended complaints. He said granting a preliminary injunction now would be premature since the review will differ in some ways from the one that spurred the legal challenge four years ago.
'It is unfortunate that the result of this order will be to force the parties to engage in another stressful, abbreviated round of briefing and litigation activity' when the new review is issued, he said, acknowledging the unusual circumstances.
Attorneys for the federal government and the mining company agreed during a recent hearing to the 60-day delay. That time frame also is specified in the legislation that Congress passed and then-President Barack Obama signed in 2014 authorizing the exchange.
The group Apache Stronghold, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and others welcomed more time to fight for Oak Flat, an area they consider as holy.
'In this critical moment, we call on the Trump administration and Congress to halt the transfer to a Chinese-owned mine, and honor what is sacred,' said Wendsler Nosie Sr., leader of Apache Stronghold. 'As we continue to fight in court, know this: Nothing will turn us away from defending the spiritual essence of our people, the lifeblood that connects us to the creator and this land.'
A statement from Resolution Cooper said the ruling is consistent with prior decisions and gives the parties time to review the final environmental impact statement that will be issued later this month.
'We are confident the project satisfies all applicable legal requirements,' said Resolution president and general manager Vicky Peacey.
She added that years of consultation with tribes and communities resulted in changes to the mining plan to reduce potential effects.
The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land exchange was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014.
San Carlos Apache Chairman Terry Rambler said Monday that the bill was not in the best interest of the American people, Arizona or his tribe. He said concerns persist about the mine's use of groundwater and the pending obliteration of the culturally significant site.
Apache Stronghold and the tribe sued the U.S. government in 2021 to protect the place tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, which is dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion. The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected an appeal by the Apache group, letting lower court rulings stand.
The project has support in nearby Superior and other traditional mining towns in the area. The company — a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — estimates the mine will generate $1 billion a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's border czar defends decision to deploy hundreds of Marines to quell LA protests
President Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan argued Monday that it was necessary to deploy hundreds of Marines to Los Angeles to quell immigration protests that are happening in the city – despite local officials saying it's unclear why they are there or what they are doing. 'Yes, it all depends on the activities of these protesters – I mean, they make the decisions. I keep hearing reports that they're rioting because President Trump sent National Guard here, it's just ridiculous,' Homan told CNN's Kaitlan Collins. 'We don't know what's going to happen tonight – it seems like at night, the crowds get bigger, the violence peaks. So, we want to be ahead of the game. We'll be well prepared for the military here to protect government property and protect officers' lives,' he said. Homan declined to say what standard the Trump administration was using to decide if mobilizing the Marines would be necessary. 'They're not reinforcing immigration law – we're doing that, we're immigration officers,' Homan said. 'Their job is protection of property and protection of our agents and their lives and their wellbeing, along with the public's wellbeing.' Over the weekend, Trump became the first president in decades to call in the National Guard without a request from a governor – doing so without invoking the Insurrection Act, the 1807 law that allows the president to deploy American soldiers to police US streets in extreme circumstances. Trump ordered the Department of Defense to deploy an additional 2,000 California National Guard members to the Los Angeles area on Monday evening, according to the Pentagon. On Monday, the administration mobilized more than 700 Marines based out of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in California to respond to the protests in Los Angeles. Homan said that there are conversations 'every day' within the administration about deploying military domestically, but he said he has not been personally involved in conversations about invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow for the use active-duty military to quell protests. 'No – again, I'm here running a Title 8 immigration operation, I was – I'm not involved in discussions, but I do know every day a conversation happens with the leadership of DOJ, DHS, and DOD on a decision going forward,' he said. 'I think decisions on deployment of the National Guard and any other deployment of DOD is a decision being made by the White House, along with the Department of Justice, DOD – I know those calls are happening every day.' But pressed if Americans should expect to see military deployed to other US cities where protests against ICE operations pop up, the border czar said, 'I hope not.' 'I hope it's not the new normal – I hope people go out there and protest peacefully, but to attack law enforcement officers who are simply enforcing the laws that Congress enacted,' he said. 'So, if you want to hate, you want to protest, go to Congress and protest them. ICE is just doing their job.' Homan also acknowledged that Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has not done anything to warrant arrest after Trump said if he were Homan, he would have him arrested. 'Governor Newsom has not done anything to warrant an arrest in your view right now, correct?' Collins asked. 'Not at this time – absolutely not,' he said. Homan told CNN that Immigration and Customs Enforcement will continue operations in Los Angeles – and across the country – to enforce immigration law. 'They'll continue every day, not only in California, Los Angeles, they're gonna continue every city across the country – we have teams throughout the country that are out there looking for those in the country,' Homan said. 'We're in every city and country, and ICE is going to be out every single day and will continue to be there regardless what's happening in LA.'
Miami Herald
36 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Scott Galloway has bold prediction on Social Security, US economy
As workers in the United States approach retirement, it's natural for them to worry about Social Security and how it will support their financial well-being in their post-career lives. Notable entrepreneur Scott Galloway, the popular podcaster and New York University professor, offers his views on the future of Social Security - and another looming threat that serves as a growing problem for the U.S. economy. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Recent reductions in staffing appear to have caused inefficiencies in the federal program, leading to issues such as extended wait times for phone assistance, raising concerns among both current and future Social Security beneficiaries. An even greater worry is long-term financial stability. Without intervention from lawmakers, Social Security's trust funds are projected to be depleted by 2033. If this happens, monthly payments may be cut to roughly 80% of what recipients currently anticipate. Related: Scott Galloway sends blunt message to Elon Musk The Social Security Administration reports that the average monthly payment stands at $1,976 - amounting to around $23,712 per year - which falls short of the financial security many retirees seek. Adjustments for the cost of living (COLA), designed to increase Social Security payments, do not always keep pace with inflation. Additionally, economic uncertainty - especially during market downturns or recessions - can heighten concerns that individuals may rely on Social Security more than they originally planned. Galloway discusses Social Security solvency and increasing worries about the U.S. national debt - particularly regarding the political stalemate that fuels inaction on solving the problem. As we discussed, action from Congress is needed to avoid Social Security recipients losing out on about 20% of the expected value of their monthly paychecks. But in his book, "The Algebra of Wealth," Galloway explains that he does not believe that is likely to happen. That is because he believes politicians on Capitol Hill are very well aware of the fact that people nearing retirement or already receiving Social Security benefits are more likely to participate in elections than those of other age ranges. "Old people keep living longer, and they vote, so we're more likely to get rid of schools, the space program, and half the Navy before we fail to fund Social Security," he wrote. More on retirement: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Galloway also addressed another looming crisis for the U.S. economy: the national debt. And the future of this growing concern is in the hands of legislators right now. Related: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security The ambitious "Big, Beautiful Bill" currently working its way through Congress faces pushback from multiple fronts. After narrowly clearing the House, the debate in the Senate is becoming increasingly tense, driven by opposition from Republicans, influential tech figures, and policy experts. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the national deficit over the next decade. Beyond fiscal concerns, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and Yale have cautioned that reductions in Medicaid and nursing home funding proposed in the bill could result in an additional 51,000 deaths annually, according to Galloway's Prof G Markets newsletter. The bill's threat to the national debt is not surprising, Galloway explained, citing his understanding that it increased by $8 trillion during President Donald Trump's first term. Galloway credits Elon Musk with drawing attention to the conversation about the deficit. "Still, no one in this so-called deficit debate is talking about raising revenues," Galloway wrote. "If we want to reduce the deficit in any meaningful way, we have to be honest about the trade-offs. That means raising taxes on the wealthy, or cutting back on large-scale programs like defense and Social Security." "But no one wants to say that out loud," Galloway continued. "So, instead, we get this sideshow - rage tweets, personal feuds, and performative austerity - instead of a serious conversation about how we fund the government." Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sends strong message on Social Security The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China carefully assembling a deep-sea mining strategy
In a world hungry for crucial resources, China may not be poised to start deep-sea mining but it is planting seeds for such operations in a meticulously planned economic and geopolitical strategy. The world's oceans, both international waters and those under national jurisdiction, are rich in minerals and metals, like cobalt, nickel and copper. These are important for building electric car batteries, for instance, and other technologies as countries try to transition away from fossil fuels. China "is an energy-thirsty country. It will look for resources everywhere," including the deep sea, said Julia Xue of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. But she said China is not particularly anxious over the issue, although recent developments -- one company is itching to be the first to start mining the sea bed -- may put more pressure on Beijing. A Canadian firm, The Metals Company, has filed an application with the United States to begin undersea mining in international waters. Using its American subsidiary, it acted after President Donald Trump, bypassing international negotiations, signed an executive order in April to speed up the permit-issuing process for such mining in US and international waters. Trump cited an obscure 1980 US law that says American citizens can explore for and recover deep sea minerals in areas beyond the country's jurisdiction. Environmental groups are outraged by Trump's order, arguing that a wild hunt for the potato-sized, metal-containing nodules could harm fragile undersea ecosystems. The Canadian company initially said it would submit its request to the International Seabed Authority (ISA), a body which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor in international waters. The Metals Company says it ignored this authority because of its slow pace in talks on adopting a mining code that establishes rules for exploiting seabed resources. The United States is not an ISA member. A long-time observer of those talks who spoke on condition of anonymity said China is not particularly worried about who starts mining first. "For them it's more about dominance, staying competitive in the game, and giving the impression that you can't mess with us," the observer said. With that goal in mind "they're definitely developing the technology and putting the strategic agreements in place," Alex Gilbert, a researcher at the Payne Institute for Public Policy at Colorado School of Mines, told AFP. For instance, China has reached an agreement with the Cook Islands to explore for minerals in that Pacific country's waters. Another tiny Pacific nation, Kiribati, also says it is exploring a deep-sea mining partnership with China. This approach is "more geopolitical than economic," said Emmanuel Hache of the French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs, noting Beijing is using undersea mining as a lure to cement greater diplomatic support as it exerts power. China holds five contracts handed out by the ISA to look for resources in the Pacific and Indian Ocean sea beds and these contracts cover all types of undersea mineral resources. China's is the largest number of the 22 contracts the organization has granted. - Years behind - "From a research perspective, we have been continuously getting closer. And from a technical perspective, we have been continuously improving," said Chen Xuguang, a researcher at Ocean University of China. In 2024 a Chinese prototype deep-sea mining vehicle called Pioneer II, developed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University, set a national record by operating at a depth of more than 4,000 meters (13,100 feet). State-owned Beijing Pioneer Hi-Tech Development Corporation told AFP that later this year it plans a seabed nodule collection test. Still, China is not as advanced technologically as The Metals Company, experts say. "I would characterize China as being two to four years behind them in terms of their technology," said Gilbert in Colorado. Hache, the French expert, put the gap at five years. But China has an advantage over firms like the Canadian one in recovering and processing nodules: its companies are supported by the state and China has infrastructure for processing metals. The observer of the international seabed talks said China does not need seabed mining for metal supply, "but maybe geopolitically, in the context of maintaining their control over the commodities market." China wants to keep its options open, this person said. And while it supports an international mining code, China does not need one now and "they're not going to put pressure until they've decided strategically that they're ready," said Gilbert. abd/dw/mlm
