Experts detail Dominguez's mental slide in jail as Davis stabbing trial presses on
Carlos Reales Dominguez sat motionless at the defense table Friday as experts testified to his mental decline at Yolo County Jail following his May 2023 arrest in the serial Davis stabbings that left two dead and another seriously injured.
Testimony continued Friday in Yolo Superior Court in the guilt phase of the former UC Davis student's murder trial. Dominguez's defense, a week into its case before Judge Samuel McAdam, is arguing that Dominguez showed symptoms of schizophrenia at the time of the knife killings in late April and early May 2023, symptoms that worsened while jailed for the crimes.
Dominguez has pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity in the stabbing deaths of David Breaux, 50, and Karim Abou Najm, 20, at Davis' Central and Sycamore parks; and the wounding of Kimberlee Guillory, then 64, in her tent in the city's downtown. Jurors will decide whether Dominguez was sane at the time of the crimes in the second phase of the scheduled 10-week trial.
Experts included Amy Gutierrez, the mental health coordinator who monitored Dominguez while he was on suicide watch in those first months inside Yolo County Jail. Gutierrez told jurors that Dominguez had dramatically dropped weight, spent long periods staring at the walls in his cell and had stopped showering or brushing his teeth, before being sent to a Davis hospital on a mental health hold.
'I believed he was greatly disabled,' Gutierrez told Yolo County deputy public defender Daniel Hutchinson, of Dominguez's placement on a mental hold.
Dominguez was on suicide watch for more than 100 days in Yolo County custody, experts testified, before that watch was lifted in August 2023.
Dominguez was also beginning to show 'significantly more serious symptoms' of mental illness, Patricia Tyler, the psychiatrist and former Napa State Hospital director, who also evaluated Dominguez, said. Tyler described a man 'very dirty, poorly groomed and barely speaking,' who appeared to show no expression or emotion, a sign of schizophrenia, she said.
'Here was a man in jail for the first time on a charge of murder with no sign of distress,' Tyler testified. 'His affect was quite unusual.'
Jurors on Friday afternoon also returned to the nearly seven-hour interview of Dominguez by Davis detectives at Davis Police Department that led to his arrest, watching as detectives pressed him for details on the stabbing of Guillory, the lone survivor of the Davis attacks, inside her tent near Second and L streets.
'Look at me, John,' Davis detective Steve Ramos said at one point, calling Dominguez by the name he gave Davis police. 'What did you do, John? What did you do at the tent? Help us understand. How did you get into the tent?'
Later, Ramos questioned Dominguez about the first victim, Breaux, the tactical knife found stowed in Dominguez's shopping tote and the leather knife sheath recovered days earlier by crime scene technicians next to Breaux's body at Central Park.
Ramos' questions were met with long pauses and short answers. Dominguez, seated next to Hutchinson at the defense table, watched intently as his videotaped self struggled to answer the detective's questions.
'Why do you have that knife?' Ramos asked.
Dominguez zipped up his jacket at one point while officers left the interview room for food and prepared to leave when he was stopped by an officer. He wanted to take a walk, Dominguez told the officer on video. The same officer asked Dominguez what he was thinking about.
'Schoolwork,' Dominguez said.
Jurors Thursday afternoon watched the first hour of the interview with a disheveled Dominguez and the Davis detectives who wanted answers from their prime suspect.
'People lie to me every day,' Ramos told Dominguez on the interview video as Davis police Detective Matthew Muscardini watched from the witness stand. 'Take a look around this room. Be honest with yourself. Why are we here? Why are we here with you in this room?' he said.
'I'm not sure,' Dominguez said.
Testimony resumes Tuesday in Woodland.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
41 minutes ago
- Fox News
17 illegal migrants discovered crammed in RV, sedan in sweltering Arizona heat
A man has been arrested and charged with human smuggling after 17 illegal migrants were found crammed inside an RV and a nearby sedan in the sweltering Arizona heat Wednesday. The majority of the illegal migrants, who are all from Mexico, were found packed inside the cramped RV which was parked on a property in Nogales as temperatures inside soared under the summer sun, according to Sean L. McGoffin, chief patrol agent of Border Patrol's Tucson Sector. Those inside the RV, including a minor, had limited space and ventilation with no access to running water, McGoffin said. The rest of the migrants were wedged into a small sedan that was discovered during a vehicle stop. "This rescue likely prevented a tragedy," McGoffin said. "With summer temperatures already climbing, packing people into trailers and vehicles without proper ventilation or water is a recipe for disaster. Human lives should never be treated as cargo." All the migrants are now safe, in custody and will be processed accordingly, McCoffin said. The rescued individuals are being processed for expedited removal in accordance with U.S. immigration law. The man who was arrested is a U.S. citizen and initially attempted to flee the scene on foot but was apprehended by agents shortly after. Investigators are working to determine whether others were involved. The operation was carried out by Nogales Border Patrol, Nogales Police and Homeland Security Investigations. "No recreation happening in this vehicle, instead it was used by smugglers forcing people to hide out in inhumane conditions in sweltering heat," McGoffin said. "Although no one was injured, the situation shows the danger illegal aliens face in the hands of smugglers."

Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Inside the battles that shattered Trump and Musk's alliance
President Donald Trump was dejected, processing his very public split with the world's richest man. Rattled in the wake of Elon Musk's public attacks and apparent call for his impeachment, Trump worked the phones, debriefing close confidants and casual acquaintances alike. His former ally was 'a big-time drug addict,' Trump said at one point as he tried to make sense of Musk's behavior, according to a person with knowledge of the call, who like others interviewed for this story spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Jury skepticism of experts could determine outcome in Karen Read murder trial: former judge
Whenever there's a battle of the experts, it's the jurors who hold the winning hand, according to a retired Massachusetts judge. And that's shaping up to be the case in Karen Read's retrial on murder charges in the death of her former boyfriend, 46-year-old Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Read, 45, is accused of hitting him with an SUV and leaving outside a house party at 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Massachusetts, as he died of a skull fracture and hypothermia during a blizzard on Jan. 29, 2022. Dr. Daniel Wolfe, a director at the ARCCA crash reconstruction firm, testified that the results of numerous tests he conducted to try and reconstruct the alleged crash that killed O'Keefe came back with "inconsistent" results. But special prosecutor Hank Brennan tore into the validity of his methods during cross-examination, noting he used a dummy that was significantly smaller than O'Keefe, alternated between different types of dummy arms without noting that under direct examination and conducted only one test at each speed rather than multiple tests to check for consistent results. A key moment in his testimony came not while discussing his findings, but when Brennan asked him about something Read said in a video clip played earlier in the trial, according to Jack Lu, a retired Massachusetts Superior Court Judge and Boston College law professor. "There's Brennan's theory – the taillight 'impaled' [O'Keefe] on the nose," he told Fox News Digital. "Read picked glass out of [his] nose, and [his] nose bled – from her video statement." Brennan played video from one of Wolfe's accident reconstructions that showed plastic fragments flying away from the vehicle after impacting a crash dummy's arm. "When the taillight is shattered and it spreads through the air, does it have the potential to impale a person, for example, on their nose?" Brennan asked. "I think that would be unlikely," Wolfe replied. As part of the prosecution's case, Brennan played a clip of Read telling an interviewer she pulled a "piece of glass" out of O'Keefe's nose and that it started bleeding. Wolfe's task has been to discredit the prosecution's core allegation that Read slammed into O'Keefe in reverse with her 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV and left him to die on the ground in a blizzard on Jan. 29, 2022. "Juries have great powers of observation, and a fundamental depth of experience seldom seen in American life," Lu told Fox News Digital. "Partially because of how many jurors there are. I predict that the jury will conclude that both accident reconstructionists' conclusions are not worthy of belief in a jury trial." GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB The defense is also aiming to sow reasonable doubt in the prosecution's crash experts, Dr. Judson Welcher and Shanon Burgess from a firm called Aperture. Welcher testified last week that he believes "[O'Keefe's injuries are] consistent with being struck by a Lexus and also contacting a hard surface, such as frozen ground." Wolfe found that the injuries were inconsistent when stacked up against the damage to Read's SUV as well as the damage to O'Keefe's clothing – which prosecutors allege had fragments of taillight plastic embedded in it. Lu said that he expects jury instructions to include a note that the experts don't decide the facts – jurors do. "Juries are not in the least bit cowed by experts," he said. "To the contrary, they view them with skepticism." Especially "hired guns," he added. Jurors will be looking at the case as a whole, but while Lu said he believes Brennan scored a victory on the day, the defense has a significant advantage. "The defense need not prove anything; they merely must establish reasonable doubt," said Mark Bederow, a New York City defense lawyer who is representing Canton blogger and Read ally Aidan Kearney. "But over the course of a few hours, Dr. Wolfe cast serious doubt by methodically dismantling the key premise of the prosecution case – through multiple scientific examinations and effective video he offered support for his opinion that the damage to the taillight was not consistent with the collision alleged by the prosecution." Read's team is expected to rest their case next week. She could face up to life in prison if convicted of the top charge.