Ohio groups lay out policy strategies for 136th General Assembly
Advocacy groups of all types are revving up for the new term of the Ohio General Assembly, laying out policy priorities from early childhood education to housing and brownfield remediation.
With a new year, a new House Speaker and a new Senate President, groups are planning their strategies when it comes to legislative and state support for what they feel are the biggest needs of Ohioans.
'State policies and tools that are sensitive to local context will ensure that all communities will contribute to Ohio's standing as an economic leader,' said Jason Warner, director of strategic engagement for the Greater Ohio Policy Center.
The GOPC recently met to discuss priorities like housing inventory, public transportation and rail expansion, but at the top of the list for the group is brownfield remediation, a topic legislators have brought to the General Assembly in the past.
'Ohio has hundreds of sites with utility infrastructure, transportation access and nearby workers which are currently unusable,' Warner said.
Brownfields are areas that were built up for industrial or commercial development, but were abandoned, at times with environmental hazards or substances keeping further development from happening on the land.
In the last General Assembly, state Reps. Thomas Hall, R-Madison Twp., and Bride Rose Sweeney, D-Westlake, introduced House Bill 519, which aimed to revive the Clean Ohio Revitalization Fund, a program to provide grants for brownfield cleanup or remediation. The CORF has been inactive since 2013 and was repealed in the state operating budget passed in the 135th General Assembly, according to the Legislative Service Commission.
The bill would have required developers to submit affidavits confirming 'that they did not contribute to the release of hazardous substances or petroleum at the brownfield that is being cleaned up or remediated.'
H.B. 519 saw one committee hearing in the House Finance Committee, but was never taken up further, thus it died at the end of the General Assembly term in December. The last two budgets, however, contained funding for the state's Brownfield Remediation Program, a total of $350 million each in the 2022-2023 and 2024-2025 budgets. GOPC data showed that the BRP has given $659 million to Ohio communities to 'assess, cleanup and revitalize brownfields in 86 of 88 counties.'
The U.S. EPA keeps track of brownfields across the country as well, along with assessments and resources in each region.
Hall and Sweeney say they plan to bring back the issue as the new GA begins, with the goal of establishing a 'fundamental, permanent funding mechanism.'
'These are the types of issues, I think, most Ohioans want us to be working on,' Sweeney said.
Among other issues the GOPC wants to see from the state is use of underutilized commercial districts and other areas to boost inventory so Ohioans can obtain housing, something the state lacks in terms of sufficient inventory, according to Warner.
'The General Assembly should continue to support programs that encourage private and nonprofit developers to produce homeownership and rental opportunities,' Warner said, adding that the state should also limit the residential purchases by institutional real estate investors.
Supporting Ohio residents also means maintaining roads and transportation options for those residents, though the struggle might grow as Ohio's population drops.
'In the next 25 years, Ohio is projected to lose 5.7% of its 2020 population,' according to Warner.
That means an aging population still looking to maintain its independence, but fewer ratepayers available to support longterm roadway maintenance costs. Because of that, the state should prioritize projects where they're most needed, and cut others, the GOPC stated in their policy priorities.
The conservative group Americans for Prosperity-Ohio also released a legislative agenda they called the 'Buckeye Blueprint.' The policy agenda focused on three major issues: the economy, education and energy.
The AFP-Ohio started their policy document by saying Ohio 'is failing to lead where it counts' in areas like tax reform, spending, education and energy.
The national Americans for Prosperity Action, a super-PAC affiliated with the AFP, spent millions on GOP-backing ads for U.S. Senate races, including the race now-U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno ran against former Sen. Sherrod Brown.
In 2024, AFP-Ohio endorsed, among other Republicans, state Sen. Jerry Cirino of Kirtland, the author of the new Senate Bill 1, a reintroduction of the highly criticized S.B. 83, which seeks to overhaul higher education by banning mandatory diversity training and faculty strikes, along with keeping colleges from taking stands on topics deemed 'controversial,' like climate change or abortion.
They top their policy agenda with support for laws that 'phase out' income tax and 'enhancing the business climate' to 'improve its citizens' financial well-being and regain competitiveness for congressional representation.'
The AFP-Ohio partnered with the Buckeye Institute on a new report laying out what they see as the 'best energy policy for Ohio.'
'Affordable energy is essential to Ohio's economy, where manufacturing accounts for over 15% of the workforce,' the groups stated. 'Rising costs are a risk driving manufacturers to relocate, threatening economic growth.'
The best energy policy, in their view, would include eliminating 'excessive government regulations' from the federal EPA, ending government subsidies that 'damage energy markets,' and taking away a focus on clean energy.
'The reliance on solar and wind, driven by regulations on fossil fuels, raises concerns about creating reliable power and maintaining a stable grid,' the report stated.
The AFP-Ohio also plans to push the Republican supermajority to advance universal open enrollment in public schools along with 'school choice' and the removal of 'barriers in the EdChoice (private school) voucher system to ensure every child is given the opportunity to choose an education option that fits their unique needs.'
The legislature already expanded voucher eligibility in the previous budget to near universal levels, but the AFP sees more ways to 'fund families, maximize flexibility and expand the supply for educational choice as demand continues to increase.'
'Despite the universal availability of EdChoice vouchers, barriers still stand in the way of true education freedom in the Buckeye state,' the policy document states.
Other groups are looking at the youngest populations of Ohioans, and prepping for 'transformative policy,' partly through the passage of the state budget.
'With the upcoming state budget process, we are seizing this crucial opportunity to ensure that Ohio's youngest children and their families are at the center of public investment,' Groundwork Ohio president and CEO Lynanne Gutierrez wrote in an email to the public earlier this month.
Groundwork's policy priorities were spurred on by a 'Roadshow Listening Tour' the group did in 13 communities in Ohio. From those conversations, Groundwork came up with budget priorities that include increasing eligibility for Publicly Funded Child Care in Ohio, increased access to public preschools, implementation of 'community impact models' for infant mortality reduction, increased access to mental and behavioral health services and support for the educators who provide the young children with their learning experiences.
'Despite diverse geographical and socioeconomic contexts, the fundamental challenges facing families with young children across Ohio – such as access to quality child care, health care and basic needs – are strikingly similar,' the policy report stated. 'This underscores a commonality that transcends urban-rural divides and offers opportunities for unified statewide solutions.'
Gov. Mike DeWine is expected to release his executive budget at the beginning of February, after which the Ohio House will introduce a budget bill for hearings. The Ohio Senate is set to hold budget hearings in the spring, with a conference committee of the House and Senate scheduled for June to bring the two budget proposals together with DeWine's proposals. The deadline for DeWine to sign the budget is June 30.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bipartisan group led by ex-Obama officials ‘rolling the dice' on new remapping plan for Illinois legislature
The departure of Texas Democrats who spent two weeks in suburban Chicago evading a vote in their state on a Republican-backed redrawing of congressional district boundaries has not ended the conversation on partisan gerrymandering in Illinois. A bipartisan pair of former high-level officials from President Barack Obama's administration on Tuesday began their public push to stop state lawmakers from directly drawing their own district boundaries, a change they argue would mean more competitive elections and a General Assembly that better represents the will of the voters. The 'Fair Maps Illinois' proposal marks the third attempt since 2014 to reduce heavy partisan influence in how Illinois district boundaries are drawn following the once-per-decade census. Supporters argue the latest effort, which requires amending the state constitution, will be tailored to fit the narrow frame the Illinois Supreme Court has outlined for citizen-driven amendments after legal challenges struck down similar proposals in 2014 and 2016. The group — being led by Chicago Democrat William Daley, Obama's former chief of staff, and Peoria Republican Ray LaHood, Obama's former transportation secretary — made its announcement just one day after Texas lawmakers headed home after their legislative walkout temporarily prevented the Texas GOP from jamming through a congressional remap and elevated gerrymandering as a national issue. The Fair Maps Illinois effort wouldn't affect the drawing of congressional maps and is focused just on the process of drawing district boundaries for the state House and Senate. Still, that issue has created substantial pushback statewide in the past, and backers acknowledge they once again anticipate having to fend off legal challenges. During a Tuesday morning panel discussion hosted by the Lincoln Forum at the Union League Club of Chicago, LaHood said they are 'rolling the dice here' on how the 5-2 Democratic-majority state Supreme Court would rule. 'There are no guarantees that the Illinois Supreme Court, as it exists today, will not throw this out. What we've done, though, is structured the language based on what the previous Supreme Court ruled in 2016, No. 1,' LaHood said. 'No. 2, there are lots of new members on the Supreme Court. … What we're saying is: 'This is what the citizens want. We followed your direction. Now, please don't rule it unconstitutional, because it's not.'' The state's high court threw out past attempts by ruling that voter initiatives to change the constitution must deal with the structure and procedure of the state legislature. That's the reason the plan isn't attempting to address the congressional district boundaries that have dominated headlines in recent weeks. 'We'd love to, but we can't,' said Michael Dorf, a longtime Democrat election attorney who helped draft the proposal. To get on the ballot, the proposition would not only need to pass legal muster but supporters would also need to gather more than 328,000 valid signatures from registered voters by May. If the question makes it onto the midterm ballot in November 2026, it would put a spotlight back on an uncomfortable issue for Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker, who is seeking a third term next year. After campaigning in support of independent redistricting during his first run in 2018 and vowing to veto partisan-drawn maps, Pritzker in 2021 signed heavily gerrymandered congressional, state legislative and state Supreme Court maps, arguing that they were legal and complied with the federal Voting Rights Act. More recently, Pritzker, as he eyes a potential 2028 White House run, has tried to position himself as a key figure in the fight against GOP gerrymandering by offering safe haven to the fleeing Texas Democrats and flirting with the idea of redrawing Illinois' congressional districts if circumstances warrant. He's also called for independent redistricting nationwide. In response to questions about whether the governor would support the proposal Daley and LaHood are backing, spokesman Alex Gough pointed to recent comments in which the governor said: 'We should have an independent commission. We should have one nationally, so that there's no dispute about it.' Asked whether a national independent commission would be a prerequisite for the governor to support a redistricting effort in Illinois that only applies to state legislative districts, Gough responded: 'Correct. The governor supports federal laws on fair maps and until Republicans also support those laws, Illinois will continue drawing maps that preserve the Voting Rights Act.' Regardless, the governor plays no formal role in citizen-driven ballot measures. To clear through the courts, the new proposal would change the procedure by which state legislative maps are currently drawn by taking the power to draw district boundaries away from the party that controls the legislature and giving it to a 12-member commission. Members of the commission would be appointed by the four party leaders in the Illinois House and state Senate, with the House speaker, Senate president and minority leaders in both chambers each getting to appoint one lawmaker from their respective caucuses and two members from outside the legislature. Mapmakers would be prohibited from using data on party registration or voting history in drawing the lines. If the commission failed to approve maps by a majority vote, a tiebreaking member would be chosen at random from two names, not of the same political party, chosen by the Supreme Court. To address the structure of the legislature, the proposal would tie the size of the General Assembly to the state's population as determined by the decennial census, with one state Senate seat per 215,000 residents, rounded down to the nearest odd number. As is now the case, each Senate district would comprise two House districts. Daley acknowledged during the panel discussion that the system would not entirely eliminate partisan considerations from the mapmaking process but argued it would ideally produce districts that keep communities more intact and lead elected officials to aim for consensus and compromise rather than trying to appease those further to the right and left of the political spectrum who tend to make up a larger share of primary voters. 'We're not looking for perfection here,' Daley said. 'We're trying to take the limitations of the constitution courts have given us and trying to come up with a better system than just allowing whoever's got a massive majority in the legislature rigging the whole thing.' The proposal quickly drew pushback from CHANGE Illinois, a nonpartisan good-government group that backed the 2016 independent maps effort. The organization said in a statement Tuesday that it was 'troubled by the initiative's lack of robust engagement during the development of the proposal with community organizations and leaders, who are most impacted by racial and partisan gerrymandering,' leading it 'to question who will benefit if the proposal were to make it on the ballot and ultimately be enshrined in the Illinois Constitution.' 'We will be convening community organizations and leaders to understand the impact this proposal would have on their ability to participate in the remap process and ensure that we collectively elevate those needs and concerns,' the group said, without specifying who would be involved in those conversations. But among the early backers of the new Fair Maps plan was former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who, before her election in 2019, was an attorney for the 2016 independent redistricting effort. During the question-and-answer portion of Tuesday's panel, Lightfoot, who had a rocky relationship with Pritzker and the Democratic-controlled General Assembly during her four-year City Hall tenure, took to the microphone to decry what she sees as the fruits of state legislative maps drawn to maximize Democratic power in Springfield. Decades of 'hyper-gerrymandered districts' have produced 'supermajorities in both chambers of the General Assembly, to the point where they won't even talk to Republicans because they don't need their votes,' Lightfoot said. 'What you end up doing is playing to the extremes of your caucus,' Lightfoot said. 'What has that meant for the average taxpayer in the state? And particularly, again, I'm partisan about Chicago. We are paying for the General Assembly's failure to be accountable to average voters: the pension cost, the failure to deal with real-world issues over and over again, every single session.' To get the question on the 2026 midterm election ballot, while supporters need more than 328,000 signatures, they aim to collect more than 600,000 from registered Illinois voters to avoid the measure being removed from the ballot due to signature challenges. Supporters estimate they'll need to raise at least $3 million to $4 million to pay for professional signature collection, legal representation and efforts to promote the initiative. It remains to be seen whether the proposal will face organized opposition from the Democratic Party that dominates state government. Under the past leadership of now-convicted former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, the state party was closely tied to efforts to knock the 2014 and 2016 measures off the ballot. The party — now run by state Rep. Elizabeth 'Lisa' Hernandez of Cicero, who was House sponsor of the current maps that produced Democratic majorities of 78-40 in the House and 40-19 in the Senate and is closely aligned with Pritzker — did not respond Tuesday to a request for comment on the proposal. Solve the daily Crossword
Chicago Tribune
4 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Bipartisan group led by ex-Obama officials ‘rolling the dice' on new remapping plan for Illinois legislature
The departure of Texas Democrats who spent two weeks in suburban Chicago evading a vote in their state on a Republican-backed redrawing of congressional district boundaries has not ended the conversation on partisan gerrymandering in Illinois. A bipartisan pair of former high-level officials from President Barack Obama's administration on Tuesday began their public push to stop state lawmakers from directly drawing their own district boundaries, a change they argue would mean more competitive elections and a General Assembly that better represents the will of the voters. The 'Fair Maps Illinois' proposal marks the third attempt since 2014 to reduce heavy partisan influence in how Illinois district boundaries are drawn following the once-per-decade census. Supporters argue the latest effort, which requires amending the state constitution, will be tailored to fit the narrow frame the Illinois Supreme Court has outlined for citizen-driven amendments after legal challenges struck down similar proposals in 2014 and 2016. The group — being led by Chicago Democrat William Daley, Obama's former chief of staff, and Peoria Republican Ray LaHood, Obama's former transportation secretary — made its announcement just one day after Texas lawmakers headed home after their legislative walkout temporarily prevented the Texas GOP from jamming through a congressional remap and elevated gerrymandering as a national issue. The Fair Maps Illinois effort wouldn't affect the drawing of congressional maps and is focused just on the process of drawing district boundaries for the state House and Senate. Still, that issue has created substantial pushback statewide in the past, and backers acknowledge they once again anticipate having to fend off legal challenges. During a Tuesday morning panel discussion hosted by the Lincoln Forum at the Union League Club of Chicago, LaHood said they are 'rolling the dice here' on how the 5-2 Democratic-majority state Supreme Court would rule. 'There are no guarantees that the Illinois Supreme Court, as it exists today, will not throw this out. What we've done, though, is structured the language based on what the previous Supreme Court ruled in 2016, No. 1,' LaHood said. 'No. 2, there are lots of new members on the Supreme Court. … What we're saying is: 'This is what the citizens want. We followed your direction. Now, please don't rule it unconstitutional, because it's not.'' The state's high court threw out past attempts by ruling that voter initiatives to change the constitution must deal with the structure and procedure of the state legislature. That's the reason the plan isn't attempting to address the congressional district boundaries that have dominated headlines in recent weeks. 'We'd love to, but we can't,' said Michael Dorf, a longtime Democrat election attorney who helped draft the proposal. To get on the ballot, the proposition would not only need to pass legal muster but supporters would also need to gather more than 328,000 valid signatures from registered voters by May. If the question makes it onto the midterm ballot in November 2026, it would put a spotlight back on an uncomfortable issue for Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker, who is seeking a third term next year. After campaigning in support of independent redistricting during his first run in 2018 and vowing to veto partisan-drawn maps, Pritzker in 2021 signed heavily gerrymandered congressional, state legislative and state Supreme Court maps, arguing that they were legal and complied with the federal Voting Rights Act. More recently, Pritzker, as he eyes a potential 2028 White House run, has tried to position himself as a key figure in the fight against GOP gerrymandering by offering safe haven to the fleeing Texas Democrats and flirting with the idea of redrawing Illinois' congressional districts if circumstances warrant. He's also called for independent redistricting nationwide. In response to questions about whether the governor would support the proposal Daley and LaHood are backing, spokesman Alex Gough pointed to recent comments in which the governor said: 'We should have an independent commission. We should have one nationally, so that there's no dispute about it.' Asked whether a national independent commission would be a prerequisite for the governor to support a redistricting effort in Illinois that only applies to state legislative districts, Gough responded: 'Correct. The governor supports federal laws on fair maps and until Republicans also support those laws, Illinois will continue drawing maps that preserve the Voting Rights Act.' Regardless, the governor plays no formal role in citizen-driven ballot measures. To clear through the courts, the new proposal would change the procedure by which state legislative maps are currently drawn by taking the power to draw district boundaries away from the party that controls the legislature and giving it to a 12-member commission. Members of the commission would be appointed by the four party leaders in the Illinois House and state Senate, with the House speaker, Senate president and minority leaders in both chambers each getting to appoint one lawmaker from their respective caucuses and two members from outside the legislature. Mapmakers would be prohibited from using data on party registration or voting history in drawing the lines. If the commission failed to approve maps by a majority vote, a tiebreaking member would be chosen at random from two names, not of the same political party, chosen by the Supreme Court. To address the structure of the legislature, the proposal would tie the size of the General Assembly to the state's population as determined by the decennial census, with one state Senate seat per 215,000 residents, rounded down to the nearest odd number. As is now the case, each Senate district would comprise two House districts. Daley acknowledged during the panel discussion that the system would not entirely eliminate partisan considerations from the mapmaking process but argued it would ideally produce districts that keep communities more intact and lead elected officials to aim for consensus and compromise rather than trying to appease those further to the right and left of the political spectrum who tend to make up a larger share of primary voters. 'We're not looking for perfection here,' Daley said. 'We're trying to take the limitations of the constitution courts have given us and trying to come up with a better system than just allowing whoever's got a massive majority in the legislature rigging the whole thing.' The proposal quickly drew pushback from CHANGE Illinois, a nonpartisan good-government group that backed the 2016 independent maps effort. The organization said in a statement Tuesday that it was 'troubled by the initiative's lack of robust engagement during the development of the proposal with community organizations and leaders, who are most impacted by racial and partisan gerrymandering,' leading it 'to question who will benefit if the proposal were to make it on the ballot and ultimately be enshrined in the Illinois Constitution.' 'We will be convening community organizations and leaders to understand the impact this proposal would have on their ability to participate in the remap process and ensure that we collectively elevate those needs and concerns,' the group said, without specifying who would be involved in those conversations. But among the early backers of the new Fair Maps plan was former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who, before her election in 2019, was an attorney for the 2016 independent redistricting effort. During the question-and-answer portion of Tuesday's panel, Lightfoot, who had a rocky relationship with Pritzker and the Democratic-controlled General Assembly during her four-year City Hall tenure, took to the microphone to decry what she sees as the fruits of state legislative maps drawn to maximize Democratic power in Springfield. Decades of 'hyper-gerrymandered districts' have produced 'supermajorities in both chambers of the General Assembly, to the point where they won't even talk to Republicans because they don't need their votes,' Lightfoot said. 'What you end up doing is playing to the extremes of your caucus,' Lightfoot said. 'What has that meant for the average taxpayer in the state? And particularly, again, I'm partisan about Chicago. We are paying for the General Assembly's failure to be accountable to average voters: the pension cost, the failure to deal with real-world issues over and over again, every single session.' To get the question on the 2026 midterm election ballot, while supporters need more than 328,000 signatures, they aim to collect more than 600,000 from registered Illinois voters to avoid the measure being removed from the ballot due to signature challenges. Supporters estimate they'll need to raise at least $3 million to $4 million to pay for professional signature collection, legal representation and efforts to promote the initiative. It remains to be seen whether the proposal will face organized opposition from the Democratic Party that dominates state government. Under the past leadership of now-convicted former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, the state party was closely tied to efforts to knock the 2014 and 2016 measures off the ballot. The party — now run by state Rep. Elizabeth 'Lisa' Hernandez of Cicero, who was House sponsor of the current maps that produced Democratic majorities of 78-40 in the House and 40-19 in the Senate and is closely aligned with Pritzker — did not respond Tuesday to a request for comment on the proposal.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Netanyahu to hold emergency meeting on Europe's recognition of a Palestinian state
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will hold a security-political meeting on Monday regarding Israel's response to European countries recognizing a Palestinian state. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will hold a security-political meeting on Monday evening regarding Israel's response to the intentions of European countries to recognize a Palestinian state in September. Smotrich is expected to demand the application of sovereignty over the West Bank and the immediate dismantling of the Palestinian Authority (PA). About three months ago, Smotrich announced the suspension of fund transfers to the PA and his intention not to extend the indemnification for Israeli banks transferring funds to the PA. This was done by canceling the indemnity provided to correspondent banks in relation to banks operating in the Palestinian Authority, his office confirmed on Tuesday. Until that moment, Smotrich had only occasionally delayed the transfer of funds from time to time, but had not ordered a complete halt. European countries to recognize a Palestinian State France and the UK are the two main European countries that plan to recognize a Palestinian State in the UN General Assembly in New York in September, alongside other European and non-European nations. Australia was the last to announce that it would recognize a Palestinian state, while Canada, another important Western ally, will also follow this route. Countries that still have not taken a position in this situation are New Zealand, whose Foreign Minister Winston Peters said he was carefully considering recognition of a Palestinian state, and Denmark, whose Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said that while her country condemned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, she did not support recognizing a Palestinian state at this time. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is considering unilaterally announcing the transformation of the PA into a state during the upcoming General Assembly, London-based outlet al-Araby al-Jadeed reported. Avraham Bloch, Reuters, and Mathilda Heller contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
