Louisiana uses nitrogen gas for first time in death row execution
Louisiana has carried out its first execution using nitrogen gas, an experimental method for judicial killings that has only been used by one other death-penalty state.
Jessie Hoffman Jr, 46, was executed at the Louisiana state penitentiary at Angola shortly after 7pm local time on Tuesday evening. He had been convicted of the 1996 rape and murder in New Orleans of Mary Elliott, a 28-year-old advertising executive.
Last-minute appeals for a reprieve failed when the US supreme court declined to take Hoffman's petition. The court had similarly refused to intervene in the earlier nitrogen executions carried out by Alabama.
Five of the six rightwing supreme court justices voted to allow the execution to proceed, with the three liberal-leaning justices saying they would have halted it. The sixth conservative, Neil Gorsuch, said he would have stayed the killing to give time to consider Hoffman's religious objections.
Hoffman's death marks the resumption of capital punishment in Louisiana. The state last carried out an execution 15 years ago.
It also marks the spread of the controversial technique of nitrogen gas as a killing method. Hoffman's lawyers had argued that the procedure, which involves piping pure nitrogen through a gas mask to induce fatal oxygen deprivation, would violate the prisoner's constitutional rights by inflicting cruel and unusual punishment.
The four previous executions carried out using nitrogen in Alabama led to distressing scenes in the death chamber. Eyewitnesses reported that Kenneth Smith shook violently, and writhed and convulsed on the gurney.
Hoffman's lawyers also argued that death by nitrogen hypoxia – forcing the condemned man to breathe only nitrogen – would interfere with his religious practices as a Buddhist. They said that meditative breathing at the time of death was integral to the religion.
Louisiana also faces questions about how it got hold of the nitrogen used in Hoffman's execution. Last year, the Guardian revealed that three of the biggest manufacturers of medical-grade nitrogen in the US had put a block on their products being used in executions.
Airgas, Air Products and Matheson Gas all took steps to prevent their nitrogen from reaching departments of correction in death-penalty states.
Yet photographs put into the public record in ongoing litigation in Louisiana show that the corrections department obtained canisters of nitrogen gas produced by Airgas, in apparent contravention of the company's strict rules. In a statement to the Guardian, Airgas said that it had been in direct contact with the department of corrections to affirm its position.
'Airgas has not and will not supply nitrogen or other inert gases to induce hypoxia for the purpose of human execution,' the company said. 'We have not supplied medical grade NF nitrogen and the facility does not have any such cylinders owned by Airgas, according to our records.'
The statement added: 'The department of corrections in Louisiana has acknowledged our letter prohibiting the use of any nitrogen for execution purposes.'
Before the execution went ahead, the sister-in-law of Hoffman's victim called for him to be pardoned. 'Executing Jessie Hoffman is not justice in my name, it is the opposite,' Kate Murphy wrote.
Earlier on Tuesday Arkansas became the fifth state to adopt nitrogen hypoxia as an execution method, after Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi and Oklahoma. Arkansas currently has 25 people on its death row.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reeves takes gamble on patience in an era of impatience
The hours, days, weeks and even months after a Spending Review can feel like peeling away the layers of an onion. First, there is the speech from the chancellor in the Commons: the political rhetoric and the numbers often designed to sound big but which are often incomprehensible. Then there are accompanying documents - in this instance in particular a blue-covered, 128-page tome crammed with words, numbers and graphs. The work of months, much of it conducted privately with intermittent blasts of authorised and unauthorised briefing, talking up and grumbling, then suddenly bursts out in public demanding digestion. But that takes time. And as the detail is pored over, elements that were not put up in lights by the chancellor become clearer. A good example is the expectation many, many people in England and Wales will be paying higher council tax to help fund the police - something not set out explicitly by Rachel Reeves at the dispatch box. More details on what is planned are expected in the coming weeks - with the government's infrastructure plans due to be set out shortly. But other elements could take much longer to play out: for example, an obscure budget in a particular department that was culled, only for an outcry in six months time. Or, conversely, a budget that hasn't been culled but is later determined to be a waste of money. Seven ways the Spending Review affects you Winners and losers: Who got what in the review? What has the chancellor has announced? The key points Watch: Where the money is being spent The government is seeking to badge this moment as a turning point. The prime minister told the Cabinet and has now written in the Guardian that "this week we bettered a new stage in the mission for national renewal. Last autumn we fixed the foundations. Today we showed Britain we will rebuild." Let's see. The curiosity here is the standard critique of political leaders is turned on its head with much of this Spending Review. So often the grumble is one of short-termism, the quick win, the lack of strategic long term thought. And yet the gamble the government has taken is a willingness for patience in an era of impatience. Long term, so called capital spending, can - the argument goes - transform the public realm and in so doing transform economic potential. But it doesn't happen quickly and day-to-day spending is limited, even cut in places. And this at a time of volatile politics and a restlessness among an electorate, many of whom feel squeezed and have done for years and years. The Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged to me there was an impatience for change - the very thing Labour promised - and pointed to an expansion of entitlement to free school meals and breakfast clubs in England, for instance. The big bet though remains on economic growth - finding it and sustaining it. The lack of it is the shackle on so much within government and beyond: the national mood, taxes, you name it. And yes the prospect of more tax rises in the autumn will hang in the air all summer. But the big test of this Spending Review is the contribution it can make to delivering growth - and when. Key points at a glance from the Spending Review Reeves boosts NHS and housing as some budgets squeezed


The Verge
5 hours ago
- The Verge
Posted Jun 11, 2025 at 2:02 PM EDT
J Justine Calma Trump reportedly plans to sunset the main federal government website on climate change. will soon stop publishing new content after most of the people maintaining the website saw their contacts terminated, the Guardian reports. We don't know yet if the website will continue to be accessible to the public. The Trump administration has already faced — and lost — legal battles forcing it to restore other climate and health resources to federal websites. It has also removed climate information from FEMA's website. The Federal Environmental Web Tracker is documenting these kinds of changes. Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired [


New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
There's nothing ‘spontaneous' about radical ICE protests — here are the groups behind them
The same media who told you in 2020 that the violent Black Lives Matter riots were 'fiery, but mostly peaceful' are at it again, pretending that your eyes are lying to you: No, they claim, there are no rampaging throngs or marauders waving foreign flags and attacking the forces of order. And the peaceful protests in Los Angeles are spontaneous. Nobody is organizing them. Advertisement Or so pretends the media. 'The Trump administration's immigration raids in the California city prompted mostly peaceful protests,' blared the leftwing British paper The Guardian. Of course, these supposedly perfectly serene public gatherings then 'escalated when the president sent in the National Guard — and then the US Marines,' added the Guardian. So, no, the scenes of mayhem and invasion that played on TV for days before the first National Guard unit arrived in the City of Angels didn't prompt Trump to act — don't believe your lying eyes. Advertisement It's like Guardian writer Chris Michael has no idea of the mockery that CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez has succumbed to since August 2020, when he went on air in front of a building engulfed in flames and complete chaos behind him, and a chyron with the 'mostly peaceful' claim. One other key thing that the left-wing media is not telling you is who is organizing the disorder, and who is funding it. Ignoring this aspect leads the public to believe two things that aren't true: that the violence is spontaneous, and that it reflects true national discontent with the deportation raids. Advertisement In fact, the opposite is true. A Polling Insights newsletter that the pollster Scott Rasmussen sends out reports that, 'In the current stand-off, 57% approve of efforts by immigration officials to find and arrest illegal immigrants in Los Angeles. Fifty-two percent approve of President Trump's decision to send in the National Guard.' Other opinon surveys support this trend. So, if the American people largely support the deportation raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who is organizing the riots against them? Advertisement We can see, from the placards and signs captured in photographs, that one key group organizing the protests comes from what one can call the list of usual suspects: the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL). The PSL, a communist party, has been involved with BLM and pro-Hamas terrorism violence. The PSL has organizational ties with the ANSWER Coalition, which the Network Contagion Research Institute says has ties with the Chinese Communist Party. ANSWER was involved with organizing a rally in sympathy with the Los Angeles rioters on June 10 in Columbus, Ohio. The PSL is an old-style communist party that will seize on any crises to try to dismantle the United States. It says that 'the United States today is a dictatorship of the capitalist class. This reality will not change without a socialist revolution.' It is funded indirectly by donations from Neville Roy Singham, an American millionaire with close ties to the CCP who lives in Shanghai. Advertisement Elias Rodriguez, the terrorist who shot and killed the couple at the Jewish Museum in Washington, DC, in late May, was a member of both the PSL and ANSWER. Another group involved in organizing the LA riots is the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a radical leftist American union with extensive overseas ties. It is a regular attendee at the conferences and workshops held by the Foro de Sao Paulo, a hemispheric network of Marxist parties founded by Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and Brazilian President Inazio Lula da Silva. Advertisement The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights LA (CHIRLA), also an organizer, received $33 million in government grants in FY2023. Then there are the 'charities' helping the rioters, such as Mutual Aid Los Angeles Network, Operation Healthy Hearts, LA Poverty Department, and Mutual Aid/Social Therapy. These riots are sure to expand in the days to come, which means that it is a good thing that some congressmen are looking to investigate who these groups are, and why they are seeking to destabilize our streets. Mike Gonzalez is a senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation and co-author of 'NextGen Marxism: What It Is and How to Combat It.'