Tshwane mayor faces jail threat over fresh produce market neglect
The High Court in Pretoria has handed down a ruling to force the City of Tshwane's mayor and manager to implement upgrades to the Tshwane Fresh Produce Market, as agreed upon in 2022, or face jail time.
On Monday, the high court gave the city 30 days to comply with the ruling or mayor Nasiphi Moya and manager Johann Mettler could receive a one-month prison sentence, suspended for a year.
This is after the city was found guilty of contempt of court for failing to fix the Tshwane Fresh Produce Market, despite having an R18 million budget.
The court case
Institute of Market Agents of South Africa chair Gjalt Hooghiemstra welcomed the ruling as the applicant for the declaratory order in January 2022, stating that the first respondent is responsible for providing and facilitating municipal services in terms of Section 1 of the Local Government, Municipal Systems Act, 32 of 2000.
In October 2022, Judge AJ Meersingh ordered the city to submit a precinct draft plan within 60 days and a final plan within 180 days of the order.
This included the implementation of the contents of the approved precinct plan in respect of fire and smoke detection compliance, electrical connectivity and facility compliance, security and checkpoint management, lift and hoist facility compliance, repairs to all sanitation facilities and refuse removal facility compliance.
ALSO READ: Marabastad Market wins reprieve as stakeholders seek amicable solution
It had to be done within 60 days of the date from the city's allocated budget of R18 million for that year.
Legal consequences for non-compliance
Legal expert Dr Llewelyn Curlewis said the mayor could actually go to jail.
'As the leader of the city, she is, at the end of the day, the responsible party. 'Just as a company's directors, in terms of Article 334 of the Criminal Procedure Code, are responsible for the actions and omissions of the company, so the mayor and the city clerk are responsible for the actions and omissions of the city council.
'But the court is not going to arrest the mayor tomorrow and throw her in jail if it has not yet given the mayor a reasonable time to ensure that the court order is implemented,' he added.
Curlewis said the current mayor could go to jail even if the verdict was made when another mayor was in power.
City's response to the judgment
Curlewis recommended that the mayor work on the court order immediately.
City spokesperson Lindela Mashigo said the city was analysing the court judgment in detail to fully understand its implications.
ALSO READ: A 'mockery' or 'flimsy attack'? ANC and DA scrap over Tshwane city manager's appointment
'This involves consulting with legal experts, assessing the potential impact on municipal operations and services and determining a course of action.
'The city remains committed to acting in compliance with the law and will communicate any further steps or decisions once the review is complete,' he said.
Political background and governance issues
The former Tshwane mayor, DA Tshwane caucus leader Cilliers Brink, who was mayor when the events unfolded, said the governance support officer was forced to resign by the ANC coalition in January and the Tshwane Economic Development Agency (Teda) mandate over the market, and much else besides, was terminated.
'Ashraf Adam was assigned to negotiate with the market agents during 2024, which he did. Those negotiations were going well.
'The Teda was also mandated to play a supervisory role at the market, since it was clear the management there was delinquent,' he said.
Brink said it was clear that the situation had been neglected by the city's political leadership.
'It is also clear that the MMC for economic development, Sarah Mabotsa, has not been of any assistance to the mayor in managing this situation,' he said.
Southern Africa Agricultural Initiative CEO Francois Rossouw welcomed the judgment against the city and said it should be seen as a clear warning to other municipalities managing fresh produce markets to take the management, maintenance and expansion of these markets seriously.
NOW READ: Tshwane mayor vows to clean up the capital city
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Bail granted to Gqeberha firearms dealer accused of selling guns to criminals
After facing murder, theft and firearms-related charges, Karen Webb walked free from the city's Magistrate's Court on Thursday under strict bail conditions, ending a drawn-out legal battle that began with her arrest in February 2024. After 18 months behind bars and multiple failed bail attempts, beleaguered Gqeberha firearms dealer Karen Webb walked out of the city's Magistrate's Court with an enormous smile on her face. Flanked by her parents and attorney, Webb took her first breath of free air since her arrest in February 2024 after she was granted bail on two separate cases on Thursday. 'Write a nice article about me,' she told journalists as she got behind the driver's seat of her parents' car and drove off. In addition to two murder charges, the 41-year-old faces 14 counts of theft, fraud and forgery, several charges related to the Firearms Control Act pertaining to the unauthorised transport of weapons, failure to report the loss or theft of weapons, unauthorised production of ammunition and providing firearms training while uncertified to do so, among other charges. The charges relate to allegations that Webb supplied firearms to criminal elements across the country, stole money and firearms from customers and provided uncertified firearms training. While she did not pull the trigger in the two murder charges against her, she is accused of providing the firearms to the violent criminals who committed the crimes. Shortly after Webb's arrest for alleged theft of firearms, her initial formal bail application was dismissed and a subsequent application based on new facts was also refused. A few months ago, she approached the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court in Makhanda to appeal against the decision and was granted bail in the amount of R10,000. However, several more charges had been brought against her, including the murder charges, meaning an entirely new bail application was undertaken. Webb was also charged with being in possession of contraband while in custody at the North End Prison after she was allegedly twice found in possession of a cellphone. She returned to court on Thursday for judgment in the bail application, which included the murder and firearms-related charges. In the judgment, Magistrate Maharaj found that the State did not present a strong enough case to prevent Webb's release from custody. She said while the charges against Webb were very serious, the State's reasons for opposing bail were not persuasive enough. Despite several pending cases against her, Maharaj said Webb had no previous convictions, and the fact that she had a minor daughter and elderly parents in the city was enough to prevent her from fleeing and evading her trial. She said there was also not enough proof before court that Webb might tamper with evidence, attempt to influence witnesses or disturb the public order. Strict conditions Maharaj set strict bail conditions – house arrest between 6pm and 6am, Webb must report to her local police station three times a week, and the investigating officers must be notified before any travel outside Gqeberha. Maharaj transferred the matter to another court where Magistrate Ralton Basterman presided over Webb's bail application related to the cellphones she allegedly smuggled into prison. Webb's attorney, Peter Daubermann, instructed by Louis van Rensburg, told the court he had been in contact with the acting director of public prosecutions, advocate Marius Stander, and made representations that his client should be released on warning. In his submissions, Daubermann said the cellphone charges were 'petty offences that paled in comparison to the other cases against her on which she was already granted bail'. After some back-and-forth between Daubermann and prosecutor Asavela Dweba, Stander contacted the State attorneys and instructed them that bail should not be opposed. Basterman subsequently granted Webb bail in the amount of R1,000 and said no additional bail conditions were required as the conditions of her other bail proceedings were adequate. Upon leaving the courthouse, Webb hugged Van Rensburg before helping her wheelchair-bound mother into their car and driving off. She is expected to return to court on 22 August, when a trial date could possibly be determined. During a previous bail application, it was revealed that more than 1,250 firearms that had allegedly been in her care were still missing. More than 100 firearms linked to Webb have already been recovered from crime scenes across the country. According to an affidavit read into the record by State advocate Liezel Landman on behalf of Detective Sergeant JJ Botha, the weapons disappeared before Webb's arrest in February 2024 and have not been recovered. DM
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Pula Group disputes Motsepe's move to South African courts in R3. 4bn graphite dispute
Motsepe and his companies - who have now sought to have the dispute heard in the South African High Court - are accused by Pula of reneging on the Tanzanian graphite mining deal by allegedly investing in a similar project by an Australian rival of Pula. Image: Karen Sandison/Independent Newspapers Tawanda Karombo A bid by billionaire Patrice Motsepe's investment company, African Rainbow Capital (ARC), to have South African courts hear a dispute over a graphite mining deal turned sour has been rebutted by Pula Group, which argues that the case should continue to be heard before the Tanzanian High Court. Pula Group is a US company with interests in Tanzania. It is suing Motsepe owned companies including ARC and African Rainbow Minerals for R3.4 billion for breaching agreements related to a graphite mining deal in Tanzania. Motsepe and his companies - who have now sought to have the dispute heard in the South African High Court - are accused by Pula of reneging on the Tanzanian graphite mining deal by allegedly investing in a similar project by an Australian rival of Pula. Apparently, the two projects are located in the same area in Tanzania. Pula Group now argues that ARC and Motsepe have 'approached the South African High Court in an attempt to shield from the consequences of a R3.4bn lawsuit filed' in Tanzania by Pula Group LLC and its Tanzanian subsidiary, Pula Graphite Partners. The suit, filed on the basis of a breach of non-compete agreement and underway in Tanzania over the past two years, had already been set for a pre-trial conference on August 22. 'ARC's appeal to the South African courts appears to be a strategic attempt to sidestep accountability. What's troubling is the inconsistency in their legal arguments,' stated Pula president Mary Stith. 'In Tanzania, they assert that the parties named in the suit are unrelated yet in South Africa, they claim that a potential judgment against Motsepe, ARM, and ARCH would impact ARC directly.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ This 'contradiction raises serious questions about the credibility' of the South African billionaire and his companies' position, said Stith, adding: 'legal integrity demands consistency, and ARC's approach undermines that principle.' ARC argued in court papers filed in South Africa that 'notwithstanding the fact that Pula Graphite, ARC, Dr Motsepe and ARCH are not parties to the confidentiality agreement, Pula Group and Pula Graphite are seeking to hold them jointly and severally' liable together with ARM. It further argues that the Tanzanian High Court has to apply the law of the Republic of SA in its determination of the case as the confidentiality provisions of the agreement under dispute are based on South African statutes. 'It is our case that a finding on SA law will be dispositive of all the relief sought, first and foremost against ARC, but by necessary implication against Dr Motsepe and ARCH too,' argued ARC. The Motsepe group of companies is being represented by IMMA, Bowmans, and FNB while Pula and Pula Graphite Partners are being represented by Advocate Michael Ngalo and Beatus Malima. Pula chairman and former US Ambassador to Tanzania, Charles Stith, said ARC's move to apply to the South African High Court 'is part of a troubling' pattern. 'ARC seeks refuge in South African courts to avoid facing the consequences of its own actions. Their argument that Tanzanian courts lack jurisdiction is not only legally tenuous - it contradicts their own logic… South African courts should not be drawn into it,' he said. Pula said it has four graphite licenses in Tanzania's rich Graphite Belt, which is among the world's richest in quality and quantity, with its priority project is in the Ruangwa District in the Lindi Region where a second drilling exercise completed in the third quarter of 2023 indicates that there is nearly 145 million tons of measured, indicated, and inferred resource of the mineral. BUSINESS REPORT
The South African
7 hours ago
- The South African
Shell and Total dealt devastating South Africa offshore drilling blow
The Western Cape High Court has refused environmental authorisation for offshore drilling in a venture led by French energy giant TotalEnergies off South Africa's west coast, in a ruling on Thursday. The High Court said on Wednesday the environment ministry's 2023 go-ahead for exploratory operations in the roughly 10 000-square-kilometre block near Cape Town had been 'reviewed and set aside'. Environmental lobby groups that launched a legal challenge against the project said it would harm marine life. The block is jointly owned by South Africa's state oil company PetroSA, TotalEnergies and British oil heavyweight Shell, with the French firm serving as the operator. In a statement to AFP, TotalEnergies said the venture complied with all required local regulations, including environmental and social, from the outset and it would assess the judgement. Although it had already announced its exit from exploration in the block, it remains 'fully committed to respecting the judicial process to its term', the company said. In overturning the environmental permit, the judge Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood said TotalEnergies could reapply for authorisation after public consultation. Green Connection, one of the groups that filed the legal challenge, said the ruling was a major victory for coastal communities and small-scale fishers. 'Oil spill and blowout contingency plans were kept from the public until after approval, denying communities a chance to comment,' it said in a statement. Interest in oil and gas exploration off South Africa's coast has surged in recent years, driven in part by major discoveries across the maritime border in Namibia and broader energy activity in southern Africa, including Mozambique. The Natural Justice group of environmental lawyers said Wednesday's judgement affirmed that all companies needed to follow due process before seeking the green light for oil exploration off South Africa. 'We will continue to turn to our courts to not only stop the takers who parade under the guise of growth and development, but to ensure that impacts of oil and gas exploration and production are properly scrutinised and that our people and our resources are not exploited,' it said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
