Georgia lawmakers push local governments to reconsider escaping a property tax cap
ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia's voters said in November that they wanted property tax relief, but many local governments are holding on to their power to raise taxes despite the statewide vote.
Now state lawmakers are trying to push local governments to reconsider and agree to limit how much of a home's increasing value can be taxed.
From 2018 to 2023, the total assessed value of property across Georgia rose by nearly 61%, according to figures from the Georgia Department of Revenue. Values rose so fast that most local governments pocketed increased revenue even as they lowered tax rates, and statewide property tax collections rose 44% from 2018 to 2023.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Hufstetler, a Rome Republican, calls it a 'backdoor tax increase.'
Amid the uproar over tax bills, lawmakers put a state constitutional amendment on the ballot in November to limit how much of a home's rising value can be translated into higher property taxes. State politicians sought instead to index a property's taxable value to the broader rate of inflation each year.
Nearly 63% of Georgia voters backed the cap, making the state one of eight where voters decided property tax measures in November, a sign of how rising tax bills are influencing politics nationwide.
But Georgia's plan gave local governments a one-time chance to escape the limit if they acted by March 1, and they exercised that right in droves. Almost two-thirds of the state's 180 school districts opted out, representing 75% of Georgia's 1.75 million students statewide, according to filings with the secretary of state. So did a quarter of Georgia's 159 counties and 20% of its more than 500 cities.
Citing their own rising expenses, local officials said the tax cap could force them to give up revenue they might need in the future. Officials in Gwinnett County — Georgia's largest school district, with 183,000 students — forecast that the cap could cut tax revenue by $35 million a year.
Hufstetler and other Republicans, unhappy that so many governments opted out, want them to change their minds. Some lawmakers are trying to force local governments in their districts to accept the cap. At least a dozen bills are advancing in the state Capitol to set local referendums in which voters could mandate that their local government abide by the cap.
On Tuesday, senators attempted something more like persuasion. Senators voted 52-2 for House Bill 92, which would give governments another chance to agree to the limits. The measure goes back to the House for more debate.
Local governments that have exited could change their minds and agree to the tax cap through March 1, 2029. In the meantime, those governments would have to print notices on tax bills encouraging citizens to call them if they have concerns.
As a concession, the bill would exempt school districts from having to pay sales taxes on construction materials if they agree to the cap.
'It does continue to allow opportunities for them to look back, particularly in a couple of years from now, when they could look back and see how minimal it is,' Hufstetler said after the vote. 'Yet it protects the homeowners.'
The bill passed Tuesday would force some local governments to vote again in 2027 to exit the cap, and hold another round of public meetings. Any government that didn't complete the steps would be put under the cap permanently.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
14 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Marines temporarily detain man while guarding LA federal building
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Shortly after they began guarding a Los Angeles federal building Friday, U.S. Marines detained a man who had walked onto the property and did not immediately hear their commands to stop. The brief detention marked the first time federal troops have detained a civilian since they were deployed to the nation's second-largest city by President Donald Trump in response to protests over the administration's immigration arrests. The Marines were activated earlier this week but began their duties Friday. The man, Marcos Leao, was later released without charges and said the Marines were just doing their jobs. A U.S. Army North spokesperson said the troops have the authority to temporarily detain people under specific circumstances. He said those detentions end when the person can be transferred to 'appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel.' Leao's detention shows how the troops' deployment is putting them closer to carrying out law enforcement actions. Already, National Guard soldiers have been providing security on raids as Trump has promised as part of his immigration crackdown . Leao, a former Army combat engineer, said he was rushing to get to a Veterans Affairs appointment when he stepped past a piece of caution tape outside the federal building. He looked up to find a Marine sprinting toward him. 'I had my headphones in, so I didn't hear them,' Leao said. 'They told me to get down on the ground. I basically complied with everything they were saying.' Leao was placed in zip ties and held for more than two hours by the Marines and members of the National Guard, he said. After Los Angeles police arrived, he was released without charges, he said. The Los Angeles Police Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'I didn't know it was going to be this intense here,' he said later. A U.S. official told the AP that a civilian had stepped over the line. He was warned they would take him down and they did, according to the official, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter. About 200 Marines out of the 700 deployed arrived in the city Friday, joining 2,000 members of the National Guard that have been stationed outside federal buildings this week in Los Angeles. Another 2,000 Guard members were notified of deployment earlier this week. Before the unusual deployment, the Pentagon scrambled to establish rules to guide U.S. Marines who could be faced with the rare and difficult prospect of using force against citizens on American soil. The forces have been trained in de-escalation, crowd control and standing rules for the use of force, the military has said. But the use of the active-duty forces still raises difficult questions. 'I believe that this is an inevitable precursor of things yet to come when you put troops with guns right next to civilians who are doing whatever they do,' said Gary Solis, a former Marine Corps. prosecutor and military judge. He said it's an example of Trump's attempt to unravel the Posse Comitatus Act, which bars active-duty forces from conducting law enforcement. ___ Watson reported from San Diego and Baldor from Washington. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Judge blocks plan to allow immigration agents in New York City jail
NEW YORK (AP) — A judge blocked New York City's mayor from letting federal immigration authorities reopen an office at the city's main jail, in part because of concerns the mayor invited them back in as part of a deal with the Trump administration to end his corruption case. New York Judge Mary Rosado's decision Friday is a setback for Democratic Mayor Eric Adams, who issued an executive order permitting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies to maintain office space at the Rikers Island jail complex. City lawmakers filed a lawsuit in April accusing Adams of entering into a 'corrupt quid pro quo bargain' with the Trump administration in exchange for the U.S. Justice Department dropping criminal charges against him. Rosado temporarily blocked the executive order in April. In granting a preliminary injunction, she said city council members have 'shown a likelihood of success in demonstrating, at minimum, the appearance of a quid pro quo whereby Mayor Adams publicly agreed to bring Immigration and Customs Enforcement ('ICE') back to Rikers Island in exchange for dismissal of his criminal charges.' Rosado cited a number of factors, including U.S. border czar Tom Homan's televised comments in February that if Adams did not come through, 'I'll be in his office, up his butt saying, 'Where the hell is the agreement we came to?' ' Adams has repeatedly denied making a deal with the administration over the criminal case. He has said he deputized his first deputy mayor, Randy Mastro, to handle decision-making on the return of ICE to Rikers Island to make sure there was no appearance of any conflict of interest. Rosado said that Mastro reports to Adams and 'cannot be considered impartial and free from Mayor Adams' conflicts.' Mastro said in a prepared statement Friday the administration was confident they will prevail in the case. 'Let's be crystal clear: This executive order is about the criminal prosecution of violent transnational gangs committing crimes in our city. Our administration has never, and will never, do anything to jeopardize the safety of law-abiding immigrants, and this executive order ensures their safety as well,' Mastro said. City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who is running in the Democratic primary for mayor, called the decision a victory for public safety. 'New Yorkers are counting on our city to protect their civil rights, and yet, Mayor Adams has attempted to betray this obligation by handing power over our city to Trump's ICE because he is compromised,' she said in a prepared statement. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump gives Homeland Security access to immigrant Medicaid data in Washington, AP reports
The Trump administration gave federal immigration authorities access to personal data on millions of Medicaid enrollees this week, including information from Washington, according to internal documents obtained by the Associated Press. Washington is one of a handful of states that allow undocumented immigrants to receive health benefits. The data transfer was ordered by two top advisers to U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., despite opposition from Medicaid officials who warned it may violate federal privacy laws. Records show that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) were given less than an hour on Tuesday to comply with the directive from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Emails and a memo obtained by the AP show that CMS officials tried to block the request, citing concerns under the Social Security Act and the Privacy Act of 1974. However, Trump appointees overruled those objections. The information shared with DHS included names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and Medicaid claims data from enrollees in California, Washington, Illinois, and Washington, D.C. All of these areas offer state-funded Medicaid programs for non-U.S. citizens and have committed not to bill the federal government for those services. The timing of the transfer coincided with a ramp-up of federal immigration enforcement in Southern California, including raids involving National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles. The move is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to give immigration authorities access to more data on undocumented immigrants. In May, a federal judge declined to stop the IRS from sharing immigrant tax records with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). CMS announced last month it would begin reviewing Medicaid enrollment data from several states to ensure that federal funds were not being used to support coverage for individuals with 'unsatisfactory immigration status.' The review was triggered by Trump's February 19 executive order, 'Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders.' In response to the AP's reporting, California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office issued a statement calling the data transfer 'extremely concerning' and potentially unlawful. 'We deeply value the privacy of all Californians,' the statement read. Democratic U.S. Rep. Laura Friedman also voiced alarm, writing on X, 'We should never use a person's need to go to the doctor against them.' ACLU of Washington sent KIRO 7 News the following statement: 'We are still waiting for complete and detailed information, but it's clear that great harm has been done. That this data was shared with the federal government and with ICE is a gross violation of Washington residents' privacy, a violation of the promises HCA made to enrollees, and a flagrant misuse of this data. Washington immigrants enrolled in the Apple Health expansion program with the expectation they would receive critical services that we all need to thrive and that their personal data would be protected – and the state promised as such, publicly and on its website. That promise was not kept. The community and advocates have long demanded a risk analysis and mitigation plan to protect the privacy and well-being of enrollees, and the state has not taken meaningful action responsive to the request. The state must treat this moment with the urgency it deserves and protect communities who put their faith and trust in a system that promised to protect them.' In contrast, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Andrew Nixon, defended the action. 'HHS acted entirely within its legal authority,' he said, describing the data transfer as necessary to ensure only lawful residents receive Medicaid. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the department is working with CMS to 'ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits that are meant for law-abiding Americans.' Critics say the decision could have far-reaching consequences for both immigrant communities and the states that provide them with health coverage. Sara Vitolo, deputy director of Medicaid, authored a June 6 memo warning that sharing personal data with DHS could deter states from cooperating with future federal requests and expose them to legal risk. Vitolo also wrote that sharing the data would violate long-standing policy and federal law, which restricts CMS from distributing personal health information for non-Medicaid administration purposes. Despite those concerns, HHS leadership directed the data to be transferred by June 10. Former CMS officials described the decision as highly unusual. 'DHS has no role in anything related to Medicaid,' said Jeffrey Grant, a former CMS career employee. California, Illinois, and Washington provided CMS with the requested data. Other states that allow undocumented immigrants to access full Medicaid coverage — New York, Oregon, Minnesota, and Colorado — had not yet submitted information as of this week, according to a public health official familiar with the process. Newsom, whose state plans to freeze new enrollment into its immigrant health care program due to budget constraints, later said the data handover 'will jeopardize the safety, health, and security of those who will undoubtedly be targeted by this abuse.' Illinois is also planning to shut down its program next month for approximately 30,000 undocumented enrollees. Health officials in Illinois, Washington, and D.C. did not respond to AP's request for comment.
