Centre clears relocation of big cats; cooler weather awaited
2
3
Jaipur: With all paperwork finalised and formal permission granted under Section 12 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, on March 25, the state forest department is now awaiting the end of summer to begin the long-awaited interstate
translocation of tigers
to
Ramgarh Vishdhari Tiger Reserve
(RVTR) and
Mukundra Hills Tiger Reserve
(MHTR).According to the order issued by the ministry of environment, forest and climate change (MoEFCC), a copy of which is with TOI, the approval clears the way for relocating three female tigers from Madhya Pradesh.
Two of them will be sent to RVTR and one to MHTR. This clearance follows a proposal submitted by the Chief Wildlife Warden of Madhya Pradesh seeking permission to capture and translocate ten tigers—two males and eight females—from tiger reserves of Kanha, Pench and Bandhavgarh to Rajasthan, Odisha and Chhattisgarh."Since translocation exercises are typically avoided during periods of extreme heat to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the animals, we are preparing to initiate the process as soon as weather conditions become favourable. Until then, necessary arrangements at these reserves are being made," said a senior forest department official.For Rajasthan, the nod from MoEFCC marks a significant step forward. While RVTR is a newly designated tiger reserve awaiting its first big cats from another landscape to improve genetic diversity, MHTR has faced setbacks in previous reintroduction efforts. Both forest department officials and conservationists hope this initiative will mark a turning point in the revival of these reserves.Environmentalists, however, alleged that despite the permission being granted, some senior officials are creating obstacles due to internal conflicts over credit. Tapeshwar Singh Bhati, a green activist, said, "Permission was received on March 25, but not much was done on the ground. Moreover, a senior official wrote that the prey base in MHTR is insufficient, which appears to be a deliberate attempt to delay the process."The Chief Wildlife Warden has been instructed to submit regular quarterly reports to the ministry. Reports from earlier studies that previously received the ministry's approval must also be submitted before seeking further translocation permissions."The ministry has also made it clear that in the event of any mishap that endangers the safety of the tigers, the permission granted may be reviewed or revoked. This is why the department is proceeding very carefully to ensure the project's success," said an official of the forest department.Jaipur: With all paperwork finalised and formal permission granted under Section 12 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, on March 25, the state forest department is now awaiting the end of summer to begin the long-awaited interstate translocation of tigers to Ramgarh Vishdhari Tiger Reserve (RVTR) and Mukundra Hills Tiger Reserve (MHTR).According to the order issued by the ministry of environment, forest and climate change (MoEFCC), a copy of which is with TOI, the approval clears the way for relocating three female tigers from Madhya Pradesh. Two of them will be sent to RVTR and one to MHTR. This clearance follows a proposal submitted by the Chief Wildlife Warden of Madhya Pradesh seeking permission to capture and translocate ten tigers—two males and eight females—from tiger reserves of Kanha, Pench and Bandhavgarh to Rajasthan, Odisha and Chhattisgarh."Since translocation exercises are typically avoided during periods of extreme heat to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the animals, we are preparing to initiate the process as soon as weather conditions become favourable. Until then, necessary arrangements at these reserves are being made," said a senior forest department official.For Rajasthan, the nod from MoEFCC marks a significant step forward. While RVTR is a newly designated tiger reserve awaiting its first big cats from another landscape to improve genetic diversity, MHTR has faced setbacks in previous reintroduction efforts. Both forest department officials and conservationists hope this initiative will mark a turning point in the revival of these reserves.Environmentalists, however, alleged that despite the permission being granted, some senior officials are creating obstacles due to internal conflicts over credit. Tapeshwar Singh Bhati, a green activist, said, "Permission was received on March 25, but not much was done on the ground. Moreover, a senior official wrote that the prey base in MHTR is insufficient, which appears to be a deliberate attempt to delay the process."The Chief Wildlife Warden has been instructed to submit regular quarterly reports to the ministry. Reports from earlier studies that previously received the ministry's approval must also be submitted before seeking further translocation permissions."The ministry has also made it clear that in the event of any mishap that endangers the safety of the tigers, the permission granted may be reviewed or revoked. This is why the department is proceeding very carefully to ensure the project's success," said an official of the forest department.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Forest Advisory Committee defers Sharavathi PSP proposal by KPCL, seeks clarifications on tree cutting
The forest advisory committee of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has deferred the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL) proposal for the Sharavati Pumped Storage Project, seeking clarification with regard to the cutting of trees in the project area. The KPCL has proposed the project to generate 2,000 MW of power in the Sharavati valley, making use of the Talakalale and the Gerusoppa reservoirs. The KPCL has sought the diversion of 54.155 hectares of forestland for the project with the outlay of ₹10,240 crore. The advisory committee, in its report on August 7, stated that it had a detailed discussion with the Deputy DGF (Central) of the regional office in Bengaluru, and the nodal officer of the State government. It sought clarifications/information for further considerations on three issues. NBW meeting Making a reference to the recommendations of the standing committee of the National Board of Wildlife (NBW) in its 84th meeting held on June 26, the committee wanted the status of compliance. The NBW, in its recommendations, stated that most of the 518 trees in the area where a surge tank had been proposed could be saved if an alternative underground structure was constructed with a narrow opening for an air outlet. Further, the NBW stated that over 12,000 trees, enumerated for felling for the construction of the 12.3-km road from Nagarabasti Kere to Begodi, could be saved if the proposed underground road was extended up to the base of the pump house. Such modification in the plan could also help the lion-tailed macaque, the flagship species of the sanctuary. The advisory committee wanted the status of compliance with regard to these recommendations. Besides that, it also sought the State government's comments on the issues raised by the regional office of the MOEF in the site inspection report (SIR). The regional office had not recommended the proposal of the project, citing 15 reasons. Praneetha Paul, DIGF, who conducted the inspection, expressed concern about the damage the project could cause to the Western Ghats. Further, the committee had sought the comments of the regional office of Bengaluru on the concerns raised in the SIR. Protest to intensify Meanwhile, environmentalists of the Malnad region, opposing the project, have resolved to intensify their protests. A meeting was held in Sagar in this regard on August 11. Environmentalists Akhilesh Chipli, Shivanand Kugve, Venkatesh Kavalakodu, and others attended the meeting and decided to spread awareness on the impacts of the project among the people in Shivamogga and Uttara Kannada districts.
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
Indian Railways done well to incorporate Braille signage in coaches. But a lot more needs doing
Written by Praveen Kumar G During a recent journey in an A1 coach on the Karnataka Express train, I encountered a telling example of how accessibility for blind passengers is often treated as an afterthought. While there was some information provided in Braille — such as berth numbers and alarm details — the implementation was far from user-friendly. The Braille plates were positioned in such a way that they were partially obscured by fixed luggage racks, making them difficult to locate and read. This is not merely a matter of inconvenience; for many travellers with visual disabilities, it is the difference between being able to navigate independently and having to rely on others. What was even more concerning was the absence of vital information in Braille. Critical details such as emergency safety instructions, contact numbers of train attendants, cleaning service information, and procedures for seeking assistance were nowhere to be found in accessible formats. This approach — providing only partial and poorly positioned information — undermines the very purpose of accessibility. It is a piecemeal effort that signals compliance in appearance, but not in substance. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act) is explicit: Persons with disabilities are entitled to equal access to information, facilities, and services without discrimination. Section 42 of the Act mandates that all service providers take steps to ensure that information is available in accessible formats, including Braille, audio, and electronic text. Indian Railways, as a public service provider, is legally and morally bound to implement these provisions fully. Partial compliance — such as offering only berth numbers in Braille — falls short of the law's intent. Inaccessible safety information can put blind passengers at direct risk during emergencies. Lack of contact details for attendants can leave passengers stranded without timely assistance. Accessibility is not a courtesy; it is a right that ensures dignity, independence, and safety. It is commendable that Indian Railways has begun incorporating Braille signage in coaches, but the execution must improve dramatically. Authorities should provide complete travel-related information in Braille — safety instructions, contact numbers, complaint procedures, and service information. They must ensure logical and accessible placement of Braille signage — away from obstructions like luggage racks. Use multiple accessible formats — including audio announcements and QR codes linked to screen-reader-friendly information. Accessibility should not be a box-ticking exercise. The RPwD Act provides a strong legal mandate — what is needed now is serious implementation with empathy, consultation with passengers with disabilities, and regular audits for compliance. For India's transport systems to truly serve all citizens, accessibility must move from being symbolic to being substantive, comprehensive, and rights-based. The writer is VSO international social accessibility advisor
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
SC orders return of four infant girls to adoptive parents
The Supreme Court has ordered the return of four infant girls from the custody of the child welfare committee (CWC) in Telangana to their adoptive parents, prioritising the welfare and emotional security of children. The Supreme Court, however, took a different view, stressing that institutionalisation should be a measure of last resort. (File photo) The apex court, invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, set aside a Telangana High Court order that had directed CWC to retain custody until statutory adoption procedures were completed. A bench of justices BV Nagarathna and KV Viswanathan noted that the children, aged between a few months and three years, had been living with their adoptive parents long enough to form strong emotional bonds, and that uprooting them would be contrary to the 'best interest of the child' principle enshrined in the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The case arose after the Telangana police took custody of the four children in May 2024 and placed them with CWC, citing non-compliance with the adoption procedures under the 2015 Act. The adoptive parents challenged the action, claiming their adoptions were valid under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Also Read: Supreme Court orders probe into Noida land compensation payouts In one case, a couple adopted a nine-day-old baby girl in March 2024 while in another, a two-day-old girl was adopted in November 2021. A third adoption involved a 20-day-old baby girl in January 26, 2024, and in the fourth case concerned a two-day-old baby girl, adopted in January 2024. While a single judge of the high court had earlier held that the 2015 Act did not apply to these cases and ordered that the police action was illegal, a division bench overturned that decision in November 2024. This bench stressed that statutory requirements under Sections 36, 37, and 38 of the 2015 Act, covering inquiry, CWC orders and the declaration of a child as legally free for adoption, had not been met, and directed CWC to complete the process before granting custody. The Supreme Court, however, took a different view, stressing that institutionalisation should be a measure of last resort and that restoration to a family environment, wherever possible, is preferable. 'This is in the interest of the children owing to the bonding between the 'adoptive parents' and the respective children,' the bench said, also citing the principles of family responsibility, safety, and repatriation laid down in the 2015 Act. Ordering that custody be restored to the adoptive parents by August 14, 2025, 5pm, the top court also put in place safeguards. The state legal services authority or district legal services committees will monitor the welfare and progress of the children through quarterly reports from November 2025 onwards. Child welfare experts may also be deputed to inspect the homes to ensure the children's well-being. The bench clarified that the order was passed in the peculiar facts of the case to 'do complete justice' and should not be seen as diluting statutory adoption procedures. 'We have passed the aforesaid order in the best interest of the children concerned… as they have been with their adoptive parents for a few months up to three years in these cases,' the judgment stated.
