
DWP benefits U-turn leaves £4.8 billion hole in the budget
Disability groups have shared their concerns
Many disability charities were unhappy with the result," despite some concessions.
James Watson-O'Neill, Chief Executive of the national disability charity Sense, said: "Today's vote in Parliament is deeply distressing. By choosing to advance this bill, MPs have voted for measures the government's data say will push 150,000 disabled people into poverty. This is not the right way to reform our welfare system — it's a move that has already caused significant fear and anxiety within the disabled people's community.
"We're incredibly grateful to all those who spoke out against the bill. Their efforts helped secure important government concessions, which mean some disabled people will retain the support they rely on. However, this creates a deeply unfair two-tier system — protecting some while leaving new claimants facing serious financial hardship. And the government's latest concession, to delay the tightening of the criteria for PIP, doesn't change the fact that it will eventually become harder for new claimants to access this vital benefit.
"Looking ahead, we urge the government to immediately reconsider their proposal to remove the health element of Universal Credit from young people until they turn 22. We also want to work constructively with them to expand the eligibility criteria for additional support for those who will never be able to work, to ensure no one is left behind."
PIP IS NOT AN OUT-OF-WORK
BENEFIT
PIP is an allowance that helps disabled people with the extra costs incurred by having a disability. You can claim it whether you work or not.
The media and government narrative about PIP is incorrect and must be challenged
KILL THE BILL!… pic.twitter.com/oOulXW1CWm — Atlanta 🦹🏻♀️ #DisabilityRebellion (@areyoflight) June 30, 2025
But Mark Rowland, Chief Executive of the Mental Health Foundation, shared these concerns: 'Tonight's concessions by the UK government are a victory for not just the millions of people across the country who are disabled, but for every single one of us who may find ourselves disabled one day. Removing Clause 5 is clearly the right decision given the lack of evidence these measures would encourage anyone with a mental health problem to return to work, and the very clear risk of pushing people into poverty, worsening their mental health. Despite this, this bill remains deeply flawed.
'We remain concerned by the measures in this bill which both reduce the amount paid to recipients of the health element of Universal Credit, and limits its eligibility to those over the age of 22. These measures are discriminatory, and will do little to support people back into the workplace. The UK government should drop the implementation of these measures too."
What will happen next?
Ahead of a crucial vote on cuts to disability benefits, our new evidence casts doubt on whether jobs are even available for disabled people facing cuts 📢
The analysis found that the parts of the country among the hardest hit by the cuts have fewer job opportunities 1/3 pic.twitter.com/4XAgKq3OoL — Joseph Rowntree Foundation (@jrf_uk) June 24, 2025
With no clarity on when the changes will be enacted or what they might entail, the Chancellor now faces a fiscal headache as a forecast £4.8 billion in welfare savings have been whittled away to nothing.
Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and Resolution Foundation think tanks warned that Tuesday's concessions meant Ms Reeves could now expect no 'net savings' by 2029/30 – a key year for meeting her fiscal targets.
IFS deputy director Helen Miller said the move had effectively halved the Chancellor's 'margin of error' against her main fiscal rule, once again raising the possibility of tax rises in the autumn.
On top of that, a stuttering economy and global instability could mean she has even less room for manoeuvre than expected.
I am going into the Commons Chamber to speak against & vote against the Government's appalling Bill to cut disability benefits. I urge all Labour MPs to do so. I was elected to protect disabled people not harm them. pic.twitter.com/Qc1TA0e90n — John McDonnell (@johnmcdonnellMP) July 1, 2025
Ms Miller said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.'
The Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice agreed that there would be no savings in 2029/30, but suggested changes to universal credit – almost the only part of the Government's proposals still standing – could save money in the longer term.
On Wednesday morning, the Conservatives accused Labour of making billions in unfunded spending commitments, including both the U-turns on welfare and the partial reinstatement of winter fuel payments.
In a letter to Ms Reeves, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride demanded to know where the money was coming from, asking: 'Will you raise tax or increase borrowing?'
Ministers have repeatedly insisted that Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT.
Recommended reading:
But Ms Reeves also remains committed to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues – not borrowing – in 2029/30.
Meanwhile, Sir Keir himself will face a grilling from MPs on Wednesday as he attempts to repair relations with his backbenchers.
The weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions comes just a day after 49 of his own MPs voted against his welfare reforms – the biggest rebellion of his premiership so far – while several backbenchers described the Government's handling of the issue as 'chaotic' and 'a shambles'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK's largest bioethanol plant to shut after blow from Starmer's trade deal with Trump
The UK's largest bioethanol plant is to close after being dealt a body blow by Keir Starmer's trade deal with Donald Trump. The owner of the Vivergo plant in Hull, owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is to close with the loss of 160 jobs, just hours after the government said it would not fund an industry rescue package. The first redundancies will be made on Tuesday. The government's decision creates uncertainty over a further 4,000 jobs in the industry's supply chain including farmers and hauliers. Bioethanol is a petrol substitute produced from agricultural products. Vivergo opened a redundancy programme in June. At that point the government appointed talks with the company, more than a month after ABF warned that the US trade deal was an 'existential threat' allowing US producers, for the first time, to compete litre-by-litre under a new duty free agreement for American ethanol. ABF and Ensus, the owner of the other major bioethanol plant in the UK, said the US deal would have a huge knock on effect in farming for wheat farmers who supplied their plants, as well as the UK's lead in clean fuels. A spokesperson for ABF said on Friday: 'It is deeply regrettable that the government has chosen not to support a key national asset. We have been left with no choice but to announce the closure of Vivergo and we have informed our people. 'We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open. We initiated and led talks with government in good faith. We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the government's own green industrial strategy.' ABF had warned the US trade deal, hailed as a triumph for Starmer, was a killer blow because it scrapped tariffs on a quota of 1.4bn litres of imports from the US, the exact size of the UK production, as part of the agreement with Trump in May. The US trade deal was a victory for the car industry which had tariffs slashed from 27.5% to 10%. The steel industry is still facing 25% tariffs but the UK government is hoping these will be scrapped through ongoing negotiation. Government sources said they had to prioritise the 320,000 jobs in auto, steel and aerospace and added that the ethanol plants had faced financial problems before the US deal. Sources in the National Farmers' Union believe that Trump's negotiators had said that in exchange for slashing tariffs on cars and steel it wanted US farmers to have access to either the British pork or ethanol industries. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion A spokesperson for the department for business and trade said it had taken 'the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces'. ABF said the decision was 'deeply regrettable' accusing the government of having 'thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber' and the opportunity to 'lead the world' on clean fuels. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'This is a shortsighted decision that totally disregards the benefits the domestic bioethanol sector will bring to jobs and energy security.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
King Charles leads 80th VJ Day commemoration in UK
King Charles led VJ Day commemorations in the UK as a national service of remembrance and two-minute silence marked the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in the second world war and the end of the six-year-long conflict. He was joined by the queen, the prime minister, Keir Starmer, and veterans who served in the far east theatres of war as wreaths were laid at the National Memorial Arboretum service in Staffordshire. Powerful testimonies read aloud reminded of the terrible cost of war, while a flypast featured the Red Arrows and historic second world war aircraft, including a Spitfire, Hurricane and Lancaster bomber. Guests of honour included 33 veterans aged from 96 to 105. A Royal Navy veteran, Alfred Conway, from Lincolnshire, watched as his great granddaughter laid a wreath on the Burma railway memorial at the arboretum. George Durrant, who served in the intelligence corps, appeared on stage to urge people not to forget the sacrifices made by his comrades. In Japan, Emperor Naruhito spoke of his 'deep remorse' on the anniversary and said he felt 'a deep and renewed sense of sorrow' in a sombre speech in an indoor arena in the centre of the Japanese capital. But a visit by two cabinet ministers to the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo angered countries that suffered Japanese military atrocities, particularly China and South Korea, AFP reported. The shrine, which the country's Asian neighbours view as a symbol of Japan's wartime aggression, honours 2.5 million mostly Japanese soldiers who perished since the late 19th century but also enshrines convicted war criminals. Japan's prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, a political moderate, sent a customary offering to Yasukuni, according to Kyodo news. No Japanese prime minister has visited the shrine since 2013, when a trip by then-premier Shinzo Abe sparked fury in Beijing and Seoul. China's foreign ministry on Friday summoned the chief minister of Japan's embassy in China, Yokochi Akira, to lodge solemn representations over Japanese politicians visiting the war shrine, according to a ministry statement, Reuters reported. In an audio message before the national service of remembrance to the nation, realms and Commonwealth, Charles spoke of allied prisoners of war 'who endured years of brutal captivity: the starvation, disease and cruelty that tested the very limits of human endurance' and the 'mental and physical scars' the war left on those who survived. He vowed the service and sacrifice of VJ Day heroes 'shall never be forgotten'. In what is believed to be the most direct reference by a British monarch to the suffering in Hiroshima and Nagasaki after their atomic bombings, he said: 'We should also pause to acknowledge that in the war's final act, an immense price was paid by the citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki – a price we pray no nation need ever pay again.' More than 90,000 British troops were casualties in the war against Japan, and nearly 30,000 died according to the Royal British Legion, while more than 12,000 Britons were among the 190,000 Commonwealth troops held as prisoners of war by the Japanese. Of the Allied forces, the US suffered the greatest losses, with more than 100,000 killed in action. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, more than 200,000 people were killed by the US bombs and in the months after succumbing to radiation sickness, the effects of burns and other serious injuries. Hundreds of buildings across the UK were due to be lit up on Friday evening to mark VJ Day 80, including Buckingham Palace, 10 Downing Street, the Houses of Parliament, the Tower of London, Tower 42, the Shard, Blackpool Tower, Gateshead Millennium Bridge, Durham Cathedral, Cardiff Castle, the Cenotaph and the White Cliffs of Dover.

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Scottish farm fumes as council gives milk contract to German dairy giant
Mossgiel Organic Dairy teamed up with the local authority back in 2021 to provide every school in the area with its organic milk. The farm in Mauchline, where Robert Burns once ploughed the fields and wrote many of his famous verses, aims to provide sustainable, organic milk while challenging the dominance of the bigger dairy companies and their negative impact on the industry. READ MORE: Scottish 85-year-old pens scathing letter to Keir Starmer over immigration rules The farm has won multiple awards and is known for providing a high quality product whilst also being environmentally friendly. For example, it was the first dairy farm in the UK to ditch single-use plastics But, The National can now confirm that the council has decided to award the contract to Müller – a German multinational firm which is considered the largest dairy brand in the UK. Mossgiel took to social media to hit out at the move. In a statement, they claimed: 'On paper, the council saves £6500 a year. In reality, here's the rest of the bill: "Recycling costs: Single-use milk packaging could add £2000–£5000 a year to waste bills, even if they pour from bigger supermarket jugs instead of little cartons. "Jobs lost: Two full-time equivalent local roles gone; £50–55k removed from Ayrshire's economy, plus around £5k less in National Insurance contributions for public services. "Local milk value: £61,000 less per year for our farm and the co-op of organic family farms we work with." They then added: 'Best case? They save a couple of grand up front, but lose around £111,000 from the East Ayrshire economy. Worst case? No saving at all plus the loss of jobs, farm income and the circular economy on top. 'Either way, that's over £100,000 stripped out of our community every year, diesel fumes back in playgrounds, and a prayer that milk cartons actually make it into recycling instead of landfill. Oh, and profits? Straight to a German-owned company. We respect the council's decision but we don't agree with it.' In a statement to The National, East Ayrshire Council confirmed that Mossgiel Milk's bid to keep the contract was unsuccessful and that Müller will replace them. 'The Council remains committed to providing healthy nutritious school meals, and has for the past 20 years, issued fresh and organic food contracts. The contracts are designed to provide a range of produce that meets higher welfare, and health and nutritional value. The successful tenderers have committed to maintain these standards,' the council said. 'The council also has strong links through the Ayrshire Economic Forum that engages with the wider local market to promote opportunity; and there is also direct support from the council's business support team and the Supplier Development Programme, which delivers grant support and expertise to businesses exploring public sector procurement opportunities.'