logo
I behaved like a rugby fan at the football

I behaved like a rugby fan at the football

Telegraph04-05-2025

Since the dawn of time, football fans have dreamt of enjoying an alcoholic beverage in view of the pitch. Must we forever suffer under draconian laws which forbid the sacred seat-pint? Cricket, tennis, rugby, the cinema, basically all other parts of public life are laughing at us.
That is how it seems to anyone born from the mid-1970s onwards who is keen on football and alcohol. The ban on terraced boozing was introduced in 1985 with the Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol etc.) Act. It forbids drinking 'at any time during the period of a designated sporting event when he is in any area of a designated sports ground from which the event may be directly viewed'.
Also outlawed are bringing alcohol with you into stadiums and entering while drunk, or becoming drunk while there. At a conservative guess this has made criminals of around 80 per cent of all match-going football fans at some point.
The rule is met with incredulity if you take an outsider to a game, whether foreign national or rugby sort. Arguably these regulations belong to the poorly behaved 1980s and do not reflect the changing demographics and behaviours of modern supporters. There is occasional appetite for change in this area. Labour MP for York Outer Luke Charters has called for trials in relaxing the ban this week, saying 'You look at fans in Germany and in Italy, they are still able to have a beer while they are cheering on their team. I just think we need a modern approach to a modern game.' The rules are seen by some as a drastic legislative over-reach. EFL Head of Security and safety ops Bob Eastwood called for trials in 2023, chief constable Mark Roberts said calls to end the ban was dangerous and warned MPs of families being soaked in 'lager shampoos'.
A small step has been taken this season in the Championship, the second tier of women's football. Southampton are one of four clubs trialling permitting alcohol in seats. There were hopes that Good Friday would bring accommodating weather as Southampton faced the London City Lionesses at St Mary's, to test the theory that fans would drink more on a sunny day. The British climate had other ideas.
Rain is whipping off the River Itchen outside and inside take-up for beers is muted. There are more coffee cups than plastic pint pots visible in the seats and the mood is flat after an early goal for the visitors, which Southampton never look likely to recover from. It is tough to generate much of an atmosphere with a crowd of 2,112 in a stadium that holds 32,000.
Nevertheless the trial has been successful so far. 'It's going really well,' says Andy Darbyshire, head of crowd safety and security at Southampton. 'What we have seen is that people who do want to take alcohol into the bowl have been very well behaved. We haven't had any reports of anti-social behaviour, heavy intoxication. The odd spillage, but no more than you have with coffee, tea or hot chocolate.
'There was a slight concern that people would throw their drinks around when goals are scored but speaking to all of the other clubs involved none of us have seen that.'
Southampton do score, and there is indeed no Boxpark historical re-enactment. Partly because it makes the score 1-3, and the Lionesses soon make that 1-4. The limit of mischief is one teenager saying 'oh s---' when it looks like the visitors are going to make it five. Otherwise the crowd is sedate.
Southampton fan Jason Hodges is an enthusiastic convert. At Bristol City, another club taking part, he was on the Thatcher's Gold. 'I had three before the game, two during and two at half-time. I was on fine form that day.
'There are a lot of kids at women's games so I separate myself from them in the stand rather than being behind them shouting. I think if it stays in the women's game it'll be all right but there's talk of extending it to men's football as well. We get enough trouble as it is without that; there are a lot of idiots that go, get drunk and start kicking off. It's a different culture.'
His worries are echoed by fellow fan Kate Arnold, although she has seen no issues so far. 'I see people walking around with wine glasses, but other than that it's made no difference to me as a fan,' she says. 'It's not likely to be like rugby fans walking around, beer in hand, it's a more reserved crowd. They won't even let me bring in my air horn.
'It would be harder in a bigger crowd, for an England game for example, because there are a lot of younger girls going by themselves, 16-25-year-olds. It would be difficult to police whether they are old enough to be drinking.'
Shortly after half-time the concourse bar shuts, curtailing my evening of hedonism at a disappointing two pints. There is no clear evidence that the trial has changed anything this evening – the test will come with larger crowds. No arrests were reported at women's football matches during the entirety of the 2023-24 season, while there were 2,584 related to the men's game.
But it still remains odd that drink-fuelled anti-social behaviour is tolerated at other sporting events. Brawls at racecourses are a social media staple every summer. What makes football so different?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Winter fuel payment U-turn in numbers
Winter fuel payment U-turn in numbers

BBC News

time36 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Winter fuel payment U-turn in numbers

The government's decision to largely reverse its cuts to winter fuel payments has raised questions about its spending and savings plans - and its fiscal Verify has been looking at the the key numbers. What has changed on winter fuel? At the time Labour won the 2024 general election, the Department for Work and Pensions was projecting that 10.8 million pensioners in England and Wales would be eligible for winter fuel payments in payments are worth either £200 or £300 per household. The new government, in order to save money, decided that only pensioners in receipt of pension credit (a separate benefit aimed at low-income pensioners) would receive winter fuel payments that winter - and said that would reduce the number of individual recipients to 1.5 the government has changed course - after widespread criticism - and said that, from 2025-26, all pensioners will get it, although it will be clawed back in the following tax year from individuals earning £35,000 and claims this means about 9 million pensioners will now be eligible.. The effect of this is largely to undo the impact of its initial policy in terms of the numbers affected. How much will this cost? The government estimated that the cost of the winter fuel payment system it inherited in 2024-25 would have been £ estimated that its initial reform last year would cut this bill by £1.4bn in 2024-25 (rising to £1.5bn in 2025-26) taking the cost of the system down to £0.5bnNow the government says the cost of the system after its latest change will be £1.25bn - a saving of £450m relative to a system in which all pensioners were eligible to receive the government added that this £450m saving has not yet been certified by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) - the government's official if it transpired, this saving would be only a third of the original £1.5bn savings target. And some analysts think the overall net saving for the government could actually be lower Labour's initial 2024 reform, winter fuel payments were only available to those in receipt of a separate benefit aimed at low-income pensioners, called pension year, the government initiated a campaign to encourage the hundreds of thousands of pensioners who are eligible for pension credit, but who do not claim it, to start doing latest data shows almost 60,000 more pension credit claims were awarded than otherwise might have been, likely because of the government's awareness campaign. With each annual pension credit claim costing the government £3,900 a year on average, the former Lib Dem pensions minister Steve Webb has calculated that the total annual cost of these new claims could be about £ additional cost would offset around half of the £450m savings claimed by the government for its latest changes to winter fuel eligibility. How can the government afford this U-turn? When Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the tightening of winter fuel payments in 2024, she said the £1.5bn per year savings were needed to stabilise the public those savings were entered into the OBR's budget calculations. Now the savings will only be £450m per year - or even lower - a gap of at least £1bn will open up in the government's Treasury said it will address this gap in the next Budget in the Autumn of 2025 and said "it will not lead to permanent additional borrowing".Assuming the OBR does not raise its GDP growth and tax revenue forecasts in the Budget, giving the government more money to fill the gap, this will imply ministers would either have to raise additional taxes or cut spending elsewhere to close this roughly £1bn gap .However, it should be noted that £1bn is a relatively low sum in the context of the public 2025-26 the government is projected by the OBR to spend £1,347bn and to borrow £ is also worth noting that the projected savings from the government's working age welfare reforms, announced earlier this year, are considerably higher than the savings from changing eligibility for winter fuel changes in eligibility for personal independence payments and the cuts to universal credit incapacity payments are projected by the OBR to save the government £4.8bn a year by 2029-30. If the government were to reverse or water down those reforms, as some Labour MPs are urging, it would create a considerably larger financial headache for the chancellor in terms of meeting her fiscal rules specify that she has to be projected to be on course to balance the government's day-to-day spending budget (which excludes spending on infrastructure) by March 2025, the OBR projected that she had just £9.9bn of "headroom" against this rule, a very small amount of leeway given the size of overall government spending and the welfare cuts would wipe out around half of many economists expect the chancellor's projected headroom to be further eroded by the OBR in any case in the Autumn Budget as a result of downgraded growth forecasts and an increase in government market borrowing costs in recent months. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?

Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street

South Wales Guardian

time39 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.'

BBC snub Emma Raducanu at Queen's as presenter explains the situation
BBC snub Emma Raducanu at Queen's as presenter explains the situation

Wales Online

time39 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

BBC snub Emma Raducanu at Queen's as presenter explains the situation

BBC snub Emma Raducanu at Queen's as presenter explains the situation Emma Raducanu teamed up with Katie Boulter in the doubles at Queen's Club on Tuesday but the match was not shown on the BBC as the British duo were snubbed Emma Raducanu teamed up with Katie Boulter in the women's doubles competition (Image: GETTY ) Emma Raducanu's debut in the doubles event at Queen's Club alongside Katie Boulter was overlooked by the BBC, who chose not to televise the match. Making a historic return to the London grass venue for women's tennis after five decades, Raducanu and Boulter faced off against Fang-Hsein Wu and Xinyu Jiang in their opening round, yet fans could not follow the action on free-to-air TV. ‌ While singles play dominated coverage on the main show court, now named the Andy Murray Arena, the British pair's efforts on Court One went untelevised, leaving supporters unable to witness their maiden team-up. ‌ Presenting the coverage, Isa Guha remarked: "Unfortunately, we won't be able to show you this match because we're focused on Andy Murray Arena, but we will be bringing you updates throughout the course of the afternoon." Prior to the match, Boulter shared her enthusiasm about playing with Raducanu, revealing in an interview with TNT Sports that they had long anticipated the partnership. She commented: "I think myself and Emma, we've been wanting to play for a while now. I think we've talked about it a lot of times," reports the Express. Article continues below Adding: "Unfortunately, it just hasn't quite happened for various reasons. I think [for the] first week on grass, to get a couple more matches is super important. "I think we were actually here at Queen's, practising on the clay, and we decided we thought we'd come back and play on the grass together. It'll be extremely special. Obviously, she's a great player and I'm looking forward to having the first of many more." Raducanu also shared her thoughts: "Playing a doubles match with Katie will hopefully give me a good feel for that surface and it will be positive. I really like playing with Katie. We've practiced a few times together in the past at Billie Jean King Cup ties." ‌ The former US Open winner has been contending with a back issue lately but is eager to put that behind her as she gears up for Wimbledon. She detailed her recent challenges: "I got back [from Paris] last week and then I got straight back on the court. I had a small interruption with a bit of a back spasm again, which was a bit annoying and that hindered my grass prep. "The last few days I have managed to get on the grass. I can't really predict the future. I know I have been managing my back for the last few weeks now and it's something that comes and goes. Article continues below "It can be frustrating. I try not to let it get to me because I have a pretty good feel when it happens of how to manage it. All I can do is deal with what's in front of me." The Brit pair won in straight sets 6-4, 6-4.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store