Trump and the GOP Will Regret the Day They Passed This Sick Bill
I think they will. They'll see, eventually, that Trump and Johnson and all of them just lied continually about the Medicaid cuts dealing only with 'waste, fraud, and abuse.' They'll watch as deep-red states build more versions of Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' with the billions in this bill for a mean-spirited and wanton immigrant detention system that majorities already disapprove of. They'll see veterans—veterans—lose their food stamp benefits. They'll see interest rates go up because of the trillions the bill adds to the debt.
Here's the important question to ponder: Why is this happening? What kind of people want to close rural hospitals? What kind of people want veterans to stop being able to buy decent groceries? Answering these questions teaches us a lot about what's become of the Republican Party over the last three-plus decades.
The seminal moment in this history isn't Trump coming down that escalator. In fact, it has nothing to do with Trump.
The year was 1990. At an impromptu meeting at Andrews Air Force Base with congressional leaders, President George H.W. Bush agreed to the last tax increase that a critical mass of Republicans backed. The tax increase was responsible fiscal policy— the deficit had jumped significantly since 1989—and in fact the revenue, and other spending caps in the bill, helped stabilize the country's finances. But all anyone remembers is that Bush broke his 'read my lips' campaign pledge not to raise taxes.
Ever since, Republican domestic policy has consisted entirely of two prongs: cutting taxes, overwhelmingly for the rich; cutting spending, overwhelmingly for, or one should say 'on,' working-class and poor people. This is who they are.
Within that broad category, there are three camps.
First, there are the coward-hypocrites: the ones who know something about policy and actually know better—who know, for example, that cutting taxes for rich people doesn't increase revenue.
Second, there are the hard-hearted red-hots: those who devoutly believe that government shouldn't be in the business of doing things like helping veterans pay for groceries, that we as a nation can't afford this (because we have to give the billionaires their tax cuts) and that it creates a nation of girly men. These are your Freedom Caucus extremists like Chip Roy and Andy Harris, who caved once again this week, proving that they have no actual principles whatsoever (or more precisely proving that their real principle is obedience).
Third, there's the clown posse: those, mostly new to politics, who are so stupid that they actually believe these lies about taxes and revenue, and spending being out of control. The lies are powerful and pervasive. If you try to Google the effect of those 1990 tax increases, for example, the first couple things you'll see are right-wing accounts that completely rewrite history. These people, mostly under 40 or so, have been hearing the lies about tax cuts and spending since they attended their first Young Republicans meeting, and they just buy it.
Donald Trump is, surprise surprise, in the stupid category. No, he's not young, but he is new to politics and utterly incurious about how policy actually works, so when someone from the Heritage Foundation or wherever fills his brain with post-Andrews dogma, he says 'sure,' because it's exactly what he wants to hear.
Likewise, when aides assure him, 'Sir, with respect to Medicaid, we're only going after waste, fraud, and abuse,' that sounds good to him. He asks no questions, because he doesn't give a shit whether some 23-bed hospital in Point Coupee Parish in Mike Johnson's Louisiana might close (neither does Johnson, obviously); all that matters to Trump is muscling his bill through, showing MAGA that he can push the likes of Roy and Harris around.
This is our reality. The Republicans just passed a cruel, stupid bill whose priorities have repeatedly failed the country over the past 25 years. But they have something that the Democrats don't have, that no political party in American history has ever had: a multibillion dollar propaganda machine that will see to it that its vast audience never learns the truth about the impacts of this bill.
The economy contracted by 0.5 percent in the first quarter of this year. What percentage of Fox News viewers do you think know that? If Fox has reported that, it has surely blamed it on Joe Biden, which they'll continue doing for a while yet.
That's the battle now: to make sure that as many Americans as possible, as many whose minds are open to evidence, see the impacts of this bill. That they connect the dots from that nurse at the assisted living facility who took such good care of mom and always had a smile on her face, to the same nurse losing her job because the facility had to close, to this bill that Trump did such a 'masterful' job—as Johnson put it—of pushing through.
I think the evidence will be so clear that enough people will see what this bill has done to their family, friends, and community, and the Republicans will rue the day they passed this sick, reactionary bill. Historic indeed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump fires BLS chief after weak jobs report
President Trump said Friday the U.S. is positioning two nuclear submarines in 'appropriate regions' near Russia, saying the move corresponds with threatening rhetoric from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, a close adviser to current Russian President Vladimir Putin. In a social media post, Trump cited Medvedev's 'highly provocative statements' and said the nuclear submarines are being moved to the region 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' Ukraine is set to receive its first two Patriot air defense systems 'in the coming days' as part of the deal the U.S. government struck with NATO last month. A bipartisan pair of senators introduced legislation this week calling for tens of billions of dollars in aid for Ukraine, as Putin continues to rebuff Trump's calls for an end to the war. The Hill's Laura Kelly writes: 'The bill's passage faces long odds in the Republican-controlled Congress, where GOP leaders in the House and Senate have deferred to Trump over which legislation makes it to the floor. The administration has slashed foreign aid so far, and administration officials and some GOP lawmakers regularly rally against sending U.S. military and other assistance abroad.' MEANWHILE… Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, visited an aid-distribution site in Gaza on Friday, as international pressure grows on Israel to address the humanitarian and hunger crisis in the enclave. Witkoff was joined by Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel. The White House said Witkoff and Huckabee will brief Trump on their findings, setting the stage for a U.S. plan to assist in distributing aid to the war-ravaged region. Trump this week said there is 'real starvation' in Gaza, breaking with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In Washington, Democrats and some MAGA-aligned Republicans are urging the U.S. to cut Israel loose. On Wednesday, more than half the of the Democratic caucus in the Senate voted in favor of resolutions to block U.S. military sales to Israel. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) missed the vote while she was in New York taping a segment on 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.' Slotkin released a statement Thursday saying she would have voted to oppose U.S. military sales to Israel. 'I have been a strong supporter of the Jewish State of Israel my whole life. And I still am,' Slotkin posted on X. 'But despite the fact that Hamas began this bloody round of conflict—and refuses to release the hostages—the images of emaciated children are hard to turn away from.' Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said Friday 'the time has come' to recognize a Palestinian state. Last week, France became the first Group of Seven (G7) nation to say it would recognize a Palestinian state. Leaders in Canada and Britain said they'd follow suit if Israel's war on Hamas does not end soon. Axios reports that Witkoff and Netanyahu this week discussed the need to secure a comprehensive deal for 'the release of all the hostages [held by Hamas], the disarmament of Hamas, and the demilitarization of the Gaza Strip.'


Hamilton Spectator
a few seconds ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Lawyer says he's not been allowed to see 5 immigrants deported by the US to a prison in Eswatini
MANZINI, Eswatini (AP) — Five immigrants deported by the United States to Eswatini in a secret deal last month had served their criminal sentences before they were sent to be held in a prison in the African country, a lawyer working on their cases said Friday. The Eswatini lawyer also said the men from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Yemen and Vietnam sent to southern Africa under President Donald Trump's third-country deportation program have been denied access to legal representation while being held in Eswatini's main maximum-security prison. The lawyer, Sibusiso Nhlabatsi, said he hasn't been allowed to see the men and that he filed court papers Thursday against the head of Eswatini's correctional services department and the country's attorney general, demanding access to them. He said he is representing them on behalf of lawyers in the U.S. and was prevented from seeing them by Eswatini prison officials on July 25. It's unlawful for the men, who have been in Eswatini for around two weeks, to be denied access to a lawyer, he added. The Eswatini government has said the men will be held in solitary confinement until they can be deported to their home countries, which could take up to a year. 'They have served their sentences,' Nhlabatsi told The Associated Press. 'If a person has committed a crime and they have served a sentence, why are you then keeping them in a prison?' Nhlabatsi said the men have not been able to communicate with their families or receive visitors since arriving in Eswatini, although prison officials said they were in the process of setting up devices to allow them to speak with their families. He alleged their ongoing detention could have legal implications for Eswatini, a small country bordering South Africa and one of the world's last absolute monarchies , ruled by a king accused of cracking down on dissent. The Trump administration has come under scrutiny for its choice of African countries to strike deportation deals with. It deported eight immigrants described as violent criminals to South Sudan in early July in an operation that was halted by a legal challenge in the U.S. The eight were held for weeks in a converted shipping container at an American military base in nearby Djibouti while the case was decided. A Supreme Court ruling eventually cleared the way for them to be sent to South Sudan. Both South Sudan, which is in danger of tipping into civil war, and Eswatini have poor rights records and governments accused of being repressive. Critics say the deportees, who the administration says were in the U.S. illegally, will likely be denied due process in those countries. The five sent to Eswatini were also described by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as serious criminals. Their convictions included murder and child rape, the department said in social media posts, calling them 'uniquely barbaric.' The department, which did not say if they had completed their sentences, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. An Eswatini government spokesman also declined to comment on Nhlabatsi's allegations, saying it was now a matter for the courts. Nhlabatsi said the deportees are being held at the Matsapha Correctional Complex near the administrative capital, Mbabane, the same prison said to hold pro-democracy activists on trumped up charges. The government has declined to say where the five men are being held, citing security concerns. Eswatini's statement about the five men ultimately being deported to their home countries appears to contradict claims by the U.S. that their home countries refused to take the men back. Activists in Eswatini have demanded that the details of the agreement with the U.S. be made public but the government has said they are 'classified.' South Sudan has also declined to give details of its agreement to take deportees from the U.S. ___ AP news on the Trump administration: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Hamilton Spectator
a few seconds ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Moe disappointed by Trump's tariffs but says Carney should remove countermeasures
SASKATOON - Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe says Prime Minister Mark Carney should start removing counter tariffs against the United States to get a deal done with President Donald Trump. U.S Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has asked Ottawa to do away with countermeasures, and Moe says Canada should heed the advice. 'If we're serious about achieving a renewed, revamped and enhanced trade environment or some type of a new and improved (Canada-United States-Mexico trade agreement), somebody's going to have to move in this space,' Moe said Friday at a news conference. 'We would suggest that it should be Canada.' Trump followed through late Thursday on his threat to hit Canada with 35 per cent tariffs — up from 25 per cent — on goods not compliant with the trade agreement, better known as CUSMA. Tariffs of 50 per cent remain in effect on steel and some copper products, and levies on Canadian automobiles and lumber are also in place. Carney has imposed 25 per cent tariffs on $30 billion in U.S. goods. Moe said he's heard from farmers dinged by Canadian levies on steel bins, as it's importers pay those tariff charges. 'The reason we will be urging for a reduction of counter tariffs is they hurt Saskatchewan and Canadians, our families, our businesses and our places of work,' he said. '(It's) in the same way that Donald Trump's tariffs are pushing up the cost of doing business in the U.S. and really pushing them into a situation where the last two months running, their job numbers have been much more dismal than the projection.' Moe also called the jump in Trump's tariffs disappointing. He said he gives credit to Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc for ensuring exports compliant with CUSMA are tariff-free. Under the agreement, 95 per cent of Saskatchewan exports move into the United States without duties, Moe added. 'That is incredibly important,' the premier said. '(It) allows us largely to have an opportunity to create North American energy security, food security and manufacturing security.' U.S. Census Bureau data shows nearly 60 per cent of Canadian goods that entered the country in May were compliant with the agreement. Moe and other premiers have also called on Ottawa to cut regulations to spur pipeline and rail development. He said he's hopeful Carney's latest law to streamline approvals for national infrastructure projects will do just that. Meanwhile, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said the vast majority of her province's products remain tariff-free, because they also fall under the trade agreement. Smith said in a social media post it's unfortunate non-compliant goods will be hit with the higher tariffs. 'These tariffs hurt both Canadian and American businesses and workers, and they weaken one of the most important trade and security alliances in the world,' she said. 'I remain convinced that the path to a positive resolution with our U.S. partners lies in strong, consistent diplomacy and a commitment to working in good faith toward shared priorities.' Smith said Carney should continue negotiating with Trump, while working toward diversifying the country's economy. Both Moe and Smith recently reallowed U.S. liquor to be sold in their provinces, after temporarily banning such sales when the tariff war started earlier this year. Moe has said the 'elbows-up' approach in dealing with Trump is nothing more than a slogan. 'This is a time for us ... to make fact-based decisions, not to make decisions that maybe make us feel good, that we think are going to be good slogans or things of that nature,' he said Friday. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. — By Jeremy Simes in Regina Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .