logo
US Warship Challenged Beijing's South China Sea Claims, Navy Says

US Warship Challenged Beijing's South China Sea Claims, Navy Says

Newsweek2 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A United States destroyer recently conducted a freedom of navigation operation in the South China Sea, challenging claims by China and other countries, the Navy told Newsweek.
The U.S. naval operation took place near the Spratly Islands, a cluster of islands claimed by China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Brunei. The U.S. Navy said the operation was specifically intended to challenge restrictions on passage by China, Taiwan and Vietnam.
Newsweek also reached out to the Chinese, Taiwanese, and Vietnamese defense ministries outside of normal business hours on Monday by email for comment.
Why It Matters
The U.S. military has been maintaining its presence in the South China Sea—where China's sovereignty claims overlap with those of other countries—to uphold lawful use of the sea and international airspace, including the rights of freedom of navigation and overflight.
The news of the recent U.S. freedom of navigation operation comes amid reports of a Chinese bomber deployment to a militarized island outpost in the Paracel Islands—located north of the Spratly Islands—and the return of an American aircraft carrier to the South China Sea.
What To Know
The U.S. Seventh Fleet—which maintains America's naval presence in the western Pacific and Indian Oceans—confirmed to Newsweek that on May 12, the destroyer USS Dewey asserted navigational rights and freedoms in the South China Sea near the Spratly Islands.
"This freedom of navigation operation upheld the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea recognized by international law by challenging restrictions on innocent passage imposed by China, Taiwan, and Vietnam," the U.S. Seventh Fleet said in an email on Monday.
According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, "ships of all states, whether coastal or land-locked, enjoy the right of innocent passage through [a] territorial sea." However, such passage must be conducted in a "continuous and expeditious" manner.
The United States Navy destroyer USS Dewey conducts routine operations while transiting in the South China Sea on May 12, 2025.
The United States Navy destroyer USS Dewey conducts routine operations while transiting in the South China Sea on May 12, 2025.
Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Devin Monroe/U.S. Navy
The Dewey—part of the U.S. Seventh Fleet's principal surface force—left the "excessive claim area" and continued transiting in the South China Sea after completing its operation.
Meanwhile, a set of photos released by the U.S. Navy shows the USS Benfold, the Dewey's sister ship, operating at an undisclosed location in the South China Sea on May 12. The Benfold is also assigned to the U.S. Seventh Fleet as part of Destroyer Squadron 15.
According to the caption, one of the photos shows an electronics technician with a Chinese name translating "incoming bridge-to-bridge voice communications" in the pilothouse of the Benfold—suggesting the American warship may have encountered the Chinese navy.
U.S. military vessels and aircraft routinely interact with foreign forces while operating throughout the Indo-Pacific region, the U.S. Seventh Fleet told Newsweek, adding that all interactions were "consistent with international norms and did not impact the operation."
United States Navy electronics technician 2nd Class Haoyu Zhao translates incoming bridge-to-bridge voice communications in the pilothouse of the destroyer USS Benfold while underway in the South China Sea on May 12, 2025.
United States Navy electronics technician 2nd Class Haoyu Zhao translates incoming bridge-to-bridge voice communications in the pilothouse of the destroyer USS Benfold while underway in the South China Sea on May 12, 2025.
Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Monica Walker/U.S. Navy
What People Are Saying
The Pentagon said in its 2024 Freedom of Navigation Report: "Excessive maritime claims are inconsistent with international law as reflected in the Law of the Sea Convention…Unlawful maritime claims pose a threat to global mobility and commerce, as well as the legal foundation of the rules-based international order. If left unchallenged, excessive maritime claims could limit the rights and freedoms enjoyed by every nation."
The Chinese Foreign Ministry said on Sunday: "On the South China Sea, there has never been any problem with regard to freedom of navigation and overflight there. China has always been committed to working with countries concerned to properly handle differences through dialogue and consultation, while safeguarding China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in accordance with laws and regulations."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen how China, which has long claimed sovereignty over most of the South China Sea, will respond militarily to the recent U.S. Navy freedom of navigation operation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's Xi meets with Lukashenko of 'all-weather' partner Belarus
China's Xi meets with Lukashenko of 'all-weather' partner Belarus

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China's Xi meets with Lukashenko of 'all-weather' partner Belarus

BEIJING (Reuters) -Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday met with President Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus in Beijing, the official Xinhua news agency reported, as the two "all-weather" partners looked to further deepen strategic ties and cooperation. Lukashenko's visit to Beijing was his first to the Chinese capital since he was declared a winner of a presidential election in January, extending his 31-year rule of the former Soviet republic.

The Secretary of Defense wants to change a ship's name. Here are the untold perils of renaming a vessel
The Secretary of Defense wants to change a ship's name. Here are the untold perils of renaming a vessel

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Secretary of Defense wants to change a ship's name. Here are the untold perils of renaming a vessel

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth reportedly intends to change a ship's name, specifically the oiler ship USNS Harvey Milk. While that might please some supporters of the Trump Administration, it might rankle the most critical constituency afloat: the U.S. Navy's sailors. It's essential to recognize that there is no more superstitious group of people on the planet than sailors. If you don't believe me, ask the Navy why it hasn't had a ship named 'USS United States' since 1797. Red skies at night are a sailor's delight, but if any vessel accidentally kills an albatross, they might as well scuttle the ship right then and there. These seemingly absurd but firmly-held beliefs might seem ridiculous to us land lubbers, but there are crews that will happily keelhaul someone for bringing a banana aboard. So it might be concerning for the crew of the Harvey Milk, named after the U.S. Navy veteran, gay rights leader, and former San Francisco mayor, to change its name. Few nautical faux pas can bring worse luck than renaming ships. There are many reasons for this, and most date back to the age of sail, when there was so much misunderstanding about the oceans. Legend has it that when a ship is christened with its name, that name is placed in the 'Ledger of the Deep.' This ledger is one kept by the gods, personally maintained by Poseidon or Neptune. When someone tries to change a ship's name, it means they're trying to slip something past the gods and should be punished for their attempted deception and disrespect. Failing to perform a proper rechristening or cleansing ritual might lead to the loss of the ship, the disappearance of its crew, or something worse. In a more practical sense, ships around the world carried a reputation among those who worked on them. Vessels known for good luck, safe travels, or sturdiness in a storm might attract more sailors than an unlucky one (like one that killed an albatross). Pirates were also well-known for capturing and renaming ships. Those recaptured from pirates or unscrupulous merchants would be renamed again, hiding their actual histories. Such a renaming also hid the fates of those who served aboard. The aforementioned USS United States began its life as one of America's six original frigates. Initially celebrated for its victory over the HMS Macedonian during the War of 1812, its luck soon ended. From then on, sailors considered it jinxed, and the ship ended up in Norfolk Harbor until the outbreak of the Civil War. Virginia rebels attempted to change the ship's name to the CSS United States, but the irony of its name wasn't lost on them. They called it the 'Confederate States,' which was the nail in its coffin. Retreating rebel troops sank it when Norfolk surrendered to the Union. While it may not seem like a big deal to change a ship's name, Secretary Hegseth is unlikely to stop with the USNS Harvey Milk, according to CBS News. The John Lewis-class oilers are named for Civil Rights figures in American history. There are also many ships named for women. The USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Harriet Tubman are also Lewis-class oilers but have yet to be christened. Other currently active vessels, like those named after Civil Rights leaders Medgar Evers and Cesar Chavez, are also being considered for new names. The question remains: Should Secretary Hegseth be afraid to venture out to sea because of Navy superstitions? Probably not. Superstitions exist to make sense of events when something important is out of our control. They exist because it makes humans feel more confident when they have no other reason to be. Anyone who thinks that's just silly should ask Michael Jordan why he wore his UNC practice shorts under his Chicago Bulls shorts in every NBA game he ever played. If the U.S. Navy is genuinely dedicated to renaming ships, even those that are already christened, the chaplains will be working overtime. Priests, rabbis, and imams need to be called in to bless the boats in their new names. They will need to pacify the gods of the seas by pouring wine into the oceans. Or they can at least formally remove the old nameplates from the vessels and ceremoniously dispose of them in the sea – or so the story goes. It might seem like a lot of work, but Hegseth is already angering many Americans by making the move during Pride Month. There's no sense in risking the anger of the gods of the sea, too.

Trump doubles tariffs on steel and aluminum, raising ire of Canada, Mexico
Trump doubles tariffs on steel and aluminum, raising ire of Canada, Mexico

Axios

time41 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump doubles tariffs on steel and aluminum, raising ire of Canada, Mexico

President Trump signed an order Tuesday doubling tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from 25% to 50% for al trading partners except the U.S. — drawing swift criticism from officials in neighboring Canada and Mexico. Why it matters: Trump's order said the increased tariffs that took effect early Wednesday "will more effectively counter" countries that "offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminum" in the U.S., but economic officials have said such levies would lead to higher consumer prices and inflation. A European Commission official said after Trump announced the metal tariffs plan at a U.S. Steel plant in Pennsylvania on Friday that the president's decision "adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic." Details: Trump says in the order that the previously imposed steel and aluminum tariffs had helped "provide critical price support" in the U.S. However, "they have not yet enabled these industries to develop and maintain the rates of capacity production utilization that are necessary for the industries' sustained health and for projected national defense needs," he said. "I have determined that increasing the previously imposed tariffs will provide greater support to these industries and reduce or eliminate the national security threat posed by imports of steel and aluminum articles and their derivative articles." Yes, but: Steel and aluminum imports from the U.K. will remain at 25% until at least July 9 due to the framework for a sweeping new trade pact that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Trump signed last month. State of play: The U.K. is not a leading exporter of the metals to the U.S., but Reuters notes that Canada exports the most steel by shipment volumes to the U.S. followed by Mexico. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's office said in a Tuesday media statement that his government was "engaged in intensive and live negotiations" for the removal of the tariffs, which it described as "unlawful and unjustified." Mexican Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said during a Tuesday event that he'd seek an exemption for the country from the tariffs that he called "not fair" and "unsustainable," per multiple reports. The EC official said the commission is was "finalizing consultations on expanded countermeasures" and if no resolution was reached "both existing and additional EU measures will automatically take effect" on July 14 or earlier, "if circumstances require." Flashback: Canada and Mexico were exempted from tariffs Trump imposed on the metals for trading partners during his first term. What they're saying: Kevin Dempsey, president of industry group American Iron and Steel Institute, in a statement welcomed Trump's tariffs action. "Led by China, global steel overcapacity and production continues to grow, even as overall global steel demand is being impacted by the sharp downturn in the Chinese construction sector," he said. "Given these challenging international conditions that show no signs of improvement, this tariff action will help prevent new surges in imports that would injure American steel producers and their workers." The other side: Robert Budway, president of industry group the Can Manufacturers Institute, in a statement said the tariffs hike would "further increase the cost of canned goods" at grocery stores. "This cost is levied upon millions of American families relying on canned foods picked and packed by U.S. farmers, food producers, and can makers," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store