'No-Kids' Holiday Venue? Think Again, Says France
While Paris is considered one of the most child-friendly cities in the world, more and more venues in France have been shunning children in an effort to shield customers from kids' unpredictable behaviour and noise.
The government on Tuesday held a roundtable meeting with key industry players to discuss a trend that France's high commissioner for childhood, Sarah El Hairy, has said should end.
Socialist senator Laurence Rossignol has introduced a bill that would make it illegal to ban children from venues in France.
"Children are not a nuisance," said Rossignol, adding that the bill is aimed at promoting "a society that is open to children".
"We cannot accept that some people decide they no longer want to tolerate a particular section of the population, in this case children," she told AFP.
El Hairy said excluding children was infringing on their rights, putting pressure on their parents and dividing society.
"There is a growing intolerance, and we must not allow it to take hold," El Hairy told broadcaster RTL. "We are pushing children and families out, and in a way, this is real violence," she added.
"It's not in our culture, it's not our philosophy, and it's not what we want to see as the norm in our country."
On Tuesday, she brought together representatives of the tourism and transport industries, including Airbnb, to discuss the "no-kids" trend.
In France, adult-only services are currently limited.
According to estimates from a travel industry union, they represented around three percent of the market in 2024.
Questions about children's place in society have been at the forefront of the public debate in France in recent years.
The French Federation of Nurseries has repeatedly called on lawmakers to ensure children's right "to make noise".
In the spring of 2024, a report submitted to President Emmanuel Macron said authorities needed to create alternatives to help children reduce the amount of screen time and "give them back their rightful place, including their right to be noisy".
A few months later, the government's High Council for Family, Children and Age (HCFEA) warned about the lack of spaces for children, pointing to the "harmful consequences for their physical and mental health".
Rossignol praised El Hairy's initiative to gather together tourism and transport executives, but said more needed to be done.
"Now we need to go further," she said. "The president's camp must put this issue on the parliamentary agenda."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Israel's military offensive in Gaza could lead to disaster, permanent war, says French President Emmanuel Macron
French President Emmanuel Macron has warned that the military offensive in Gaza for which Israel has been preparing for weeks could lead to disaster for both set of people. In a post on X, the French President said he spoke with Jordan's King Abdullah II and Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi about the developments in Gaza. According to Macron, the three leaders agreed that the military offensive risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war. 'The military offensive in Gaza that Israel is preparing can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war,' Macron stated. The three leaders acknowledged that only a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages, large-scale delivery of humanitarian assistance, the disarmament of Hamas, and the strengthening of the Palestinian Authority can bring an end to the conflict. To achieve this, Macron said France, together with Egypt, Jordan, and other regional partners, will have to deploy an international stabilisation mission for Gaza and work towards a political solution that fulfills the aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians. He also reiterated France's commitment to co-chairing a conference along with Saudi Arabia in New York in September on the two-state solution. 'This is the only credible way forward—for the families of the hostages, for Israelis, and for Palestinians alike. No to war. Yes to peace and security for all,' he said. I have just spoken with His Majesty King Abdullah II of Jordan and with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt. We share the same conviction: The military offensive in Gaza that Israel is preparing can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region… — Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) August 20, 2025 In July, France and Saudi Arabia had agreed to revive the push for a two-state solution at a UN conference in New York in September. Macron also announced that he would formally recognise the State of Palestine in September. The announcement, however, did not go down well in Israel, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a letter written earlier this week, accused Macron of fuelling anti-semitism. 'Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on this anti-semitic fire. It is not diplomacy, it is appeasement. It rewards Hamas terror, hardens Hamas's refusal to free the hostages, emboldens those who menace French Jews and encourages the Jew-hatred now stalking your streets,' Netanyahu wrote in a strongly worded letter. Responding to Netanyahu's letter, Macron's office, in a statement on Tuesday, said the accusations were 'erroneous, abject, and will not go unanswered'. 'Violence against the Jewish community is unacceptable,' the statement added.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Protest held in Mumbai's Azad Maidan to condemn violence against Palestinians in Gaza
Around 250 citizens, political leaders, activists, and artists assembled at Azad Maidan on Wednesday afternoon to condemn the ongoing violence in Gaza and express solidarity with the Palestinian people. The public protest, held between 3 pm and 6 pm, was organised after Mumbai police on August 12, informed the Bombay High Court that it agreed to allow the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and allied groups to hold the gathering. Describing the High Court Judgement as a huge victory, P Sainath, founder and editor of the People's Archive of Rural India (PARI) said, 'Palestine is not just a global issue, it's a super local issue and an issue that is close to our hearts.' In his speech he also referred to Mahatma Gandhi's statement in the Harijan Journal in 1938 which said, 'Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France belongs to the French.' The assembly was called jointly by CPI(M), CPI, CPI(ML), CPI(ML) Liberation, PWP, Samajwadi Party, NCP (SP), and the Indian National Congress, along with civil society platforms such as the All India Peace and Solidarity Organisation (AIPSO). Among those who addressed the crowd were CPI(M) leaders Vivek Monteiro and Prakash Reddy, activist Feroze Mithiborwala, Congress leaders Hussain Dalwai, Manoj Joshi, Dhananjay Shinde, and Sandesh Kondvilkar, Samajwadi Party representative Shabana Khan, and cultural figures including actor Swara Bhaskar, theatre personality Dolly Thakore, writer Beena Elias, editor of international magazine Gallerie, Bina Sarkar, and journalist P. Sainath. The Speakers denounced Israel's actions in Gaza, terming it as 'genocide,' citing the International Criminal Court's warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. They also condemned the killings of journalists reporting from Gaza, calling it an attack on press freedom and an attempt to silence independent voices. 'We may be far from Gaza, but our voices matter. When reporters are being killed for showing the world the reality, it becomes our responsibility to stand in solidarity and demand accountability,' said Anjali Deshmukh, a social worker from Bandra, holding a placard calling for peace. 'What is happening in Gaza is not just a political conflict, it is a humanitarian crisis. No child should grow up under bombs, and no journalist should be silenced for telling the truth,' said Rashid Khan, a college professor from Kurla. Permission for the meeting was granted only after CPI(M) approached the Bombay High Court for a second time this month. The court permitted the protest at Azad Maidan under strict conditions, including compliance with the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, and regulations against provocative speeches. Following this Mumbai Police had on Aug 12 informed the High Court of its decision to allow the gathering. Earlier, the Mumbai Police had denied permission for the assembly, citing law-and-order concerns over demonstrations on international conflicts. Wednesday's meeting, however, passed off peacefully. Participants carried placards and banners calling for an immediate ceasefire, lifting of the blockade in Gaza, and protection of civilians and journalists.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Anatomy of the budding India-China bonhomie
Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi's just concluded visit to India and the agreement between the two sides on the India-China boundary question is an encouraging sign in mending the relationship between the two countries, which has been struggling to normalise since the border standoff in 2020. Wang Yi's visit to Delhi and the agreement outlining several measures to manage the contested border ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's planned trip to China for the annual Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit also reflect broader changes occurring in geopolitics. The India-China dynamics must also be read in conjunction with the engagement of the two countries with Russia. The three-way conversations involving Russia, India, and China are noteworthy as it is reflective of the broader regional geopolitical realignments in response to US policies towards them. In an ideal world, New Delhi would prefer to see Chinese power balanced by the US and/or Russia. (AFP) External affairs minister S Jaishankar is now in Russia. For both India and China (as also for Russia), the three-way conversations present an excellent opportunity to signal to Washington that there are possibilities of alternative global blocs and realignments outside of Washington's orbit and influence. What is perhaps more important and consequential are the underlying causes behind the current bonhomie between India and China. Beyond the optics, it is also evident that both India and China are eager to achieve a degree of normalcy in their relationship. The statement from the ministry of external affairs on the outcomes of Wang's India visit testifies to that. It is, therefore, possible to argue that there is a convergence between New Delhi and Beijing on the need to normalise bilateral relations. However, their respective definitions of normalcy are different. For China, normalcy means moving on from the current border impasse with India and focussing on the global balance of power. As Wang said, 'We (India and China) should never allow bilateral relations to be defined by the boundary question or specific differences to affect the overall picture of our bilateral ties.' Without normalcy with India, China knows that it will not be in a position to leverage Indian unhappiness with US President Donald Trump for its own larger geopolitical purposes. In other words, China seeks to exploit the current opportunity to challenge the US's global supremacy, and for that purpose, normalcy with India would be helpful. But the question is whether Beijing is willing to engage in sustained give-and-take negotiations with New Delhi to settle the border issue. For New Delhi, normalcy with China is centred on disengagement at the border so that it can focus on the larger geopolitical questions of India-China relations, India-China-Russia dynamics, and so on. For India, normalcy on the border and status quo ante bellum as of 2020 is key. China's global objectives behind the current warmth towards India should not be missed. Wang stated recently that 'as important members of the Global South, we have the responsibility to take the lead in opposing hegemonism and power politics'. There is little doubt that China would want to use India and Russia, and the Global South, to target the US-led world order. However, let's be clear. If Trump offers a G-2 with China, Beijing is likely to settle for it, sacrificing its secondary geopolitical equations. A similar logic extends to Russia as well. Moscow would vociferously promote the virtues of an alternative world order outside of the US orbit, but what it wants is to be recognised and treated by Washington and Europe as a great power and be accommodated within the European balance of power system, rather than being part of a China-led global order. As for India, it will continue to emphasise the importance of the Global South, multipolarity, and global alternatives, but New Delhi is not comfortable being part of a China-led, Russia-backed, non-American world order. If India is accommodated into a US-led world order as an important stakeholder, New Delhi is likely to accept that. In an ideal world, New Delhi would prefer to see Chinese power balanced by the US and/or Russia. However, since these options are not currently available, it is inclined to settle for underbalancing China, given its lack of capacity to balance Beijing on its own. In that sense, the three countries – India, China, and Russia – are hedging against geopolitical uncertainties and opting for their respective second-best options. This essential geopolitical dynamic should not be lost on our policymakers. In the meantime, and notwithstanding the deep mistrust between the two countries, India needs to engage with China for two key reasons. For India, conflict management with China is a key issue, as the fundamental contradictions in the relationship are unlikely to disappear soon. Therefore, it is essential to establish and strengthen confidence-building measures (CBMs) to manage Sino-Indian tensions. In that sense, the recent agreements are in the right direction. A no less important reason for India to engage with China on a sustained basis is that managing the relationship with Beijing — its rise as a global power and ambitions for superpower status, aggressive pursuit of its territorial ambitions, and attempts at unipolarity in Asia — is going to be India's most crucial task for the next several decades. From that perspective alone, New Delhi will need to engage productively with Beijing. Happymon Jacob is the founder and director of the Council for Strategic and Defense Research and the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal
