Terrifying ‘death date' of the universe moves much CLOSER as scientists reveal exactly when all the stars will go out
Published: Invalid Date,
OUR universe is set to end far sooner than we thought – so if you planned on living forever, there's bad news.
Scientists have calculated a possible "death date" for our universe, revealing how long it will take for all stars to decay.
5
Thankfully this terrifying dead universe is so far in the future that you won't have to cancel any plans.
The prediction is 10 to the power of 78 years away – or a one followed by 78 zeroes.
Written out, that looks like: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years.
That's a lot of candles for the universe's final birthday cake.
This "end" is due to take place through an "evaporation"-like process where objects in the universe ultimately decay.
This is through a process similar to something called Hawking radiation, which is where black holes decay over time.
And through a series of calculations, scientists were able to show how long it might take for other objects to decay too.
"The researchers calculated that the end of the universe is about 10^78 years away (a 1 with 78 zeros), if only Hawking-like radiation is taken into account," Radboud University Nijmegen noted.
"This is the time it takes for white dwarf stars, the most persistent celestial bodies, to decay via Hawking-like radiation."
Previous studies that have examined the end of the universe didn't take this effect into account.
Terrifying Nasa simulation lets you 'plunge' into black hole to 'point of no return' that would rip your body apart
So the earlier estimation showed the lifetime of white dwarfs as 10 to the power of 1,100 years – or a one followed by 1,100 zeroes.
That's far longer than the latest estimate, although both numbers are incomprehensibly large that it's unlikely to affect humans.
"So the ultimate end of the universe comes much sooner than expected," said study lead author Heino Falcke.
"But fortunately it still takes a very long time."
5
HAWKING RADIATION
Hawking radiation is named after famed English theoretical physicist and Cambridge professor Stephen Hawking.
In the 1970s, Hawking suggested that radiation could escape from a black hole.
"At the edge of a black hole, two temporary particles can form, and before they merge, one particle is sucked into the black hole and the other particle escapes," the Radboud University Nijmegen explained.
"One of the consequences of this so-called Hawking radiation is that a black hole very slowly decays into particles and radiation.
5
What is a black hole? The key facts
Here's what you need to know...
A black hole is a region of space where absolutely nothing can escape
That's because they have extremely strong gravitational effects, which means once something goes into a black hole, it can't come back out
They get their name because even light can't escape once it's been sucked in – which is why a black hole is dark
What is an event horizon?
The point at which you can no longer escape from a black hole's gravitational pull is called the event horizon
The event horizon varies between different black holes, depending on their mass and size
What is a singularity?
The gravitational singularity is the very centre of a black hole
It's a one-dimensional point that contains an incredibly large mass in an infinitely small space
At the singularity, space-time curves infinitely, and the gravitational pull is infinitely strong
Conventional laws of physics stop applying at this point
How are black holes created?
Most black holes are made when a supergiant star dies
This happens when stars run out of fuel – like hydrogen – to burn, causing the star to collapse
When this happens, gravity pulls the center of the star inwards quickly and collapses into a tiny ball
Part of the star collapses inward thanks to gravity, and the rest of the star explodes outwards
The remaining central ball is extremely dense, and if it's especially dense, you get a black hole
5
"This contradicts Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, which says that black holes can only grow."
Scientists working on this new study calculated that this "evaporation" process can also apply to other objects with a gravitational field – not just black holes.
They also checked to see how long it would take the Moon and a human to decay in this way.
And it turns out that it would take us 10 to the power of 90 years (or one with 90 zeroes) to disappear.
But there are lots of other reasons why the Moon and humans won't make it anywhere close to that distant time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Zombie' spiders infected by never-before-seen fungus invade parts of the world
A mysterious fungus is turning cave-dwelling spiders into real-life 'zombies,' consuming their organs and taking control of their behavior. Known as Gibellula attenboroughii, the fungus attaches to the spider, invades its body and devours it from the inside out. It then manipulates the spider's brain chemistry, altering dopamine levels to force the insect out of its web and into the open, where it ultimately dies. Afterward, the fungus sprouts fruiting bodies from the corpse, releasing spores to infect new spiders and continue its deadly cycle. Researchers said it is difficult to determine how long the zombie spiders survive, but some estimates suggested they may live for up to three weeks. The infected spiders have been found across the UK, including England and Ireland, Russia and other parts of the globe. Scientists stress that G. attenboroughii poses no threat of turning humans into zombies like in the popular video game-turned-HBO series ' The Last of Us,' where a fungus infects people, takes control of their minds, and sparks a global apocalypse. João Araújo, a mycologist at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, said: 'Infecting humans would require many, many millions of years of genetic modifications.' The fungus was first brought to light during filming in 2021 of the BBC's nature documentary Winterwatch in Northern Ireland, where an infected spider was spotted on the ceiling of an abandoned gunpowder store. Dr Harry Evans, Emeritus Fellow at CAB International, an international nonprofit focused on agriculture and the environment, set out to determine its origins, determining that the spider host was the orb-weaving cave spider, Metellina merianae. Evans and his team discovered the fungus lurking in cave systems in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, as well as on a related spider, Meta menardi, occupying different ecological niches within the caves. Normally reclusive, the spiders abandoned their lairs and webs to die in the open, mimicking the behavior seen in ants infected by fungi in Brazil's Atlantic rainforest. Based on both its physical traits and genetic analysis, the fungus was confirmed as a new species and named G. attenboroughii in honor of broadcaster and natural historian David Attenborough, who laid the groundwork for the modern nature series during which this species was first discovered. Evans told Live Science the fungus penetrates the spider's body and invades its hemocoel, the cavity that carries the invertebrate's bloodlike fluid. Once the host is lured from its lair, G. attenboroughii releases a toxin to kill it, then produces antibiotics to preserve the body as it mummifies. The fungus drains the spider of nutrients and, under the right conditions, such as high cave humidity, sprouts long stalks from the corpse to release spores and spread the infection. The study, published this year, revealed a hidden diversity of parasitic fungi in the British Isles, suggesting many more species remain undiscovered. Fungi are one of the five kingdoms of life, alongside plants, animals, protoctista and monera. 'There's a lot more fungi to find,' Evans said. 'The fungal kingdom could be up to 10, 20 million species, making it the biggest kingdom by far, but only one percent have been described.' Earlier this year, landscaper Gareth Jenkins was lifting a deck in a London garden when he spotted what appeared to be a large ball of cotton wool hanging underneath. On closer inspection, he discovered something far more chilling: it was crawling with legs. Jenkins told the Wall Street Journal that the spiders were clumped in groups, appearing as if they were frozen in ice. 'Their legs were curled up in a horrible crow position as if they were going to jump on my face,' he said. Thousands of miles away in Anapa, Russia, Simon Butenko reported seeing zombie spiders in his parents' wine cellar, first thinking they were moldy berries. 'What was especially creepy was that these spiders were hanging at head height,' he said. Ben Mitchell, an amateur naturalist and photographer, told the WSJ that his first zombie spider encounter was in the Scottish woodland in July 2024. 'I saw this amazing candyfloss thing stuck to the underside of a leaf,' he said. 'It had a membrane of threads around it holding it in place, and all I could see of the spider was its toes sticking out.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Now that I know, what do I do?' The terrible question of how and when to tell a small child about abuse
In the winter of 2010, less than two weeks before Christmas, dozens of parents in Amsterdam received terrible news. Police in the US had tipped off Dutch authorities that a young male childcare worker had sexually abused tens of young, preverbal children in his care, mostly boys under the age of two. The man confessed to numerous instances of abuse. The courts went on to convict him. And the parents of the children abused had to decide what to do next. As they grappled with the abuse of their child, the parents faced a difficult dilemma: If their child showed no signs of being traumatised by or even remembering the abuse, should they tell them? And how? It was a decision that researchers in the Netherlands tracked in a unique long-term study, posing questions now likely being asked by potentially thousands of parents in Australia, after allegations of serial abuse in childcare settings. 'That's the big question. 'Now that I know, what do I do?'' says Hetty Johnson, the founder of Bravehearts, an Australian child protection organisation. 'How do you rescue the child?' The burden of that decision is huge, says Johnson, 'Parents are not equipped [to handle that]… If the child is non-verbal it's even more difficult because then you're left in a situation where you're thinking 'Well, am I going to give them too much information or not enough? How do I deliver that information? What are the words I use? 'Do I even need to tell them or will they just forget about it?'' Few people can remember anything before the age of three or four, by which stage most children gain language fluency. The period until that point is regularly called 'infantile amnesia'. Additionally, there has historically been a belief that very young children feel pain less or feel it differently. Until the early 1980s it was routine for surgeries to be performed on babies without anaesthetic. This pair of assumptions led to what researchers now identify as a misconception that children may not be traumatised by events early in their lives. 'It is difficult to scientifically demonstrate whether children remember abuse that happens in pre-verbal years but we do know children develop some forms of early implicit memories from birth or even before,' says Divna Haslam, a child psychologist and associate professor at the University of Queensland. 'These memories are less about specific events and more about feelings and experiences and often fade with time. Episodic memory [the ability to remember specific events] typically develops around age four. This means while early abuse can impact children they may not vividly remember specific occurrences of very early abuse particularly over time.' Research into the impacts of early child abuse is limited. There has been an assumption that serious child sexual abuse does not happen often to children under the age of three, says Delanie Woodlock, deputy director of Childlight East Asia and Pacific at UNSW. 'It's kind of a neglected area because these children can't tell us about what's happened,' she says. Research has found that online child sexual assault material featuring infants and toddlers is 'not uncommon'. 'So contrary to what we have believed, and what we have dismissed in survivors, we now see so much evidence that this is occurring and has occurred for a long time,' says Woodcock. In the 15 years since the revelation of the abuse in Amsterdam, psychologists and researchers have been following a few dozen of the confirmed and strongly suspected victims and their families. It is a unique study in the under-researched field. Parents in the study reported their children had not been subject to any other maltreatment outside the sexual abuse case. Three years after the abuse was revealed, researchers found that 39% of the child survivors were asymptomatic. However, 30% showed sexual behaviour problems – defined as 'overstepping normative behaviour, indicating a possible link to the [child sexual abuse]' – and eight years into the study researchers reported rates of such behaviour were still 'high'. At three years into the study a quarter had attachment insecurity (although it was not possible to compare this rate to a control group). At the eight year mark, researchers reported 'low percentages of PTSD and dissociation in children at each time point' over the study, and that symptoms of 'disassociation' appeared to reduce over time. As for the parents, one in four demonstrated clinical PTSD symptoms at some point over eight years. Parents surveyed at the three year point reported feelings of guilt, shame and anger. One of the core things the researchers tracked was when, how and why parents did or did not tell their children about their abuse history. The decision to tell or not to tell was a significant source of worry for many parents, a 2024 paper by the researchers reported. Parents were cautious about the possible harm of keeping the abuse a secret and felt their child had a right to know, but were also worried about the impact that knowledge could have on their child. One told researchers: 'Why should I do this to her? To ruin her life?… It is my worry, my problem', citing a concern that the information would 'damage my own daughter again'. Over 10 years, 41 parents took part in interviews. At the 10-year mark more than two-thirds had chosen to tell their child. The researchers found that most parents said the child had no memory of the event. After they were told, many children were quiet or had questions. One child experienced PTSD after the disclosure, another asked why he had been told as he did not want to know. 'None of the parents regretted disclosing,' the study found. 'There is no strong evidence that disclosure is harmful,' the researchers concluded. However, they also found no evidence that children found out later and were angry at their parents for withholding the information, 'suggesting that not disclosing is not necessarily harmful either. However, most parents seem to experience ongoing moral dilemmas with non-disclosure while disclosing provided relief for most parents.' Haslam is keen to stress that while for some children, particularly those for whom it was repeated or severe, sexual abuse in early childhood may prompt difficulties later in life, 'this is not the case for all children'. Woodlock says families need to understand where certain behaviours in children might be coming from. But moving forward requires a balanced outlook. 'It is a significant and sometimes catastrophic event in a child's life,' she says. 'But you can heal, you can recover.' Bravehearts' Johnson says it is a mistake not to tell children of abuse in their history, not least because the child may have some form of memory retained or the trauma may manifest in different behaviour, feelings, aversions or fears. A child has the right to know what is in their past, she says, and withholding this kind of information can lead to conflict in the relationship if it is found out later. She says some parents hesitate to tell their child of past abuse for fear being labelled a 'victim' will draw sex offenders towards that child in future. 'The fact that the child has been a victim of crime is not the thing that gravitates sex offenders to that child,' she says. 'It's the disempowerment of a child. So when a child is sexually assaulted at whatever age, that takes some of their power away, their agency, their right to say no.' In her experience, telling a child can recover some of that power and reinforce that their parents intervened to protect the child as soon as the abuse was discovered. 'Silence, secrecy, shame is not the solution to anything. That is the sex offender's very best friend and our children's very worst enemy.' Disclosing abuse for parents in the Amsterdam study was a gradual process, rather than a singular event. 'Full disclosure will likely occur over a period of time with more information being provided as the child develops the emotional maturity to understand and discuss the topic, or even ask their own questions,' Haslam says. It is important, she says, to reinforce that the child is not at fault and follow the child's lead. It may be that a conversation is very short, but it is key to keep the door open for further discussion. Importantly, Haslam says, parents should have processed their own emotions – potentially with psychological support – in advance, in order to be a calm and reassuring guide to their child. 'It may also be appropriate to wait if the motivation to disclose is driven more by the parents' needs than the child's best interests,' she says. 'Don't make it a big deal,' says Johnson. 'If it's a big deal for you, don't say it because the idea is to take away that fear and all that anxiety' and to replace it with reassurance and security. For Woodlock, recovery is something that happens in families and also something that needs to play out on a larger scale. 'This happens on all of our watch,' she says. 'It's not inevitable, particularly in institutional care. This is 100% preventable. 'I think that [preventing it happening again is] something we owe them, and we should be working towards that as a community. So it's not just left up to parents.' In Australia, children, young adults, parents and teachers can contact the Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800; adult survivors can seek help at Blue Knot Foundation on 1300 657 380. In the UK, the NSPCC offers support to children on 0800 1111, and adults concerned about a child on 0808 800 5000. The National Association for People Abused in Childhood (Napac) offers support for adult survivors on 0808 801 0331. In the US, call or text the Childhelp abuse hotline on 800-422-4453. Other sources of help can be found at Child Helpline International
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Horrifying 6,000-year-old ‘victory graves' where warriors tortured & mutilated enemies during war celebrations
A GRUESOME pit has been uncovered full of Stone Age human skeletons who met their end in brutal agony inflicted by their enemies. Dozens of invaders were mercilessly tortured and mutilated after being captured in northeastern France more than 6,000 years ago. 2 2 The group came to their doom at a time when warfare was widespread across the region. But rather than kill their foes and be done with it, warriors held grim "victory" celebrations. Some of the bodies had their left arms severed or hands completely dismembered, researchers say. "The severed upper limbs would represent war trophies removed at the battle site following the violent encounter and then taken back to the settlement for perhaps further transformation and display," experts wrote in the Science Advances journal. Others were believed to have been tortured before being murdered. They had their lower limbs fractured to stop them from getting away after scientists found "blunt force traumas", Dr Teresa Fernandez-Crespo, who worked on the findings told Live Science. There are signs of piercing holes through their bones too which could mean that the victims were put out on display as a warning for all to see. A total of 82 human skeletons were unearthed in the pits, dating back to between 4300 and 4150 B.C. The tortured invaders may have come from around Paris, food evidence found on their teeth suggest. However, there were chemical signatures from their remains that indicate the group may have moved around quite a bit too. Bones of mysterious HOBBITS that roamed paradise island 700,000 years ago are found…& they're smaller than first thought Some of the remains did not have signs they were mutilated, which could point toward warriors who didn't survive when defending the area. However, it all remains a theory for now. Scientists say the skeletons could also be the result of "collective punishments or sacrifices of social outcasts".
