logo
Women in workforce drive shift in investor spending: From staples to discretionary goods

Women in workforce drive shift in investor spending: From staples to discretionary goods

Mint11-08-2025
Not too long ago, pureplay FMCG staples had all that investors loved. But the spotlight is shifting – thanks in no small part to more women joining the workforce.
Consumer discretionary companies are quickly becoming the new favourites. The alpha, it seems, may now lie beyond toothpastes, soaps and shampoos in the fast lane of aspirational spending, according to experts.
Mint took a closer look at the five-year CAGR returns of traditional FMCG giants and stacked them up against the newer consumer discretionary pack, a space that now spans everything from quick commerce, paints and automobiles to apparel, travel and leisure.
The analysis showed that the five-year CAGR returns of good old FMCG names Britannia Industries, Colgate-Palmolive, Nestle India, Hindustan Unilever, Gillette India, Dabur India, Marico and Emami ranged from 7% to 17%. Decent – but a far cry from the solid returns by consumer discretionary companies including Dixon Technologies (113%), Carysil (52%), Tata Consumer Products (32%) and Chalet Hotels (23%).
Navin Matta, equity fund manager at Mahindra Manulife, points to a few key reasons for the divergent performance. First, discretionary demand rebounded strongly after the covid years (2020-2021), driven by pent-up demand and the 'YOLO' effect, boosting spending on categories such as apparel, jewellery and travel.
In contrast, listed FMCG players faced several challenges – from high inflation hurting profitability to market share shifts toward D2C and regional brands, leading to muted volume growth for listed companies, he explained.
Biscuit maker Britannia highlighted in a recent investor presentation that its overall market share remained little changed in Q1 of FY26 as regional companies gained traction in select markets and categories.
The K-shaped recovery post-Covid resulted in higher-income groups benefiting more from the economic rebound, boosting their spending power. Health-related challenges during the pandemic also influenced consumer behaviour, leading to increased spending on travel, apparel, and jewellery – habits that have largely stuck.
Low base
Additionally, discretionary companies came off a very low base in terms of business activity and valuations five years ago, which amplified their returns, Matta added.
Eternal, Dixon, Trent, Chalet Hotels, Dollar Industries, Delta Corp, Swiggy and Yatra Online are among the companies included in the BSE Consumer Discretionary Index, which accounts for about 9% of the exchange's total turnover.
According to Deepak Shenoy, CEO of Capital Mind Mutual Fund, most staples companies were expensive five years ago and discretionary ones not quite so.
'The exact mix of discretionary versus staples will change and many staples companies will move into the discretionary universe," he said.
He noted that in terms of financial performance, many discretionary consumption companies have done very well, while the consumer staples segment has not seen much profit growth.
Dabur India's sales of personal care products grew at about 7.6% compounded annually over the past five years, with net profit rising about 4%. Emami's sales of skin and healthcare products grew a modest 7.5% CAGR, although profit jumped about 22%. Turnover at Marico, the maker of Parachute oils, grew 8% but profit rose just 10%.
Now compare that with Dixon Technologies, an electronics manufacturing services company – revenue surged 54.6% annually and net profit soared 59% CAGR over the same period. PepsiCo bottler Varun Beverages clocked an 18.6% CAGR in sales over the past five years, with net profit up 40.8%.
Trent, which operates Westside and Zudio fashion stores, has been in a league of its own: sales have surged 37.5% and net profit has leapt 66%, Mint's analysis showed.
From 2012 to 2019, traditional staples such as soaps and shampoos enjoyed a phase of rapid growth. But since then, pureplay FMCG companies have struggled with growth and revenue visibility, observed Manish Jain, head of fund management at Centrum.
'In contrast," Jain said, 'the quick commerce space offers far more visibility when it comes to growth, which is why investors are leaning more towards consumer discretionary plays."
This shift is driven by a clear evolution in consumer and investor behaviour – from focusing on basic needs to embracing aspiration and convenience-led consumption, Jain said.
The hunt for alpha
Sonam Udasi, senior fund manager at Tata AMC, said consumer discretionary is where the real action is: with volume growth outpacing that of traditional staples.
Zomato and Blinkit parent company Eternal's B2C businesses delivered a solid performance, with net order value rising 55% year-on-year in Q1 of FY26. Swiggy's food delivery gross order value grew almost 19% YoY, while quick commerce more than doubled.
In contrast, growth in staples was far more muted: Britannia posted 2% volume growth, Marico rose 9%, Emami's volumes fell 3% and Dabur recorded a 1% drop.
One big factor driving this shift is the rising number of women entering the workforce, Udasi said.
'With both partners working, there is less time for daily chores and convenience becomes a priority, and that's driving up demand for categories like ready-to-eat meals, packaged foods and lifestyle related choices," Udasi explained.
Jain of Centrum said categories like quick commerce could grow 10x, apparel by 5-7x, and even big-ticket items like TVs and ACs are set to outpace staples and 'that is where the opportunity lies."
With India's per capita income expected to rise from $2,500 to over $4,000 in 5-7 years, Jain said lifestyle upgrades will make discretionary consumption a key theme for the next decade.
That said, the wider perception is that recent fiscal and monetary moves by the government and the Reserve Bank of India will leave more discretionary income in the hands of low- to mid-income consumers.
Matta of Mahindra Manulife expects a pick-up in demand for these low-end consumption segments including two-wheelers, footwear, value fashion apparel, and quick service restaurants.
'We expect some alpha generation opportunities from these spaces," Matta said.
How do valuations stack up?
Nestle, HUL and Britannia currently trade at price-to-earnings multiples of 71.2, 55.2 and 59.1 times, respectively. Marico is at 54.7 times and Godrej Consumer Products at 63.4%.
In contrast, Dollar Industries, a maker of hosiery products, trades at a far lower multiple of 23.52 times. Sula Vineyards is currently at 38.6 times price-to-earnings multiple, casino gaming company Delta Corp at about 15 times, and kitchen sink maker Carysil 34.9 times. Yatra Online is at a multiple of 41.1 times and Trident at 32.3 times.
Udasi of Tata AMC said traditional FMCG companies have to adapt and innovate. The only way for them to keep up and justify their still-rich valuations is to revamp their portfolios and tap into newer, fast-growing categories including convenience foods.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Personal guarantors' assets under threat under proposed IBC changes
Personal guarantors' assets under threat under proposed IBC changes

Mint

time6 minutes ago

  • Mint

Personal guarantors' assets under threat under proposed IBC changes

Individuals who step in as personal guarantors for loans to companies are set to lose a crucial protection. Until now, when a company went bankrupt, guarantors enjoyed a 'moratorium" that stopped banks and creditors from touching their assets until the case was finally decided. That breathing space is gone with the proposed changes in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025, tabled in Parliament last week, makes it clear that existing moratorium protections under Sections 96 and 124 will no longer apply to personal guarantors. According to lawyers that Mint spoke to, banks can now immediately attach houses, freeze bank accounts, sell pledged shares, or even push guarantors into bankruptcy—all while the company's insolvency case is still ongoing. 'This change means guarantors stand exposed from day one, with their personal assets and income streams vulnerable to direct recovery," said Raheel Patel, partner, Gandhi Law Associates. Read more: Cross-border insolvency shake-up: Govt to draft rules, special NCLT bench likely Personal guarantors were first brought under the IBC purview in December 2019, when the government activated provisions on individual insolvency. This allowed lenders to pursue not just defaulting companies but also promoters and directors who had given personal guarantees, making such assurances legally enforceable and carrying real consequences. The framework was strengthened in 2023, when the Supreme Court upheld key provisions of the IBC—including the appointment of resolution professionals—and rejected around 350 petitions filed by guarantors challenging the constitutionality of IBC provisions related to them. Since their inclusion in 2019, lenders have sought to recover over ₹2 trillion from personal guarantors. However, recoveries have been slow. In the past six financial years, about 4,203 cases against personal guarantors involving claims worth ₹2.78 trillion were filed. Of these, resolution professionals were appointed in 1,832 cases, while 664 were admitted. Just 39 cases resulted in approved repayment plans, yielding creditors only ₹129 crore—or 2.49% of admitted claims. Since 2019, some of India's biggest insolvency proceedings have pulled in personal guarantors. High-profile names include Reliance ADA Group's Anil Ambani, Videocon's Venugopal Dhoot, Bhushan Power & Steel's former promoter Sanjay Singhal, and Zee Group's Subhash Chandra. The country's largest insolvencies have leaned on guarantees. In the Essar Steel case, promoter guarantees were invoked to cover part of the shortfall after a ₹42,000 crore resolution against claims of ₹54,000 crore. Similarly, in the Videocon case, creditors pursued Venugopal Dhoot and other guarantors after absorbing a haircut of nearly ₹31,000 crore. Why the moratorium was removed Experts say the reform was necessary because guarantors—often company promoters—were misusing the moratorium to stall recovery of secured creditors. 'The removal of moratorium protections for personal guarantors shall improve the positioning of the secured creditors, in as much as the moratorium over the period of time was being attempted to be misused by unsecured creditors as well as debtors to march over the rights of secured creditors," said Varsha Banerjee, partner, Dhir & Dhir Associates. According to Banerjee, creditors will be entitled to realize their secured interest promptly without being thwarted by other unsecured creditors as well as the guarantors. Read more: IBC amendments plug a major gap in the insolvency process With the new changes, creditors can move swiftly: seize and auction properties, freeze bank accounts, invoke pledged shares or deposits, and continue civil recovery suits. Under the SARFAESI Act, they can even take possession of secured assets without court intervention. If a personal guarantor submits a repayment plan, the resolution professional (RP) is required to summon a meeting of creditors to consider the plan. In other cases, the RP has discretion over whether to convene such a meeting. Along with that, if no repayment plan is submitted within 21 days, creditors can escalate by filing for personal bankruptcy—causing guarantors to lose control of their estates and face reputational damage. Still, guarantors are not entirely without defenses. They can propose structured repayment plans, dispute inflated claims, and rely on the rule that liability is capped at the guaranteed amount—meaning banks cannot recover twice from both debtor and guarantor, said Madhav Kanoria, Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. But lawyers warn the proposed changes in the IBC provisions could make individuals think twice before signing guarantees. "The individuals (especially promoters, directors, and family members) may not be readily willing to offer personal guarantees, given the loss of protection. Further, companies may struggle to secure personal guarantees unless they incentivize guarantors with compensation or reduced liability structures, and the lenders may demand stronger asset-backed security instead of personal guarantees," Kanoria of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas added. Read more: IBC reforms will benefit distressed real estate projects, experts say

Fortis Healthcare still heals portfolios, but valuations are running hot.
Fortis Healthcare still heals portfolios, but valuations are running hot.

Economic Times

time2 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Fortis Healthcare still heals portfolios, but valuations are running hot.

Covid took away millions of lives, but it also brought to light one segment that may be worth investing in — hospitals. With no major chain other than Apollo Hospitals a decade ago, analysts paid little attention to the segment. Even after the pandemic changed that, Fortis Healthcare Ltd. was a laggard, thanks to charges of malpractices of its ousted promoters. That hangover seems to be receding. Fortis Healthcare stock is up 80% in the past

MEA rejects Nepal's claims over Lipulekh after India, China restart trade through border points
MEA rejects Nepal's claims over Lipulekh after India, China restart trade through border points

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

MEA rejects Nepal's claims over Lipulekh after India, China restart trade through border points

India on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) rejected Nepal's objection to resumption of India-China border trade through the Lipulekh Pass in Uttarakhand, stating that Kathmandu's arguments are not based on 'historical facts'. 'Our position in this regard has been consistent and clear. Border trade between India and China through Lipulekh Pass had commenced in 1954 and has been going on for decades. This trade had been disrupted in recent years due to COVID and other developments, and both sides have now agreed to resume it,' said Randhir Jaiswal, Official Spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs. 'As regards territorial claims, our position remains that such claims are neither justified nor based on historical facts and evidence. Any unilateral artificial enlargement of territorial claims is untenable,' he said. 'India remains open to constructive interaction with Nepal on resolving agreed outstanding boundary issues through dialogue and diplomacy,' Mr. Jaiswal added. Nepal's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday objected to the resumption of border trade between India and China that was announced during the India visit of Wang Yi, China's Foreign Minister on Tuesday (August 19, 2025). The development acquires diplomatic significance as Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri earlier this week (August 17-18, 2025) visited Nepal and invited Prime Minister K. P. Sharma Oli to visit India in September . 'The Nepalese government is clear that the official map of Nepal has been included in the constitution of Nepal and that the map shows Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani east of the Mahakali River as integral parts of Nepal,' said the press statement from MoFA of Nepal after India in a bid to improve ties with China announced that border trade with China would resume through Lipulekh Pass in Uttarakhand, Shipki La Pass in Himachal Pradesh, and Nathu La Pass in Sikkim.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store