School bus enlisted temporarily to help move Sydney cruise ship passengers
Nicole MacAulay, manager of cruise for the Port of Sydney Development Corporation, said the port used to provide a free shuttle service for passengers arriving at the second berth to get them to the main terminal where they can access shops and bus tours to attractions around Cape Breton.
But that became impossible this spring after the port's bus unexpectedly suffered a serious mechanical problem.
"We had reached out to the school board to cover off our dates for July and August," MacAulay said. "They're going through that process to help us out as we work for a longer-term plan for September and October."
The Joan Harriss Cruise Pavilion terminal is several hundred metres away from the second berth.
The Cape Breton-Victoria Regional Centre for Education has applied to the Nova Scotia Regulatory and Appeals Board for permission to temporarily operate a bus between the sites.
MacAulay said she hopes that will be approved soon. The next time more than one cruise ship will be in Sydney harbour is Aug. 4.
She said buying a new bus is expensive, and last week, when two cruise ships were in, the port had to hire a taxi company's vehicle and van for two days.
That meant shuttling passengers took longer than it normally would, but the weather was good, so many passengers opted to walk.
That's not always an option for those who have mobility issues, MacAulay said.
'Reviewing all options'
She said commercial bus operators on the island are all busy and it's not clear what will happen in the fall when schools reopen.
"At this point, we're reviewing all options and doing our homework and talking to some partners to see what makes the most sense for transportation between the two piers," MacAulay said.
In an email, a spokesperson for the centre for education said if it receives approval, the port would be paying for the bus and driver, so the centre would not bear the cost or make a profit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
40 minutes ago
- CBC
Bad cell service, with dropped calls and garble, continues to frustrate many P.E.I. residents
Social Sharing "Absolutely terrible" is how Darlene Jurkowski describes cell service in her community of Chelton, just west of Borden-Carleton on the southern shore of Prince Edward Island. "You cannot call a person without getting cut off, you sound like a robot half the time, you can't understand what they're saying," Jurkowski told CBC News. Like many P.E.I. residents and tourists, she is living with dropped calls, unsent texts, or just no service at all. Jurkowski helps run a family construction and excavation concern, so she needs a reliable way of making business calls. "We're paying high prices for cell phone services that we can't use," she said, estimating her Bell contract costs her about $400 a month. Gary Smith owns a cottage nearby and has a rust-proofing shop. He had hoped to spend time at his cottage while still booking appointments and dealing with customers, but the poor cell service is getting in the way. "It's just impossible up here," he said. "I can hear them, they can't hear me, or vice versa." 'If there's ever an emergency...' People in the community say it's a safety issue too. They worry about elderly relatives being unable to reach them, and wonder what will happen if they ever need to call 911 for help. "We have kids. We have elderly people who live near us. Are we going to be able to make that call?" said Chelton resident Sam McKendrick. McKendrick has young children and also works from home some days. She worries about not being able to do her job properly, and not being able to get calls from her daycare. "If there's ever an emergency, can they get a hold of me while I'm here?" she said. Just west of Charlottetown, the Town of Cornwall has problem spots too. "We need to be able to communicate in times of emergency," said Coun. Cory Stevenson, who said bad cellphone service has been a dominant issue among constituents. The town is working on changing its bylaws to make it easier for companies to construct cellphone towers, but they don't have a new one yet. Stevenson said the approval process falls under federal jurisdiction but the town wants to reduce "red tape" on the municipal side. Minister says she 'can relate' Belfast-Murray River MLA Darlene Compton is the provincial minister of economic development, innovation and trade, the department dealing with P.E.I.'s cellphone service issues. Compton lives in one of the areas of eastern P.E.I. that also has bad service. "I understand and can relate to the frustration of all Islanders," she said. "We're very well aware and concerned." We need to have the buy-in from the companies. My understanding is that there really isn't a business model there for them to improve service... — Darlene Compton Compton said the province set aside $2.5 million late last year to help build more towers, and officials are talking to service providers. Initially there wasn't much interest from them, she said, but she hopes that will change. "We need to have the buy-in from the companies. My understanding is that there really isn't a business model there for them to improve service, so we as a province — and through the federal government — are going to have to find a way forward," said Compton. A study has been done to identify the worst areas for reception, and the provincial government plans to meet with cellphone service providers again in the fall. Compton said details of who exactly would use any new infrastructure and how it would be paid for still have to be worked out. In the meantime, she encourages people with bad service to complain to their cellphone companies and the CRTC, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. In the end, she said the federal government might have to step in because lacking cell service is a safety issue. Cell companies respond CBC News reached out to a number of cellphone companies about the problems people are reporting. In a statement, Eastlink wrote: "We have no reports of broad mobile service issues across the Island and remain committed to continuous improvements."
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Billionaires Buy a Brilliant Growth Stock That Has Partnered With Amazon
Key Points Most Wall Street analysts view Roku as undervalued; the median target price of $105 per share implies 28% upside from its current share price of $82. Roku is the leading streaming platform in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, and The Roku Channel is the fifth-most popular streaming service in the U.S. Roku recently formed an exclusive partnership with Amazon, giving media buyers that use Amazon's ad buying platform more precise targeting capabilities. 10 stocks we like better than Roku › A handful of billionaire hedge fund managers purchased shares of Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) in the first quarter. Here's a look: Cliff Asness at AQR Capital Management added 467,005 shares of Roku, increasing his stake sixfold though it remains a small position. Stanley Druckenmiller at Duquesne Family Office bought 493,600 shares of Roku, starting a modest position that ranks among his 30 largest holdings. Chris Rokos at Rokos Capital Management bought 54,690 shares of Roku, starting a new and relatively small position. Steven Schonfeld at Schonfeld Strategic Advisors bought 68,886 shares of Roku, starting a new and relatively small position. Wall Street analysts generally agree Roku is undervalued. The median target price is $105 per share, which implies 28% upside from its current share price of $82. Here's what investors should know. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Roku is the most popular streaming platform in North America Roku is the leading streaming platform in North America as measured by hours streamed, and Roku OS is the best-selling TV operating system in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In addition, The Roku Channel is the fifth most popular streaming service in the U.S., behind only Alphabet 's YouTube, Netflix, Walt Disney, and Amazon Prime Video. Put simply, Roku is ideally positioned to benefit as advertisers spend more on connected TV (CTV). Some readers may be surprised to learn traditional TV advertising is still a larger market than CTV advertising, and it's expected to be the larger market until 2028. But CTV ad spending is forecast to grow at 12% annually through 2029, according to eMarketer. Jeremy Deal, portfolio manager at JDP Capital Management, writes, "The Roku operating system and The Roku Channel are valuable assets that are highly under-monetized today." Deal says The Roku Channel alone is probably worth more than the entire company's current market value, implying Roku is materially undervalued today. Roku's recent partnership with Amazon could be a meaningful growth driver Roku in June announced an exclusive partnership with Amazon. While Amazon's demand-side platform (DSP) is not the only media buying platform with access to Roku inventory, it is the only one that can use a custom identity solution to recognize logged-in viewers across the Roku platform in the United States. A press release from Roku explains, "This exclusive capability enables advertisers to reach the same viewer deterministically across different streaming channels and devices." The upshot for investors is brands on Amazon DSP can now target and measure ad campaigns with greater accuracy. In other words, Roku is now a more compelling place for marketers using Amazon DSP to spend their advertising dollars. Roku highlighted the benefits following an early test of the integration, "Advertisers using this new solution reached 40% more unique viewers with the same budget and reduced how often the same person saw an ad by nearly 30%, enabling advertisers to benefit from three times more value from their ad spend." Roku stock trades at a reasonable valuation Roku currently trades at 2.7 times sales, a discount to the two-year average of 2.8 times sales. That valuation looks quite reasonable for a company whose revenue is forecast to increase at 12% annually through 2027, especially when that consensus estimate leaves room for upside. As mentioned, CTV ad spending is forecast to grow at 12% annually through 2029, and Roku is well positioned to benefit given its status as the most popular streaming platform in North America. To that end, its revenue could certainly grow faster than 12% annually with help from its Amazon partnership. Long-term investors should feel comfortable buying a small position in this growth stock today. Should you invest $1,000 in Roku right now? Before you buy stock in Roku, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Roku wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
What industry consolidation can teach advisors about their own succession planning and firm value
Succession planning has long been the Achilles' heel of the wealth management industry. Some studies suggest that 80 to 90 per cent of advisors have no formal succession plan – a startling gap for a profession built on planning for others. At the same time, the industry is experiencing an unprecedented wave of consolidation. The result? A perfect storm of capital, urgency and opportunity. Two recent transactions capture this moment: Bank of Montreal's acquisition of Burgundy Asset Management Ltd. and Sagard Private Equity Canada's take-private of Lorne Park Capital Partners Inc. (also known as Bellwether Investment Management). These are more than headline-grabbing deals. They reflect a profound shift in how value is being defined and who's best positioned to capture it. A feeding frenzy is underway in the Canadian wealth management space. Banks, independent dealers, private equity firms and consolidators are seeking exposure to high-margin, recurring, fee-based revenue. The demographics are on their side: more than half of Canadian financial advisors are over the age of 50, with succession planning looming large. But while capital is abundant, high-quality platforms are not. That's why deals like Burgundy and Lorne Park matter. They're not just M&A transactions – they're signals to the rest of the market about what gets rewarded. In Burgundy's case, the co-founders were remarkably candid. In an email to clients shortly after the sale announcement, Tony Arrell explained that their original intention had been to transition ownership internally. However, by the time they considered it seriously, the opportunity had passed: employees lacked the capital to fund a meaningful buyout, and the leadership was unwilling to dilute their long-held value-investing principles to attract outside financing. In the end, BMO offered what internal succession could not: a culturally aligned partner, liquidity through publicly traded stock, and a structure that preserved Burgundy's investment autonomy while ensuring long-term continuity for clients and staff. It's a story many founders know too well: they want to keep ownership 'in the family,' but the financial, operational and leadership handoff is rarely achievable without compromise. For firms that don't have Burgundy's scale or brand equity, it's even harder. Ask most advisors what their practice is worth and you'll hear a familiar refrain: two to three times trailing revenue. The widely accepted industry rule of thumb implies a 2- to 3-per-cent price relative to assets under management (AUM), assuming a 1 per cent average fee rate. But here's the catch. Burgundy, a firm with $27-billion in AUM, just traded at 2.3 per cent, while Lorne Park, with $3.9-billion in AUM, traded at 3.9 per cent of AUM. These are full-firm transactions with sophisticated infrastructure and recognizable brands. So, why would a large wealth management firm pay an advisor 3 per cent of AUM to buy their book when other firms are only trading at 2 to 3 per cent? The truth is, they might. But it won't be because of an advisor's revenue multiple – it will be because of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Buyers are focused on what your business earns, not just what it brings in. If your practice generates strong margins, recurring cash flow, and has low advisor/key-person risk, it might justify a premium. If it doesn't, even 2 per cent of AUM may be a stretch. Firms with strong EBITDA margins, scalable operations and sticky client relationships are trading at 10 to 15 times EBITDA even if the AUM multiple looks modest. But for those running a lifestyle practice, in which profits are drawn down annually and the business revolves around a single advisor, then even a two-times revenue multiple may be generous. If you're an advisor or firm principal considering the next chapter – be it succession, retirement or recapitalization – now is the time to understand how buyers are evaluating value. Multiples are a starting point, not a finish line. The Canadian wealth industry is entering its next phase. Buyers are sitting on the sidelines, ready to act. However, value creation and capture belong to those who look beyond the headline metrics and focus on building enduring, cash-generating businesses. The lesson from Burgundy is simple. Succession is not optional; it's a matter of timing. The difference is whether you drive the process or respond to it. Joe Millott is a partner at Fort Capital Partners, an independent investment bank that specializes in wealth and asset management mergers and acquisitions, with offices in Vancouver, Calgary and Toronto.
