Hanoi scooter riders baulk at petrol-powered bikes ban
"Of course everyone wants a better environment," said housewife Dang Thuy Hanh, expressing her frustration over the 80 million dong ($3,000) cost to replace her family's four scooters with electric alternatives. "But why give us the first burden without any proper preparation?" she lamented.
Hanoi's bustling scooter traffic is a hallmark of the city's urban life. With nearly seven million two-wheelers in a northern hub of nine million people, the rush hour creates a chaotic scene of congestion.
Pollution crisis
The exhaust emissions from these vehicles regularly propel Hanoi to the top of global smog rankings, contributing to an estimated 70,000 pollution-related deaths annually in Vietnam, according to the World Health Organization.
Last weekend, the government announced plans to prohibit fossil-fueled bikes from Hanoi's 31 square kilometers (12 square miles) by next July, with an aim to phase out all gas-fueled vehicles in urban areas over the next five years.
Infrastructure challenges
Hanh, one of the 600,000 residents in the central embargo zone, worries about the potential loss of "a huge amount of savings." While she acknowledges that e-bikes could alleviate pollution, she criticizes the lack of public charging points near her home. "Why force residents to change while the city's infrastructure is not yet able to adapt to the new situation?" she questioned.
Impact on daily life
In Vietnam, many families own at least two motorcycles for various daily tasks, from commuting to leisure activities. Transport reform proposals often spark allegations that the working class bears the brunt of such changes.
Similar situations have unfolded globally; for instance, London has charged a toll for older, higher-pollution vehicles, while France's "Yellow Vest" protests were partly ignited by perceptions that President Macron's "green tax" unfairly targeted the masses.
Potential solutions
Hanoi authorities are considering alleviating the financial strain by offering subsidies of at least three million dong ($114) per e-bike switch and increasing public bus services. Food delivery driver Tran Van Tan, who travels 40 kilometers (25 miles) daily to downtown Hanoi, laments the high cost of transitioning to an e-bike. "Those with a low income like us just cannot suddenly replace our bikes," said the 45-year-old.
Health and environmental concerns
Despite the challenges, deputy mayor Duong Duc Tuan emphasized the necessity for "drastic measures" to combat air pollution, which poses a significant threat to health and quality of life. A recent report indicated that over half of the toxic smog enveloping Hanoi is attributed to petrol and diesel vehicles, while the World Bank estimates this figure at 30 percent, with factories and waste incineration also contributing significantly.
Looking ahead
Several European cities, including Barcelona, Paris, and Amsterdam, have imposed restrictions on internal combustion engines, and other major Vietnamese cities are considering similar actions. Ho Chi Minh City, for instance, aims to gradually transition delivery and service motorbikes to electric in the coming years.
However, office worker Nguyen My Hoa doubts the enforceability of the ban in Hanoi. "Authorities will not be able to stop the huge amount of gasoline bikes from entering the inner districts," said the 42-year-old. "It simply does not work."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Slovenia becomes first EU country to impose arms embargo on Israel
Slovenia on Thursday imposed an arms embargo on Israel citing the European Union's failure to take action to stop Israel's assault on Gaza. "At the initiative of Prime Minister Robert Golob, the Slovenian government confirmed a decision prohibiting the export and transit of military weapons and equipment from or through the Republic of Slovenia to Israel, or the import from Israel to Slovenia," a government statement read. Golob announced the decision after a government meeting, saying that his country is the first EU nation to take such a step. Two weeks ago, Slovenia was also the first EU country to declare two Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, persona non grata, accusing them of making "genocidal statements" against Palestinians. In June 2024, Slovenia followed Norway, Spain and Ireland in recognising Palestine as an independent state and has been among the most vocal European nations in its criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza, with President Natasa Pirc Musar describing the onslaught as a genocide. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In their meeting in mid-July, the EU's 27 foreign ministers failed to agree on the suspension of the controversial EU-Israel Association Agreement, which covers both trade and political relations. They also failed to agree on nine other possible measures against Israel put forward after it was found to have breached the human rights provisions of the trade agreement. The measures that would have been agreed last month included full suspension of the agreement, suspension of its preferential trade provisions, an arms embargo, sanctions on Israeli ministers, or imposing a ban on trade with Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine. Slovenia's Golob has repeatedly stated that his government would act independently if the EU fails to take concrete measures against Israel by mid-July. 'People in Gaza are dying because humanitarian aid is systematically denied them. They are dying under the rubble, without access to drinking water, food and basic medical care," Golob said. "This is a complete denial of humanitarian access and a deliberate prevention of basic conditions for survival. In such circumstances, it is the duty of every responsible state to take action, even if it means taking a step ahead of others.' The government added that more measures will be announced in the coming weeks in response to "serious violations of international humanitarian law" by Israel. Other EU countries urge sanctions On Thursday, Sweden and the Netherlands called on the EU to suspend the trade agreement with Israel over the continued Gaza siege and ban on the UN's humanitarian aid operations. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said that the situation in Gaza had become "utterly deplorable" and that Israel was failing to uphold its obligations with regards to the delivery of aid. Exclusive: Spain and Ireland to join more than 30 states to declare 'concrete measures' against Israel Read More » "Sweden therefore demands that the EU, as soon as possible, freezes the trade component of the association agreement," he wrote on X. "Economic pressure on Israel must increase. The Israeli government must allow unrestricted humanitarian aid in Gaza." Two days earlier, a similar stance was taken by the Netherlands, as Dutch foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp advocated suspending the trade element of the Association Agreement if aid was not stepped up in Gaza. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has accused the EU of double standards for failing to apply sanctions to Israel. 'It makes absolutely no sense that we've passed 18 sanction packages on Russia for its aggression against Ukraine and Europe but, with double standards, haven't even been able to suspend the Association Agreement with Israel when they are flagrantly violating Article 2 in terms of human rights,' he said in June. Spain, Ireland and the Netherlands have led efforts calling for the EU to review the Association Agreement since February 2024. Israel's war on Gaza, now widely recognised as a genocide, has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children. Since the full siege imposed by Israel on 2 March, over 150 adults and children died of starvation and over 1,000 aid-seekers were killed while trying to reach the US-Israeli run aid distribution sites in southern Gaza.
Web Release
15 hours ago
- Web Release
Fashion Arena Prague Outlet Collaborates with VFS Global to Promote Czechia's Shopping Appeal in the Gulf & Middle East
Fashion Arena Prague Outlet, part of the VIA Outlets portfolio, is pleased to announce a new collaboration with VFS Global's Tourism Services Unit to jointly promote the outlet's appeal to travelers from the Gulf and Middle East region. This partnership is designed to enhance awareness of Fashion Arena Prague Outlet as a preferred European shopping destination among GCC travelers. Offering over 200 international and Czech fashion brands with year-round discounts of 30%–70%, the outlet is conveniently located just 20 minutes from Prague's city centre. It operates seven days a week and provides a seamless shopping experience across fashion, sportswear, accessories, cosmetics, and home décor. Through this collaboration, Fashion Arena Prague Outlet and VFS Global will work together on a coordinated promotional strategy that engages both travel trade professionals and consumers. The joint efforts will include outreach to travel agents and tour operators across key Gulf cities through roadshows, trade workshops, and shared marketing initiatives. Travel partners will be supported with tailored incentives, VIP group access, and co-branded promotional opportunities. Consumer-facing activities will focus on influencer-led campaigns, seasonal promotions, and curated shopping experiences that resonate with GCC travelers. These will be complemented by value-added services such as extra discounts, dining vouchers, and VAT refund assistance to enrich the overall visitor experience. This collaboration reflects a shared commitment to connecting GCC travelers with premium shopping experiences in Europe and to strengthening Czechia's positioning as a fashion and lifestyle destination. Quotes from the Partners- Petr Vejvoda K?ivonožka, Senior Tourism & Partnerships Manager, Fashion Arena Prague Outlet, shared: 'We look forward to working closely with VFS Global to welcome more guests from the Gulf and Middle East. Their regional expertise and strong industry relationships will be instrumental in showcasing the outlet's unique appeal.' GB Srithar, Head – Tourism Services, VFS Global stated: 'We are delighted to support Fashion Arena Prague Outlet in its outreach initiatives to travellers from the GCC region. This collaboration reflects our shared commitment to promoting premium shopping experiences in Czechia through meaningful engagement with the travel trade.'
Arabian Post
19 hours ago
- Arabian Post
After Trump's 25 Per Cent Tariff On Indian Exports, There Is No Cause For Panic
By Dr. Nilanjan Banik Before the August 1 deadline, the U.S. President Donald Trump decided to impose a 25% tariff on Indian exports. He also talked about an additional penalty on Indian exports, which could go up to100% as a surcharge, targeting countries that continue trading oil with Russia. Trump seems to care less about 'friend' India, as trade with India accounts for a much smaller share compared to U.S. trade with China. Because of U.S. interests, China is likely to get a better trade deal than India, for instance removal of restrictions of U.S. chip-design software exports to China. This is not the first time Trump has taken a hard line on India. During his earlier stint at the President not only did Trump label India as the 'tariff king', but he also removed the country from the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). Under the GSP, established by the Trade Act of 1974, US policymakers allowed imports of around 3,500 products from designated beneficiary countries—primarily low-income nations—at a preferential duty-free (zero-tariff) rate. The aim was to help these countries increase and diversify their trade with the US. According to the World Bank, a 'low-income' country is one with a per capita income of less than $1,045 per year in 2024. As U.S. remains India's largest export destination, it is only natural to feel the pressure with increasingly restrictive trade measures in place. Around 18% of India's total exports are directed to the US, with a value of $77 billion in 2023, and $78 billion in 2024. However, if previous restrictive trade measures, including the withdrawal of GSP, are any indication, then the impact has been relatively modest. A quick review of the items qualified under the GSP reveals that they primarily fall under categories such as textiles and apparel, watches, footwear, work gloves, automotive components, and leather apparel. Among these key export categories, some items within textiles and apparel and automotive components were included in the GSP list. Additionally, exports of organic chemicals, steel, and certain engineering goods—such as nuclear boilers, machinery, and mechanical appliances—were also impacted by the withdrawal of GSP benefits. However, the value of these items as a proportion of total Indian exports to the US is relatively small. India's exports to the US are mainly comprised of diamonds (19%), packaged medicaments (14%), refined petroleum products (8.9%), automotive components (2.1%), and textiles and apparel (3.7%). The percentages in parentheses represent the share of India's exports to the U.S. as a percentage of India's total exports. The recent signing of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is expected to help offset some of the negative effects of excessive tariffs in the long run. Indian policymakers had anticipated a tariff around 20%, but Trump ultimately imposed a 25% rate. Thanks to the India-UK Free Trade Agreement, India stands to benefit from zero tariffs on 99% of its exports, particularly in sectors like textiles, jewellery, pharmaceuticals, automotive parts, and information technology services – areas that commentators fear could be negatively impacted by higher U.S. tariffs. Indian exports to the U.S. are also likely to be less affected in relative terms, since Trump has unilaterally imposed tariffs on countries whose exports compete with India in the U.S. market. For example, Bangladesh (35%), Thailand (36%), Vietnam (20%), Indonesia (19%), Malaysia (25%), and the Philippines (19%) – some of India's competitors in leather, textiles, and machinery – are equally impacted, with the numbers in parentheses indicating their respective tariff levels. To better withstand external shocks — whether from protectionist tariffs or even war — India should focus on making its manufacturing sector/exports more competitive and focus on its domestic economy. The Indian economy benefits from a strong domestic sector, with domestic consumption, government spending, and private investment together accounting for nearly 80% of the country's GDP. However, the contribution of manufacturing value added to GDP remains stagnant at 17%, indicating no significant improvement in manufacturing competitiveness. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), a key driver of technology transfer and manufacturing competitiveness, is declining, with gross FDI flows dropping to just 1% and net FDI falling to 0.6% in the first half of the 2023-24 financial year—levels not seen since 2005-06. Rigidities in the business environment, the inverted duty structure (IDS), and India's decision to terminate bilateral treaties are to be blamed for discouraging flow of FDI. A study by CUTS International of 1,464 tariff lines across textiles, electronics, chemicals, and metals reveals how the IDS is hurting competitiveness, with 136 items from textiles, 179 from electronics, 64 from chemicals, and 191 from metals most affected. For example, apparel items priced below $14 (Rs 1,000) are subject to a GST of 5%, while those exceeding $14 are taxed at 12%. For textile manufacturers, there are also significant investments required in value-added services such as marketing, warehouse rentals, logistics, courier services, and other fulfilment costs. However, these additional services are subject to a higher GST rate of 18%, making the products less competitive in the international market. The India budget 2025 has addressed the issue of IDS; for example, the government has increased tariffs on Interactive Flat Panel Displays from 10% to 20%, while reducing tariffs on Open Cells and related components to 5%. This trend needs to continue, and policymakers must implement further reforms to enhance the competitiveness of the manufacturing sector. While tariff negotiations is an ongoing process, India could consider strengthening its position by increasing purchases of U.S. oil and defense equipment. During his last tenure, Trump positioned himself more as a major arms dealer, focusing on selling more weapons and oil. India has contracted for nearly $20 billion worth of US origin defense items since 2008. This trend is likely to continue in a potential Trump 2.0. India, for its part, should focus less on tariffs and more on addressing domestic distortions. (IPA Service) (The author is Professor, Mahindra University).
