
Israel looking to re-settle Gazans in South Sudan
The sources, who have knowledge of the matter but spoke on condition of anonymity, said no agreement had been reached but talks between South Sudan and Israel were ongoing.
The plan, if carried further, would envisage people moving from an enclave shattered by almost two years of war with Israel to a nation in the heart of Africa riven by years of political and ethnically-driven violence.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office and Israel's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the information from the three sources.
A spokesperson for the U.S. State Department said, "we do not speak to private diplomatic conversations," when asked about the plan and if the United States supported the idea.
Netanyahu said this month he intends to extend military control in Gaza, and this week repeated suggestions that Palestinians should leave the territory voluntarily.
Arab and world leaders have rejected the idea of moving Gaza's population to any country. Palestinians say that would be like another "Nakba" (catastrophe) when hundreds of thousands fled or were forced out during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948.
The three sources said the prospect of resettling Palestinians in South Sudan was raised during meetings between Israeli officials and South Sudanese Foreign Minister Monday Semaya Kumba when he visited the country last month.
Their account appeared to contradict South Sudan's foreign ministry which on Wednesday dismissed earlier reports on the plan as "baseless".
The ministry was not immediately available to respond to the sources' assertions on Friday.
News of the discussions was first reported by the Associated Press on Tuesday, citing six people with knowledge of the matter.
Wasel Abu Youssef, a member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, said the Palestinian leadership and people "reject any plan or idea to displace any of our people to South Sudan or to any other place".
His statement echoed a statement from the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday. Hamas, which is fighting Israel in Gaza, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, who visited the South Sudanese capital Juba this week, told reporters that those discussions had not focussed on relocation.
"This is not what the discussions were about," she said when asked if any such plan had been discussed.
"The discussions were about foreign policy, about multilateral organisations, about the humanitarian crisis, the real humanitarian crisis happening in South Sudan, and about the war," she said, referring to her talks with Juba officials.
Netanyahu, who met Kumba last month, has said Israel is in touch with a few countries to find a destination for Palestinians who want to leave Gaza. He has consistently declined to provide further details.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mass rally in Tel Aviv calls for end to Gaza war, hostage deal
Demonstrators block a Tel Aviv road during an anti-government protest demanding a deal to release Israelis detained by Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Photo: AFP / Gil Cohen-Magen Tens of thousands of demonstrators gathered in Tel Aviv to call for an end to the war in Gaza and the release of hostages , one of the largest demonstrations in Israel since the start of the fighting in October 2023. The rally on Sunday evening (local time) was the culmination of a day of nationwide protests and a general strike to pressure the government to halt the military campaign. "Bring them all home! Stop the war!" shouted the vast crowd which had converged on the so-called "Hostage Square" in Tel Aviv plaza - a focal point for protesters throughout the war. The Hostage and Missing Families Forum, the initiator of the day of protest, estimated that about 500,000 people joined the evening demonstration in Tel Aviv - a figure not confirmed by the police. "We demand a comprehensive and achievable agreement and an end to the war. We demand what is rightfully ours - our children," said Einav Zangauker, mother of hostage Matan and a leading figure of the protest movement. "The Israeli government has transformed a just war into a pointless war," she told the crowd. National media published a video message by Matan Zangauker on Sunday, in which the hostage, weak and emaciated, addressed his family and told them he missed them. The video was filmed by Hamas and found in Gaza by the army, the family said. "This is probably the last minute we have to save the hostages," demonstrator Ofir Penso, 50, told AFP. A member of the Israeli security forces scuffles with a protester holding a cutout of a hostage, during an anti-government protest in Tel Aviv on 17 August 2025 demanding a deal to release Israelis detained in the Gaza Strip by Hamas militants. Photo: AFP / Gil Cohen-Magen The protests come more than a week after Israel's security cabinet approved plans to capture Gaza City , 22 months into a war that has created a dire humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian territory. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum campaign group vowed Sunday that protesters would "shut down the country" with the goal of bringing back the hostages and ending the war. Throughout the country, demonstrators blocked traffic arteries, set tyres on fire and clashed with the police. More than 30 protesters were arrested, law enforcement said. In many places, though, AFP journalists saw businesses carrying on unimpeded. In Jerusalem's main shopping district, it was business as usual. A shop assistant in the city centre said the owner supported the campaign for the hostages' return but chose not to participate in the strike. "Everyone is helping the way they can," she said, declining to give her name. Netanyahu slammed the protesters, saying their actions "not only harden Hamas's position and draw out the release of our hostages, but also ensure that the horrors of October 7 will reoccur". Egypt said in recent days mediators were leading a renewed push to secure a 60-day truce deal that includes hostages being released, after the last round of talks in Qatar ended without a breakthrough. Some Israeli government members who oppose any deal with Hamas slammed Sunday's demonstrations. Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich decried "a perverse and harmful campaign that plays into the hands of Hamas" and calls for "surrender". However, Benny Gantz, an opposition leader, condemned the government for "attacking the families of the hostages" while "bearing responsibility for the captivity of their children by Hamas for nearly two years". Demonstrators raise flags during the protest in Tel Aviv, 17 August 2025. Photo: AFP / Gil Cohen-Magen The Israeli plan to expand the war into Gaza City and nearby refugee camps has sparked an international outcry as well as domestic opposition. On Sunday, Israeli military chief of staff Lieutenant General Eya Zamir said the army was moving ahead with a plan "focusing on Gaza City". Hamas warned it would result in "a new wave of extermination and mass displacement". Army Radio said residents would be evacuated before troops encircled and seized Gaza City in the coming weeks, with tens of thousands of reservists called up. UN-backed experts have warned of widespread famine unfolding in the territory, where Israel has heavily limited the amount of humanitarian aid it allows in. Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli fire on Sunday killed over sixty Palestinians, including at least 37 waiting to collect food aid near two sites. The conflict began with Palestinian militant group Hamas's 7 October, 2023 attack on Israel, during which 251 people were taken hostage. Forty-nine captives remain in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Hamas's assault resulted in the deaths of 1219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's offensive has killed more than 61,944 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to figures from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza which the United Nations considers reliable. - AFP


NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Israeli military plans Gaza City push, 40 killed in latest attacks
Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli attacks killed at least 40 people on Saturday, as the Israeli military hinted at an approaching call to push civilians from Gaza City before a new offensive. The latest toll comes more than a week after Israel's security cabinet approved plans to capture the


Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Mediawatch: Palestinian Statehood Push Vexes Media
Article – RNZ An media debate over New Zealand recognising Palestinian statehood was partly overshadowed by party political rows and claims it would only be a gesture. , Mediawatch Presenter 'New Zealand is fast becoming one of the last Western democracies to recognise Palestine as a state,' Corin Dann told Morning Report listeners on RNZ National last Tuesday. While there was a bit of cognitive dissonance in fast becoming one of the last, the roll call of those who have been more decisive was comprehensive. 'Australia, Canada, the UK, France, and 147 other countries have made similar declarations as the world responds to the ongoing destruction and famine in Gaza,' he added. Just a couple of weeks ago, news organisations were prevaricating over whether they could say 'famine' was happening in Gaza or not, but not so much now. The previous evening, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Winston Peters, put out a statement that said the government would 'carefully weigh up its position … over the next month'. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told reporters recognition was 'not a race'. But back on Morning Report on Tuesday, former prime minister Helen Clark told Dann she thought it really was urgent. 'I've seen victims of the war in the hospital in a nearby town. I've seen the trucks turned around carrying food and medicines which were unable to enter Gaza. This is a catastrophic situation. And here we are in New Zealand somehow arguing some fine point about whether we should be adding our voice,' she said, after a trip to the Rafah border crossing. But in the media here, party political tensions were overshadowing debate about New Zealand's official response. When Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick condemned what she saw as government's spinelessness in the House, it led the ZB news soon after – followed by points of order about MPs accessories from ACT leader David Seymour. And Swarbrick's eventual expulsion led TVNZ's 1News at Six soon after that. But on Newstalk ZB, the hosts overwhelmingly declared that declaring Palestinian statehood was just a gesture. 'Two groups determined to wipe each other off the face of the earth will never stop until one wins. Definitively recognising one as a state will not make a jot of difference,' Mike Hosking insisted on his breakfast show on Tuesday. Later on her ZB Drive show, Heather du Plessis-Allan reckoned it was just a distraction – one that had already distracted the media. 'For every minute and every column inch that we dedicate to talking about whether we should or should not support the state of Palestine in September, we are not spending … talking about getting aid into kids who need food,' she said. 'I'm sorry, but recognising Palestine right now while this war between Hamas and Israel is ongoing is rewarding Hamas for what they did on October 7th,' she added. Half an hour later, du Plessis-Allan's partner Barry Soper backed her up. 'Is that going to stop the war? Is Hamas going to finally put down the arms. They can see it as a badge of honour if they did do that.' Neither of them were convinced by Child Fund chief executive and politics pundit Josie Pagani. 'The only way that we're going to get any movement forward on this is to recognise a two state solution,' she said on the same show 24 hours earlier. 'The purpose of recognising Palestinian statehood is not to instantly magic up a happy ending to the misery in Gaza. It's to preserve the viability of a two-state solution,' The Herald's senior political correspondent Audrey Young wrote in response. Clark had also told Morning Report that she'd just been talking to Egypt's foreign minister about plans. 'There's elaborate plans which don't include Hamas. So I think it's all a bit of a red herring now to be talking about Hamas. There are credible plans for moving forward,' Clark said The same day University of Auckland international relations professor Maria Amoudian – on Jesse Mulligan's Afternoons show on RNZ National – said Palestinian statehood would not just be symbolic. 'It would mean they would get a seat at the United Nations. A better voice in UNESCO, diplomatic relations among countries which could evolve into economic support and trade. Also legal rights over territorial waters, airspace and sovereignty over their own territory,' she said. On RNZ's Midday Report the same day, Otago University professor Robert Patman said that our government's current position not only 'lacked moral clarity,' it was actually inconsistent with our own recent actions and statements. International law was being 'trashed on a daily basis by Israel,' Patman said. 'In Gaza, cameramen and journalists from Al Jazeera were assassinated by the Netanyahu government. It raises issues which go right to the heart of our identity as a country. I think most Kiwis are very clear. They want to see a world based on rules.' Meanwhile, political reporters here sensed that we were international laggards on this because partner parties in the Coalition were putting the handbrake on. In his online newsletter Politik, Richard Harman pointed out ACT MP Simon Court had said in Parliament there cannot be progress towards a Palestinian state until all Israeli hostages are returned and Hamas is dismantled. He said it was also the position of the foreign minister, though Peters himself had not actually said that. And Luxon had said on Monday Hamas held hostages that should be released. 'We are thinking carefully about all of the different sides … rather than trying to prove our own moral superiority over each other, which the likes of Chlöe Swarbrick have just been doing,' ACT's David Seymour told ZB when asked if ACT was holding up Cabinet support for recognition of Palestine. Seymour gave a similar response to the Parliamentary Press Gallery reporters. It was later posted to ACT's YouTube channel as 'David versus the media. David Seymour WARNS against rushing Palestine'. He repeated his worry that Hamas might benefit. But when a reporter pointed out a Palestinian state means more than just Gaza, and that Hamas doesn't control the West Bank, that episode of 'David versus the Media' came to an end. 'Right now everyone is focused on Gaza. And no one, if you recognise any kind of state – is going to think that this is about the West Bank. That's where the image of every country is going to be judged,' he said. 'Talk to you about domestic politics tomorrow,' Seymour said in closing. On TVNZ's 1News, Simon Mercep highlighted another practical problem. 'All five permanent members of the UN Security Council. – America, Russia, China, France and the UK – have to agree on statehood. 'Israel's major ally, the US, does not agree. It used its veto as recently as last year.' It wasn't much mentioned in the media this past week, but the veto right is something that New Zealand has long opposed. Back in 2012, foreign minister Murray McCully called on the five permanent members to give up their veto rights issues involving atrocities. He said the inability to act in Syria had 'cost the UN credibility in the eyes of fair-minded people around the world'. Three years later, he said that the Security Council was failing to prevent conflict – and during a stint chairing the Security Council later that year (when New Zealand was a non permanent member for two years) McCully criticised it again. The government paid for New Zealand journalists to travel to the UN at the time to watch sessions chaired by New Zealand. In late 2016, New Zealand co-sponsored a UN resolution that said Israeli settlements in the occupied territories had no legal validity – and were dangerously imperilling the viability of the two-state solution.' The resolution passed, Israel withdrew its ambassador here – and the incoming President Trump said 'things will be different in the UN' after his first inauguration. 'The position we adopted is totally in line with our long established policy on the Palestinian question,' McCully said at the time, stuck to his guns. Back then he also said he hoped the attitude of Israel would eventually soften. Eight years later, it's the attitude of New Zealand's government – and its clarity on two-state solution – that seems to have diluted.