More scam victims in Singapore in debt; rise in cases seen by credit counselling agencies
Ali (not his real name), who took out over $25,000 in loans due to a job scam, is part of a growing number of scam victims who incur mountains of debt. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
More scam victims in Singapore in debt; rise in cases seen by credit counselling agencies
SINGAPORE – When a woman whom Ali (not his real name) liked asked him to help with her part-time job, he thought he had a chance at romance.
Instead, his savings were wiped out, and he is more than $25,000 in debt.
Scam victims in Singapore lost a record $1.1 billion in 2024.
Some victims, like Ali, do not just lose their savings, but incur mountains of debt as they try to address these losses.
Non-profit organisation Credit Counselling Singapore (CCS), which typically helps people with business and credit card debt, has seen more than 200 scam victims since they started recording such cases in 2023.
CCS general manager Tan Huey Min said the number of cases is rising.
With 33 such victims in the first quarter of 2025 alone, there could be more than 130 cases in 2025 , up from 106 in 2024, she said.
Ms Tan said these victims usually fall for investment scams, where they are told to invest in schemes before they can withdraw their capital and profits.
She added: 'When they see their money going in and not coming out, the victim will find more money to pump in, and that's how they get into trouble.'
The Financial Industry Disputes Resolution Centre (Fidrec), which helps consumers resolve disputes with financial institutions, saw a rise in scam-related disputes from 325 cases in 2022 to 879 in 2024.
About 3 per cent of such cases annually involve victims who incur debt with financial institutions, either by borrowing money during the scam, or by scammers taking loans in their name without their knowledge.
Debt trap
Ali, 40, had accepted a Facebook friend request from a woman named 'Jannah' on March 30, the day before Hari Raya.
The delivery driver, who is single, texted her daily.
Despite never having seen her or hearing her voice, 'we shared pictures of our meals, and she even said she wanted to taste my mum's cooking', said Ali.
Then, 'Jannah' – who claimed to be a Malaysian working in Singapore – asked Ali for financial help.
All he had to do was to make 'purchases' from a luxury fashion brand to boost the products' popularity by transferring money to various bank accounts.
Ali was told to make 'purchases' from a luxury fashion brand to boost the products' popularity, by transferring money to various bank accounts.
ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
After one successful attempt where he earned a 10 per cent commission , Ali spent all of his $6,000 savings making more 'purchases'.
When the platform claimed he had to complete more jobs to withdraw his commission, Ali panicked.
He borrowed about $9,000 from a former colleague by lying he needed it for his home renovation.
He also got more than $11,000 in cash advances from two banks, and almost $6,000 from two licensed moneylenders.
When he still could not get his money back, Ali made a police report.
Every month, Ali can set aside only $500 from his $2,500 income to pay off his debts.
Listing the late charges and interest he would incur, Ali said: 'I have no idea how to manage the coming months.'
Debt-laden scam victims can seek help from non-profit organisations such as CCS and AMP Singapore.
The proportion of cases handled by AMP Singapore's Debt Advisory Centre (DAC) that were linked to scams grew from about 5 per cent in 2023 to 15 per cent in 2024.
Mr Muhd Alamin Ab Majid, one of DAC's case officers, said the centre provides victims with psychological and emotional support, and guides them on legal options, such as making a police report.
Apart from case management and counselling, DAC runs support groups, where clients can meet former debtors.
CCS gives free weekly information talks to explain how to reasonably manage debt, and offers free individual consultation sessions.
Debt-laden scam victims like Ali can seek help from various non-profit organisations such as CCS, and AMP Singapore.
ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Ms Tan said its counsellors calculate how much debtors can set aside monthly to pay off their debts.
This may include cutting down on expenses, such as switching from private-hire rides to public transport.
CCS then proposes the debt repayment plan to creditors, who will pause demands for repayment.
But if debtors still cannot pay up, Ms Tan said one option is to file for bankruptcy.
'I skipped meals'
An expatriate in his 40s who wanted to be known only as Mr V. J. had to repay $650,000 after falling for an investment scam in July 2024.
Of this amount, $200,000 was borrowed from friends, while $450,000 was from banks.
Selling his house in India was not enough.
Mr V. J., who declined to reveal his job or income, said: 'There were three months when I was skipping meals because I didn't have money.'
CCS negotiated with the banks to increase his loan period from two to five years. He also cut his monthly spending to about $1,000.
Now, half of his salary goes into repaying loans. He has since cleared over 90 per cent of his debt. He said: 'I could have said I'm bankrupt and just run away, but I took a loan. Whether I was cheated or not, I will pay.'
In cases where consumers lodge a complaint with Fidrec, they first give the financial institution 10 business days to resolve the matter directly.
But if parties do not reach an agreement, Fidrec may help by facilitating mediation.
A Fidrec spokesman said victims typically request financial institutions to waive all or part of their debts, or allow repayments through instalments.
He added that the proportion of debt-laden scam victims who settled amicably during mediation rose significantly from 27 per cent in 2022 to 67 per cent in 2024.
If all else fails, the victim can request adjudication – a process where an independent party issues a final decision.
The spokesman said: 'In cases where victims had voluntarily authorised the loan or failed to adequately safeguard their banking credentials, claims are often dismissed during adjudication.'
Ms Tan said: 'If you need to borrow to pay your debts, you need to seek help. Because borrowing will not solve the problem. It will only grow bigger.'
Christine Tan is a journalist at The Straits Times reporting on crime, justice and social issues in Singapore.
Helplines Credit Counselling Singapore: 6225-5227
AMP Singapore: 6416-3960 or 6416-3961
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
'Why do such dangerous things': Netizens enraged as video from MRT track goes viral, Singapore News
Public transport operator SMRT has lodged a police report after a video showing an individual filming on the train tracks was widely circulated on social media. The video was taken in dimly lit conditions, and minimal footsteps can be heard as a train was passing by. It is not sure when the video was recorded, but it has been making the rounds across multiple social media platforms, drawing increasing public attention. It garnered 28.2k views on TikTok as at Thursday (June 12) afternoon, while a version posted on the Facebook page Complaint Singapore has received 9.4k views. The Instagram account Singapura Legends has recorded the highest traction, with 28.6k views. The footage has sparked widespread concern among netizens, many of whom expressed shock over the individual's actions. One user questioned, 'How on earth (did) he access that in the first place?' while another asked, 'Why did he do such dangerous things?' Another netizen described the incident as a 'life-endangering action'. In response to AsiaOne's queries on Thursday, the president of SMRT Trains, Lam Sheau Kai, said that SMRT is aware of a video circulating on social media showing footage taken from the MRT track. The video was filmed between Simei and Tanah Merah stations, where nearby construction work is ongoing for new viaducts connecting to the future East Coast Integrated Depot (ECID). Lam also noted "we take a serious view of this incident, as track trespassing poses severe safety risks". SMRT added that such reckless actions not only endanger the individual but can also cause service disruptions, affecting many commuters. When emergency brakes are applied, there is also a risk of causing injury to commuters onboard the train. Under the Rapid Transit Systems Regulations, any unauthorised entry into MRT tunnels or tracks is considered a serious offence. Offenders found guilty of trespassing may face a fine of up to $500. Police investigations are ongoing. [[nid:718670]]


AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
'Why do such dangerous things': Video from MRT track circulates online, SMRT lodges police report, Singapore News
Public transport operator SMRT has lodged a police report after a video showing an individual filming on the train tracks was widely circulated on social media. The video was taken in dimly lit conditions, and minimal footsteps can be heard as a train was passing by. It is not sure when the video was recorded, but it has been making the rounds across multiple social media platforms, drawing increasing public attention. It garnered 28.2k views on TikTok as at Thursday (June 12) afternoon, while a version posted on the Facebook page Complaint Singapore has received 9.4k views. The Instagram account Singapura Legends has recorded the highest traction, with 28.6k views. The footage has sparked widespread concern among netizens, many of whom expressed shock over the individual's actions. One user questioned, 'How on earth (did) he access that in the first place?' while another asked, 'Why did he do such dangerous things?' Another netizen described the incident as a 'life-endangering action'. In response to AsiaOne's queries on Thursday, the president of SMRT Trains, Lam Sheau Kai, said that SMRT is aware of a video circulating on social media showing footage taken from the MRT track. The video was filmed between Simei and Tanah Merah stations, where nearby construction work is ongoing for new viaducts connecting to the future East Coast Integrated Depot (ECID). Lam also noted "we take a serious view of this incident, as track trespassing poses severe safety risks". SMRT added that such reckless actions not only endanger the individual but can also cause service disruptions, affecting many commuters. When emergency brakes are applied, there is also a risk of causing injury to commuters onboard the train. Under the Rapid Transit Systems Regulations, any unauthorised entry into MRT tunnels or tracks is considered a serious offence. Offenders found guilty of trespassing may face a fine of up to $500. Police investigations are ongoing. [[nid:718670]]


Singapore Law Watch
2 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts
Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts Source: Straits Times Article Date: 12 Jun 2025 Author: Aqil Hamzah This is the second time that The Online Citizen has been slapped with the declaration, with its first due to expire in July 2025. The people behind The Online Citizen's (TOC) website and Facebook, Instagram and X pages will continue to be barred from deriving any financial benefits from the running of its platforms till 2027. In a statement on June 11, the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) said TOC's website and social media pages – which were labelled as Declared Online Locations (DOLs) – had been declared as such in July 2023, and the designation was due to expire on July 21, 2025. DOLs have to comply with actions under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma) that would prevent their operator from financially benefiting during the period they are listed as one. However, said MDDI, TOC 'continued to communicate falsehoods through its online platforms over the past two years'. Between July 2023 and June 2025, it received eight correction directions under the fake news law. These included one on Feb 25, after TOC published an article about modification works at the Ridout Road colonial bungalow leased by Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam's wife. In its article, it said the Singapore Land Authority had given Mr Shanmugam assurances of a lease extension beyond its 2027 expiry, and that public funds were used to pay for the earthworks carried out at the bungalow since 2024, among other claims. These are falsehoods, said MDDI. As a result of the eight correction directions, TOC's website and social media pages have again been labelled DOLs, a move necessary 'to ensure Singaporeans continue to be alerted to TOC's record of communicating falsehoods', said the ministry. The new declaration comes into effect immediately after the current direction expires and will remain till July 21, 2027 at 12pm. TOC will be able to continue its operations, but will have to carry a notice on its online platforms to notify its audience that it has been declared a DOL. The notice will also have to state that it had 'communicated multiple falsehoods' and that its viewers should exercise caution when accessing it for information. MDDI added that service providers, including digital advertising agencies, will have to take steps to ensure that their paid content on TOC's platforms is not made available in Singapore. 'Individuals and companies must also not provide financial support to TOC's DOLs to avoid promoting the communication of falsehoods in Singapore on these platforms,' it added. There are three other outlets currently listed as DOLs. They are Transformative Justice Collective's website and social media pages, and Gutzy Asia's website and social media pages, as well as opposition politician Kenneth Jeyaretnam's website and social media pages. A provision under Pofma allows the Government to order an internet intermediary to disable access to a DOL if the owner of the DOL does not comply with the declaration and paid content on the site continues to be displayed to users here. If an internet intermediary fails to comply and is convicted, it can be fined up to $20,000 for each day that the government order is not fully complied with, up to a total of $500,000. The owner or operator of a DOL can however apply to the Minister for Digital Development and Information to suspend, vary or cancel the declaration. If the minister rejects the application, an appeal can be made to the High Court. Aqil Hamzah is a journalist covering breaking news at The Straits Times, with interests in crime and technology. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print