Waste Fees And Charges Consultation Opens Monday
Marlburians are encouraged to have their say on Council's Waste Fees and Charges consultation from Monday 26 May.
Acting Mayor David Croad said dealing with the cost of Marlborough's waste was a challenging part of Council's core business.
'Almost half of the increase we are proposing is related to Government requirements that are outside of Council's control. We are also working hard to prolong the life of the Bluegums landfill including to reduce the volume of waste going into it. At the same time, we need to plan for the day when the landfill ultimately closes and the ongoing costs associated with that,' he said.
'We do not wish to see additional price increases at this time, but the disposal of waste is not free and whatever we can do to reduce, reuse and recycle is to all our collective benefit.'
Waste costs are covered via a user pays system at the Bluegums landfill and the Blenheim Transfer Station with the other transfer stations around Marlborough funded through a mixture of user pays and rates.
The proposed increase from 1 September 2025 at Bluegums landfill is 17.82% for all waste types except grass clippings and green waste. It is also proposed to increase all charges at the region's transfer stations by an average of 17.82%.
'In real terms, the proposed changes equate to an extra $5.92 for the average load of general waste to the Blenheim transfer station, an increase of $2.43 for an average load of green waste and grass clippings will not increase at all,' Acting Mayor Croad said.
Whiteware and E-Waste prices will remain the same for the next 12 months.
The proposed charges will cover legislative requirements including an increase in the Waste Levy, a change in the method of calculating the Unique Emissions Factor and an increase in the cost of carbon credits to offset the landfill's greenhouse gas emissions. The balance is made up of increases in landfill aftercare and reserve provisions including operational and capital costs, and post closure expenses.
Solid Waste Manager Mark Lucas said comparisons with other local authorities in the South Island showed Marlborough had the third lowest overall cost for waste disposal.
'The charges set at the Bluegums landfill have a flow on effect for all other waste streams in Marlborough and are based on a user-pays model designed to cover the costs associated with this service. The more waste that can be diverted from landfill, the easier it will be on everyone's pockets.
'By embracing reuse and recycling, the community not only avoids immediate disposal fees for reusable items but also contributes to a more financially sustainable waste system that protects everyone from the fee increases that inevitably accompany landfill capacity constraints,' Mr Lucas said.
Council has budgeted $22M for the 2025/26 year to cover the costs of Marlborough's waste services.
The consultation closes on 6 June 2025. Submissions will be considered by full Council on 26 June.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Elon Musk's online war with Republicans leaves Donald Trump to wonder if he's created a monster
By Brad Ryan, ABC in Washington Elon Musk has left his position at DOGE, but remains a political player. Photo: AFP / Allison Robbert Analysis -The anger is taking many forms on Elon Musk's X account. Multiple graphs illustrating the growing national debt. A meme showing a microscopic pair of scissors with the words: "Republicans getting ready to reduce the size of government." Even a sword-wielding Uma Thurman from the movie Kill Bill. (Geddit?) It all represents a stunning tburst over Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" just days after Musk's departure from his government cost-cutting gig . But the tweet that Musk has chosen to pin to the top of his feed might be the one that most troubles Trump. It's a repost of another X user's collection of reader comments from the Fox News website. It shows a lot of support for Musk among the network's MAGA-loving audience. One article has attracted almost 8000 comments at time of writing, and it takes a lot of scrolling to find many that don't back Musk. A lot of them purport to be from Trump supporters who have taken Musk's side of this argument. It's by no means a perfect poll, but it could give Trump pause for thought. Musk's anger doesn't just manifest in tweets. His time as Trump's "first buddy" earned him a massive MAGA following. He now has sizeable influence over the Americans that Trump needs most: the Republican voters who didn't just put him back into power, but also handed him vital, and vulnerable, Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Musk justified his controversial work at DOGE with arguments about the need to bring down the national debt. He often pointed to the fact the US pays more interest on its debt than it spends on defence. But he lamented that he couldn't do more to deal with it. DOGE's cruelling and culling of government jobs and departments achieved about $US180 billion in savings, according to its own estimates. That would equate to 9 percent of his early target of $US2 trillion. And those numbers are rubbery and widely viewed with scepticism. Outside fact-checks of DOGE's online "wall of receipts" resulted in reductions to its posted savings claims, and there are disputes over others that remain uncorrected. And a lot of the cuts could still be reversed by the courts, shrinking the savings figure further. Musk insists DOGE's ongoing work, in his absence, means the savings figure will continue to grow. But he recently argued that DOGE was an advisory board rather than "the dictators of the government", so the savings achieved were "proportionate to the support we get from Congress, and from the executive branch of the government in general". Now Congress - at the behest of the executive, i.e. Trump - is considering legislating spending and tax cuts which would undermine all those money-saving efforts. The most recent analysis, from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, found the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would increase budget deficits by $US2.4 trillion over the next decade. It would also increase the debt ceiling, allowing the US to borrow trillions of dollars more than it currently can. Elon Musk in the Oval Office with his son X Æ A-Xii as President Donald Trump signs executive orders in March 2025. Photo: AFP / Jim Watson Trump's support for the bill - which is full of all sorts of MAGA priorities - has been absolute. He's described it as "arguably the most significant piece of legislation that will ever be signed in the history of our country". His demand that Republicans support it means some apparently did without even reading it. Hard-right Republican and hardcore Trump fan Marjorie Taylor Greene admitted she didn't know what was in it when she voted for it, and voiced regret after discovering it would curb states' power to regulate AI. "Full transparency," she said, "I did not know about this section … I would have voted NO." Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years. I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in… Some of Trump's Republican foot soldiers have been running the line that Musk's anger is just business. House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested it was all about the bill's termination of tax breaks for buyers of electric vehicles. But the angry noise on Musk's X platform has so far not been matched on Trump's Truth Social. At time of writing, he's limited his online response to a somewhat cryptic repost of Musk's tweet announcing his departure from DOGE. He knows a public brawl with Musk is what Democrats have been dreaming about. But he also knows all about the power of money in politics. Musk, the world's richest man, sank hundreds of millions of dollars into getting Trump re-elected. He's threatened in the past to fund challengers to sitting Republicans, including from within the party, if they displease him. He recently said he was looking to rein in his political spending, but added: "If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it." The midterm elections are only 18 months away. All members of the House of Representatives, and a third of the Senate, will face an election battle. Trump wants not only to retain the slim Republican majorities in the House and Senate but also to make sure those Republicans are cooperative with his MAGA agenda. Musk's been pumping up those who aren't - retweeting Republicans who are voting against the Big Beautiful Bill. He could now see a reason to restart political spending, and try to get more of them into Congress and in Trump's way. And even if he doesn't dig into his billions, the Musk-Trump bromance helped build Musk's influence in the MAGA world. It's something Trump may come to regret. - ABC
National Business Review
an hour ago
- National Business Review
Tax revenue up on forecasts but SOE returns down
The Government's latest financial statements are slightly better than forecast in last month's Budget. In the 10 months to the end of April, the operating balance before gains and losses, and excluding ACC, recorded a deficit of $7.4 billion, $100 million lower than forecast. Once ACC is included
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Porirua Backs Regional Approach To Water Services Delivery
Porirua City Council's Te Puna Kōrero committee has endorsed a joint regional approach for water services delivery. As part of the Local Water Done Well reform, the Government has mandated that councils must review how water services are delivered. Te Puna Kōrero met this morning to deliberate and made a recommendation to Council, after consulting on two options for a future water services delivery model - a new water services organisation, or a modified version of the status quo. They voted unanimously to recommend that Council should jointly establish and co-own a new water organisation with Upper Hutt City Council, Hutt City Council, Wellington City Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council. Under this model, a multi-council-owned water organisation will take ownership of public water assets. The alternative was a modified version of the current Wellington Water model, where councils retain ownership while Wellington Water manages water services. That recommendation will need to be endorsed at the full Council meeting on 26 June. All five councils are independently making decisions by the end of June on how to proceed. Officers will then develop a joint Water Services Delivery Plan and foundation documents for the new organisation, which must be lodged with the Department of Internal Affairs by 3 September 2025. The intention is that Council will transfer its assets, debt, liabilities and services in relation to drinking water, wastewater and stormwater to the new organisation by1 July 2026. In making today's decision, the committee unanimously supported an amendment from Councillor Geoff Hayward, setting out the principles Porirua City wants reflected in the new organisation's foundation documents. These include recognising water as a public good, safeguarding households from disconnection, value for money, fair pricing, supporting local employment, and upholding Te Mana o te Wai. Porirua Mayor Anita Baker said like many parts of the country, Porirua's water networks faced significant challenges. "We have old pipes that cause water leaks, contribute to water shortages and are a main contributor to pollution in the harbour. "While we've poured all the money we can into funding water assets, we simply can't address these challenges on our own. Doing nothing is not an option, and we believe the new model is the best way forward for Porirua."
