logo
Misinterpreting Words and Gestures in Medicine

Misinterpreting Words and Gestures in Medicine

Medscape16 hours ago
This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hello. I'm David Kerr, professor of cancer medicine at University of Oxford. Today I'd like to talk about words and gestures, and how we can communicate unconsciously with patients in ways where we can end up being misunderstood.
In the clinic on Friday, one of our patients, somebody we looked after for quite a long time, had evidence of oligometastatic recurrent colorectal cancer. By that, I mean the tumor had come back in three small spots within the peritoneal cavity. She's had multiple chemotherapies and we've done hepatic resections. We looked after her for 4.5 years with her metastatic disease and she's remained remarkably well, fully fit and active, and has been taking care of her young family and so on.
What we thought that we would do for her treatment would be to offer, with my specialist colleagues in Oxford, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This is very highly focused radiotherapy — spot welding, if you like — that can be delivered, with fantastic accuracy, safely to small areas of disease. We had arranged for her to see one of my senior colleagues in Oxford.
The way that our NHS communicates with our patients is: A letter goes out saying, 'You have an appointment to see Professor Kerr and Dr Muirhead,' a fantastic radiotherapy colleague. Of course, our literate, clever patient looked up who Dr Muirhead was, and she saw the word "palliative" splashed across all the work that Rebecca does.
Immediately, because that word was used, she assumed that she'd come to the end of the road, that there was nothing effective that we could offer for her treatment. Quite the opposite was the case, but the use of the word "palliative," to her mind, meant palliative care, end of care, and imminent death.
For those of us who were somehow forced to do Latin to get into medical school, it comes from palliare, the Latin word for "to cloak" or "to hide." This was a word that was just utterly, completely misinterpreted, and the 2 weeks between receiving a letter and meeting me in a clinic had been the worst 2 weeks of the patient's life over the past 4.5 years. You can imagine the tears of joy when we explained exactly what it was we were going to do.
It reminded me of another time, when I was a very young doctor in Glasgow, a senior registrar in my mid-twenties. I had looked after a young woman about the same age as me with metastatic ovarian cancer, along with my boss, Stan Kaye, another fantastic oncologist.
We looked after her well and continually, but the disease caught up with her eventually. We were very active at that stage, one of the first centers in Europe to be involved in phase 1 trials with the National Cancer Institute. I wanted to explain that we could offer her a position in one of the phase 1 trials that we were doing, but of course, as a prelude to that, I had to explain that we had no more conventional treatment to offer.
I come from the west of Scotland. We're not a very naturally tactile group of male human beings, but I leaned over, held her hand, and explained the situation, thinking really nothing of that small gesture.
Later in her illness, as she did inch closer to death, we continued to look after her and to palliate — that word again. She said that the single scariest thing that she remembers of all the journey that we'd been over for all those years was when I held her hand, because she thought it must be very, very bad indeed for that young doctor to reach out, to hold her hand, and just to be gentle and kind.
Words and gestures need to be chosen carefully. But, clearly unconsciously, whether aware of it or not, we're sending subliminal messages out to our patients. We may not be able to control them, but it's interesting how patients can interpret and misinterpret what we see and sometimes do.
I'd be really interested in your own experiences, if you've come across anything even remotely similar.
As always, thanks for listening. For the time being, Medscapers, ahoy. Thank you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A third of GP appointments in June were over the phone or online, data shows
A third of GP appointments in June were over the phone or online, data shows

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A third of GP appointments in June were over the phone or online, data shows

A third of GP appointments in June were over the phone or online, data shows A third (33.3%) of GP appointments in England in June were carried out either over the phone or online, the highest proportion since the pandemic. The figure is up from 30.9% a year earlier in June 2024, and 28.3% in June 2023, according to new analysis of NHS England data by the PA news agency. Family doctors said remote consultations 'offer convenience and flexibility that many patients value', and the majority of appointments are still delivered face to face. As many as four in 10 appointments were carried out by phone or online during the pandemic, but the proportion fell once the impact of Covid-19 eased and had dropped to 27.7% in January 2023. In the past two years the figure has risen slowly but steadily, driven by a sharp increase in consultations taking place online. These accounted for only 1.5% of all GP appointments in June 2023 but had jumped to 4.9% by June 2024 and 8.0% in June this year. This has helped push up the combined figure for phone and online appointments to its current post-pandemic high of 33.3%. The figure just for telephone appointments has remained broadly unchanged over this period, at about 25%. Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chairwoman of the Royal College of GPs (RCGP), said: 'Remote consultations, whether delivered over the phone or via video, can offer convenience and flexibility that many patients value, and evidence has shown that in the vast majority of cases, remote care is safe. 'Often a GP might initially consult with a patient remotely and then ask them to come into the practice if it's necessary to see them in person. 'However, we also know that many patients prefer to access their care in-person, and this is how the majority of appointments are still delivered. 'Over the last 12 months, GPs and their teams have delivered a record-breaking number of appointments, and nearly 250 million were carried out in person.' Some 63.3% of GP appointments in June in England were in person, data shows, down from 65.3% a year earlier and 68.4% in June 2023. Online appointments include those carried out using live chat tools or non-video apps, as well as video-based calls. The proportion of appointments taking place by phone or online varies across the regions, with the figures for June ranging from 38.2% in London to 28.4% in North East and Yorkshire. Prof Hawthorne said the college 'supports a mixed-method approach to delivering care' in general practice and decisions on how appointments are carried out are between clinicians and patients. 'What's key is that when GPs are consulting with their patients remotely, they have access to the robust and up-to-date IT systems that allows them to do so safely and effectively,' she added. Prof Hawthorne said the Government 'has put forward some encouraging proposals to improve the GP practice digital infrastructure and IT systems' but 'significant investment' is needed to make this a reality. She added: 'The college has called for additional funding of at least £2 billion to ensure our physical and digital infrastructure is fit for purpose so we can offer patients the appointment that's right for them.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We've made real progress fixing the front door of the NHS, recruiting more than 2,000 GPs in the last year and delivering an additional 7 million GP appointments to improve access for patients. 'Through our 10 Year Health Plan we are delivering Neighbourhood Health Services that deliver more personalised, proactive care in local areas where it is more convenient for patients. 'This Government is also clear that patients should have access to health and care when they need it and people who prefer a face-to-face appointment should have one, so we are transforming the NHS app to make managing your healthcare online easy and flexible.' An NHS England spokesperson said: 'Every GP practice must offer face-to-face appointments where patients want or need them, and many patients choose remote appointments where it is clinically appropriate and more convenient for them. 'GP teams are working hard to offer better access for patients, with a record number of appointments being carried out in the last year and recent findings showing the number of patients who are satisfied with their practice has improved.'

The impact strike action by hospital doctors had on Bolton patients
The impact strike action by hospital doctors had on Bolton patients

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The impact strike action by hospital doctors had on Bolton patients

Dozens of appointments and procedures had to be cancelled in Bolton after resident doctors went on strike in Bolton last week. Bolton NHS Foundation Trust detailed the number at its board meeting, which was held just after the strike action. The latest strike began last week amid an ongoing row over pay. Resident doctors, previously known as junior doctors, went on strike demanding a 29 per cent pay rise and have since been locked in industrial action with the government, which has refused to negotiate on pay. Hospital leaders have since called on the British Medical Association (BMA) and the Government to end the strikes after five days of disruption across the NHS in England. The Royal Bolton Hospital was among those affected by the industrial action. Figures have revealed the NHS maintained care for an estimated 10,000 more patients during the latest doctors' strike compared with last year's industrial action. READ MORE: NHS maintained 93% of planned care during resident doctors' strikes Bolton patient calls on hospital to rethink decision over cutting sandwiches Bolton patients given advice what to do during doctors' strike Nationally, data shows that 93 per cent of planned operations, tests and procedures went ahead during the five-day walkout across England. Chief Operating Officer Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Rae Wheatcroft said: 'As a result of the strike action, Royal Bolton NHS Foundation Trust have had to cancel 58 outpatient appointments and 32 procedures over the course of the five days. 'The action has had an impact and will continue to have an impact on our longer waiting patients unfortunately. 'The longer waiting patients are lower risk patients, and therefore they are the ones that have been cancelled in some instances. 'It will depend on whether there is further action as to how this transpires. 'The financial impact of the strikes will depend on the decisions we take as early warning indicators. If we see the waiting list change direction, which has been reducing for the past 12 months. 'If this changes direction, that will be an early indicator, and we will know to take action.' Nationally, in previous walkouts, the majority of non-urgent care was postponed. Fewer than a third of resident doctors, previously known as junior doctors, chose to join the strike, which ended on Wednesday morning. The number was down by 7.5 per cent (1,243) on the previous round of industrial action in July last year, according to the early analysis of management information collected by NHS England. The BMA said it recognised the efforts that senior doctors and healthcare workers made during the strike to provide care to patients, but it disputed the figure set out by the NHS. It said: 'NHS England's claim that the majority of England's 77,000 resident doctors chose to 'join the NHS-wide effort to keep the services open' requires a huge stretch of the imagination, given it is almost impossible to know the exact number of residents working on any given day because of complex work patterns, on-call schedules and the strike spread across a weekend. "Added to that, in July many doctors are using up their remaining annual leave before their new posts start and would therefore not show up as striking. 'We look forward to seeing hard and fast data on NHS England's claim. "The strike could have been averted, as could any future ones, if Mr Streeting had come, and will come, to the table with a credible offer that resident doctors in England can accept.'

Warning over serious virus affecting newborns after surge in cases
Warning over serious virus affecting newborns after surge in cases

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Warning over serious virus affecting newborns after surge in cases

Britain should prepare for a surge in a potentially serious virus following a record number of cases in Australia, health experts have warned. NHS officials said the Australian winter is often a reliable indicator of how viruses will spread in the UK. Following a spike in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cases in Australia, officials have confirmed that cases have been steadily rising in England since the beginning of 2025. NHS England has encouraged pregnant women to receive the vaccine which guards against RSV in order to protect their newborn babies. The health service said the virus is a leading cause of death among babies and the primary cause of hospital admissions for children. READ MORE: Girl, four, dies after incident at water park READ MORE: Full list of air fryers recalled as households told 'stop using' Kate Brintworth, chief midwifery officer for NHS England, said: "While for most adults RSV only causes mild, cold-like symptoms, for older adults and young children it can lead to serious breathing problems that can end up in hospitalisation. "Getting vaccinated while pregnant is the best way to protect your baby from the moment they are born, and now is the time for mums to act, to make sure their babies are protected ahead of their first few months this winter, when there tends to be more bugs circulating." Expectant mothers can receive the jab from 28 weeks of pregnancy onwards through their maternity services or GP surgery. Older adults aged 75-79 are also eligible for the vaccination and NHS England will begin inviting people to come forward in the coming weeks. RSV is a frequent cause of coughs and colds. However, certain individuals, including infants and adults over the age of 75, are at high risk of becoming seriously ill from the virus. In infants, RSV is a common cause of a chest infection known as bronchiolitis. Last week, data demonstrating the effectiveness of the vaccine was published by the UK Health Security Agency. The agency stated that the jab for expectant mothers can prevent 72% of hospital admissions for their babies. Furthermore, the vaccine is 82% effective at preventing hospital admissions for RSV among older adults, according to the UKHSA. For the latest news and breaking news visit Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you by signing up to our daily and breaking newsletter. Sign up to our breaking news newsletter here. Follow us on X @LivECHONews or on Bluesky @ - official Liverpool ECHO accounts - real news in real time. We're also on Facebook/theliverpoolecho - your must-see news, features, videos and pictures throughout the day from the Liverpool ECHO.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store