
Monday briefing: What a new investigation tells us about the shooting of Palestinians at Gaza aid sites
In the months since, humanitarians' worst fears about the aid sites have been realised. International observers have expressed concern as daily reports emerged of civilians being shot, shelled or crushed while attempting to access aid. Almost 1,400 Palestinians have reportedly been killed while seeking food, primarily near GHF distribution sites.
Bitter dispute over responsibility has followed. Journalists, Palestinian eyewitnesses and humanitarian workers on the ground have attributed the killings to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), alleging that soldiers have fired on civilians. The IDF and GHF reject these allegations, denying the reported death toll and claims of misconduct. They argue that accusations of starvation are either exaggerated or the result of a UN failure to distribute aid effectively.
Now, a new investigation by the Guardian has corroborated longstanding claims by Palestinian journalists and aid workers, finding evidence that Israeli forces have repeatedly fired on civilians attempting to access food.
For today's newsletter, I spoke to investigative correspondent and the paper's visual forensics lead Manisha Ganguly on what exactly her investigation found, and how we reached this catastrophic moment. That's after the headlines.
Israel-Gaza war | Benjamin Netanyahu has defended his plan to take control of Gaza City, even as senior UN officials warned the move risked unleashing 'another calamity' on the territory. On Sunday, Anas al-Sharif, a prominent Al Jazeera journalist, was killed in an Israeli airstrike. Israel admitted a deliberate attack on the journalist.
Ukraine | Europe's leaders have raised the pressure on Donald Trump to involve Ukraine in a planned summit with Vladimir Putin, as Germany warned the White House against any deal hatched 'over the heads of Europeans and Ukrainians'.
Housing | Lower-income householders, minority ethnic people and those with young children are more likely to live in homes at risk from dangerous overheating, research has found.
UK news | Half of the people arrested during the protest in relation to Palestine Action in London on Saturday were aged 60 or above, according to police figures. A total of 532 people were arrested at the largest demonstration relating to the group – all but 10 under section 13 of the Terrorism Act for displaying supportive placards or signs.
Crime | Foreign criminals from 15 more countries face deportation before they have a chance to appeal, in an expansion of the UK government's 'deport first, appeal later' scheme.
When Israel shut down the UN-led humanitarian aid system, the government alleged Palestinian militant group Hamas was diverting aid to support its operations. However, a USAID analysis published last month found no evidence of large-scale diversion of aid by Hamas. The following day, The New York Times reported that an Israeli military official acknowledged there was no proof Hamas was routinely stealing UN-provided aid.
Manisha Ganguly tells me that, on the back of this claim, Israel imposed an 11-week siege on the Gaza Strip. 'During this time, Gaza's population, over two million people, was effectively starved, creating the acute conditions we're seeing now.'
The GHF was set up amid the siege and became the only organisation allowed to operate in the Strip, she explains, while veteran aid groups were refused entry. 'GHF only operates in areas under IDF control. Humanitarian organisations like Oxfam, whose policy lead for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Bushra Khalidi, told me that the conditions under which GHF operates, conditions set by the Israeli military, do not meet the standards required by international humanitarian law,' she adds.
She explains that international law says aid must be delivered independently, impartially and with safe access. But due to IDF operations in Gaza, there is no real way to do this. She points to two key indicators of the lack of safe access:
All four GHF food distribution sites are located in areas the Israeli military has marked for evacuation. To collect food, Palestinians must enter zones of direct danger.
There are reports, and video evidence, of the Israeli military firing on Palestinians near or en route to these distribution sites.
What does the evidence show?
Manisha reviewed a range of evidence, and reached a damning conclusion. She first started with videos uploaded to social media by Palestinians showing attempts to collect food near GHF sites.
'In nearly all of them, you hear the distinctive sound of machine-gun fire. A weapons expert told me the machine guns heard are likely Israeli. Hamas does have machine guns, but they're typically used ceremonially and don't match the pattern here,' she says.
Next, she spoke to doctors at Nasser hospital in Khan Younis, and a field hospital operated by the International Red Cross. 'They reported a clear correlation between spikes in gunshot wounds and days when food was being distributed, at a level that was unprecedented in the entire previous year,' Manisha says. 'One surgeon told me that every single patient with gunshot wounds said they had come under Israeli fire.'
Then, to strengthen the link, she asked surgeons to send photos of bullets removed from patients. 'The tricky thing about bullets is that you need exact measurements to be able to correctly attribute it. For two of them, I had exact measurements: one matched the IDF's standard calibre of bullet. The other matched calibres used by both the IDF and some Hamas snipers – but remember, the firing heard in the videos was unmistakably machine-gun fire, not sniper fire,' she says.
'If you combine the visual evidence of machine gun fire, the Palestinian testimony, reports from doctors at hospitals who are describing an overwhelming number of patients with gunshot wounds coming in, in an unprecedented way that they hadn't seen in the previous entire year of the war, with the really solid evidence of the bullet being cut out of patients and analysed, it paints a very clear picture,' she says.
Manisha didn't want there to be any reasonable doubt, so she also reviewed one specific video where you can actually hear the machine gun fire, and see the bullets hitting the sand right next to Palestinians in the immediate vicinity of the GHF food site.
'There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that suggests that the Israeli military has been indiscriminately firing on Palestinian food seekers in an extremely sustained way.'
One particularly disturbing testimony came from Prof Nick Maynard, a consultant surgeon at Oxford University Hospitals, who has visited Gaza repeatedly since 2010. He spoke to Manisha during his third mission to Nasser hospital since the current war began.
'He said that on particular days, he saw particular body parts being targeted. One night he was on call, Nasser hospital admitted four teenage boys, all of whom had been shot in the testicles. Other days, he saw patterns of gunshots to the neck, head, or arms, and he told me that the clustering of similar injuries in one day suggests that this is a targeting activity,' she says.
How the IDF and GHF responded
When Manisha put these conclusions to the IDF, they 'unequivocally denied' deliberately targeting civilians or minors and said they have standing orders prohibiting intentional fire on these groups.
The IDF has admitted to firing 'warning shots' at Palestinians. But weapons experts told Manisha that what's happening doesn't fit that definition. In the two cases she reviewed, the victims were civilians trying to collect food. The IDF explanation that troops were firing at 'suspicious individuals' or people who 'left the queue' just doesn't hold up.
The response from GHF was interesting, too. 'In the first instance, they accused me of aiding Hamas, and said the statistics I used in my report appeared to directly align with the Gaza Health Ministry, and called them false and exaggerated,' Manisha says, 'even though my analysis relied on Red Cross data, UN statistics and extensive interviews with doctors.'
The GHF also added that it had reached out to the UN and other humanitarian organisations to collaborate, but that the UN continues to reject those offers.
What this means for the GHF scheme
Last Friday, Israel's security cabinet approved a plan to take over Gaza City, marking another escalation in the 22-month offensive that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, destroyed most of Gaza and pushed the territory toward famine.
Israel has said it would work with the US to continue getting aid into the territory. It's now clear that it will be through the GHF. Manisha tells me that the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, who recently visited Gaza on a trip with Donald Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, described GHF's work as 'phenomenal'. Reports have since come out that Huckabee was told they are exploring the possibility of opening 12 new sites and a 24-hour operation.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'The rationale behind the 24-hour operation is that it is easier and safer for Palestinians to travel to the sites – at the moment they're open for a limited period. Palestinians usually end up travelling at night or in the early hours of the morning and queueing for hours while facing bullets from the Israeli military,' Manisha says.
'So they're thinking, this might minimise it, but it doesn't go to the heart of the central problem: the Israeli military is indiscriminately firing on Palestinians.'
In case you missed it, Harriet Sherwood's weekend read on the rise of digital reincarnations of the recently departed is chilling. From Rod Stewart's weird AI ghost of Ozzy Osbourne to companies 'digitally resurrecting' loved ones through AI, it's a stark tale of how technology is transforming the way we grieve. Charlie Lindlar, acting deputy editor, newsletters
Why are asylum seekers being accommodated in hotels in the first place? Daniel Trilling expertly breaks down how a series of actions by Labour and Conservative governments since the turn of the century have brought us to this point. Aamna
Topshop returns to the runway for the first time in seven years this coming weekend. Lauren Cochrane explains how the once-ubiquitous high-street brand came back from the brink – and whether there's a gap in the market for it any more. Charlie
I love this profile by the Guardian's Patrick Greenfield on Lek Chailert, a woman who has devoted her life to rescuing abused elephants. Aamna
Simon Hattenstone's interview with the straight-talking Sharon Stone on everything from childhood sexual abuse to her stroke at 43 is a sobering discussion on how to wade through the hardest moments in life. Charlie
Football | Debut goals for Hugo Ekitiké and Jeremie Frimpong were not enough for Premier League champions Liverpool, who lost on penalties to Crystal Palace in Sunday's Community Shield. After a 2-2 tie at 90 minutes, substitute Justin Devenny sealed victory for the south London club after Mohamed Salah, Alexis Mac Allister and Harvey Elliott all missed in the shootout.
Tennis | Emma Raducanu has underlined her excitement before what she describes as a 'fact-finding match' against the world No 1 Aryna Sabalenka as they prepare to battle in the third round of the Cincinnati Open on Monday.
Boxing | Hiromasa Urakawa has become the second boxer to die from brain injuries sustained at the same event in Tokyo. The World Boxing Organisation announced the death of Japanese boxer Urakawa at the age of 28 on Sunday following a bout with Yoji Saito on 2 August. It occurred days after Shigetoshi Kotari, who fought out a draw with Yamato Hata on the same card in Tokyo, died due to injuries to his brain.
The Guardian leads with ''Another calamity': UN's warning as Netanyahu defends Gaza plan'. The i has 'UK calls for halt to 'path of destruction'– as Netanyahu insists Gaza City plan will end war'. The Financial Times says 'Europeans press Washington to turn sanctions screw on Putin before talks'.
The Telegraph reports 'Starmer hid £30bn cost of Chagos surrender', while the Mail has '26,000 prisoners freed early by Labour'. The Times leads with 'Drivers over 70 face eye tests every three years'.
How the University of Edinburgh helped create scientific racism
Will the University of Edinburgh confront its dark past? Severin Carrell reports.
A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad
Saturday's baseball game between the Atlanta Braves and the visiting Miami Marlins was, at first glance, a relatively meaningless bout between two middling teams with little to play for late in the season. It saw, however, a remarkable moment in Major League Baseball history as umpire Jen Pawol became the first woman in league history to referee a game. After a decade working up through the minor leagues, the 48-year-old former art teacher, finally got her much-deserved chance.
'It was pretty amazing when we took the field,' Pawol said. 'It seemed like quite a few people started clapping and saying my name, so that was pretty intense and very emotional.'
Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday
And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow.
Quick crossword
Cryptic crossword
Wordiply

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
The 184 Palestinian journalists killed in the war in Gaza endured hunger and grief
Since the war began in Gaza, 184 Palestinian journalists have been killed, according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists. They include men and women, freelancers and staffers, veterans with years in the field and young reporters on some of their first assignments. Some were killed with their families at home, others were in vehicles marked 'PRESS,' or in tents near hospitals, or out covering the violence. Many endured the same conditions as those they covered — hunger, displacement, and grief. Among them: —Ayat Khadoura, 27. The Al Quds University graduate shed light on the hardships families faced in the first weeks of the war. She became known for reporting on bombs striking her northern Gaza neighborhood, including one video in which she said Israeli forces had ordered residents to evacuate moments before a strike hit her home and killed her in November 2023. — Hamza Dahdouh, 27. The son of Al Jazeera's Gaza City bureau chief, he was killed in a January 2024 drone strike after leaving a reporting assignment at the site of an earlier strike in southern Gaza. He was the fifth member of his family to be killed. —Fatima Hassouna, 25. The photojournalist was killed in an April 2025 Israeli airstrike a day after a documentary about her efforts to film daily life amid war in Gaza was accepted at a Cannes Film Festival program promoting independent films. — Hossam Shabat, 23. A freelancer from northern Gaza, he was killed while reporting for Al Jazeera in March 2025. Before the war, he told a Beirut-based advocacy group he hoped to start a media company or work in his family's restaurants. — Anas al-Sharif, 28. The father of two was killed in an Israeli strike on a tent outside Shifa hospital on Sunday, days after he wept on air while reporting on starvation deaths in Gaza. The strike — which also killed five other journalists — prompted an outpouring of condemnation from press freedom groups and foreign officials. Israel has accused some of the journalists killed of involvement with militant groups, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad — charges that journalists and their outlets have dismissed as baseless. Israel's military did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment about the CPJ data. Figures and methodologies may differ among groups that track journalist deaths. CPJ said it 'independently investigates and verifies the circumstances behind each death,' including to verify journalists' lack of involvement in militant activities. __ Sam Metz in Jerusalem and Fatma Khaled in Cairo contributed reporting.


The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Anas al-Sharif and Gaza's journalists: Israel is wiping out the witnesses
Anas al-Sharif knew that far from offering protection amid the slaughter in Gaza, his press credentials further endangered him. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) warned last month of acute danger to the 28-year-old's life as the Israel Defense Forces stepped up online attacks on him. These were not merely smears, but a death threat in response to his coverage, the Al Jazeera reporter said. And now he is dead, one of five media workers killed in an airstrike on Sunday. The CPJ says that more than 180 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed in almost two years of war – more than the number who have died globally in the previous three years. This does not merely reflect Gaza's vast death toll – 61,599, most of them women and children, according to the health ministry and many more if independent experts are correct. Nor does it merely reflect the courage shown by reporters, photographers, camera operators and others in a war zone. The CPJ says 26 of the reporters were targeted. Israeli officials have bragged of killing Mr Sharif, whom they have claimed was the head of a Hamas terrorist cell, planning rocket attacks against Israeli civilians. Mr Sharif and Al Jazeera had already denied this. It would surely be hard for such a prominent figure to combine reporting with command of such a unit. The documents offered up by Israel as evidence end two years before the war began, and were reportedly screen grabs of electronic spreadsheets, not independently verified. Israeli officials have repeatedly offered wildly misleading and rapidly shifting accounts of events, including the killing of paramedics in Gaza this spring. In 2023, an IDF general reportedly told American officials within hours that one of its soldiers had probably shot dead the acclaimed Palestinian-American Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in the occupied West Bank – but Israeli officials insisted publicly that Palestinian militants were to blame. No justification has even been attempted for the deaths of Mr Sharif's colleagues. Mr Sharif's 90-year-old father was killed in an airstrike on their home in late 2023, after Israeli military officials called the journalist telling him to stop reporting and leave Gaza. Israeli claims that he was a Hamas fighter resurfaced last month after his emotional reporting on starvation went viral. He was killed as outrage mounted over Gaza's famine and shortly after Israel announced its plan to launch a ground offensive in Gaza City, which would only deepen the catastrophe and is reportedly opposed by many in the military too. The deaths of the Al Jazeera team in the city ensure few are left to bear witness to what unfolds. International correspondents are unable to enter Gaza except on escorted military trips during which they cannot speak to Palestinians. Sheltered by the US, Israel's government appears unmoved as international public opinion turns against it and even staunch allies blench at the horrors of Gaza. The Al Jazeera killings have been widely and rightly condemned. The Reporters sans Frontières group has also urged the international criminal court to investigate the treatment of media workers. 'If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice,' Mr Sharif wrote in a posthumously published statement. Deliberately targeting journalists is a war crime: an assault not only on the person, but on truth itself. Yet it cannot disguise Israel's other atrocities. Rather, it adds to the charge sheet against its leaders.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
On Gaza's killing fields, journalism faces its darkest hour – but that won't stop us reporting
As the world witnesses the horrors unfolding in Gaza, a related tragedy continues with chilling regularity: the systematic targeting and killing of journalists. Just as the Gaza journalistic community thought matters could not get any worse, Benjamin Netanyahu's brutal occupying forces carried out yet another cold-blooded murder on Sunday, this time of the Al Jazeera journalists Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qraiqea, along with videographers Ibrahim Thaher, Mohammed Nofal and their colleagues. They were sheltering in a media tent near al-Shifa hospital, and were killed by a direct strike. The Israeli war machine, accelerating its stated goal of occupying Gaza, showed no restraint in targeting journalists, in violation of international conventions. So far in this war it has killed 238 of us. The war on Gaza has become the deadliest conflict for journalists and media workers in living memory, with 2024 recording the highest number of journalists killed, the vast majority at the hands of Israeli forces. The systematic targeting and elimination of journalists is not merely a local or regional tragedy; it is a catastrophic breach of international norms regarding the protection of journalists in conflict zones, signalling a global collapse of the moral responsibility in safeguarding those who risk everything to shed light on the realities of war. Gaza is not the only place where journalists are under siege. Threats, intimidation and murderous violence against journalists are on the rise. However, what differentiates Israeli crimes is the impunity with which the occupation forces murder journalists and the indifference shown by leaders of the so-called free world. What is especially shocking is when some media organisations repeat the Israeli regime's false allegations against targeted journalists without verification. By any measure, it is the most dangerous time to be a journalist in recent history. Reporters are threatened, harassed and killed merely for fulfilling their public duty of bearing witness and reporting the truth. Worldwide, the dangers faced by journalists in conflict zones have intensified. In 2023, a journalist or media worker was killed, on average, every four days. In 2024, this grim statistic worsened to once every three days, most of those by Israeli forces. The journalists in Gaza are not parachuted-in international correspondents but local journalists – those who know the land, the people and the stories best. These journalists are not just reporting on Gaza's tragedy; they are living it. This surge in violence against journalists is neither accidental nor isolated. It is part of a broader, deeply worrying trend: the systematic silencing of the media, often orchestrated by autocrats and regimes who seek to conceal their crimes in darkness. This should horrify us all. It is an assault not only on individual reporters but on the entire global public's right to know, to understand the depth of human suffering, and to hold the powerful to account. Beyond the killings of more than 230 journalists, Israel now employs starvation as a tool, with journalists pushed to the brink, collapsing from hunger while reporting. At Al Jazeera, we have lost colleagues and their family members in Gaza, with the latest killing of Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues bringing the total number of the network's journalists killed to nine. Our colleagues have been forced to report not just on the atrocities happening to civilians, but on the direct attacks against those whose only weapon is a microphone or a camera. Despite this, we insist on continuing in our professional duty. We remain committed to reporting unfolding genocide, despite Israeli efforts to blind us and the world. We will tirelessly work to strengthen the teams and to remain faithful to our global audience, who have a right to be informed. But this requires international solidarity, and the exertion of full pressure on Israel to stop targeting and killing journalists and to allow international media access and freedom of operation in the Gaza Strip. The international community must act, urgently and decisively, to safeguard journalists and to protect those who risk everything to inform the world about the continuing humanitarian catastrophe and genocide in Gaza. Journalists must be allowed to perform their duties without fear of violence. Anything less is a betrayal of the most fundamental principles of free expression. We owe it to the courageous journalists in Gaza to amplify their voices. Their work is not merely documentation; it is the first draft of history, whereby future historians will study the horrors of the 21st century's most televised genocide. Access to reliable information about wars and conflicts is not a luxury; it is essential for the wellbeing of global populations, the protection of human rights and the global effort to hold perpetrators of war crimes accountable. When journalists are silenced, we all become more vulnerable to disinformation, propaganda and the unchecked abuse of power. We are at a crossroads. If the world continues to tolerate the murder, starvation and persecution of journalists, it is not only journalism that will suffer, but also accountability, democracy and the possibility of a more just future. The international legal framework for the protection of journalists in war must be urgently strengthened and enforced, and governments must be held to account for violations. The international journalistic community, and indeed the world, bears an immense responsibility. The courage, commitment and sacrifice of journalists in Gaza demand nothing less than our full support and unrelenting advocacy. Our inaction will be recorded by history as a monumental failure to protect those who stood at the frontlines of truth. Asef Hamidi is the director of news, Al Jazeera Channel Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.