Protecting Protest Rights And Dissent Amid Trump's Attack On Freedom
The Trump administration's recent militarized response to protests in Los Angeles represents an escalation in its assault against various rights and freedoms. It comes after nearly five months of tactics that contravene existing laws and standards; yet, the Trump administration persists.
Civil rights attorney Judith Bronwne Dianis, executive director of the Advancement Project, called out the Trump administration's escalating in Los Angeles as a 'threat to our democracy and our communities.'
'As the administration pursues aggressive and dehumanizing methods of immigration enforcement – relying on racial profiling to target those they suspect are immigrants and then kidnapping and deporting them without warrants, legal counsel, or judicial oversight – it is no surprise that communities across the country are standing up in solidarity with our immigrant families, neighbors, friends and coworkers,' Dianis said. 'Dissent is being met with flash-bang grenades, tear gas, and military vehicles, as protestors are criminalized and their lives put in danger for exercising their fundamental rights to assemble and speak freely.'
And it's not just Trump. The Republican controlled Congress continues efforts to pass legislation that not only robs families and communities of necessary programs, but also whittles away at civil liberties and public safety and well-being. Protest rights and free speech have been under attack at the state level for many years. As of April 2025, there were 41 anti-protest bills introduced since the beginning of the year. Even before the 2020 racial justice uprisings following George Floyd's murder, several states passed laws restricting rights or enhancing penalties for protests.
But the current protests against the Trump administration's expansive deployment of ICE and other federal authorities, including illegal deployment of the military, represent a broader movement to protest fundamental rights like due process and keep people safe. The way people are treated matters. Resisting repression of these fundamental rights and others remains an essential strategy in safeguarding families and communities impacted by systemic oppression.
Protesting and acts of civil disobedience have always been used to object to brutality and injustice. Whether you're a concerned citizen, mayor of a major city, state court judge, or member of Congress, everyone has a duty to speak up and stand firm against tyranny. As we've seen with Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, and U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver, the current administration does not care who you are or what title you hold. While all the attention has been on Los Angeles, and deservedly so, there have been protests happening across the country. //www.instagram.com/embed.js
Here are four considerations as mass protests continue to unfold, including planned 'No Kings' day actions on June 14, challenging Trump's escalating repression
Protesting may not be for everyone, but understanding your rights is essential for exercising them effectively. Various advocacy organizations, such as the Black Alliance for Just Immigration and Free Press, have created 'know your rights' resources that provide an overview of the rights at stake and offer tips for protecting oneself and one's community. These guides are not a substitute for legal advice but serve as a valuable starting point.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by BAJI (@instabaji) //www.instagram.com/embed.js
While knowing one's rights is essential, it's also important to consider personal safety and security. Everyone needs a plan beyond basic situational awareness.
The Trump administration's response to recent protests, including those in Los Angeles, highlights the need for vigilance. The escalation of repression and retaliation by the federal government against protesters and elected officials alike underscores the importance of staying informed and aware. Media outlets and social media platforms can often sensationalize events, making it crucial to verify information through reputable sources.
Also, just knowing what is really at stake can help raise awareness about the harms being caused and the broader impact. Consider checking out these resources from BAJI, given the escalating immigration attacks and increased interactions with various levels of law enforcement impacting our communities.
The media's insistence on publishing what Trump and other officials say without any qualification or context remains a problem. Simply writing DHS says, or Trump officials say, when there is clear information to the contrary, requires more discernment than many outlets give on the first take. Being objective and telling 'both sides' of a story should not require running interference for an administration trying hard to prove its fascist street cred. Similar to concerns raised by community advocates around crime reporting, reports of protests and other forms of dissent require a different lens that doesn't automatically give deference to government authorities.
Also, deep fakes, out-of-context photos and videos, and other inflammatory content, since protests first started in Los Angeles last week. As discussed on the recent Wired podcast 'Uncanny Valley,' there is widespread disinfo spreading online about the Los Angeles protests. Take a step back and consider the sources and context of information being shared, do reverse image searches when possible, or simply refrain from sharing a possibly inflammatory post. It takes a few minutes, but it can go a long way in stopping the spread of disinformation at a time when people's lives could depend on it.
As we've seen from our ancestors, collective action and collaboration require sustained commitment to defend our rights and freedoms in the face of government repression. Several national and local organizations offer events, trainings, and resources to help individuals stay informed and safe while participating in protests. The Advancement Project, the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, the Movement for Black Lives, and many others are excellent resources for finding information and support at this time.
In addition to leading conversations on digital safety, organizations like Media Justice provide valuable resources and spaces for challenging the weaponization of technology and digital platforms. Reporting for Truthout documented the expansive surveillance state that is rapidly scaling up, with immigrants serving as 'the first target.' From license plate readers and traffic cameras to facial recognition software, this technology puts us all at risk.
The Working Families Party offers an alternative for those seeking an organizing space and a political home outside the traditional confines of the Democratic Party. As a fusion party, WFP often works alongside the Democratic Party, but it also develops its own candidates and infrastructure across the country. //www.instagram.com/embed.js
Efforts like the Othering and Belonging Institute at UC Berkeley offer webinars and research that help bridge connections across groups. Instead of wasting energy trying to change hearts and minds, their work focuses on building across commonalities and shared interests.
If you're bothered by the expansion of private prisons for immigration and are thinking about exploring prison abolition, Critical Resistance might be an organization for you. //www.instagram.com/embed.js
There are numerous amazing groups doing impactful work; it's impossible to name them all. But you can find a place to plug in and share your time, treasure, and talents.
Or look local and see where you can plug in. Ask people in your family or social circle where they volunteer. Everything we do to build into our communities and lift each other up counts.
SEE ALSO:
200 George Floyd Demonstrators Gather In Chicago To Protests Trump Administration's Police Reform Rollbacks
19 Unforgettable Photos From LA Protests Against ICE
SEE ALSO
Protecting Protest Rights And Dissent Amid Trump's Attack On Freedom was originally published on newsone.com
Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil slips as Russia supply concerns ease after Trump-Putin meet
By Florence Tan SINGAPORE (Reuters) -Oil prices slipped in early Asian trade on Monday as the United States did not exert more pressure on Russia to end the Ukraine war by implementing further measures to disrupt Moscow's oil exports after presidents from both countries met on Friday. Brent crude futures dropped 32 cents, or 0.49%, to $65.53 a barrel by 2213 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $62.57 a barrel, down 23 cents. U.S. President Donald Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday and emerged more aligned with Moscow on seeking a peace deal instead of a ceasefire first. Trump will meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders on Monday to strike a quick peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years. "What was primarily in play were the secondary tariffs targeting the key importers of Russian energy, and President Trump has indeed indicated that he will pause pursuing incremental action on this front, at least for China," RBC Capital analyst Helima Croft said in a note. "The status quo remains largely intact for now," she said, adding that Moscow will not walk back on territorial demands while Ukraine and some European leaders will balk at the land-for-peace deal. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
Ukrainians in Boston not optimistic about President Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy; "It makes me mad"
As President Donald Trump prepares for the high stakes meeting on Monday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, back home in Boston, Ukrainians don't feel optimistic. Since the war started three years ago, Yelena Cannata has been volunteering and employing every resource she has for the children of Ukraine to be introduced to early intervention services. "It makes me mad. I have zero trust in President Trump in regulating this war," said Cannata. She hopes Zelenskyy avoids a repeat of that infamous February meeting he had with the president in the Oval Office. "I do hope that out of tomorrow's meeting that lots of the European leaders will come in, there won't be that bullying like the last meeting in the Oval Office and there will be no nonsense about the suit. It should be concrete, normal adult conversation." On Friday, President Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The summit ended early and with the two leaders making remarks without taking any questions. Vsevolod Petriv is head of the Boston chapter of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, an organization that looks out for the interest of Ukrainians in America, providing assistance as it relates to community service and politics. He said the president's recent meeting with Putin was disappointing and a peace deal would come at too much of a cost. "I don't see anything good coming out of it, given the current announcements. And it sounds like he's trading what they are saying is land," said Petriv. "The people in the area of Donbas that they haven't been able to take, they've been fighting hard for at least three years and so you are going to say to all those people we are going to give you to the aggressor that you've been fighting for peace that we know is meaningless because Putin will be back." Both Cannata and Petriv said they'll be looking to see what the next steps will be. "If you are going to give up the lands, which were just occupied without any rights, any rights, how would you consider this peace deal?" said Cannata.
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ukrainians fleeing Russia's attacks say the Alaska summit was an insult
'This is insane,' she said. 'Here there is war, rivers of blood, and they are making some kind of deal.' Advertisement While the much-ballyhooed summit appeared to be more a show of amiable backslapping than tough negotiating, by Saturday it had become clear that Putin and Trump had discussed proposals that would be very hard for Ukraine to swallow. In a post on social media, Trump reversed his support of Ukraine's position that a cease-fire must precede any peace negotiations. And in an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, he said that he and Putin had largely agreed to a territorial swap and security guarantees to end the war. European officials said that Putin was demanding all of the eastern Donbas region of Ukraine, including land still held by Ukrainian forces. Half a world away, people who had recently fled the fighting in that region for a shelter near the city of Pavlohrad said the whole summit felt like an insult. The fact that President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine was not invited. That Trump had treated Putin like a friend instead of a man under US sanctions, who is a wanted war criminal in Europe. That the world was now talking about Ukraine permanently giving up land to Russia for peace. Advertisement It was all too much. 'I hate Putin,' said Kateryna Chernenko, 65, who has been bedridden since a stroke about four years ago paralyzed her left side. She had been rescued Thursday, carried down from her second-floor apartment in the city of Dobropillia, which had been battered by the new Russian offensive, and brought to the shelter with her son and family friends. 'How can he do this for so long?' she said. 'Killing civilians while they sleep. This isn't war — it's murder. Trump doesn't understand — it hasn't touched him. If he had lived through this, he wouldn't say what he says.' Any land swap could involve the homes of both Chernenko and Shevchenko, who, like most people at the shelter, had fled from the Donetsk region, which makes up a large part of the Donbas. Russia now occupies almost 20 percent of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk, almost all of the adjacent Luhansk region, and the entire Crimean Peninsula. Chernenko moved to Dobropillia when she was about 22. She was given an apartment there under the Soviet regime because of her work at a sparkling-water factory. She learned to do basic home repairs and repeatedly revamped her apartment, which stands in the shadow of a large walnut tree, most recently putting up pink wallpaper dotted with blue flowers. Advertisement She raised three sons there. Her oldest died of a brain tumor. She rarely talks to her youngest son, who moved to Russia to be near her former husband. Her middle son, Serhii Khalturin, 40, came home to care for his mother after her stroke. He bought her a modern stove, a washing machine, a TV, and a refrigerator as tall as the ceiling. Both said they would never give up their land. When asked how it felt to leave home, Khalturin gestured as if tears were rolling down his face. 'That's where my childhood was, that's where my school is. I don't want to leave,' he said. 'Everything's still there — my mother's photos, my brother's photos — old ones from the 1980s, with my mother young and beautiful.' Shevchenko had seen her life whittled away. She used to be an accountant, before moving to a village called Oleksandrivka in Donetsk. She lived in the servants' quarters of a rich professor's weekend home, taking care of the garden and the house and writing children's books. Her boyfriend — he refused to marry her, because he said she was too troublesome — owned his own ramshackle house nearby. Often, they stayed together. The professor died of natural causes. His family moved to France. The main house was bombed. Her boyfriend's house was split in two. The servants' house was destroyed. The couple moved into the summer terrace of the ruined main house, basically a covered porch, patching up holes from shrapnel. A missile hit nearby last fall, setting the forest and a nearby village aflame. The village once had 300 people. After she and her boyfriend fled, Shevchenko said, nine people remained. Advertisement If Putin wanted this land so much, and other regions such as Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia, why did he destroy everything in his path, Shevchenko wondered. Maybe for mineral resources. Maybe to prove a point. Regardless, she said, Putin did not want peace. 'This is our land,' Shevchenko said. 'Not an inch of it can be given away. Give him just a slice and he'll say, 'I want Kharkiv, I'll take the Zaporizhzhia region.' He wants all of Ukraine and won't stop. We must not agree. We will fight to the end, because we are Ukrainians. That's the only way. We have no other choice.' This article originally appeared in
