Texas asks Illinois court to enforce arrest warrants for Democratic lawmakers
A filing with the Eighth Judicial Circuit Court, Adams County, Illinois, names the Texas House of Representatives as the petitioner and various state House members as respondents.
After the Democrats absconded, the state House sought to compel their attendance, voting in favor of a lawmaker's motion for the sergeant-at-arms to send for lawmakers with unexcused absences "for the purpose of securing and maintaining their attendance, under warrant of arrest if necessary."
"Accordingly, Speaker of the House Dustin Burrows issued civil warrants for the members who had deliberately and without excuse broken quorum," the court filing states.
The state wants Illinois to help.
"The Texas House of Representatives seeks an order recognizing the Quorum Warrants as a public Act of the State of Texas that is entitled to full faith and credit in Illinois, and requests that this Court issue civil warrants directing the appropriate Illinois law enforcement officials to effectuate the civil arrest of Respondents and coordinate with the Sergeant of Arms of the Texas House of Representatives and the Texas Department of Public Safety to return them to Texas," the filing declares.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton — who is running for U.S. Senate, hoping to defeat incumbent Republican Sen. John Cornyn — referred to the Democrats who fled the state as "rogue legislators."
"We are pursuing every legal remedy at our disposal to hold these rogue legislators accountable. Texas deserves representatives who do their jobs instead of running away at the behest of their billionaire handlers. If there's one thing Texans can't stand more than losers, it's cowards," Paxton noted, according to a press release.
"From day one, I have said that all options are on the table when it comes to making sure my colleagues who have fled the House return to fulfill their constitutional obligations," Burrows said, according to the attorney general office's press release. "The members who fled have been given ample time and opportunity to return on their own accord, and because they have continued to refuse their responsibilities to their constituents and return to Texas, the State has no choice but to pursue additional legal remedies to compel their return from other states."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 seats on Orlando City Council attract slew of candidates as election season approaches
With election season beginning to ramp up, 11 so far have declared their candidacies for three seats on the Orlando City Council that represent residents from Lake Nona to downtown Orlando up into College Park and Rosemont. More than half are in District 3, where Robert Stuart is retiring after representing it since 2006. So far, six candidates have filed to succeed him serving the northwest portion of the city. While in fast-growing Lake Nona, incumbent Jim Gray, the nonpartisan board's lone Republican, is trying to hold on to his seat and faces familiar challengers in former state Rep. Tom Keen, D-Orlando, and Sunshine Grund, also a Democrat. And District 5 could have more twists and turns ahead as interim commissioner Shan Rose is slated to take on Regina Hill, who was suspended last year following a felony indictment on charges that have yet to be tried in court. The three contests could evolve further, as candidates don't have to qualify for the ballot until noon Sept. 11. Election Day is Nov. 4. In District 1, spanning Lee Vista and Lake Nona, as well as Orlando International Airport, three military veterans have tossed their hats in the ring so far. Gray, an Air Force veteran and commercial real estate executive, has represented the area since 2012. For years he's been critical of the city's management of downtown — arguing the mix of businesses leans too heavily in favor of nightlife — with not enough dining, retail and family entertainment options. So far, he's the best-funded candidate in the race with $54,000 in his most-recent campaign finance report. Keen served one year in the Statehouse, winning a special election last year to flip a red district in a victory Florida Democrats hoped would propel the party from its statewide doldrums. Ultimately, it did not, and Keen lost a November rematch for a full term representing the district. A Navy veteran, Keen said he wants the city to better address traffic in the booming district and plan for growth. He's raised $29,000 so far. Grund, who served in the Army National Guard, is a real estate broker. She said she's building her platform by talking to voters who've emphasized public safety and traffic among their concerns. She doesn't accept campaign contributions and believes in keeping money out of politics. In District 3, covering neighborhoods like College Park, Baldwin Park and Rosemont, a slew of candidates have entered the fray. So far Jason Albu, Samuel Chambers, Roger Chapin, Chris Durant, Kimberly Kiss and Mira Tanna have declared their candidacies. Albu owns a Winter Park-based construction company. He said he believes a focus on economic development will prove impactful in improving transportation, housing, parks and public safety. Chambers is a Valencia College professor who was elected to the county's Soil and Water Conservation Board. His top priority is to end urban sprawl and support denser developments in urban areas. Chapin, who owns a public relations firm, is an Orlando Utilities Commission board member. He said his campaign is focused on affordability — ranging from rental costs to other housing opportunities — as well as expanding transit options. Durant works in real estate and also wants to improve affordability, public safety and advocate for protected bike lanes. Kiss is a lawyer whose website states she's a skilled problem-solver who will take on challenges such as building more affordable housing as well as roads where pedestrians, bikers and drivers can safely coexist. Tanna is the city's grants manager and wants to improve the Lynx bus system and operate SunRail on weekends. She supports more affordable housing through decreasing parking requirements and minimum lot sizes. In District 5, voters may get to choose between political rivals who have represented them before. Rose won a special election last summer to represent the district on an interim basis after Hill's suspension. Now she may take on Hill for a full four-year term in the district spanning downtown Orlando and neighborhoods west of I-4. She advocated for expanding youth mentorship programs, supported downtown nightlife businesses as city officials weigh further regulation of the industry and backed a plan to purchase a pair of shelter buses for the Christian Service Center. Hill, who represented the district for a decade and remains popular there, wants to expand job training programs she started while in office and grow programs offering services for youths and seniors. Hill's candidacy remains up in the air as she faces seven felony charges related to fraud and elder abuse. A status hearing in her trial is scheduled for Wednesday, which could determine if a trial is possible before the election as she hopes. She's pleaded not guilty to all counts and maintains her innocence. If charges are eventually dropped, or Hill wins at trial ahead of Election Day, she could return to serve out the remainder of the term. If convicted of felonies she'd be ineligible to hold office. If the trial is still pending she'll be allowed to campaign and appear on the ballot. If she wins she could presumably return to office — suspensions don't apply to future terms. However, Gov. Ron DeSantis could suspend her again until the trial is over. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Pack a toothbrush. Pack hair spray.' How the Texas Democrats are living on the run
A child starting kindergarten is a milestone most American families wouldn't dare miss, but it's one John Bucy will be absent from this month when one of his daughters takes a first step in her education. The 41-year-old Texas state legislator, whose district includes parts of northern Austin, is among the more than 50 Democratic lawmakers who've fled the Lone Star State to thwart President Donald Trump's effort to protect his razor-thin Republican majority in Congress. He packed his suitcase to be gone for 30 days – maybe longer. "It makes me scared. It makes me sad," Bucy said in an interview about his self-imposed exodus from his family. "I want to be a part of their lives every chance that I can. But what scares me more is if I'm not here, if they grow up and things are worse off in this country because we didn't stop this gerrymandering." More: Why Trump's political war in Texas is much bigger than the Lone Star State Bucy is staying at an undisclosed hotel in Illinois while he and his fellow Democrats continue to block their Republican colleagues from conducting official business back in Austin, such as the rare mid-decade redrawing of their state's maps that define congressional district boundaries. He said he's still in touch with his legislative staff, who are keeping up with constituents and connecting them to state agencies. Texas is a part-time legislature with a $7,200 annual salary, so like many members, Bucy also has a regular job running a statewide organization that provides athletic, academic and arts competitions for charter school students. Other Texas colleagues who aren't able to work remotely say they are juggling their personal lives, too, amid a partisan firestorm that is spilling over into other Republican and Democratic-controlled states ahead of the November 2026 midterm election campaign. Texas state Rep. Donna Howard said she had to take her grandson along when she left town. Baker, 4, has one parent in recovery and another who isn't in the picture. He's since become a "mascot" for the Democratic legislators at the hotel who have volunteered to help watch him when she speaks with constituents, conducts media interviews or when she needs time alone. "It is a village and my village is stepping up to support me with my grandchild," said Howard, 73, whose district includes parts of southern Austin. "I can't tell you how many people I don't even normally work with on things who have come up and said, 'Can I take him for a little bit and go throw the ball?' So he's kind of like 'King of the Hill' in a lot of ways." Texas Dems resist 'headache factor' but for how long? More: Trump says FBI 'may have to' force Democratic lawmakers back to Texas USA TODAY spoke with more than a dozen Texas Democrats at the center of the national tug-of-war who are facing $500-per-day fines, plus sharp rebukes from Trump and his allies. They have made arrangements to secure extended childcare. They have requested longer-than-expected work absences and found new locations for aging loved ones who require 24-hour caretakers. But they also said living in close quarters has an upside: their relationships and team-building have improved with activities such as daily exercise groups. "Pack a toothbrush. Pack hair spray, because hey, this could go on for a while and you got to be ready for it," said Democratic state Rep. Ann Johnson, an attorney who represents parts of Houston. Johnson, 50, participated in the last Texas quorum break orchestrated by Democrats in 2021, when they fled to Washington, D.C., to resist the GOP tightening the state's election rules. She said she was more prepared this time, but added that this fight is a more stressful and significant situation given the Trump administration's pressure campaign. More: Texas Democrats flee state amid heated redistricting battle. Has this happened before? "They'll continue to try to break us, but I actually feel, unlike 2021, there's a really strong coalition here," Johnson said. "There's a drastic difference... now the threats are so much harsher, they're so much more significant, and the risk of what we lose if we are not successful is really large." Republicans are also doing their part to stymie the Democrats' political efforts, not to mention making their personal lives uncomfortable. Three-term Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to arrest and expel the missing Democrats from the legislature. The state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, filied an Aug. 8 lawsuit seeking to get 13 of them removed from office. The FBI is also helping with the search for the lawmakers, according to U.S. Sen. Jon Cornyn, a Texas Republican facing his own 2026 primary challenge from Paxton and who made the request for help. "A lot of people are demanding they come back," Trump told reporters on Aug. 5. "You can't just sit it out. You have to go back." In suburban Chicago, an Aug. 6 bomb threat at the hotel where some of the Texas Democratic legislators have been staying woke them from sleep with a blaring siren echoing through the halls every 30 seconds. It forced an evacuation of the building and took about two hours before guests were allowed back inside, several lawmakers told USA TODAY. Many of the Democrats said the bomb threat marks a turning point, and made them think of officials being targeted in other states, such as in Minnesota, where an alleged gunman shot two state lawmakers and their spouses at their homes in June, killing one of the couples. "We have people who are threatening our lives, threatening our families' lives by exposing us," said state Rep. Christian Manuel, 38, whose district covers an eastern portion of the state that includes Beaumont, Texas. Manuel, who is Black, helps take care of his 95-year-old grandmother and remains in constant contact with family members. Living an hour outside of Jasper, Texas, where a Black man named James Byrd was dragged to death by confirmed white supremacists in 1998, he said the bomb threat at the Illinois hotel reminded him of the potential danger. "My family is aware," Manuel said. "We are all on alert." For many of the absconding Democrats, these incidents have hardened their resolve to resist what progressive critics say are Trump and Abbott's attempts to change the math in their favor for the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. Texas state Rep. Jolanda Jones, who represents parts of Houston, went viral this week after she slammed Abbott's attempt to have the legislators return. She was also embroiled in controversy for comparing the redistricting plan to the Holocaust in an Aug. 5 interview on "The Don Lemon Show," for which she later apologized. Jones said she serves as her mother's primary caregiver and that other relatives and neighbors back home have stepped up to help, but that she remains worried about her mother's well-being, given Jones' high visibility. "My mother can't live by herself – that's the bottom line. So me deciding to quorum break was a big deal," Jones, 59, who is running for a Houston-based seat in Congress, told USA TODAY. "I don't know what would happen to my mom if she opened the door and, would they barge in, what would they do? I'm absolutely concerned." Dems hope to frame Texas battle as flood victims v. Trump's whims Experts warn the endgame of the quorum break looks bleak for Democrats even as the national party and liberal activists say they believe the fight could be an inflection point against the Trump administration. "They walked out to stop Republicans from hijacking our democracy," said Christina Harvey, executive director of Stand Up America, a left-leaning voting rights group that has been running ads on social media and TV to mobilize its members against the redistricting efforts. The current Texas special session is scheduled to end Aug. 19, and Democratic legislators say they're committed to staying away from Austin for the long haul. But Abbott can also keep convening legislators, over and over, legal and political experts say, while applying legal and law enforcement pressure until the Republican-controlled legislature gets what it wants. The governor is adding a "headache factor" for lawmakers, Mark Jones, a professor of political science at Rice University, told USA TODAY. Even if none of Abbott's efforts bear fruit, they could lead to the need for the runaway legislators to at least respond to a lawsuit and incur costs, lost time and extra effort, he said. Quorum breaks have been a tool used by the minority party in Texas since 1870. Often, the move is more of a messaging effort with little success in blocking the specific proposal, experts point out. Texas rules say the House must have two-thirds of its members, or 100 people, present to move forward. Of the 62 House Democrats, a few have remained behind in Austin, meaning only a handful need to be arm-twisted into returning to the state for a quorum to be restored and votes to proceed. Jones, the Rice University professor, said the roughly 50 legislators would have to stay out of the state through the end-of-year holidays and into the spring of 2026 for their long-term strategy to prevail. Asked how long they can stay out of Texas, many of the Democratic legislators pivot in their responses to hammer the argument that Abbott is putting the two-term Republican president's desires over a needed aid package for the destructive and deadly flooding that submerged central parts of the state in July. For now, it's unclear how the public is coming down on the Democrats' framing of the fight. A poll conducted by Texas-based Z to A Research, a Democratic-aligned firm, found that 63% of likely voters – including 41% of Republican voters – believe it's unnecessary to be redrawing the congressional district lines several years before it typically happens. An overwhelming majority of 94% said they support funding flood warning systems and relief efforts, according to a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee memo. Wherever the Texas battle lands, the Democratic legislators who have fled to Illinois – a few others have been part of press conferences and public events in California, New York, Massachusetts – said they have become a stronger caucus as a result. They described bonding in ways they couldn't during regular sessions, and they believe that sense of unity will spread to Democrats in other states as the Trump administration looks to expand its redistricting strategy. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How the Texas Democrats are living on the run: 'We are all on alert'
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A proposed ballot initiative in MA would roll back marijuana legalization. Will it pass?
A group of Massachusetts citizens have filed an initiative petition to roll back marijuana legalization in the state, according to the MA attorney general's office. On Aug. 6, the attorney general's office announced that 19 groups had filed 47 initiative petitions for new proposed laws or constitutional amendments. Two of the proposed laws, both filed by Caroline Cunningham and signed by about 14 others, would repeal provisions in the current marijuana law passed in 2016 that allow for the drug to be sold commercially in the state. However, the process to become law is lengthy, and there are other challenges in its way. What do the marijuana initiatives say? The two proposed laws on marijuana are largely similar. Both titled 'An Act to Restore a Sensible Marijuana Policy,' they would repeal Chapters 94G and 64N in the Massachusetts general laws, which are sections that regulate the use, distribution and taxation of recreational marijuana. It would also repeal adults' right to cultivate cannabis at home. It would decriminalize possession of more than one ounce but less than two ounces, and a violation of the law would only be a civil offense with a fine $100. While retail sales wouldn't be allowed, adults would still be able to gift cannabis to each other. Medical marijuana would stay legal under the proposals, but one would tighten THC limitations. Will the initiatives succeed? Proposed laws and constitutional amendments must go through a long process to make it to the statewide election ballot in November 2026. First, the attorney general's office must review whether the petitions meet certain constitutional requirements to be filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth. They will announce whether it's been approved for certification on Sep. 3. If the initiative petition for a proposed law is approved, the initiatives proponents are then required to gather 75,574 signatures from registered voters to file with the Secretary of the Commonwealth by Dec. 3. Once those signatures are verified, it will be sent to the state legislature in January for its approval. If the legislature does not enact the proposal, the proponents must then gather an additional 12,429 signatures from registered voters by July 1, 2026, to place the initiative on the November 2026 ballot. The proposed laws are likely to face a few challenges along the way. Massachusetts has increasingly legalized marijuana and reduced criminal charges associated with the drug: voters made recreational cannabis legal in 2016, and retail sales became legal two years later. In 2024, Gov. Maura Healey pardoned misdemeanor marijuana possession convictions before March 13, 2024. And this year, the Democrat-controlled state House passed a bill that would expand marijuana laws, including increasing the purchase and possession limit from one to two ounces of marijuana. In July the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission that total marijuana sales in the state have surpassed $8 billion. Polls taken since legalization have also shown that Massachusetts residents largely approve of marijuana legalization. The MassINC Polling Group found in April of 2024 found that 65% of Massachusetts residents think that legalizing marijuana in Massachusetts was the right decision. This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: Could legal cannabis be rolled back in Massachusetts? Solve the daily Crossword
