Today in Chicago History: Wingfoot Air Express dirigible catches fire and crashes in the Loop, killing 13 people
Is an important event missing from this date? Email us.
Weather records (from the National Weather Service, Chicago)
1919: For most of the day, the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.'s Wingfoot Air Express airship cruised above the city. The powerful hum of its engines and a serene shadow were the only indicators of its passage as it flew from the South Side to Grant Park and as far north as Diversey Parkway.
At about 5 p.m., the blimp hurtled through a lobby skylight of the Illinois Trust & Savings Bank at 231 S. LaSalle St., killing 13 people and injuring 27. It was America's first recorded commercial aviation disaster.
1924 Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb's attorney Clarence Darrow entered a plea of guilty on his clients' behalf. By entering guilty pleas, Darrow didn't have to persuade 12 jurors to spare his clients the hangman's noose. In a trial's sentencing phase, the judge has the ultimate say.
Vintage Chicago Tribune: Leopold and LoebAfter the evidence had been presented, Darrow addressed the judge, speaking for 12 hours over two days. Darrow's eloquent plea had the desired effect. Leopold and Loeb were sentenced to life in prison.
1952: The Democratic National Convention opened in Chicago at the International Amphitheatre. Illinois Gov. Adlai Stevenson was chosen as the party's nominee.
Stevenson, who did not seek the presidential nomination, was drafted on the third ballot. Although he was a reluctant candidate, he pledged a hard-fighting campaign.
Vintage Chicago Tribune: Tradition of acceptance speeches at political conventions began in Chicago'I have no feeling of exultation, nor sense of triumph,' Stevenson said outside the home of William McCormick Blair at 1416 Astor St. 'I shall ask my God to give me courage in this great undertaking.'
Eisenhower won the 1952 election on Nov. 4, 1952, bringing the Republican Party its first White House victory in 24 years.
Vintage Chicago Tribune: Soldier Field's century of concerts, car races, circuses and contests1956: The Grand National 100-mile race, considered the first NASCAR cup series race held in Chicago, was witnessed by 14,402 fans who saw Fireball Roberts win by a car length over Jim Pascal, who was ahead until Roberts passed him on the 194th of 200 laps.
1980: Twelve-year-old Walter Polovchak, who said he did not want to go back home to Ukraine when his family returned to the then-Soviet Union, was granted political asylum in Chicago.
Polovchak was dubbed the 'the littlest defector' by the media during a yearslong court battle between his parents and the U.S. government that raised complex questions about personal freedoms, parental rights and government overreach.
2002: Pyewacket, owned by Walt Disney's grandnephew Roy P. Disney, set a record finish time of 23 hours, 30 minutes, 24 seconds in the Race to Mackinac. It bested the 1987 record of 25:50:44 by Dick Jennings' Santa Cruz 70, Pied Piper. Pyewacket, named after the cat in the film 'Bell, Book and Candle,' retained the record in the race until 2024.
Subscribe to the free Vintage Chicago Tribune newsletter, join our Chicagoland history Facebook group, stay current with Today in Chicago History and follow us on Instagram for more from Chicago's past.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
13 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Even Clarence Thomas agreed these kinds of Trump money moves are illegal
Having prevailed in mid-July on party-line congressional votes to slash foreign assistance and zero-out public broadcasting, senior Trump administration officials immediately signaled intent to seek still more 'rescissions' of money already appropriated for the current fiscal year. Even more provocatively, they are discussing plans to engage in the cuts by flagrantly sidestepping Congress. All this comes against a backdrop of the administration's quiet withholding or slow-walking of billions of dollars for programs ranging from Head Start to medical research. This mad rush to defund public programs is deeply irresponsible. These programs serve real purposes that the administration has ignored in its haste to slash domestic spending. Comedians poked fun at Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency when it had to scramble to rehire the fired workers who keep our nuclear weapons safe. This willful ignorance took a tragic turn when the National Weather Service's Texas offices were left understaffed as catastrophic flooding and hurricane season approached. The Lancet medical journal published a study finding that the administration's rapid-fire foreign aid cuts will lead to 14 million preventable deaths by 2030 if they continue. The White House defunding marathon is also illegal. President Nixon tried very much the same thing, withholding appropriated funds from programs he disliked. Every court that considered the merits of his impoundments found them unlawful, including a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court. The president can veto spending legislation he finds excessive, but he may not sign an appropriations act and then simply refuse to implement it or appropriations signed into law before his administration. The Supreme Court made the same point again in 1998 when it struck down the Line Item Veto Act. This law authorized the president to sign funding legislation and then designate parts not to be implemented. The justices held that this was tantamount to allowing the president to amend a law, which only Congress may do. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the majority. Congress opposed Nixon's impoundments on a bipartisan basis. It did, however, give future presidents an expedited method for asking Congress to rescind funds. This Impoundment Control Act requires that Congress be notified immediately whenever the president thinks funds should not be spent and ensures Congress' timely consideration. Unfortunately, President Trump has ignored the Impoundment Control Act's mandate to promptly notify as he has withheld billions of dollars for months. In fact, in March, Trump signed a bipartisan appropriations act for the remainder of this fiscal year, and then impounded large parts of the spending he had just approved. When he finally requested congressional approval of a small fraction of his impoundments in June, Democrats understandably cried foul. The final fiscal year appropriations act had passed only because Democrats voted for it, and they did so to properly fund these and other programs. Bipartisan appropriations bills torn apart, after they've been signed into law, by party-lines rescission bills is a prescription for gridlock: Nobody is going to make a deal in the future with those who blithely go back on their word. But the administration was not done. Now Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, is planning 'pocket rescissions.' His idea is to ask Congress to rescind funds imminently due for disbursement so late in the fiscal year that the funding will expire before Congress can act. He assumes that the Impoundment Control Act authorizes the president to withhold the dollars while Congress considers this bad-faith request. But the act says just the opposite: 'Nothing contained in this Act … shall be construed as … superseding any provision of law which requires the obligation of budget authority or the making of outlays thereunder.' Unless the president can persuade Congress to change programs' funding laws, these impoundments are just as illegal as Nixon's, which the Supreme Court ruled against unanimously. Some may feel the Vought-Trump rescissions are unavoidable now that the president's tax cut bill has torn a huge hole in the deficit. But the scale is not remotely comparable. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act's' upper-income tax cuts add $3.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. The rescission package that slashed foreign assistance and zeroed out public broadcasting reduced the deficit by about $8.4 billion over the same period. If Congress passed a rescission bill of a comparable size every week for the remainder of the Trump term — taking no recesses or so-called district work periods — the decreased spending would make up less than half of the deficit increase. And long before it reached that point, Congress would run out of programs that even the most zealous budget cutters could get away with rescinding out of existence. The two parties should return to the bargaining table and negotiate funding bills for next year. If either Republicans or Democrats have evidence that programs are overfunded or not working, bring that to the negotiations. But once a deal is struck, both sides need to honor it. The administration's capricious and chaotic impoundments have done more than enough damage already. David A. Super is a professor of law at Georgetown Law.
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Texas Redistricting Plan Explained As Democrats Threaten To Flee State
An unusual plan to re-draw congressional lines in Texas that could earn Republicans five more House seats in next year's midterms was unveiled Wednesday, and the state's Democrats are reportedly considering a stonewalling move that could cost them up to $1 million per month in fines. The exterior of the Texas State Capitol is seen on Sept. 5, 2023 in Austin, Texas. Getty Images Texas GOP legislators are working to try to help Republicans cling to the narrow majority they currently have in the U.S. House by re-drawing lines in the state years before they would normally redistrict at the end of the decade. Lawmakers have been working on the plan for months—since President Donald Trump's team called on them to take action and flip Democratic seats through redrawing district lines—but the draft map unveiled Wednesday is the first time the plan has been publicly revealed. The map aims to flip seats currently held by Democrats near the Austin, Dallas and Houston metro areas, but the maps are likely to change before a final draft is approved. The current proposal targets the seats of Democratic Reps. Greg Casar, Lloyd Doggett, Julie Johnson, Marc Veasey and Al Green are the most directly, and the changes would also bleed over into the districts of other congress members, like outspoken Trump critic Rep. Jasmine Crockett, but not dramatically change their constituency. Under the proposed new lines, Trump would have won 30 of Texas' 38 House seats in the 2024 election, according to the Texas Tribune (he did win 27—all 25 of the seats currently held by Republicans and two won by Democratic Reps. Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez). To block the proposed redistricting, Texas Democrats have considered fleeing the state and forcing a quorum break that would see them each incur a fine of $500 per day, or a combined $1 million per month—a cost the Tribune says deep-pocketed donors have expressed willingness to pay if needed. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here : The current House of Representatives has 219 Republican members and 212 Democratic members (there are four vacancies—three Democrats have died this year and one Republican resigned). Traditionally, parties in power lose seats in midterm elections and it's possible Democrats could win the majority next fall, which has led the White House to push Texas Republicans to redistrict and secure more seats. The current plan for the new lines would give some Democrats in urban centers even bigger margins than they currently have, and disperse Republican voters into several districts currently represented by Democrats, making them more competitive. The maps don't significantly change the political make up of any Republican incumbents' districts, according to the Tribune, but they do change demographics. The changes would create two more majority white districts (there are currently 22), add one majority Hispanic district (currently seven) and create two majority Black districts, where there currently are none. Democrats in the Texas legislature are willing to take drastic measures to stop the redistricting, which Doggett has called a 'crooked scheme' by Trump. Democrats told the Tribune they're considering fleeing the state so Republicans don't have the quorum they need to vote on the new maps, but it comes at a hefty price and at the risk of arrest. Crockett has said she doesn't think the monetary penalties are enforceable, but even if they are, unnamed sources said they'd likely be covered by fundraisers. If they do manage to force a quorum break, Crockett said the time would be used to educate the public about the new maps and allow legal challenges to proceed. Tangent In California, where 43 of the 52 House seats are held by Democrats, Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to respond in kind. He has proposed re-drawing districts in his state in a way that could give Democrats a boost between five and seven seats, but his plan would be more complicated. In Texas, the legislature controls redistricting, full stop. But in California, it's an independent commission that draws the state's political maps and they do so once per decade, following the census. For Newsom's plan to go forward, voters would have to vote on a ballot measure in an upcoming election to either approve new maps or to permanently change the way the state does redistricting. Even if that happened, it's unlikely to be done before the midterms next year. Ohio and Missouri, which could render four more Republican seats, combined, are also looking at redistricting. Florida and New Hampshire have Republican governors who could possibly be swayed to re-draw congressional lines. Further Reading Texas House Republicans unveil new congressional map that looks to pick up five GOP seats (Texas Tribune) Texas Democrats are fundraising to potentially leave the state to block GOP-backed redistricting (Texas Tribune) How Republicans are trying to redistrict their way to a majority (Vox) White House Pushes Texas to Redistrict, Hoping to Blunt Democratic Gains (New York Times)
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
TribCast: What's next for Republicans?
Eleanor is joined by Tribune politics editor Jasper Scherer and fellow radio-head Mark Davis, host of The Mark Davis Show on 660 AM The Answer in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, to talk about the GOP's outlook for 2026. The gang breaks down why 2024 was such a good year for Republicans, why 2026 might defy conventional midterm wisdom and whether there's a scandal out there that could imperil Attorney General Ken Paxton's support in Texas. Watch the video above, or subscribe to the TribCast on iTunes, Spotify, or RSS. New episodes every Tuesday. This week's episode of the TribCast is supported by members of the Texas Tribune. Texas needs trusted journalism. Help sustain fact-based reporting with your donation. Become a member of The Texas Tribune today at The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase. Solve the daily Crossword
