
Sol Straps An E-Reader To Your Face To Perfect The Lazy Reader Trend
Ironically, he can't see that perfectly-placed beam of light. Sol
Updated May 7, 2025 to include beta Kindle integration
If you've been on TikTok (or, more precisely "BookTok") you'll have seen them. People "struggling" with books falling as they lay in bed or holding tomes directly above their faces. They're "suffering" as they try and fail to hold books or e-readers for more than a few seconds. These are people who want only to lay as flat and still as possible while reading. They're the "lazy readers" and they've got hacks galore—from stands to articulated arms to special glasses with down-facing mirrors.
Sol has seen their struggles and they're here to provide the ultimate solution.
The Sol Reader is a pair of "cyberpunk" shades with a built-in E Ink display (technically two displays, but your binocular vision merges them into one). Put them on, open your book and the world fades away, practically no pesky muscle use required.
Sol Reader Sol
At first glance, the Sol Reader looks like a small VR headset or an oversized pair of sunglasses (depending on the finish you've selected—black, silver, gold, or dark blue).
This was the most flattering I could make these in the real world. Anthony Karcz
While I'm sure that Sol would like to call the Sol Reader futuristic-looking, I live in Florida and I've seen exactly this style of eyewear worn by cataract patients at my optometrist's office. The first night I used them to read before going to bed, my wife couldn't stop glancing over and giggling. These are not, by any stretch of the imagination, going to make you look cool.
Sol Reader, back, with remote Anthony Karcz
Flip it to the business side and you'll see a pair of lenses that look like something you'd see your optometrist use to dial in your eyeglasses prescription (Does this look clearer? How about now ?).
This looks way better in binocular vision, a few inches from your face Anthony Karcz
Unfold the arms, and the dual displays light up. Put the reader on (watch out for the surprisingly pokey earpieces at the ends of the arms), and those displays merge into a single 271 ppi E Ink display. While it's only around 30 ppi off your average Kindle, the proximity of the display to your eyeballs makes every missing nit stand out. The resulting output feels lower resolution than I'd expect from the specs. That's even more evident when you look at graphics of any sort (like book covers or comics).
But for reading books, 271 ppi is more than clear enough. You dial in the focal point on the lenses (anywhere from 0 to 5.75 — if you're nearsighted or have 20/20 vision you might not need to adjust them at all) and do a quick walkthrough to set your font size. There's a densely-packed display that has your eyes travelling quite a bit but is more like a standard e-reader page, a larger font size that only takes up the bottom half of the screen to effectively eliminate excessive eye movement, and a default midpoint setting that's comfortable without making you feel like you're reading a board book.
Navigating through a large library can be a bit tiresome, there's no search function (nor would entering things letter by letter via the remote be anything other than frustrating) but generally I could find what I was looking for in a few presses.
Speaking of the remote, it fits comfortably in hand and is refreshingly simple to use. Other than the directional arrows to navigate menus, there's a page turn/enter button in the center and that's it. You largely forget it exists once you start reading. The Software
While Sol has an ebook store, there's not much there (which makes sense, navigating publishing distribution contracts is way different than building reading hardware). They have a larger library available but only if you sign up for their "Beta Book Club" which still only gives you access to one book a month (while giving you credit to buy books once they're in the regular bookstore). As far as business models go, it's an odd one.
The better usage for the app, then, is to upload your DRM-free ePub files (like the ones that you downloaded from your Kindle before Amazon disabled the feature back in February ). If you have a large library, this could take a little bit of time, since you have to upload files individually in the app or 10 at a time on their web interface. Once uploaded to the app, though, I was able to download all 130 of my books to the Sol Reader without any fuss.
A quick aside — Sol is building their own DRM software standard . Why? Because they want you to be able to read the books you buy anywhere, but they also want authors to get paid. Sadly, pirated ebooks are extremely easy to find (which makes no sense to me when digital libraries exist). I'd love to see something like what Sol Reader is working on take root and be used by libraries so that you could easily read books you check out anywhere.
May 7, 2025 Update : Sol reached out to let me know that "Kindle Integration" is currently in beta testing. Once out of beta, this makes Sol Reader much more useful for a lot more readers who are looking to take advantage of the hardware. The Experience
Testimonials on the site praise the "immersion" and "movie-like" quality that Sol Reader brings to their reading experience. Obviously these are people who've never spent time under the covers with a flashlight after they were supposed to be asleep in bed, a book 3 inches from their nose.
While the reading enhancement benefits may be overstated, it is an extremely handy reader for when you want to read late at night when your significant other is sleeping. There's no light leakage and you can be in a comfortable, nearly prone position so you're shifting around less. It's the perfect thing to grab when you wake up at 3 AM, mind racing, and need to read a bit to divert your brain's anxiety hamster from its wheel.
Reading on the Sol Reader is comfortable, though you'll have to get used to moving your eyes around a bit more than if the reader was held in your hand. The First Edition reader is lighter than the original Limited Edition and has a redesigned nose piece for a snugger fit. It took some minor adjustment but once I settled in to a comfortable position (flat on my back like a true lazy reader) I didn't really feel the Sol Reader at all.
The reader does make it easier to block out environmental distraction (like a TV in a dark room). However, it can start to feel a bit claustrophobic after a while, especially if you've turned on the auto page-turn feature. While I appreciate wanting to "lock in" to reading, I don't necessarily want to be locked in. I want to be able to put down the book and think about phrases, take a moment away from the page to absorb what I've just read. Even just answering a quick question while you're reading is inconvenient. Who's Sol Reader For?
Aside from able-bodied 'lazy readers,' there is a very real audience for the Sol Reader.
People with degenerative diseases such as ALS or Parkinsons can have issues when it comes to keeping a book steady enough to read for any length of time. And it doesn't even have to be a major disability, hand tremors can afflict almost anyone at any age for a variety of reasons.
When all you have to have in your hand is a remote to turn the page and the reader itself is mounted on your face, there's no barrier to comfortably reading. Heck, you can set up the auto page-turn feature and you don't even need to use the remote. For those who've been kept from their love of literature by physical constraints, the Sol Reader gives back access to reading. Where to Buy
Overall, the Sol Reader is a compelling experiment. And while it may only serve a niche market, it does what it says it does and it does it well. You can order the Sol Reader First Edition for $249 on the Sol site.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


WIRED
33 minutes ago
- WIRED
Perplexity's CEO Sees AI Agents as the Next Web Battleground
Jun 4, 2025 12:25 PM Aravind Srinivas says agents need access to apps and claims that letting OpenAI take control of Chrome would be a disaster for the open Web. Aravind Srinivas attends the 2025 Breakthrough Prize Ceremony at Barker Hangar on April 05, 2025, in Santa Monica, California. Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Photograph:Perplexity has tapped into the power of generative artificial intelligence—with all its problematic tendencies—in an effort to challenge Google as the dominant way people find information online. The AI search tool rose in prominence in 2024 and was lauded as a promising alternative to Googling. Like other AI players though, the service has been sued for alleged copyright infringement. It has been accused by Forbes of plagiarizing its news articles, closely paraphrasing other websites, and hallucinating incorrect information. Despite the furor, Perplexity today says that its service gets 650 million queries per month and is said to be chasing investment that would value the company at $18 billion. The company is pushing AI assistants for mobile devices and working on its own web browser. In April, Motorola announced that Perplexity would come bundled with its new Razr Ultra phones. Last month the company partnered with PayPal to make it easier for users to buy products using its assistant. Samsung is also said to be in talks to possibly include Perplexity on its devices, according to a report from Bloomberg. (Perplexity declined to comment on this after the interview.). Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas spoke with Will Knight, senior writer at WIRED, by phone and email. This conversation has been edited for clarity and brevity. WIRED: The PayPal deal seems important to the vision that everyone has for agents. Is ecommerce the killer 'agentic' app? Aravind Srinivas: Agents are the killer app for everything. Agents allow users to have the experience that's best for them. Some people like shopping and researching, and some people want it done for them. There's a spectrum in between, and our focus is what is the best experience for the user. Speaking of the experience, agents still make mistakes. What happens when they buy something by accident? Merchants and buyers have adapted to every new technology since ancient times. We just show both of them what is possible, and they choose. Every successful technology has had to take security and error-resolution very seriously, and that won't change. Integrating AI with personal devices is another big theme. Why does the Motorola deal matter to you? It's a big deal because Motorola is one of the largest phone brands in the world. This partnership gives us the ability to make trustworthy AI more accessible than ever. Now, by introducing Perplexity to millions of people around the world, in a native and seamless way, more people will get to see how much more really is possible with search. Would you consider developing your own devices eventually? We are focused on building the best AI assistant and answer engine. Motorola will offer other AI assistants, so how will Perplexity distinguish itself? As AI assistants become more common, accuracy and trust will become even more important. An assistant isn't very useful if it's unreliable. Worse, if an assistant is misleading or sycophantic, then it isn't an assistant—it's a manipulator. That's not just useless, it's dangerous. Inaccurate AI has a negative compounding effect, and we have always been the leader in developing AI and AI assistants focused on accuracy and verifiability. That will have a positive compounding effect. Wait though … Perplexity—like other AI search engines—has been criticized for hallucinating and getting things wrong. We welcome this criticism, because it's the best way for us to continually improve. In reality, errors account for a small fraction of results, and our answers are far more accurate than 10 blue links polluted by decades of SEO-optimized content. [In response to a follow-up request, Perplexity did not provide further details on error rates, but Jesse Dwyer, a spokesman, said that reliability is improving constantly]. But the fact is, accuracy and trust will only become more important as AI integrates into more of our lives, so this is something we're relentlessly focused on. We can't get there without this feedback. Perplexity also cribs from copyrighted news articles with its 'discover' section. Do you understand why some publishers are upset? We've answered that before. See our blog post on how we respect [a file added to websites that specifies whether web crawlers should access their content]. The Perplexity assistant for Android and iOS seems 'agentic' because it can take actions. How big of a shift is this? AI is pretty good at answering questions now. What really needs to be done is get AI to take actions. People use the word 'agents'; you can go with whatever you want—'agent' or 'assistant'—but in the end, it needs to string together tools and execute actions. That's why we're [also building a] browser, and an assistant on iOS, Android. Do Apple and Google have too much control over their mobile platforms compared to outsiders looking to build agents? With iOS it's particularly challenging, because you have to string together a bunch of event APIs. On iOS, Mail, Calendar, Reminders, Podcasts, all that stuff is natively available through the Apple SDK [software development kit used to build applications], so you can actually at least draft emails, schedule meetings, move meetings, set reminders, all this stuff, open podcasts pretty easily. You can do searches for podcasts … 'get me the one where Mark Andreessen discusses de-banking with Joe Rogan.' It can get you that pretty quickly. It's mostly difficult because you cannot access other apps. iOS is not very different from Android, because AI cannot access most apps on Android either (meaning that the Perplexity assistant can interact with some apps more easily than others). [But] third-party apps can build their SDKs to be accessible on the Android SDK. For example, our Android system can display a song on Spotify. On iOS, you can only link to a specific Spotify song, and you have to manually start playing the audio. Oh, so it's app-makers that are holding AI agents back? That's the challenge. If people are offering us APIs—say, Open Table, Uber, DoorDash, or Instacart—where we can access information within the app without even having to open the app. On the back end, that's pretty powerful. For example, if we can access information on Uber and find that Uber comfort doesn't cost more than 5 or 10 percent of Uber X, then we can just book Uber comfort for you—if that's a preference that you set on Perplexity. Or similarly [we can] find the best Thai place near you and get me a dash [delivery] a lot faster than going to DoorDash app, searching for Thai food and scrolling through all these options, reading all those reviews and then putting your address, doing the checkout, all that stuff. We could honestly do all that in our system and just make the experience a lot more seamless and simple. I think that's where things are headed, but people need to open up their apps to us, and we'll have to see who's willing to do what. Isn't the biggest problem that AI agents just aren't very smart and useful yet? My analogy [for AI agents] is that we are at a point where Perplexity was in 2022 [just before it took off]. It's not like we got all the answers right, people made fun of hallucinations and some people call it 'Google in macro seconds.' It was not quite there. It only took off many months later, when models got better, and I expect the same trend with the agents and assistants. There's going to be some set of things that really work, daily use cases, and there'll be a long tail of things that don't work, that we're going to keep fixing over time. But that's exactly why we are building a [web] browser, because the browser front end will let you do the work on your own too, if you're not happy with what the AI did. So, then we can learn from that and fix that over time. Waymo and Tesla self driving did not work for a long time. Now, people take them for granted. I think it is a similar trajectory for us. Is this why you floated the idea of Perxplexity taking control of Chrome—if Google were forced to divest it? We're not saying we're interested in buying Chrome. We're saying that if there's no other path, if Google is put in a situation where they have to divest Chrome, then we'd be open to running it. But Google should not have to divest Chrome, because Chrome and Chromium are tied to each other. Chromium is an open source project that's being run very [well] by Google, and it is the reason for Microsoft Edge and the Brave browser. OpenAI has also shown an interest in taking control of Chrome. Giving ownership of Chrome or Chromium to a company like OpenAI would be a disaster, because open source and OpenAI are an oxymoron at this point. [OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment. The company says it will release an open source AI model this summer.] There are only two companies that can really potentially run Chrome: Microsoft and Meta. Honestly, Microsoft would spoil it, just like it spoiled Edge. And transferring Chrome to Meta is transferring Chrome from one monopoly to another. [The FTC has filed a lawsuit that accuses Meta of acting as a social networking monopoly; the company argues this is not the case.] What do you expect agents to be useful for first? I think [they will make] a lot of your personal searches a lot better. Like asking, 'What was the article I read last week about this one particular company?' or 'Can you summarize my X feed for me so that I know what's trending?' because you don't want to go to X and get distracted by it. Or 'Can you schedule this meeting for me with this person and if there's a conflict send them an email asking for a different time?' All these boring things, I feel we will be able to automate [them] pretty quickly [in future].


Skift
38 minutes ago
- Skift
Hilton's AI Strategy: Less Hype, More Guest Experience
Hilton shows that AI's real value in hospitality may be behind the front desk, not in the booking path. Hilton believes that its best early opportunity to deploy artificial intelligence isn't by changing how travelers book rooms, but by improving the experiences that guests have. At the Skift Data + AI Summit in New York Wednesday, Chris Silcock, Hilton's president of global brands and commercial services, said the hotel giant is deploying AI tools to predict guest needs, automate hotel operations, and improve how staff recognize the most loyal customers. "We're not a tech company, but we deploy a lot of tech, and we build a lot of tech," said Silcock. "We're a service company. We're a hospitality company, people serving people." That distinction drives Hilton's AI strategy. Rather than investing heavily in the front end of travel, like inspiration and search, Silcock said Hilton is betting t


CNET
42 minutes ago
- CNET
Nintendo Switch 2 Launch: What to Know Before You Get Yours
Scott Stein/CNET The Nintendo Switch 2 goes on sale tonight, but I've got a Switch 2 and some other gear right now, and am getting a feel for the hardware as fast as I can. The Switch 2 box is pretty compact, and it's similar-looking to the original Switch. The dock is thick, but similar to previous Switch docks. This one has its own cooling fan, with HDMI, USB-C and Ethernet ports inside, and two USB-A ports outside. I'll be setting up the Switch 2 soon, will have thoughts on how everything works! The magnetically-snapping Joy-Cons are already a lot easier to swap on and off.