
Varanasi gang rape case: Claims of survivor can't be overruled, says SIT report
Varanasi: The special investigation team (SIT) formed to uncover the truth behind the allegations of a 19-year-old girl, who claimed she was raped by 23 individuals over seven days between March 29 and April 4, submitted its report on Thursday.
In the light of the Supreme Court and high court judgments, the report mentioned that the claims made in her statement cannot be denied. "During her disappearance, the presence of several accused individuals was found at different places and times with her. In such serious cases, SC and HCs have issued various important decisions and guidelines, emphasising that the survivor's statement should be given priority.
In this context, based on her statement and the facts found during the investigation, it cannot be denied that the accused committed the crime," the SIT said.
On April 17, commissioner of police Mohit Agrawal had formed SIT following the submission of a memorandum by the family members, especially women, of the accused persons. The SIT was asked to submit a report within 30 days. Further arrests in the case were stopped until the submission of this SIT report.
Taking note of the SIT report, the CP said, "Based on the recorded statements, medical reports, CCTV footage, call detail records, IP logs, and other evidence collected during its investigation, the SIT concluded that the possibility of the incident occurring cannot be ruled out. The investigator of the case has been asked to incorporate all points mentioned in the SIT report and conclude his investigation impartially and promptly.
"
The mother of the survivor reported to Lalpur Pandeypur police station on April 4 that her daughter left home on March 29 but did not return. After lodging the case, the police started searching for her and, after finding her at a friend's house, they asked her to return home. Initially, she refused to return home, but after much persuasion, she was handed over to her family.
On the night of April 6, her mother lodged a complaint with the police, alleging that upon returning home, her daughter revealed that during the period of disappearance, different individuals committed wrongful acts against her at different places.
After lodging the FIR, Lalpur Pandeypur police arrested a total of 14 individuals, including nine named accused on April 8, three on April 11, and two more on April 15.
The survivor was taken for a medical examination to PDDU district hospital, where she initially refused external and internal medical examinations. After the police explained the legal aspects, she agreed to undergo a medical examination.
During the investigation by the SIT, the CDR of various individuals' mobile numbers, witness statements, CCTV footage, the victim's Instagram IP logs, the survivor's statement, and statements of the accused and their relatives were collected, and all evidence was examined.
The investigation revealed that during the period of disappearance, the victim was found to be moving freely and was seen with some of the accused. During this time, she was seen going to the mall and Chausatti Ghat with her colleagues and some friends. During the incident, the victim borrowed mobile phones from about 11 different individuals to log into Instagram and also made several calls. When asked why she didn't go home or inform anyone about the incident, she said she was afraid to go home and didn't tell anyone about the incident due to fear and shame.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
YouTuber's home too raided
Bathinda: NIA also searched the residence of YouTuber and digital creator Sukhveer Khipal in Budhlada town of Mansa district, SSP (Mansa) Bhagirath Singh Meena confirmed. As Sukhveer stays in Chandigarh, he was not available at his Budhlada home when the NIA team arrived. NIA officials were not available for comment, but it was learnt that Sukhveer was allegedly in touch with Pakistan-based don Shahzad Bhatti. The NIA team spoke to the family members of Sukhveer and asked them to send him to NIA's Chandigarh office for questioning. Khipal has 1.07 lakh followers on Instagram. tnn


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Karnataka high courtquashes criminal case against apartment resident & contractor
Bengaluru: Karnataka high court has quashed proceedings against an apartment resident and a civil contractor in a criminal case registered by a fellow flat owner alleging obscene acts and intentional insult. The complainant — from Embassy Palace, Nandidurg Road, Jayamahal — had stated that on Feb 28, 2023, she encountered six individuals in the garden area while heading to a hospital. They told her they were there to clean and construct a rainwater harvesting pit. However, she alleged, they used harsh language and inappropriate songs when questioned. Following an investigation, police filed charges under IPC Sections 294, 504, and 506 against the accused for obscene acts and criminal intimidation. The petitioners contested the charges, stating that rainwater harvesting was a legal requirement and the work was necessary. They mentioned an existing civil suit on the matter and suggested the criminal case was retaliatory. The contractor maintained he was merely fulfilling his assigned duties. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Whilst the complainant insisted on the occurrence of abusive behaviour and threats, Justice M Nagaprasanna found the complaint to be "voluminous, yet materially thin". The judge noted discrepancies between the original complaint and the subsequent chargesheet. The court referenced Supreme Court precedents stating that without lascivious elements or public obscenity, Section 294 is inapplicable. Additionally, harsh language alone doesn't constitute criminal intimidation or breach of peace, the judge said. Concluding that the case lacked essential elements of the alleged offences and appeared motivated by malice rather than justice, the court held that continuing proceedings would constitute an abuse of legal process.


New Indian Express
5 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Family values: Court affirms Tamil Nadu's inclusive gender traditions
In a landmark ruling delivered earlier this month, the Madras High Court affirmed that same-sex couples can form families without legal marriage. It marked a major milestone for LGBTQIA+ rights in India, particularly in Tamil Nadu. Emerging from a habeas corpus petition, the ruling addressed the case of a 25-yearold lesbian woman detained by her natal family. Her partner sought her release so that they could live together. While securing her freedom, Justices G R Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan expanded the definition of family under Indian law, emphasising personal autonomy and right to self-determination. It comes decades after the 2002 suicide of two lesbian women in Erode's Satyamangalam forest after facing societal rejection of their relationship. Despite this, the 2025 verdict builds on Tamil Nadu's progressive legacy rooted in both legal reforms and Indic traditions fostering wider acceptance of diverse identities. The verdict signals progress while recognising the concept of a 'chosen family' under Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees life and personal liberty. The court's assertion that 'marriage is not the sole mode to found a family' validates non-traditional relationships and offers hope where despair once prevailed. Despite a section of society refusing to accept gender-diverse communities, every May to July, vast numbers of indigenous gender-variant and diverse SOGIESC (sexual orientation, gender identity, expression, and sex characteristics) communities in south India honour their patron deities at temples such as those for Koothandavar Aravan in Tamil Nadu, and for Ellamma, Bhagavati and Mariamman across the region. These communities enact gender-specific Hindu rituals, which have historically provided sacred spaces for early LGBTQIA+ activism. This cultural acceptance, though not universal, has helped shape a more inclusive societal framework and complemented the legal efforts. The court's legal reasoning in the latest case was meticulous. The detainee confirmed her lesbian identity and desire to live with her partner, exposing familial coercion. The judges, referencing the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling in the Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty case, noted while same-sex marriage remains unrecognised, same-sex couples can still form families. The court criticised police inaction and directed law enforcement to protect the couple, reinforcing the judiciary's role in safeguarding individual rights against societal and familial pressures