
Can Zohran Mamdani's win help the beleaguered Democratic Party find a new roadmap?
Shortly after midnight on June 25, New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani appeared before his supporters at a rooftop brewery to greet the crowd of supporters chanting his name.
His main rival for the Democratic Party nomination, Andrew Cuomo, had just conceded defeat on television and the mood was delirious. Said Mamdani, quoting Nelson Mandela, 'It always seems impossible until it is done.'
Hours later, as the magnitude of his upset became clear, the 33-year-old Mamdani found himself fielding questions about what his victory might mean for the floundering Democratic Party in the United States.
Since losing to Donald Trump in November's presidential election, the Democratic Party has faced intense criticism from its own supporters who believe their leaders have been too passive in opposing Trump's agenda and failed to present voters with compelling alternatives.
The party hit historic lows in public approval in April, with merely a quarter of voters holding positive views about the Democrats – the worst showing since tracking began in 1990.
Mamdani's win has given the party cause to cheer – and perhaps a new roadmap. The result is a 'larger referendum about where our party goes', Mamdani told MSNBC, contending that the Democrats must 'move our political instinct from lecturing to listening'.
The victory for Mamdani in Tuesday's Democratic primary makes him the party's nominee for New York mayor in November's general election. A self-avowed democratic socialist, his campaign has advocated policies such as free public transit and rent freezes. He defeated Cuomo – a former state governor with strong establishment backing – despite starting the race with little name recognition.
For the Democratic Party, it may be difficult to seek definitive pointers from the primary election in one city – particularly when that city is overwhelmingly Democratic and the establishment candidate was as flawed as Cuomo, who previously resigned over sexual harassment allegations.
CNN: Do you like capitalism?
ZOHRAN MAMDANI: No. I have many critiques of capitalism.
In the words of Dr. King decades ago, he said, 'Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism; there must be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country.'… pic.twitter.com/iW02E21Qoe
— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) June 27, 2025
Yet Mamdani's success provides evidence that the brand of democratic socialism advanced by his wing of the party can attract diverse voters. He received endorsements from Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, two other prominent politicians who describe themselves as democratic socialists.
Mamdani seems to have been buoyed by the frustration many feel with the old Democratic machine and strategies. His campaign managed to mobilise voters who had previously stayed away from mayoral elections in New York.
Nearly a quarter of early voters were casting ballots in a Democratic primary for the first time since 2012 – a jump from 2021, when only 3% were new to Democratic primaries.
'Mamdani's focus on concrete economic issues such as free buses, rent freezes, and universal childcare clearly resonated with a wide range of voters,' said Na'ilah Amaru, a policy advocate who works with Democratic politicians. 'Campaigns that rely too heavily on past voting patterns miss entire groups of emerging voters who are ready to engage when offered something real.'
Mamdani's campaign released a statement to journalists on Thursday that he had won working-class neighborhoods that Mayor Eric Adams had carried in 2021, and captured areas that swung toward Trump in 2024.
The campaign's scale was also unprecedented for a municipal race, deploying over 50,000 volunteers who knocked on 1.5 million doors –in a city with 4.7 million Democrat voters and a population of 8 million.
Mamdani also benefitted from New York City's public financing system, which is designed to level the playing field and reduce the influence of wealthy donors. Under this system, for every dollar up to $250 that a city resident contributes to a campaign, the city government adds another $8 from public funds.
In March, Mamdani became the first candidate in the election to reach the $8 million spending cap for the primary. He did so with donations from a far more diverse sources than Cuomo: while Cuomo's campaign had 5,730 donors giving an average of $700 each, Mamdani was backed by 20,720 donors averaging $82.
Another source of disappointment among the Democratic base that Mamdani tapped into was the party's messaging around the violence in Palestine. Many voters have criticised Democratic leaders, including presidential candidate Kamala Harris, for remaining largely silent as tens of thousands of Palestinians were killed.
Mamdani is a rare US politician who has openly declared his support for Palestine, even as he runs to be mayor of a city in which estimated 11.6% of the population is Jewish.
Zohran Mamdani's win isn't just historic for New York City – it's groundbreaking for how U.S. politicians talk about Palestine. AJ+'s @TonyKaron breaks down why Mamdani's victory proves that candidates can openly support Palestine. pic.twitter.com/APSgJd7bdn
— AJ+ (@ajplus) June 26, 2025
Raza G, who worked with a South Asian collective canvassing voters for Mamdani's campaign, contended that the results demonstrated 'a breakdown of the centre' in Democratic party politics.
'The election was between a candidate who was pro-Palestine and another who was backed by pro-Israel groups,' he said. 'Voters saw that in the silence of Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party did not have a plan to address the question of Palestine and at the same time saw in Mamdani someone who has consistently spoken up about Palestinian rights.'
Raza added that unlike Harris, Mamdani did not disengage from voters who disagreed with him. 'People may have moved to the right but Mamdani understood that these people wanted an end to the violence and wanted inflation to reduce,' he said.
While Mamdani worked to mobilise the South Asian and Muslim communities that had a historically low turnout in mayoral elections, his campaign also made an effort to engage with Jewish voters.
Daniel Aldana Cohen, an assistant professor of sociology at UC Berkeley, suggested that Mamdani's campaign could be used across the US.
'When Mamdani talks about the cost of living, he's talking about solutions,' Cohen said. 'He's emphasising tangible benefits for ordinary people while keeping economic issues front and centre – but not at the exclusion of everything else like opposing bigotry…This is certainly a national model.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Supreme Court curbs nationwide injunctions in win for Trump's immigration agenda
A united conservative majority of the Supreme Court ruled Friday that federal judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision left unclear whether President Donald Trump's restrictions on birthright citizenship could soon take effect in parts of the outcome represented a victory for Trump, who has complained about judges throwing up obstacles to his agenda. Nationwide, or universal, injunctions had emerged as an important check on the Republican president's efforts to expand executive power and remake the government and a source of mounting frustration to him and his the court left open the possibility that the birthright citizenship changes could remain blocked nationwide. Trump's order would deny citizenship to U.S.-born children of people who are in the country illegally or temporarily. The cases now return to lower courts, where judges will have to decide how to tailor their orders to comply with the high court ruling, which was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Enforcement of the policy can't take place for another 30 days, Barrett justices agreed with the Trump administration, as well as President Joe Biden's Democratic administration before it, that judges are overreaching by issuing orders that apply to everyone instead of just the parties before the court. Judges have issued more than 40 such orders since Trump took office for a second term in administration has filed emergency appeals with the justices of many of those orders, including the ones on birthright citizenship. The court rarely hears arguments and issues major decisions on its emergency, or shadow, docket, but it did so in this courts, Barrett wrote, 'do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too.'The president, speaking in the White House briefing room, said that the decision was 'amazing' and a 'monumental victory for the Constitution,' the separation of powers and the rule of Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York wrote on X that the decision is 'an unprecedented and terrifying step toward authoritarianism, a grave danger to our democracy, and a predictable move from this extremist MAGA court.'Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing in dissent for the three liberal justices, called the decision 'nothing less than an open invitation for the government to bypass the Constitution.' This is so, Sotomayor said, because the administration may be able to enforce a policy even when it has been challenged and found to be unconstitutional by a lower administration didn't even ask, as it has in other cases, for the lower-court rulings to be blocked completely, Sotomayor wrote. 'To get such relief, the government would have to show that the order is likely constitutional, an impossible task,' she the ultimate fate of the changes Trump wants to make was not before the court, Barrett wrote, just the rules that would apply as the court cases groups that sued over the policy filed new court documents following the high court ruling, taking up a suggestion from Justice Brett Kavanaugh that judges may still be able to reach anyone potentially affected by the birthright citizenship order by declaring them part of a 'putative nationwide class.' Kavanaugh was part of the court majority on Friday but wrote a separate concurring that also challenged the policy in court said they would try to show that the only way to effectively protect their interests was through a nationwide hold.'We have every expectation we absolutely will be successful in keeping the 14th Amendment as the law of the land and of course birthright citizenship as well,' said Attorney General Andrea Campbell of citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers in the country illegally. The right was enshrined soon after the Civil War in the Constitution's 14th a notable Supreme Court decision from 1898, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the court held that the only children who did not automatically receive U.S. citizenship upon being born on U.S. soil were the children of diplomats, who have allegiance to another government; enemies present in the U.S. during hostile occupation; those born on foreign ships; and those born to members of sovereign Native American U.S. is amongst about 30 countries where birthright citizenship — the principle of jus soli or 'right of the soil' — is applied. Most are in the Americas, and Canada and Mexico are amongst and his supporters have argued that there should be tougher standards for becoming an American citizen, which he called 'a priceless and profound gift' in the executive order he signed on his first day in Trump administration has asserted that children of noncitizens are not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States, a phrase used in the amendment, and therefore are not entitled to states, immigrants and rights groups that have sued to block the executive order have accused the administration of trying to unsettle the broader understanding of birthright citizenship that has been accepted since the amendment's have uniformly ruled against the Justice Department has argued that individual judges lack the power to give nationwide effect to their Trump administration instead wanted the justices to allow Trump's plan to go into effect for everyone except the handful of people and groups that sued. Failing that, the administration argued that the plan could remain blocked for now in the 22 states that sued. New Hampshire is covered by a separate order that is not at issue in this justices also agreed that the administration may make public announcements about how it plans to carry out the policy if it eventually is allowed to take effect.- EndsMust Watch


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Melania Trump's EB-1 Visa Questioned Amid Crackdown On Immigrants: 'First Lady Had None...'
Last Updated: Melania Trump was Donald Trump's girlfriend when her EB-1 visa was approved. Though she is a US citizen now, her visa approval in 2001 was questioned in House Judiciary Committee. Amid Donald Trump's stringent immigration policies, criticism has now reached his doorstep as Jasmine Crockett, a Democratic Congresswoman, questioned why First Lady Melania Trump – an immigrant herself – was given an EB-1 visa back in 2001, despite not having 'significant achievements" in any field. Crockett questioned why the issue isn't being raised 'when it comes to the president's family's visas". She voiced her sharp opinion that she should not have been given the EB-1 visa. Her remarks came during a meeting of the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. 'The first lady, a model, and when I say model, I'm not talking about Tyra Banks, Cindy Crawford, or Naomi Campbell-level, applied for and was given an EB-1 visa," she said. The EB-1 visa, often called the 'Einstein Visa," is for people with outstanding talent or achievements. The government says this includes winners of awards like the Pulitzer, Oscar, or Olympic medals, as well as top researchers and executives from big international companies. Melania applied for the visa in 2000, when she was not married to Donald Trump and was only his girlfriend. She was then known as Melania Knauss, a Slovenian model who worked in New York. She got the EB-1 visa in 2001 and became a citizen in 2006. She got the right to sponsor her parents after that. 'Let me tell you how you receive an Einstein visa. You're supposed to have some sort of significant achievement, like being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize or a Pulitzer, being an Olympic medallist, or having other sustained extraordinary abilities and success in sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics," Crockett pointed out. 'Last time I checked, the first lady had none of those accolades under her belt. It doesn't take an Einstein to see that the math ain't mathin here," she added. She also raised questions on Donald Trump: 'Why aren't we talking about integrity when it comes to the president's family's visas?" Crockett criticised the US immigration approach, saying people are being arrested even at visa or citizenship appointments. She called Republican claims of restoring integrity a 'joke," adding that real integrity isn't detaining legal visa holders or cancelling visas over social media posts.


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
"I Think We Are Going To Reach A Deal": Trump On Trade Deal With India
US President Donald Trump has expressed optimism about a trade deal with India and said his country is looking for "full trade barrier dropping which is unthinkable" and that he is not sure that that is going to happen. "India, I think we are going to reach a deal where we have the right to go and do trade. Right now, it's restricted. You can't walk in there, you can't even think about it. We are looking to get a full trade barrier dropping, which is unthinkable and I am not sure that that is going to happen. But as of this moment, we agree that going to India and trade..." "We have made a deal with have 200 countries plus," Trump told reporters here. "At a certain point over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before we are going to send out a letter and talk to many other countries. We are going to tell them what they have to pay to do business with the US," he added. He was responding to a query on US reciprocal tariff deadline. Trump said on Thursday (US local time) that America has signed a deal with China and hinted that a "very big" deal with India will follow soon. Trump made the remarks while speaking at the Big Beautiful Bill event. In his speech hinting towards trade deals, Trump said, "Everybody wants to make a deal and have a part of it. Remember a few months ago, the press was saying, 'You really have anybody of any interest? Well, we just signed with China yesterday. We are having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one. Where we're going to open up India, in the China deal, we are starting to open up China." Trump asserted that deals will not be made with every other nation. "We're not going to make deals with everybody. Some we are just going to send them a letter, say thank you very much. You are to pay 25, 35, 45 per cent. That's the easy way to do it, and my people don't want to do it that way. They want to do some of it, but they want to make more deals than I would do," he said. "But we're having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one. Where we're going to open up India, in the China deal, we're starting to open up China. Things that never really could have happened, and the relationship with every country has been very good" he added. However, Trump did not elaborate on the details of the deal signed with China. Earlier in June, CNN reported that the United States and China reached a new trade agreement, reviving terms first agreed to in Geneva last month, after escalating tensions led to a virtual halt in bilateral trade. Earlier this month, while speaking at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum, US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said that a trade deal between India and the United States could be finalised soon, with both countries finding common ground that suits their interests. "I think to be in a very, very good place, and you should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not-too-distant future because I think we found a place that really works for both countries." When asked if he was hopeful about the outcome, Lutnick said he was "very optimistic," and added, "It could be sort of the way I come across," he said. Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on June 10 that India and the US were in the process of negotiating a fair and equitable trade agreement that will benefit both economies. Addressing a press conference over India-US trade deal and Future trade agreement with the European Union, Piyush Goyal said, "PM Narendra Modi and US President Trump met in February our leaders have decided to enter into a bilateral trade agreement which will be mutually beneficial for both the economies, businesses on both sides and the people of both countries. We are negotiating to make a nice, fair, equitable and balanced agreement to promote business." Highlighting that both America and India are "very close friends, allies and strategic partners", Piyush Goyal said that the trade deal is an opportunity to expand bilateral trade and strengthen the partnership between the two nations. About two weeks remain before the critical July 9 deadline as India and the United States negotiate challenges in finalising their Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) as the 90-day tariff pause period draws to a close. Government sources earlier emphasised that India's national interests will remain paramount in ongoing negotiations, even as both nations work intensively to reach an interim deal before the deadline expires. The negotiations had hit roadblocks, with the US maintaining its demands for substantially reduced duties on American agricultural and dairy products, along with market access for genetically modified (GMO) crops. Indian is apparently not keen on these proposals, citing concerns over food security, environmental protection, and the welfare of its domestic farming sector.