
Sanctions against individual settlers are hopelessly inadequate. The real settler organisation is Israel
expansion of the Abraham Accords
, Israel would be delighted to once again draw attention away from the carnage it continues to inflict on Gaza's civilian population.
Such a regional expansion would serve to advance another key goal of the accords: to spell out to Palestinians how Israel can look past them, not towards Ramallah or Rafah, but towards Abu Dhabi and – ideally – Riyadh. Israel's strategic gaze remains the same: skip over those erased Palestinians in order to look towards deal-making in the Gulf and beyond.
Of course, the violent, state-sanctioned erasure is not limited to Gaza. Almost daily pogroms against a defenceless Palestinian population in the West Bank have resulted – for now – in the ethnic cleansing of an area 'larger than the entire Gaza Strip'. And the violence continues.
Yet even amid all the bloodshed and destruction, Palestinians are not erased. They are right here – and still they comprise half of the people living between the river and the sea. The future of Israelis and Palestinians – just like our present and past – is here. That is the reality that must be addressed.
READ MORE
All this is well known. And all this, staggeringly, is not only tolerated but in fact underwritten by Europe through various partnerships with Israel, chief among them the EU-Israel association agreement. The agreement – supposedly 'based on respect for human rights and democratic principles' – has just now gone through an ever-so-belated 'review'. Its conclusion?
That '[t]here are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations.'
The resulting action on behalf of the EU? None.
Every new day of European inaction is a day in which Europe articulates a clear message to Israelis. What is that message? That the EU is fine (bar the occasional lip service) with what Israel is doing to Palestinians; that the killings and oppression are in fact greenlighted to continue by Brussels, Paris, Berlin and Dublin. For sure, the EU may not have the leverage to make it all stop. But it at least has the basic obligation not to be part of it, not to underwrite it, not to be continuously complicit in it. And it has a considerable measure of genuine leverage.
[
What gives Ursula von der Leyen the right to egg Binyamin Netanyahu on with his killing crusades?
Opens in new window
]
That kind of leverage – which is perhaps what French President Emmanuel Macron meant when recently speaking of 'concrete measures' – has rarely been used to counteract Israeli state violence. In recent years a modest wave of personal sanctions against 'violent settlers' has emerged – and is clearly a step in the right direction. The most recent announcement, earlier in June, by the UK and others of personal sanctions against two Israeli ministers – Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir – is yet another such step forward. Further steps could now follow – if not at EU level then from individual states or ad-hoc, like-minded, alignments.
But personal sanctions, to date, have demonstrably failed to stop either the violence itself or the impunity enjoyed by its perpetrators. The logic at the core of sanctioning individual settlers – or some of their political leaders – has been flawed from the get-go. Settlements, and all the violence, dispossession and loss of Palestinian land and livelihood that comes with them, are not a project of a few individual settlers, nor of Israel's extreme political right. They are an Israeli state project – a violent one – backed for decades by all Israeli governments through decisions, policy, funding, planning and military might.
As such, the review – and suspension – of the trade agreement with the EU could have served as the appropriate level at which Israeli policies are to be addressed. Acting effectively against these Israeli policies would certainly be met by a predictable Israeli response: accusations of 'anti-Semitism' and 'BDS' per the usual script. Yet a suspension of the agreement – or similar action at the appropriate government level – would amount to neither. Instead it would simply be the outcome of Israel's own undermining of its international obligations, flowing directly from Israel's criminal and cruel policies.
To impact Israeli policies, you must impact Israel. Not a specific settler nor even a specific settler organisation: for the real 'settler organisation' is the state of Israel itself.
Hagai El-Ad is a writer based in Jerusalem
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Mirror
a few seconds ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Ireland among nations urging Israel to abandon plans to occupy Gaza city
Ireland is among eight European nations that have urged Israel to abandon its plans to occupy Gaza City. Tanaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Simon Harris, signed the letter on Sunday along with representatives from Iceland, Luxembourg, Malta, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain. The letter states that the countries "strongly condemn the recent announcement of the intensification of the occupation and the military offensive, including in Gaza city". It said Israel's plan to expand its military operation and take control of Gaza City would force the displacement of a million Palestinians and "further endanger" the remaining hostages' lives. The signing comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel "has no choice but to finish the job and complete the defeat of Hamas". Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during an event at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in Jerusalem on July 27, 2025. (Photo by GIL COHEN-MAGEN / AFP) (Photo by GIL COHEN-MAGEN/AFP via Getty Images) He also pushed back against what he called a "global campaign of lies" as condemnation of the plan grows both inside and outside Israel. The letter from eight European nations said: "We firmly reject any demographic or territorial changes in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. "Actions in this regard constitute a flagrant violation of international law and international humanitarian law. "The intensification of the military offensive and the occupation of Gaza City represents a serious obstacle to the implementation of the two-state solution, which is the only path towards a comprehensive, just and lasting peace. "The Gaza Strip must be an integral part of the state of Palestine, along with the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. "The recognition of both Palestine and Israel is the best security guarantee for both and will ensure stability for the whole region. "We continue to call for an immediate ceasefire agreement and a permanent end to hostilities, for the immediate release of all hostages at the hands of Hamas and for the rapid, unimpeded and large-scale entry of humanitarian aid. Hamas cannot have a role in the future governance or security arrangements in Gaza, and must be disarmed." Speaking on Sunday, Mr Harris said this was "an extraordinarily dangerous moment" for Palestinians in Gaza. "We're living at a time where children are starving in Gaza and where there had been a lot of effort by a lot of countries, including Ireland, to try to get to a moment of de-escalation, where finally there could be a ceasefire, humanitarian aid could flow, hostages could be released. "We now see the Netanyahu government take an extraordinarily dangerous step in the absolute wrong direction, and we are joining today with a number of other European countries… in calling this out for what it is and condemning these actions. "We will continue to use every lever available here in this country and working across the European Union and the international community to call for a reversal here, a ceasefire, the release of the hostages and a major surge in humanitarian aid. "I think people in Ireland know what famine is like. It's ingrained in our mindset, in our history, and to be seeing a modern day famine take place in the 21st century is utterly repulsive and repugnant to everything any decent person can stand." Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.


RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Which UN members recognise Palestinian statehood?
Three-quarters of UN members have already or soon plan to recognise Palestinian statehood, with Australia becoming the latest to promise it will at the UN General Assembly in September. The Israel-Hamas war, raging in Gaza since the Palestinian militant group's attack on 7 October 2023, has revived a global push for Palestinians to be given a state of their own. The action breaks with a long-held view that Palestinians could only gain statehood as part of a negotiated peace with Israel. According to an AFP tally, at least 145 of the 193 UN members now recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state, including Ireland, France, Canada and Britain. Here is a quick recap of the Palestinians' quest for statehood: 1988: Arafat proclaims state On 15 November 1988, during the first Palestinian intifada, or uprising against Israeli rule, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat unilaterally proclaimed an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital. He made the announcement in Algiers at a meeting of the exiled Palestinian National Council, which adopted the two-state solution as a goal, with independent Israeli and Palestinian states existing side-by-side. Minutes later, Algeria became the first country to officially recognise an independent Palestinian state. Within a week, dozens of other countries, including much of the Arab world, India, Turkey, most of Africa and several central and eastern European countries followed suit. The next wave of recognitions came in late 2010 and early 2011, at a time of crisis for the Middle East peace process. South American countries, including Argentina, Brazil and Chile, answered calls by the Palestinians to endorse their statehood claims. This came in response to Israel's decision to end a temporary ban on Jewish settlement-building in the occupied West Bank. 2011-2012: UN recognition In 2011, with peace talks at a standstill, the Palestinians pushed ahead with a campaign for full UN membership. The quest failed, but in a groundbreaking move on 31 October of that year, the UN cultural agency UNESCO voted to accept the Palestinians as a full member, much to the dismay of Israel and the United States. In November 2012, the Palestinian flag was raised for the first time at the United Nations in New York after the General Assembly overwhelmingly voted to upgrade the status of the Palestinians to "non-member observer state". Three years later, the International Criminal Court also accepted the Palestinians as a state party. 2024-2025: new push Israel's offensive in Gaza after the 7 October 2023 attack has boosted support for Palestinian statehood. Four Caribbean countries (Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados and the Bahamas) and Armenia took the diplomatic step in 2024. So did four European countries: Ireland, Spain, Slovenia and Norway, the first three EU members. Within the European Union, this was a first in ten years since Sweden's move in 2014, which resulted in years of strained relations with Israel. Other member states, such as Poland, Bulgaria and Romania, had already done so in 1988, long before joining the EU. On the other hand, some former Eastern bloc countries, such as Hungary and the Czech Republic, do not or no longer recognise a state of Palestine. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that "Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own" at the UN General Assembly. France said last month it intends to recognise a Palestinian state come September, while Britain said it would do the same unless Israel takes "substantive steps", including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. Canada also plans to recognise a Palestinian state in September, Prime Minister Mark Carney said, marking a dramatic policy shift that was immediately rejected by Israel.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Israel kills Al Jazeera journalists in air strike on tent in Gaza
Israel 's military said it killed an Al Jazeera journalist it accused of being a Hamas cell leader in a Gaza air strike on Sunday, but rights advocates said he had been targeted for his frontline reporting on the Gaza war and Israel's claim lacked evidence. Anas al-Sharif (28) was among a group of four Al Jazeera journalists and an assistant who died in a strike on a tent near Shifa Hospital in eastern Gaza City, Gaza officials and Al Jazeera said. An official at the hospital said two other people were also killed in the strike. Calling Mr Sharif 'one of Gaza's bravest journalists', Al Jazeera said the attack was a 'desperate attempt to silence voices in anticipation of the occupation of Gaza'. Mr Sharif was the head of a Hamas cell and 'was responsible for advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF [Israeli] troops', the Israeli military said in a statement, citing intelligence and documents found in Gaza as evidence. READ MORE Journalists' groups and Al Jazeera denounced the killings. The other journalists killed were Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal, Al Jazeera said. A press freedom group and a UN expert previously warned that Mr Sharif's life was in danger due to his reporting from Gaza. UN special rapporteur Irene Khan said last month that Israel's claims against him were unsubstantiated. Al Jazeera said Mr Sharif had left a social media message to be posted in the event of his death that read, '...I never hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or misrepresentation, hoping that God would witness those who remained silent'. Last October, Israel's military had named Mr Sharif as one of six Gaza journalists it alleged were members of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, citing documents it said showed lists of people who completed training courses and salaries. 'Al Jazeera categorically rejects the Israeli occupation forces' portrayal of our journalists as terrorists and denounces their use of fabricated evidence,' the network said in a statement at the time. In a statement, the Committee to Protect Journalists, which in July urged the international community to protect Mr Sharif, said Israel had failed to provide any evidence to back up its allegations against him. 'Israel's pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' said Sara Qudah, CPJ's director for the Middle East and North Africa. Mr Sharif, whose X account showed more than 500,000 followers, posted on the platform minutes before his death that Israel had been intensely bombarding Gaza City for more than two hours. Palestinian militant group Hamas, which runs Gaza, said the killing may signal the start of an Israeli offensive. 'The assassination of journalists and the intimidation of those who remain paves the way for a major crime that the occupation is planning to commit in Gaza City,' Hamas said in a statement. Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has said he would launch a new offensive to dismantle Hamas strongholds in Gaza, where a hunger crisis is escalating after 22 months of war. 'Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices in Gaza conveying the tragic reality to the world,' Al Jazeera said. The Hamas-run Gaza government media office said 237 journalists have been killed since the war started on October 7th, 2023. The Committee to Protect Journalists said at least 186 journalists have been killed in the Gaza conflict. Australia plans to recognise a Palestinian state as early as Monday, the Sydney Morning Herald reported. Prime minister Anthony Albanese could sign off on the move after a regular cabinet meeting on Monday, the paper reported, citing unidentified sources. Albanese's office did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. France and Canada last month said it planned to recognise a Palestinian state, while Britain has said it would follow suit unless Israel addresses the humanitarian crisis in Palestine and reaches a ceasefire. Ireland formally recognised Palestine in May 2024. Israel has condemned decisions by countries to support a Palestinian state, saying it will reward Hamas. Mr Netanyahu told reporters on Sunday that most Israeli citizens were against establishing a Palestinian state as they thought that would bring war and not peace, even as thousands of protesters flooded the streets of Tel Aviv, opposing his plan to escalate the nearly two-year war and seize Gaza City. 'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole just like that, fall right into it ... this is disappointing and I think it's actually shameful but it's not going to change our position,' Mr Netanyahu said. Albanese has been calling for a two-state solution, with his centre-left government supporting Israel's right to exist within secure borders and Palestinians' right to their own state. - Reuters '