Worried ISL clubs seek status check and direction from AIFF
Panaji: The uncertainty surrounding the start, or even the future, of the
Indian Super League
(ISL) has prompted eight clubs to collectively write to the All India Football Federation (AIFF) 'with a sense of shared concern and responsibility towards the current status and direction of Indian football.
'
This season's edition of ISL was marked to kick off from Sept 14. However, FSDL, the federation's marketing partners and owners of the league, has kept the country's top-tier football league on hold due to lack of clarity over the 15-year Master Rights Agreement (MRA) that ends on Dec 8 later this year.
'In the absence of proper interaction and a lack of taking clubs into confidence, either from the AIFF or its commercial rights holder, clubs now find themselves unable to plan with the level of visibility and certainty that professional football operations require,' the eight clubs wrote in a letter to AIFF president Kalyan Chaubey on Tuesday.
'This has impacted not just short-term decisions but is now beginning to affect the structural backbone of our institutions,' they added.
The clubs who have called for a "constructive dialogue" with the AIFF president and a meeting at the earliest include
Bengaluru FC
,
Jamshedpur FC
,
FC Goa
, Hyderabad FC, Kerala Blasters FC, NorthEast United FC, Odisha FC and Punjab FC. The three Kolkata giants – Mohun Bagan Super Giant, East Bengal, Mohammedan Sporting – have not signed the letter, while Mumbai City FC and Chennaiyin FC have also stayed away.
The eight clubs said activities such as youth development, player recruitment, staffing, budgeting, and grassroots programming, all of which require months of advance planning, have become increasingly difficult to sustain.
'The longer this uncertainty continues, the greater the risk that years of hard-won progress may begin to unravel.
'Worryingly, most clubs have also been forced to paralyse their youth operations due to the current climate; halting scouting, coaching, and academy-related activities.
This puts at risk the very developmental structures that have taken years to build and which were intended to serve as a long-term pipeline for Indian football talent.'
The clubs have said a constructive dialogue between the AIFF and the participating clubs is critical.
'Our intent is to understand—and to contribute wherever possible to—the process of resolution. As clubs, we remain deeply committed to the growth of the game in India and are prepared to work with the governing body to overcome the current challenges,' the clubs said.
Last week, Chaubey assured franchises, players, coaches and other stakeholders that the ISL would take place this season, potentially with a slight delay due to ongoing litigation in the Supreme Court. In April this year, the apex court had verbally asked the AIFF not to take any decision on the renewal of the MRA until the final order.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
India's auto parts exports face heat as Asian rivals gain edge; all eyes on bilateral trade pact
NEW DELHI : India's $111 billion auto components industry faces a fresh threat after US President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian goods, denting the sector's edge in its largest export market. The latest levy, revealed on Wednesday evening, slightly moderates the 26% rate proposed in Trump's April Liberation Day speech. But even at 25%, it places India at a disadvantage compared to other Asian exporters—Japan faces a 15% tariff, Vietnam 20%, and Indonesia 19%. More worryingly for India, North American peers Mexico and Canada remain exempt under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which offers zero-tariff access to the US market for automotive components, provided they meet local content requirements. The move has rattled India's supplier base, especially firms closely tied to US automakers, and may slow fresh investments until trade terms are clarified. Also read: Luxury cars not the biggest opportunity UK senses in India after FTA. It's this US market access under strain The move assumes significance as the US accounted for 27% of India's auto component exports in FY25, worth about $5.9 billion, according to the Automotive Components Manufacturers Association of India (ACMA). Any erosion in competitiveness could ripple across Indian suppliers that serve US-based automakers and aftermarket clients. 'Indian exporters may face some price pressures in auto component exports compared to other Asian countries which have struck a deal with the US such as Japan, Vietnam, and Indonesia. These tariff announcements would have a slowdown in investments, at least till the India-US bilateral trade agreement (India-US BTA) is finalised," said Ashim Sharma, senior partner and Business Unit head, Nomura Research Institute Solutions and Consulting. Data from the US Census Bureau shows Mexico and Canada were the top auto parts exporters to the US in 2024, with exports worth $81 billion and $19.4 billion, respectively. India, in comparison, exported just $3 billion worth of parts in the same period—lagging far behind Asian rivals such as China, Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan, and Vietnam. India has said it is analysing the tariff statement and will protect domestic interests in ongoing trade negotiations. But analysts say uncertainty will hurt the investment outlook in the short term. 'Any investments including capital investments, development investments are bound to slow down. Vehicle makers in the supply chain may also hold their cards closer to their chest due to the uncertainty. For instance, if an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) was planning to continue with an auto parts manufacturer, it may wait for the India-US BTA to be signed before investing further," said Sharma. Publicly listed auto part makers with significant US exposure have already started feeling the heat. Sona Comstar, which derived 41% of its ₹3,555 crore revenue from North America in FY25, saw its shares fall over 1.5% on Thursday. Bharat Forge, which earned 15% of its standalone revenue from the US Class 8 Truck market, also saw its stock drop close to 3%. This compared with a 1.2% decline in the Nifty Auto index. Also read: Indian markets stare at short-term jitters from Trump's tariff hit Tariffs raise pricing pressure 'Our competitors in both our major product categories tend to be from China. And in an event in which tariffs are imposed on every country, it is basically then your relative pricing that comes into place. And then the gap has actually widened much more," said Vivek Vikram Singh, MD and CEO at Sona Comstar, during the company's 30 April earnings call. Singh also pointed to a potential upside from Trump's tariff policy and trade deals involving Southeast Asian countries. 'They are also closing, I think, backdoors, like Southeast Asia, Mexico, etc. where people could just reroute goods. I think those have also effectively been closed because now they're talking about US content," he added. Nikhil Dhaka, vice president–public policy at Primus Partners, said the tariffs may especially impact Indian suppliers with tight links to the US. 'While Indian automotive OEMs have relatively limited exposure to the US compared to markets like Europe or Japan, the impact on component suppliers is more pronounced. The tariff may lead to short-term disruptions, especially for Tier-1 and Tier-2 suppliers with strong US linkages." The component sector, composed largely of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), is also sensitive to shifts in global demand. In July, Mint reported that the government had begun working on a scheme to boost auto part exports by offering financial incentives for both operational and capital expenses, and non-fiscal support such as skilling initiatives to narrow talent gaps.
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran slams Donald Trump over sanction on 6 Indian companies: ‘Coercive, discriminatory actions violate…'
The Iran Embassy in India has slammed the Donald Trump administration over its decision to sanction six Indian companies for trading with Iran, calling it a 'coercive' and 'discriminatory' action to 'dictate its will on independent nations' 'The United States continues to weaponize the economy and use #sanctions as tools to dictate its will on independent nations such as Iran and India and impede their growth and development,' the Iranian Embassy said in a post on X. 'These coercive discriminatory actions violate the principles of international law and national sovereignty, representing a modern form of economic imperialism. Resisting such policies is a stand for a more powerful emerging non Western-led multilateral world order and a stronger Global South,' it added. (This is a developing story. Check back for updates)
The Print
26 minutes ago
- The Print
Indian negotiators play defence in trade deals. Weighed down by weaknesses in economy
So, how did we end up in this position? And can we change it? The good news is that Trump's decisions aren't always set in stone. The bad news is that the Indian economy has several chronic structural weaknesses, which weigh us down while negotiating. Indian exporters will face a higher tariff than East Asian countries like Vietnam (20 per cent), the Philippines (19 per cent), and Indonesia (19 per cent). Penalty included, the levy will end up closer to Bangladesh, which faces a 35 per cent rate. Remember, countries like Vietnam already have a cost advantage over India. With one stroke of his pen, US President Donald Trump has dented India's ambition to be the world's 'China Plus One' manufacturing hub. His decision to levy a tariff of 25 per cent—plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian arms and crude oil—on India's exports to the US will have real consequences. America is, after all, the world's largest economy and biggest consumer of all goods. Stuck playing defence Perhaps it was always over-optimistic to hope for a trade deal that would meet expectations on both sides. For long, Trump has singled India out as an egregious offender on trade barriers, both tariff and non-tariff. And he isn't wrong. Countries in East Asia, like China and Vietnam, haven't been as tariff-happy and have used other methods of supporting domestic producers, such as subsidies. India's expectation would always have been for a 'friendly' deal. It probably expected a staggered reduction of tariffs over a decade or more, exclusion of the most sensitive sectors like dairy and farming, and a lower average tariff from the US than from India (because India is a lower–middle income economy and a counterweight to China). However, President Trump is a tough negotiator and wants to show results to his electors here and now. The US would have wanted a much greater upfront tariff reduction (than the UK did); it would have wanted market access for its agricultural exports; and it would have wanted India not to buy Russian oil and arms. But all of these are only the proximate causes of Trump's India tariff announcement, a day ahead of the 31 July deadline for a trade deal. The reality is that Indian negotiators aren't always on the strongest footing in most negotiations. They tend to play defence rather than strategic offence. And that is because two out of the three pillars of the Indian economy—agriculture and industry—are not ready to face unbridled external competition. In turn, that is because the country hasn't implemented the depth of market reforms required to be a truly competitive economy. Consider the reality that India will never be able to have flexibility while negotiating on agriculture. It would be suicidal for any government to open up the sector to external competition when the largest part of the sector is low–productivity subsistence agriculture. More than half the population still relies on farming. Agriculture has remained untouched by market reform. The Modi government tried to modernise the sector, but it didn't succeed in facing down large farmer lobbies. For the foreseeable future, agricultural reform seems off the policy agenda. Also read: India must not retaliate to Trump's tariff tactic. Secure interim deal, fix internal issues A lesson long overdue By now, almost 35 years after the 1991 market reforms, India should have been able to at least create a competitive manufacturing sector. That would have greatly eased the burden of agriculture by absorbing surplus labour, offering high–productivity jobs. But the absence of fundamental reforms has proved to be an Achilles' heel. Factor markets—land, labour, and capital—are still highly controlled and regulated, which has kept costs elevated. Power is expensive, and industry is charged higher rates to cross-subsidise consumers and farmers. Railway tariffs are too high because freight charges cross-subsidise passengers. Clearances for projects take years. The one reform that did happen after 1991 was trade liberalisation, but that was reversed after 2014 in an attempt to give manufacturing another chance. Unfortunately, tariff protection alone cannot create a globally competitive manufacturing. It can, at best, be a temporary crutch while other reforms are implemented. India is now caught in an awkward position where tariffs are higher than what the initial post-1991 trajectory would have suggested, while other reforms haven't taken off. It's a self-inflicted double wound. India cannot and should not bow to America's terms. Every country has to protect its immediate interests. But the Trump tariffs will hopefully bring the long-overdue realisation that it is unwise to expect any favours from the world in our quest for prosperity. The hard work has to be done at home. Whether or not a better deal can be negotiated with the US, there is no escape from the need to create a truly competitive economy. Dhiraj Nayyar is Chief Economist at Vedanta. His X handle is @nayyardhiraj. Views are personal. (Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)
