H-E-B pilots autonomous vehicle delivery in Austin
Dive Brief:
H-E-B is piloting autonomous vehicle delivery from a store in Austin, Texas, the grocer confirmed in an email to Grocery Dive.The robots have been delivering select orders of grocery items through Favor, the H-E-B-owned delivery app offering groceries, restaurant meals, alcohol and household items, from the Mueller H-E-B store since May, the grocer said.The pilot marks the latest effort by a grocer to test autonomous vehicle delivery.
Dive Insight:
While several grocers have tested bot delivery over the last few years, autonomous delivery is still rare in the grocery industry.
H-E-B partnered with autonomous vehicle maker Avride, which is headquartered in Austin, for the pilot. The bots have a delivery radius of roughly one mile and service customers living in the Austin Mueller District of the city.
With the pilot, customers can get 10 small items delivered by the bots between 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily, Chron reported.
Avride's website says that its delivery robot can hold six 16.5-inch pizzas and five 1.5-liter bottles. The bot uses sensors, lidar and cameras to navigate and has cameras that blur faces and license plates to ensure privacy, according to the company. The robots travel up to five miles per hour and can cover 31 miles on a single charge.
The bots are a familiar sight to people in the Mueller neighborhood. Last spring, Avride bots started ferrying food from restaurants to delivery customers, according to local news station KXAN.
H-E-B said it does not have expansion plans to share about the pilot.
Last summer, Favor added a quick delivery option that lets customers get up to 15 grocery items in 45 minutes or less.
Save Mart and Erewhon Market have also piloted sidewalk delivery robots in recent years as several tech companies, including Uber, look to make autonomous vehicles mainstream.
Copyright 2025 Industry Dive. All rights reserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Berkshire Sells Major Healthcare Holding After 10+ Years
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK-B) is among the 11 Best Financial Services Stocks to Buy Right Now. It has restarted sales of DaVita, selling 200,010 shares between May 22 and May 27, 2025. A team of insurance professionals in a boardroom overlooking a city skyline. The deal comes after Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK-B) made a $116 million sale of 750,000 shares in February. Despite the sales, the firm still has 35.14 million shares in DaVita, making it the company's largest institutional investor. The healthcare stock, which it originally purchased in 2011, is still the conglomerate's tenth-largest position. The new disposal comes after DaVita's share price skyrocketed, quadrupling since 2011, while the company's operational difficulties grew. Ted Weschler, the portfolio manager, is believed to have spearheaded the purchase because he valued DaVita's effectiveness and shareholder-friendly approach. Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK-B) is a holding company with numerous subsidiaries engaged in various operations. The company's primary business is insurance, which is mostly handled by Geico, Berkshire Hathaway Primary Group, and Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance Group. It is among the best financial stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of BRK-B as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 High-Growth EV Stocks to Invest In and 13 Best Car Stocks to Buy in 2025. Disclosure. None.
Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
DHL Express to suspend operations countrywide amid strike, lockout
DHL Express Canada plans to shut down operations across the country this week amid a strike and lockout involving 2,100 truck drivers and other workers, adding to turmoil in the parcel market. With the two sides at an impasse, the company said it will halt thousands of daily deliveries starting Friday — the same day that federal legislation banning replacement workers takes full effect. DHL will stop receiving inbound packages to Canada from abroad on Tuesday at 9 p.m., DHL said in an email. Spokeswoman Pamela Duque Rai pointed to stalled negotiations with Unifor and the legislation known as Bill C-58, 'which prohibits the use of replacement workers during industrial action,' she noted. On June 8, the German-owned carrier said it was rolling out a 'contingency plan' that allowed it to keep serving its more than 50,000 customers, which range from retailer Lululemon to e-commerce giants Shein and Temu. Duque Rai had said in an email at the time that DHL did not expect 'significant disruptions' to its service. Unifor, which represents DHL truck drivers, couriers and warehouse and call centre employees, had warned against any steps to supplant unionized workers with temporary ones, with president Lana Payne saying the move would impose a chill on contract talks. Last Friday, Unifor's bargaining committee said it had met with DHL Express Canada CEO Geoff Walsh, who stressed the possibility of a halt the following week. 'We will not be intimidated by the company's threats to disrupt service or shut down operations,' the committee said in a June 13 bulletin to members. The upcoming pause adds to the labour tumult in the parcel sector, as Canada Post remains at loggerheads with 55,000 workers amid strained negotiations and an overtime ban imposed by the union last month. Canada is not the only country struggling with falling mail volumes — a key factor in the impasse between the two sides — and DHL is among those feeling the pinch. In March it announced plans to cut 8,000 jobs in Germany this year, marking the largest set of layoffs in its home market in decades. Back in Canada, Duque Rai sought to frame the union's proposals as unreasonable. 'While we are committed to fair compensation for our employees, our position is that Unifor's demands — a 22 per cent salary increase for hourly employees, as well as a 42 per cent salary increase for owner-operators — do not reflect the current economic landscape and would jeopardize our operational viability,' she said. Payne said DHL has been seeking concessions since negotiations kicked off nearly a year ago. She highlighted a push by the company to change the pay model for owner-operators — roughly 500 independent contractors drive for DHL and also have union membership — in a way she claimed would reduce their compensation, not boost it. 'What we've seen over many months of bargaining are what I would say is an attempt to divide workers in classifications, pit one group against another, pit one region against another,' Payne said in a phone interview on June 8. A group of employers expressed concerns Tuesday about the effect of legislation passed under the previous Liberal government to ban replacement workers in federally regulated workplaces, pointing to DHL as the latest example of potential disruption. 'Canadians should prepare for more frequent and prolonged work stoppages that can impact supply chains, critical infrastructure and the broader economy,' said Daniel Safayeni, CEO of Federally Regulated Employers – Transportation and Communications, in a statement. The group called for a more 'balanced labour relations framework.' In contrast, labour groups have decried federal intervention in labour disputes over the past year, including strikes by railworkers, B.C. dockworkers and WestJet mechanics. Unifor has said its bargaining priorities with DHL revolve around wages, working conditions and surveillance and automation in the workplace. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 17, 2025.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tech recruiter settles DOJ claim alleging it favored H-1B holders over US workers
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. California tech recruiter Epik Solutions agreed to pay $71,916 to resolve allegations by the U.S. Department of Justice that it violated the Immigration and Nationality Act by discriminating against U.S. workers in favor of foreign H-1B visa holders, DOJ announced June 10. The charges came after investigators from DOJ's Immigration and Employee Rights section, a component of the agency's civil rights division, found that, allegedly without legal justification, Epik Solutions placed numerous job ads stating that certain positions were open only to applicants with H-1B visas, according to the settlement agreement. 'A top priority of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division is protecting American workers from unlawful discrimination in favor of visa workers. Companies engaging in such discrimination are on notice that the days of the federal government looking the other way on American workforce protection are over,' Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet K. Dhillon stated in the announcement. The settlement highlights the broad scope of the Trump administration's efforts to crack down on illegal immigration, particularly as it relates to alleged anti-American bias in U.S. workplaces. This can get complicated for employers because it requires them to be on top of several – sometimes intersecting — laws and regulations, which are often enforced by different federal agencies. For instance, in 1990, an amendment to the INA created the H-1B classification for foreign workers to be temporarily hired in the U.S. for specialty occupations, according to a U.S. Department of Labor fact sheet. The intent was to help employers who couldn't obtain needed business skills and abilities from the U.S. workforce, the fact sheet explains. However, to protect both U.S. employees from being adversely affected by the employment of H-1B workers and the H-1B workers themselves, employers must attest to DOL that they will meet certain standards when employing H-1B workers, including that they will adhere to specific pay requirements. The pay issue was at the crux of a December 2024 report from university researchers, estimating, based on DOL 2005 salary data publicly released in 2014, that the accounting firm Deloitte paid newly hired H-1B accountants 10% less than U.S. workers in similar roles. Deloitte countered that the researchers' data was incomplete and hadn't been validated. It said it complies with all immigration regulations, provides competitive wages and uses the visa program to complement its workforce with highly skilled professionals, many of who are graduates of U.S. colleges, to meet its business needs. Issues related to hiring H-1B workers can also arise under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of national origin, Ogletree attorneys noted in a March analysis. The attorneys pointed to a February press release from EEOC Chair (then Acting Chair) Andrea Lucas advising employers the agency would prioritize 'protecting American workers from anti-American national origin discrimination.' To achieve this priority, Lucas said the EEOC planned to increase 'enforcement of employment anti-discrimination laws against employers [and staffing agencies] that illegally prefer non-American workers.' The Ogletree post also predicted the DOJ will step up its enforcement of the INA's employment-related provisions, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of citizenship status, including discrimination against U.S. citizens, the attorney said. According to the settlement in the Epik Solutions case, DOJ said it has reasonable cause to believe the company — through its job ads — engaged in citizenship discrimination against U.S. workers. Under the agreement, Epik Solutions must provide training to any employee, recruiter, contractor or agent involved in its recruiting, referral, hiring or employment eligibility process on how to avoid discrimination prohibited under the INA. Epik Solutions also may not agree to a client's request or preference to exclude protected workers from employment opportunities unless it obtains written proof from the client demonstrating the legality of the request, the settlement states. Recommended Reading California acts on noncompetes, caste discrimination
