Taiwan unveils ‘carrier killer' missile plans in bid to deter mainland Chinese forces
In a list issued under the Defence Industry Development Act, Taiwan's defence ministry announced a new weapon described as a 'long-range subsonic anti-ship cruise missile'.
The list said the island's military would spend NT$40 million (US$1.4 million) next year and the year after that to buy 80 'frequency-agile coaxial magnetrons' – components that can quickly and dynamically change their operating frequency.
In radar applications, frequency agility helps reduce interference and improve target detection.
The list said the components would be used in the new long-range missile as well as in the Hsiung Feng II and III anti-ship missiles, prompting defence analysts to suggest that the National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology (NCSIST) – Taiwan's top weapons builder – had been working on the project for several years.
Local news media outlets have reported that between 2021 and 2022, the defence ministry had allocated more than NT$800 millionto develop the missile using the Hsiung Feng IIE land-attack cruise missile's core technology with a particular emphasis on stealth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US stops all visitor visas for people from Gaza
The US State Department on Saturday said it was halting all visitor visas for individuals from Gaza while it conducts 'a full and thorough' review. The department said 'a small number' of temporary medical-humanitarian visas had been issued in recent days but did not provide a figure. The US issued more than 3,800 B1/B2 visitor visas, which permit foreigners to seek medical treatment in the United States, to holders of the Palestinian Authority travel document, according to an analysis of monthly figures provided on the department's website. That figure includes 640 visas issued in May. The State Department's move to stop visitor visas for people from Gaza comes after Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and an ally of US President Donald Trump, said on social media on Friday that the Palestinian 'refugees' had entered the country this month. Play Loomer's statement sparked outrage among some Republicans, with congressman Chip Roy, of Texas, saying he would inquire about the matter and congressman Randy Fine, of Florida, describing it as a 'national security risk'.
RTHK
9 hours ago
- RTHK
European leaders back three-way meeting
European leaders back three-way meeting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was one of many leading figures to back a Trump-Putin-Zelensky meeting. File photo: Reuters European leaders on Saturday expressed support for a three-way summit between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Russia's Vladimir Putin and US leader Donald Trump, after a US-Russia summit failed to produce a ceasefire. A statement, signed by French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, insisted on maintaining pressure on Russia until peace was achieved, including through sanctions. The European leaders also insisted Moscow "cannot have a veto" on Ukraine joining the European Union or NATO. Russia has made clear it will not tolerate Kyiv's membership of the defence alliance. But the leaders said they were "ready to work ... towards a trilateral summit with European support". Friday's Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska ended without the US president extracting concrete commitments from Putin to halt Russia's invasion of Ukraine launched in February 2022. "We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace," said the European joint statement. European leaders had been uneasy over Trump's diplomatic outreach to Putin, arguing that Zelensky should have been involved in the Alaska summit. In a separate statement, Starmer praised Trump's efforts as bringing "us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine". Macron, writing on X, cautioned against what he said was Russia's "well-documented tendency to not keep its own commitments". He called for any future peace deal to have "unbreakable" security guarantees. He also argued for increased pressure on Russia until "a solid and durable peace" had been achieved. The European leaders welcomed what they called "security guarantees" made by Trump without giving details. (AFP)
AllAfrica
16 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Inequality, taxes and a false fiscal dilemma in Singapore
Since its inception, Singapore's paramount economic advantage has lain in its seamless integration with global markets, attracting vast foreign investment and driving trade flows that transformed it from a sleepy entrepot into a burgeoning metropolis. Yet the turbulence unleashed by Donald Trump's tariff wars has starkly illuminated how such openness can become a strategic liability. With Singapore's GDP forecast for 2025 recently slashed to a mere 1.7% — a precipitous decline from the twenty-year average of 4.2% — it's time to reconsider the island-nation's fiscal paradigm to catalyze economic stimulus and fortify long-term resilience. Two fiscal levers merit particular scrutiny: the Goods and Services Tax (GST), a 9% consumption levy and the Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC), which channels returns from GIC, Temasek and the Monetary Authority of Singapore into the national budget. Parliamentary discourse has misleadingly cast these instruments in binary terms. The Workers' Party and Progress Singapore Party have advocated increasing the share of the NIRC used for public spending from 50% to 60%, potentially unlocking S$4 billion to S$5 billion (US$3.1 billion to US$3.9 billion) annually to boost the economy and strengthen social safety nets. Both have also proposed targeted GST relief, whether through the PSP's call for a rollback to 7%, or the WP's push for exemptions on essential goods. Meanwhile, the incumbent People's Action Party (PAP) remains wedded to the austere status quo, preserving the full GST rate while stockpiling national reserves for our 'rainy day fund.' To avert further economic torpor, Singapore must confront its two greatest exigencies: persistent inequality and an impending demographic crisis. The PAP should therefore harness the full spectrum of government resources by synthesizing salient opposition fiscal proposals into a hybrid framework — maintaining the existing GST structure while augmenting NIRC expenditure. Contrary to the PAP's postulations, Singapore has considerable scope to responsibly expand NIRC spending. The party routinely echoes the plight of Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand during the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis as proof that insufficient reserves can catalyze currency collapses. But this narrative is patchy at best. Those countries suffered from profound structural vulnerabilities, including fragile financial systems, vast short-term foreign-currency debts and inadequate reserves. Even South Korea, which benefitted from relatively robust investor confidence, was beset by comparable systemic risks, as exemplified by its parlously overleveraged chaebols and limited domestic savings base. None of these conditions applies to contemporary Singapore. With a meticulously regulated financial system, Singapore is the only country in Asia to boast a AAA credit rating. The country commands approximately US$511 billion in foreign exchange reserves. This comprises a minute fraction of the total estimated S$1.9 trillion, yielding an extraordinary reserves-to-GDP ratio of just under 300%, one rivaled only by resource-rich states such as Qatar and Norway. Crucially, the WP and PSP merely wish to modestly increase the share of investment returns allocated for public expenditure, not the assets themselves – hardly a radical adjustment that would imperil the country's formidable fiscal bulwark. The government's stringent criteria for reserve utilization further underline the infrequency with which such funds are deployed; over the past two decades, reserves have been tapped only twice: S$4.9 billion during the 2008 global financial crisis (which was fully replenished within two years), and S$40 billion amid the highly unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic. Former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's admonition to restrain NIRC spending, given the unpredictability of future crises ranging from geopolitical upheavals to climate threats, should buttress rather than diminish the imperative to address pressing domestic challenges. Unmitigated, these internal issues could pose even graver risks to Singapore's long-term prosperity, increasing the necessity for emergency withdrawals in future crises. The merits of raising public spending also rationalize maintaining the GST at its current rate. While the WP and PSP rightly highlight its disproportionate burden on lower-income households, the GST confers irreplaceable advantages. It preserves Singapore's fiscal flexibility to sustain ultra-competitive personal and corporate tax rates, a pivotal asset given the city-state's dependence on foreign capital inflows. Moreover, the PAP correctly notes that as a broad-based consumption tax, GST revenue is significantly underpinned by tourists, expatriates, and the wealthiest 20% of residents, who account for 70% of total collections. Instead, transfer schemes such as GST-V should be bolstered to mitigate the GST's regressive impact. Inequality remains alarmingly rampant; even after accounting for such transfers, the bottom 10% and 20% of households only earn 15% and 30% of the median income, respectively, disparities that are both morally indefensible and economically detrimental. Financial insecurity deters lower-income individuals from risk-taking, whether by seeking better-suited employment or entrepreneurial ventures such as heartland food stalls, thereby stifling overall productivity. Furthermore, this inequity renders these groups disproportionately susceptible to economic shocks, escalating the future fiscal burden of crisis support. Additional revenues should be channelled into two pivotal areas to unlock the potential of lower-wage workers, investments that promise handsome rewards. The first involves upskilling initiatives, particularly SkillsFuture, which remain largely inaccessible to those most in need. Employer support is markedly skewed, with 69% of degree holders receiving training sponsorship compared to just 41% of those with only secondary education, and the scarcity of hybrid and online learning options further restricts participation among lower-income workers constrained by time. Enhanced funding could redress these gaps and facilitate upward mobility, an especially critical priority in the face of rising automation risks. Secondly, the increased spending from the NIRC and GST could bolster Singapore's SMEs, which employ lower-income workers more often than larger companies. Since these businesses have a relative lack of creditworthiness and collateral, initiatives such as the Enterprise Financing Scheme and SME Working Capital Loans would empower these businesses to invest in digitalization, sweeten incentives to attract talent and broaden their international customer bases, strengthening their resilience amid economic downturns. Addressing the needs of lower-income groups also intersects with a critical demographic imperative: reversing Singapore's vertiginously declining birth rate, which plummeted to a historic low of 0.97 in 2024. This trend portends a drastic reduction in working-age adults per senior from 5.7 in 2015 to an alarming 2.7 by 2030, threatening to curtail output and tax revenues. Singapore's status as the world's most expensive city in 2022 elucidates much of this reluctance to procreate; 89% cite the exorbitant cost of child-rearing, while 81% lament insufficient time. NIRC and GST revenues could meaningfully alleviate these pressures, chiefly by subsidizing housing and childcare and enabling businesses to adopt more flexible work arrangements. Admittedly, many countries, such as Russia and Hungary, have expended mammoth resources into reversing their population declines, only to see minimal results. But Singapore's enviable economic fundamentals could make similar measures far more efficacious, as demonstrated by Sweden's success in the early 1990s, where sustained family support during an economic boom lifted fertility rates even above replacement levels. With renewed global economic uncertainty on the horizon, coupled with the longstanding pressures of inequality and demographics, Singapore's political leaders can ill afford to obdurately cling to their reductive views of the GST and NIRC. Rather, they must recognize both as complementary levers to amplify public investment, uplifting present well-being while safeguarding the future. Sean Tan is a former King's Scholar at Eton College and intern at the Center for International Governance Innovation. He has also written articles for St Antony's International Review Oxford, Yale's undergraduate US-China magazine 'China Hands', Oxford Political Review and several other notable publications.
