Elon Musk pushes US lawmakers to fast-track self-driving car approvals
By David Welch, Ed Ludlow and Kara Carlson
Elon Musk is pushing lawmakers to help clear a path for driverless vehicles, according to people familiar with the matter, part of a broader effort behind the scenes to lobby for a key priority of Tesla Inc.
In recent weeks, Musk and people who work for him have been calling members of Congress directly to gather support, said the people, who asked not to be named because the discussions are private. He has also been weighing in on revisions of a bill introduced on May 15 that would begin setting up a basic framework for autonomous vehicles.
Options discussed include expediting the bill or presenting a more detailed measure similar to it before Congress's July 4 recess, one of these people said.
On Friday in an Oval Office press conference Musk said he will continue to advise President Donald Trump even after he steps away from the Department of Government Efficiency he has spearheaded.
'The administration's policy is driven by one thing and one thing only: achieving the president's agenda and his commitment to the American people,' White House deputy press secretary Harrison Fields told Bloomberg.
Musk and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment.
Clearing the path for autonomous vehicles would be a huge win for Musk, who has said he's refocusing on running his business empire. He's increasingly betting Tesla's future on autonomy and robotics.
Tesla plans to launch its long-anticipated rideshare service in Austin on June 12, using a small fleet of existing Model Y SUVs, Bloomberg reported. Tesla also aims to add purpose-built Cybercabs, expected to reach volume production next year, to its rideshare service.
Right now, Tesla's Cybercab usage would be limited by federal rules that only allow special exemptions for a test batch of 2,500 vehicles that lack a steering wheel and control pedals. Tesla and other operators have pushed for years to get a federal standard to allow such driverless vehicles on America's highways.
The Trump administration has said it's amenable to federal rules for AVs and Musk has used Tesla's earnings calls to advocate for a federal framework for self-driving cars.
A White House official said Tesla has to make business decisions that are in its best interest. The person, speaking under the condition of anonymity to discuss private matters, said the president will continue to focus on making American energy dominant again and will pursue policies to support that infrastructure.
'It'd be wonderful for the United States to have a national set of rules for autonomous driving as opposed to 50 independent sets of rules on a state-by-state basis,' Musk said to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy when he visited Tesla in May.
Currently, companies running AVs are keeping the numbers small and are adhering to a patchwork of state rules. In Texas, Tesla will face few regulations at its launch, with the state regulating autonomous vehicles much like any other car, only requiring cameras, insurance and the ability to follow traffic laws.
Congress has had various bills pushing to permit a range of 80,000 to 200,000 autonomous vehicles per manufacturer, but none have managed to pass through the Senate. One bill passed the House in 2017 to allow 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never brought it to a vote. There, trial attorneys lobbied Democrats to keep new rules at bay without guarantees of how legal liability would be managed.
Representative Bob Latta, a Republican from Ohio who's a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and sponsored the bill, is working on revisions with plans to reintroduce it within the next few weeks, said the people. Latta did not return requests for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
TPCC chief to take up ceasefire appeal with State government; Peace Talks Committee slams Centre for not announcing ceasefire
Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee (TPCC) president B. Mahesh Kumar Goud has said that he will bring the Peace Talks Committee's appeal for a ceasefire with the CPI (Maoist) to the notice of Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy, besides discussing it completely in the party's high-level committee, to explore the possibility of announcing a ceasefire in the State. Addressing a roundtable conference organised by the Peace Talks Committee at Sundarayya Vignana Kendram here on Sunday, Mr. Mahesh slammed the Modi-led Central government for its handling of the Maoist issue and Operation Kagar at Karreguttalu. He accused the Centre of aiming to eliminate Naxalites to hand over mineral wealth in Chhattisgarh and other States to corporate companies. The Congress leader also criticised the Modi government for its 'fascist rule', saying it is willing to hold talks with terrorists but not with those who sacrificed their lives to address social inequalities. Stating that any democratically-elected government must act following the Constitution, he questioned why the Centre is not willing to hold talks with Maoists, who are Indian citizens, while offering a ceasefire with Pakistan. Referring to the Congress's ideology, he remembered that their party was built on the foundations of non-violence. He, however, condemned violence from all sides and stated that Naxalism was born out of economic inequalities. Expressing similar views, Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLC Dasoju Sravan Kumar, representing the party at the conference, emphasised his party's commitment to peace, dialogue and democratic values. He recalled that former Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao, during a public meeting in Warangal, had called for an immediate end to Operation Kagar and urged the Central government to hold peace talks. Mr. Sravan suggested that people resort to arms when they lack a platform to raise their grievances and stressed the need for effective platforms for people to express their grievances. Peace Talks Committee convener Justice Chandrakumar, members Prof. Haragopal, Prof. Anwar Khan and others urged the Centre to hold talks with the Maoists immediately.


The Print
19 minutes ago
- The Print
Not the first rodeo for Shimla SP Sanjeev Gandhi, who took on Himachal DGP, top IAS officers
A native of Arki Bughar village in Solan district, Gandhi has been in the force for 25 years. As SP, Kangra, in 2017 under the Congress-led Virbhadra Singh government, he spearheaded operations against drug and mining mafias. These actions resulted in three transfers within 15 days, though public and political support called for his retention. Verma retired Saturday and necessitating the transfer of his charge to 1994-batch IPS officer Ashok Tiwari, posted as DGP (Vigilance and ACB). Gandhi, meanwhile is on medical leave and Solan SP Gaurav Singh has been given additional charge for Shimla. Shimla: Sanjeev Kumar Gandhi, a 2012-batch Indian Police Service (IPS) officer posted as Superintendent of Police (SP) of Shimla, has landed at the center of a controversy involving senior police officers and political figures. The Himachal Pradesh government placed Gandhi, former director general of police (DGP) Atul Verma, and Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Onkar Sharma on leave on 29 May, citing 'indiscipline'. He was subsequently transferred to Una, where he continued targeting similar syndicates. In 2022, Gandhi was awarded the DGP Disc and Best Administrator Award for his work against the drug mafia in Himachal Pradesh. The current controversy stems from Gandhi's role leading a Special Investigation Team (SIT) investigating the death of Vimal Negi, a chief engineer with the Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, whose body was found in Gobind Sagar lake on 18 March. On 23 May, Himachal Pradesh High Court transferred the case to Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) citing delays on the part of the state police. At a press conference the next day, on 24 May, Gandhi publicly named Verma, former DGP Sanjay Kundu, and Chief Secretary Prabodh Saxena, accusing them of obstructing justice. Gandhi alleged that Verma submitted a misleading affidavit questioning the SIT's evidence handling, particularly regarding a formatted pen drive, claiming it was intended to discredit his investigation. The affidavit referenced a 20 March conversation among five police officers discussing the pen drive's potential replacement. He also criticized the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for allegedly using corrupt means to destabilize the Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu government. Verma recommended Gandhi's suspension for these allegations, and Gandhi's attempt to challenge the high court's CBI transfer ruling through a Letter Patent Appeal (LPA), an appeal made against the decision of a single judge to another bench in the same court. But CM Sukhu did not act on Verma's recommendation. Subsequently, the LPA was withdrawn. ThePrint reached Gandhi, Verma and Kundu for comment but had not received a response by the time of publication. This report will be updated if and when a response is received. Gandhi's run-ins with Verma go back to 2021-22, when Gandhi, part of a police recruitment committee, raised concerns about irregularities, prompting a CBI investigation. He accused Verma, then DG-CID, of pressuring subordinates to produce a misleading report in another case and claimed Verma's staff leaked a confidential CID report in the 'samosa scandal'. As for Kundu, Gandhi alleged in the press conference on 24 May that he misrepresented a 18 July, 2023, gas leak explosion in Shimla's Middle Bazaar as a terror attack, 'misusing' the National Security Guard (NSG) to fabricate evidence. In another case, Gandhi's status report on a complaint by Dharamshala businessman Nishant Sharma detailed nine phone calls between Kundu and K.D. Shreedhar, an advocate and Sharma's business partner, in 2023, including a 256-second call on 25 October, 2023, suggesting potential 'criminal links', leading to a court-ordered impartial investigation. Gandhi's investigations have also led to tensions with BJP MLA Sudhir Sharma, whom he accused of orchestrating 'horse-trading' during the February 2024 Rajya Sabha elections, when six Congress MLAs cross-voted in favour of BJP candidate Harsh Mahajan. Gandhi filed a contempt of court petition against Sharma for sharing a video of Negi case proceedings. Sharma responded with a criminal defamation notice and wrote to the Speaker of the Himachal Pradesh Vidhan Sabha to move a privilege motion against Gandhi, claiming the officer's statements harmed his reputation. Gandhi has accused Chief Secretary Prabodh Saxena of pressuring him to halt police inquiries in cases related to the Ram Krishna Ashram land dispute, alleging he was instructed not to question the ashram's swami. He claims a 'long-term conspiracy' by senior officials to undermine his investigations, particularly in the Negi case, which BJP alleges involves a Congress cover-up. Gandhi has reported these issues to the state government and Advocate General, stating that no action has been taken. He has expressed readiness to resign rather than compromise on his integrity, emphasising his 25 years of service. Public opinion on Gandhi is divided. Some view him as an officer committed to addressing corruption, while others, including Sharma, describe him as defiant, accusing him of politicizing investigations and challenging senior officials. 'The ongoing disputes reflect the complex interplay of policing, bureaucratic dynamics, and political tensions in Himachal Pradesh. Gandhi is outspoken but when you are in force, there is a procedure. He has made a mistake by holding a press conference against superiors,' a retired IPS officer told ThePrint on condition of anonymity. A senior police officer who did not wish to be named said Gandhi had Sukhu's backing, so far. 'He worked with a free hand. Proceeding on leave is not a big deal. But since he has levelled open accusations against superiors, that amounts to indiscipline,' he told ThePrint. 'The SIT led by Gandhi has not questioned those accused by the deceased's wife. It raises fingers on his probe and even the court has pointed it out,' another officer pointed out. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: Himachal chief secy in soup after Rs 1.2 lakh bill for Holi party sent to govt for clearance


Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Indian-American banned from MIT graduation ceremony for pro-Palestine speech. Who is Megha Vemuri?
Indian-American student Megha Vemuri of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), was banned from attending a graduation ceremony on Friday after she delivered a pro-Palestinian speech during a commencement event on May 29. Vemuri was designated to be the marshal at the graduation ceremony, however, the university announced that she and her family were barred from attending the event. Vemuri, the elected class president and a double major in computation and cognition and linguistics, spoke at MIT's OneMIT Commencement Ceremony in Cambridge. Her speech, which was not pre-approved, denounced MIT's research ties with Israel and accused the university of being complicit in the 'genocide' of the Palestinian people. Following the speech, University Chancellor Melissa Nobles informed Vemuri that she would not be allowed to participate in the graduate ceremony on Friday, adding that she would receive her diploma by mail. In a statement, the university said: 'MIT supports free expression but stands by its decision, which was in response to the individual deliberately and repeatedly misleading Commencement organizers and leading a protest from the stage.' In response to MIT's decision to bar her from the graduation ceremony, Vemuri said she was not disappointed about missing the event. 'I see no need for me to walk across the stage of an institution that is complicit in this genocide,' she wrote. However, she expressed disappointment with the university's handling of the situation, saying school officials 'massively overstepped their roles to punish me without merit or due process.' According to data from the United States Department of Education, MIT received $2.8 million in grants, gifts, and contracts from Israeli entities between 2020 and 2024, as reported by The Boston Globe and cited by The New York Times. Born and raised in Alpharetta, Georgia, Vemuri graduated from Alpharetta High School in 2021. She studied computer science, cognition, and linguistics at MIT, recently completing her degree while serving as the class president. At MIT, Vemuri was also a part of the Written Revolution, a student group that 'platforms revolutionary thought on campus' through writing and art, which it describes as 'powerful tools for conducting a revolution.' Before enrolling at MIT, she interned at the Neuroscience Institute at the University of Cape Town in South Africa and participated in various youth leadership and science outreach programs. Vemuri's ONEMIT speech quickly went viral on social media, drawing widespread criticism. In response to the online backlash, she has since taken down her LinkedIn profile. Taking the stage wearing a red keffiyeh – a symbol of solidarity with Palestine – Vemuri was one of nine speakers at MIT's OneMIT Commencement Ceremony on Thursday. Read from crumpled sheets of paper, her speech, roughly four minutes long, was addressed to her classmates, highlighting some of their efforts to protest against Israel. 'You showed the world that MIT wants a free Palestine,' she said, adding, 'The MIT community that I know would never tolerate a genocide.' After Vemuri left the stage to a round of applause, MIT President Sally Kornbluth spoke next. She paused as some people began chanting, and then responded, 'OK, listen folks. At MIT, we believe in freedom of expression. But today is about the graduates.' President Kornbluth has found herself on this type of tightrope before. In December 2023, she testified before the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce, alongside student presidents of Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania. The hearing was on how universities were handling campus protests and allegations of antisemitism. Unlike her counterparts Claudine Gay and Liz Magill —both of whom were replaced by their schools — Kornbluth managed to avoid serious consequences. The 2023-24 academic year saw widespread pro-Palestinian protests on many college campuses, including encampments and tense standoffs across the country. Graduation ceremonies became a stage for political expression, with walkouts and protest speeches common. Generally, those who participated in such actions were not subjected to disciplinary measures. Vemuri's also drew criticism from the House Speaker, Mike Johnson, a key ally of US President Donald Trump. 'Ignorant. Hateful. Morally bankrupt. Where is the shame—or appropriate response from the institution?' he wrote on X. 'Have your children avoid MIT & the Ivy League at all costs.'