Don't take the pistachio out of Sicilian pesto
We in the Green party campaigns committee have taken up Umberto Eco's baton (Letters, 25 February) and produced a set of 'how to spot a fascist' beermats. On the other side are suggestions for what to do about fascism when you spot it. They've proved very popular. Maybe the Guardian could consider beermats in the future, to replace wallcharts.Charles HarrisLondon
Tell you what, I'll stop eating kebabs if the government stops building runways (UK urged to act now on net zero – and skip two kebabs' worth of meat a week, 26 February).Nick RogersBaldock, Hertfordshire
When did it become appropriate for a visitor to the Oval Office in the White House to keep their hat on, as Elon Musk did? Another example of declining standards?Hugh CraigEdinburgh
In the late 70s, one of my history teachers described me as laconic (Letters, 26 February). Being a man of few words, my da had to look it up. Polly LlwyndedwenAberhonddu, Powys
'It is impossible to assess Alison's work as she has not done any.'Ali CrusoeGoudhurst, Kent
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
20 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
SNP's handling of Flamingo Land appeal 'risks being unlawful'
Since then, Green MSP Mr Greer, who is involved in the Save Loch Lomond campaign, had his legal advisor send a detailed letter of concern to the Government. Concerns raised include the reappointment of the same official who previously recommended that Flamingo Land's mega-resort be given permission to go ahead. This official will now lead on the recall case and make a new recommendation to Ministers, which Greer's legal advisor Ian Cowan warned risks making the process 'tainted by bias'. READ MORE: Yes to Flamingo Land, no to National Parks: what's the SNP playing at? What locals in Balloch think of Flamingo Land The Green MSP for the West of Scotland said: 'The public and the experts have said again and again that [[Flamingo Land]]'s destructive application must be rejected. The National Park did the right thing last year when they unanimously said no to this daft mega-resort. And when SNP Ministers were about to overturn that decision and let it go ahead, we forced them into a u-turn. 'But since then the Scottish Government has made some deeply questionable decisions. They refuse to hold any public hearing and have asked the same official who tried to approve the plans to 'mark his own homework' by making recommendation for a fresh decision." Another concern raised in the letter is the apparent contradiction in the dates of specific documents. The document formally reappointing the previous official to prepare a new report for Ministers was published on July 4th, having apparently been signed off by a senior planning official on June 24th. However, the document's properties show that it was created on July 4th, shorty after the publication of a separate document from this official which laid out the new process. The appointment document also did not carry the digital signature of the relevant senior official. Mr Greer added: 'Now they're [the Scottish Government] asking Flamingo Land to draft their own planning conditions on their own terms, against the wishes of the National Park. Is it any wonder that local people get the feeling that the cards are being stacked against them? 'I hope there is a simple explanation for this inconsistency in the date of the official's appointment, because it is hugely concerning. There needs to be full transparency here if the public are to have any confidence in this process. As it stands, the timeline just doesn't add up and that's a massive cause for concern.' The Scottish Government said the development raised issues of "national significance" and so they decided to recall the appeal. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers decided to recall the Lomond Banks appeal as the proposed development raises issues of national significance in view of its potential impact on Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park. As this is a live planning appeal it would not be appropriate to comment further.'
The Guardian
20 hours ago
- The Guardian
Fewer green energy tariffs offered as British households opt for cheaper deals
The number of green energy tariffs available to British households has plummeted during the cost of living crisis as bill payers choose affordability over sustainability, according to industry data. Energy suppliers have pulled tariffs advertised as 'green' from the market since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 triggered a global energy crisis that pushed gas and electricity bills to record highs. Green tariffs, which are typically more expensive than standard deals, made up about 85% of the UK's supply market in 2022 as climate-conscious households opted to pay a premium for deals backed by renewable energy. But industry data, commissioned by the Guardian, has revealed that energy suppliers have radically scaled back their green offerings, which now make up about a fifth of the tariffs on the market. William Mann-Belotti, an analyst at Cornwall Insight, an energy consultancy, said demand for tariffs backed by renewable energy had fallen because 'green credentials aren't a higher priority than cost … Amid a cost of living crisis, it becomes difficult to sell pure green tariffs at a premium'. Energy tariffs marketed as green typically promise to supply renewable energy rather than power from a mix of sources provided to the UK's power grids, either by matching each unit of energy sold with a renewable energy certificate bought in an open market, or through a direct deal with a renewable energy generator. The consultancy found that the number of green dual-fuel tariffs has halved in the last year alone. Last month there were 13 dual-fuel green tariffs available to consumers out of 57, compared with last summer when there were 24 green tariffs on offer out of 56 dual-fuel energy deals. All the energy deals now advertised as 'green' on the uSwitch price comparison website, including dual-fuel and separate gas and electricity tariffs, have made up just 18% of the overall total this year, data from the switching service shows. Before Russia's invasion of Ukraine, green energy deals made up 85% of all energy tariffs on offer on the price comparison site, according to uSwitch data. 'Consumer choice plays a strong role in what is offered on the market, so cost concerns might see people switching away from more expensive green tariffs. This would therefore reduce the demand for them,' Mann-Belotti said. 'Also, there are other ways for people to reduce their carbon footprint, with quite the increase in solar PV installations in recent years.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion However, the Uswitch data revealed some good news for climate-conscious households. Although there are fewer green tariffs on the market today, the deals available are 'greener' than they used to be. Uswitch grades each tariff marketed as green to help customers avoid greenwashed deals. In 2021, fewer than 15% of tariffs received a gold- or silver-standard rating from the switching service, but last year nine of the 10 green tariffs on its site were ranked at this level, leaving a single tariff ranked bronze. The stronger green credentials behind these tariffs reflect a shift away from using renewable energy certificates to guarantee the origin of the electricity – called 'greenwashing' by consumer groups and investigated by the government. Instead, suppliers are opting to buy clean energy directly from renewable energy projects. Others sell energy that is cheaper when there is more renewable energy across the country as an incentive to use more clean power when it is available.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Fewer green energy tariffs offered as British households opt for cheaper deals
The number of green energy tariffs available to British households has plummeted during the cost of living crisis as bill payers choose affordability over sustainability, according to industry data. Energy suppliers have pulled tariffs advertised as 'green' from the market since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 triggered a global energy crisis that pushed gas and electricity bills to record highs. Green tariffs, which are typically more expensive than standard deals, made up about 85% of the UK's supply market in 2022 as climate-conscious households opted to pay a premium for deals backed by renewable energy. But industry data, commissioned by the Guardian, has revealed that energy suppliers have radically scaled back their green offerings, which now make up about a fifth of the tariffs on the market. William Mann-Belotti, an analyst at Cornwall Insight, an energy consultancy, said demand for tariffs backed by renewable energy had fallen because 'green credentials aren't a higher priority than cost … Amid a cost of living crisis, it becomes difficult to sell pure green tariffs at a premium'. Energy tariffs marketed as green typically promise to supply renewable energy rather than power from a mix of sources provided to the UK's power grids, either by matching each unit of energy sold with a renewable energy certificate bought in an open market, or through a direct deal with a renewable energy generator. The consultancy found that the number of green dual-fuel tariffs has halved in the last year alone. Last month there were 13 dual-fuel green tariffs available to consumers out of 57, compared with last summer when there were 24 green tariffs on offer out of 56 dual-fuel energy deals. All the energy deals now advertised as 'green' on the uSwitch price comparison website, including dual-fuel and separate gas and electricity tariffs, have made up just 18% of the overall total this year, data from the switching service shows. Before Russia's invasion of Ukraine, green energy deals made up 85% of all energy tariffs on offer on the price comparison site, according to uSwitch data. 'Consumer choice plays a strong role in what is offered on the market, so cost concerns might see people switching away from more expensive green tariffs. This would therefore reduce the demand for them,' Mann-Belotti said. 'Also, there are other ways for people to reduce their carbon footprint, with quite the increase in solar PV installations in recent years.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion However, the Uswitch data revealed some good news for climate-conscious households. Although there are fewer green tariffs on the market today, the deals available are 'greener' than they used to be. Uswitch grades each tariff marketed as green to help customers avoid greenwashed deals. In 2021, fewer than 15% of tariffs received a gold- or silver-standard rating from the switching service, but last year nine of the 10 green tariffs on its site were ranked at this level, leaving a single tariff ranked bronze. The stronger green credentials behind these tariffs reflect a shift away from using renewable energy certificates to guarantee the origin of the electricity – called 'greenwashing' by consumer groups and investigated by the government. Instead, suppliers are opting to buy clean energy directly from renewable energy projects. Others sell energy that is cheaper when there is more renewable energy across the country as an incentive to use more clean power when it is available.
