logo
Police brigadier accused of multi-million-rand fraud scheme; source claims charges lack merit

Police brigadier accused of multi-million-rand fraud scheme; source claims charges lack merit

IOL Newsa day ago
A senior police brigadier accused of a multimillion-rand fraud and corruption scheme is pleading her innocence, as a close source questions the legitimacy of the charges despite her arrest.
Brigadier Stephinah Mahlangu has reportedly been arrested three times on allegations of fraud and corruption.
Her first arrest, in February 2022, involved irregular PPE procurement worth R1.9 million alongside 14 other officers. In June 2022, she was again taken into custody for allegedly committing fraud involving toner cartridges valued at R960,000, along with two colleagues.
Most recently, on July 30, 2025, she was arrested over claims of fraud and corruption connected to a furniture tender estimated at R79 million.
However, a close source within the procurement division who is known to The Star has refuted the allegations against Mahlangu, insisting that while arrests were made, the charges do not reflect her conduct.
'Brigadier Mahlangu has always been someone who worked strictly by the book and was extremely careful when granting procurement authority,' the source said.
The source further suggested that Mahlangu's refusal to bend procurement rules may have earned her powerful enemies.
'Some senior managers from the head office used to approach her with suppliers of their choice, asking for procurement approval. When she turned those requests down, they were unhappy, and that is why I believe she is now being mishandled,' the source added.
The source also questioned why Mahlangu was being singled out, stressing that as head of procurement, her role was limited to granting authorisations within set thresholds and ensuring that the bidding process was properly followed.
'There are several other processes that take place before procurement authority can even be granted, and Brigadier Mahlangu was never directly engaging with service providers. So the real question is: why, out of all these layers of red tape, is she the one being portrayed as the corrupt person?' the source asked.
The source went on to outline how the procurement process for quotations works, explaining that Mahlangu's office only became involved at the final stage.
'The process is very clear,' the source said. 'First, the end-user activates the need. Once that need is approved, they source three suppliers from the database system. Those suppliers are then approached for quotations.
A submission is compiled with the names of suppliers, together with a request for financial authority (FA) and procurement authority (PA). Only after financial authority is obtained does her office come in at the final stage to issue procurement authority so that the purchase can go through.'
The source further alleged that in September 2022, Mahlangu and another official responsible for finance at Division SCM were suspended over the granting of FA and PA for PPE procurement. According to the source, the approvals had been granted under an emergency delegation by the National Treasury, the former National Commissioner, whose name is known to The Star and three lieutenant generals.
A departmental investigation was later conducted by the Northern Cape Provincial Commissioner, who, in her report, allegedly confirmed that Mahlangu and her team had fully complied with National Treasury regulations.
'Until today, the office of the National Commissioner refuses to release that report because it doesn't favour them,' the source claimed.
The source added that following their suspension, both Mahlangu and her colleague were transferred to the Division Inspectorate in February 2023, where they remain.
The source argued that Mahlangu's repeated arrests were unjust, insisting she was simply carrying out her duties.
'She has been arrested for doing her job. Nowhere has it ever been stated that she received kickbacks from suppliers.'
According to the source, the investigating officer alleged in his statement that one supplier had forged a BEE certificate and questioned why the company was used despite not being a VAT vendor. 'There is no tool within SAPS to verify whether a document is forged or not, yet that was used against Mahlangu,' the source explained.
The source further claimed that the investigating officer once told Mahlangu he had a mandate to arrest her multiple times.
'I believe that, because in 2022, two separate warrants of arrest were both signed in January, but they were carried out at different times. The most recent arrest, there wasn't even a warrant; he simply called them to the police station, charged them, and then they went straight to court,' the source added.
Responding to the allegations, Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) spokesperson Henry Mamothame said the directorate had established prima facie evidence against Brigadier Mahlangu before formally charging her.
He explained that Mahlangu faces three separate and unrelated fraud cases, in which she is alleged to have acted in common purpose with others in the irregular awarding of contracts to various companies.
Mamothame also dismissed suggestions from our source that Mahlangu was being targeted, emphasising that the IDAC does not single out individuals.
'The IDAC has and will always follow due process in bringing the accused and criminal matters before any court of law. The IDAC does not and will not target any individual or entity, save to pursue criminality without fear, favour or prejudice,' he added.
Mahlangu is scheduled to appear in the Pretoria High Court tomorrow (Thursday) to face the charges.
By the time of publishing, both the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) and the South African Police Service (SAPS) had not responded to requests for comment.
The Star
[email protected]
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ActionSA files criminal complaint over failed Boipatong Old Age Home project
ActionSA files criminal complaint over failed Boipatong Old Age Home project

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

ActionSA files criminal complaint over failed Boipatong Old Age Home project

ActionSA has lodged a criminal complaint with the Boipatong South African Police Service (SAPS) over the collapse of the R28 million Boipatong Old Age Home project. The project, launched by the Emfuleni Local Municipality in 2015, has been plagued by delays, including contractor failures, poor administration, and community unrest. The Star previously revealed that the project came to a standstill nearly a decade later, after the late discovery of a gas pipeline running beneath the site, halting planning and construction. On August 20, ActionSA Gauteng Provincial Chairperson Funzi Ngobeni presented evidence at the Boipatong SAPS pointing to financial misconduct, fraudulent spending, and gross dereliction of duty by both contractors and government officials. 'This project is a textbook case of how corruption and incompetence rob communities of dignity. We will not allow public funds to disappear while our elderly continue to suffer without care or protection.' Ngobeni added that, given the seriousness and the amount involved, Boipatong SAPS has referred the case to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the Hawks. In his complaint, Ngobeni alleges that R25 million was paid to contractors despite the site being abandoned, with professional fees exceeding R3 million disbursed without any corresponding service. He claims no funds have been recovered, no disciplinary action has been taken against officials, and that the case may involve violations of the PFMA, MFMA, and anti-corruption laws. He added that ActionSA will urge the Gauteng Premier to use his executive authority to petition the President for a Proclamation under Section 2(1) of the Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act, 74 of 1996. The party also calls on Premier Panyaza Lesufi to publicly release the full audit trail of the project, explain why no action has been taken against the companies and officials involved, and commit to recovering public funds while completing the facility for Boipatong's elderly. Previously, Gauteng MEC Jacob Mamabolo's spokesperson, Theo Nkonki, said the government is taking decisive steps to complete the Boipatong Old Age Home by 2026: 'We have launched a detailed planning process, including updated technical studies, revised project scopes, and active engagement with key stakeholders such as SASOL.' Nkonki added that safety considerations and redesign efforts are ongoing, and that new contracts will include penalties to ensure contractors are held accountable. The Star [email protected]

Citizens can record police: General Masemola clarifies the law
Citizens can record police: General Masemola clarifies the law

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Citizens can record police: General Masemola clarifies the law

Members of the SA Police Service are not allowed to arrest ordinary people recording videos or taking photographs of their operations in public. Image: Supplied / SAPS National Police Commissioner General Fannie Masemola has informed SA Police Service (SAPS) members that there is no prohibition preventing any person from recording or photographing officers while on duty or executing their duties. Masemola noted that police officers seem uncertain about how to react when a member of the public photographs or records a police official in public. 'There is no prohibition that prevents a private person from recording a member while the member is on duty or exercising any power or duty as a police official in public,' he explained in a letter dated August 12, 2025, to acting Hawks head Lieutenant-General Siphesihle Nkosi, all deputy national, provincial, divisional, district commissioners, and all heads and section heads, among others. The top cop warned that arrest under these circumstances will be unlawful. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Masemola said cases of people arrested for recording a police officer or taking a photograph must be dealt with circumspection and unless an offence has been committed, justifying the registration of a case docket and the alleged offence is of a serious nature that requires detention, a case may not be registered and the person must be immediately released and an entry made in the occurrence book. He added that a commander must be satisfied that there is prima facie evidence that the elements of an offence are present before accepting an arrested person and processing him or her for detention in the SAPS's custody. In June, Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, Judge Mpostoli Twala ordered suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Police Department to each pay R100,000 and R150,000, respectively, for the unlawful arrest and detention of attorney Shaun Jacobs for taking a video of a roadblock on a public road in front of the driveway to his house in March 2019. Jacobs had complained about the unreasonableness and disturbance caused by the roadblock and approached the officers and asked them to relocate it to a vacant land not far from his house but was ignored. When Jacobs asked for their details, an officer identified as Koahela George became aggressive, pushed him with both his hands on his chest, and told him to get into his house, threatening him with arrest. He then fetched his cellphone from his house to record the roadblock to lay a complaint with the authorities on how it was set up in front of his house. Despite not being rude or aggressive towards the officers, when they saw him recording a video of the scene and especially the vehicle, George pounced on him and arrested him without explaining his rights and what he was arrested for. He was detained for 26 hours, which the court deemed unjustified and unlawful. To make matters worse, Jacobs and his attorney attended mediation where the prosecutor told them if there was a payment of R20,000, the matter will go as it is a serious matter similar to the infamous Vicky Momberg racism case and the resultant three-year imprisonment sentence. He refused and made representations, attaching the video and the prosecutor withdrew the charges. Masemola does not make reference to Jacobs' judgment but states that 'a person is not committing an offence, albeit interference with a member, defeating or obstructing the course of justice or any other offence, merely because he or she is recording the conduct of a police official'. He added that the device used by a person to make such recording or to take a photograph may not be seized, damaged or destroyed merely because a recording was made or a photograph was taken of an SAPS member. In addition, according to Masemola, recording or photographing SAPS members does not constitute a contravention of the Protection of Personal Information Act and police officers cannot rely on their right to privacy to protect their identities or conduct as SAPS members. Masemola said police officers must exercise proper control over crime scenes and protect the privacy of victims of crimes, including deceased persons. 'Where a person interferes with a crime scene or hinders a member in the execution of his or her duties at a crime scene, the person must, as far as possible, be warned to refrain from continuing with the conduct before arrest is considered,' he explained. If after the warning a person continues to interfere with the crime scene, arrest may be considered and a case docket be opened at a police station. However, Masemola states that the recording or taking of photographs while a person is outside the cordoned off area of a crime scene does not constitute defeating or obstructing the course of justice or interfering with a member in the execution of his or her duties. Persons recording or taking photographs at police stations may compromise the privacy of persons inside such as witnesses and victims of crime as well as security measures. 'Police stations are increasingly being targeted by criminals. A recording or photograph may compromise the security of a police station by exposing security measures and any shortcomings thereof, especially if shared on public platforms. 'This increases the risk of harm to every person at a (police) station, including members of the public. Persons who are making such recordings must be requested to refrain from doing so,' explained Masemola.

ActionSA files criminal complaint over failed Boipatong Old Age Home project
ActionSA files criminal complaint over failed Boipatong Old Age Home project

IOL News

time4 hours ago

  • IOL News

ActionSA files criminal complaint over failed Boipatong Old Age Home project

ActionSA has filed a criminal complaint regarding the R28 million Boipatong Old Age Home project, highlighting issues of alleged corruption and mismanagement that have delayed vital care for the elderly. ActionSA has lodged a criminal complaint with the Boipatong South African Police Service (SAPS) over the collapse of the R28 million Boipatong Old Age Home project. The project, launched by the Emfuleni Local Municipality in 2015, has been plagued by delays, including contractor failures, poor administration, and community unrest. The Star previously revealed that the project came to a standstill nearly a decade later, after the late discovery of a gas pipeline running beneath the site, halting planning and construction. On August 20, ActionSA Gauteng Provincial Chairperson Funzi Ngobeni presented evidence at the Boipatong SAPS pointing to financial misconduct, fraudulent spending, and gross dereliction of duty by both contractors and government officials. 'This project is a textbook case of how corruption and incompetence rob communities of dignity. We will not allow public funds to disappear while our elderly continue to suffer without care or protection.' Ngobeni added that, given the seriousness and the amount involved, Boipatong SAPS has referred the case to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the Hawks. In his complaint, Ngobeni alleges that R25 million was paid to contractors despite the site being abandoned, with professional fees exceeding R3 million disbursed without any corresponding service. He claims no funds have been recovered, no disciplinary action has been taken against officials, and that the case may involve violations of the PFMA, MFMA, and anti-corruption laws. He added that ActionSA will urge the Gauteng Premier to use his executive authority to petition the President for a Proclamation under Section 2(1) of the Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act, 74 of 1996. The party also calls on Premier Panyaza Lesufi to publicly release the full audit trail of the project, explain why no action has been taken against the companies and officials involved, and commit to recovering public funds while completing the facility for Boipatong's elderly. Previously, Gauteng MEC Jacob Mamabolo's spokesperson, Theo Nkonki, said the government is taking decisive steps to complete the Boipatong Old Age Home by 2026: 'We have launched a detailed planning process, including updated technical studies, revised project scopes, and active engagement with key stakeholders such as SASOL.' Nkonki added that safety considerations and redesign efforts are ongoing, and that new contracts will include penalties to ensure contractors are held accountable. The Star

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store