
My first ever blind date
Four of us go for lunch once a month. My hippy ceramist neighbour, Geoffrey, is a foodie and one of the best cooks I know. He was born a few years after the second world war and, along with his brother, who went on to become a Michelin-starred chef, developed an interest in food from his English, Belgian and Italian grandparents and Swiss mother. I couldn't afford to heat the little painting studio downstairs this winter and have only sold one work since November, so our choice of restaurants has been necessarily modest. The menus include dishes made with items from the end of the butcher's counter that I, vegetarian for most of my twenties, still avoid: pied et paquets (sheep's feet and tripe stuffed with pork), tête de veau (boned and boiled calf's head) and andouillette (a coarse and malodorous sausage made from colon).
Geoffrey loves this stuff. He often berates us for avoiding it, but even he wouldn't eat andouillette in company because of the smell. Our favourite place is more expensive at €20-30 a head for three courses where they serve 12 fabulous oysters for €18, and, occasionally, andouillette. 'It'll be all right here. A really good one shouldn't smell too much, but don't worry, I won't have it,' Geoffrey says if it's on, choosing hake or something else normal like the rest of us.
A while back a friend called. He was coming to the coast for a week and asked if I'd like to meet for lunch, his treat. Because he's good fun, smart and unavailable – and therefore perfect, uncomplicated company – I said yes. In England recently, after my heavily pregnant middle daughter was discharged from hospital following a nasty bout of flu, and her husband and little daughter also became ill, I ran a field hospital for a week. Once they were on the mend they decided I needed a night out and put me back on Bumble. 'This guy looks all right: your age, ex-naval officer, lives in a nice village,' said my son-in-law, a Navy diver. 'He writes a good sentence, Mum, and he goes to the gym,' added my daughter. 'All very well but is he clever and amusing? Does he read? And what does he smell like?' 'Mum, it's just dinner. You don't have to marry him.'
I swiped right. A first. Two days later we met in a pub restaurant. On the way I told my son-in-law that my date didn't drink. 'Well that's not going to work,' he said. I got there early and took a large gin and tonic into the garden and smoked two cigarettes. It was the first time in my life I'd agreed to meet someone I didn't know. We collided awkwardly in the bar but he was friendly and pleasant. I relaxed. While we waited for food I asked him if he read. He had a thousand books, he told me, most of them on management. 'Any novels?' He thought for a while and remembered he'd read Wolf Hall last year.
I showed him a photo of my cave house in Provence and he showed me pictures of his house, a modern build in a pretty village in Wiltshire. Inside all was shipshape. The tasteful contemporary objects of uniform colour, the row of pictures painted by the same hand, 50 pairs of polished shoes and the huge rail of perfectly ironed shirts couldn't have been more different from the live rock walls and barely contained bohemian chaos of my place.
I listened to him – he had an interesting story. But when he asked about me, I couldn't stop talking about Jeremy. My date liked ballet. I like opera and Radio 3. He liked ballroom dancing. I like jumping up and down in a mosh pit. But it was a pleasant enough evening. In the car on the way back to my daughter's house he put on the heated seats and played Olly Murs, whom he loved but I'd barely heard of. He was disappointed in my lack of enthusiasm for the music. A decent man, but romance wasn't in the air.
No more dates for me. Lunch or dinner with pals and colleagues only. Back in Provence, I met my friend from the coast in a hilltop village restaurant. He suggested a kir royale to kick off, then said: 'What will you have? I'm tempted by the andouillette.' 'Are you sure?' I said, noticing for the first time that he was looking at me intently and had nice eyes. 'Yes, I love it!' 'Show off. I'll have the chicken, please.'
We were engrossed in chat and halfway down a good bottle of local white when the food arrived. The smell was worse than I could've imagined – slaughter-house offal bin with top notes of a 1980s surgical ward laundry basket: blood, pus, faeces and rotting toe. My favourite French cheeses, Époissesand Morbier, smell awful but taste delicious, so emboldened by the wine I asked if I could try the andouillette. 'Half a teaspoon…'
It was the most disgusting thing I'd ever put in my mouth. I immediately spat it out on to my hand and, without thinking, put it back on his plate. 'I'm so sorry.' After a fit of the giggles and a glug of wine I composed myself. He leaned forward in his seat. His hand edged towards mine. 'What?' By way of an answer he looked into my eyes and sighed. Fumes of andouillette hit me square in the face.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Ascot fans furious as wheelie bins dumped outside Frankie Dettori statue
Race-goers blasted Ascot bosses yesterday as wheelie bins were dumped near a statue of the world famous jockey Frankie Dettori. Guests at the posh festival found the bronze sculpture - depicting the super jockey performing one of his trademark flying dismounts - surrounded by wheelie bins. One fan said: "It's a bloody outrage" while another reveller added: "It looks like Frankie's been dumped." The life-sized statue marks Dettori, 54, riding all seven winners in one day at the Berkshire course in 1996 at staggering odds of 25,051/1. Fans - and bookies - yesterday said they therefore felt it was disrespectful the bins had been abandoned in front of the statue, erected in 2001 by Ascot management. One visitor said: "It's a shame. Frankie's a hero to everyone here. He's won us all money. I think they should leave the bins where they are and move the statue to a more prominent position. Lots of people will want selfies taken with it. They're missing a trick." The sculpture, near the Royal Enclosure, and shows the Italian jockey performing his trademark flying dismount. The army of bins has grown as the week has progressed, according to the Daily Star with, at one stage, six wheelies lined up in front of the statue. When an official spotted photographers taking pictures of the bins two were wheeled away and the others were hastily moved to the side, our sister publication added. But the sight did not go unnoticed by guests at the four-day race meeting, a highlight in the sporting calendar. One said: "It's like an after-thought. It should be in the parade ring to mark where he did his dismounts. It's a bloody outrage." Another said: "I guess this just proves one minute you're hot and the next you're not. It's a bit like someone's book ending up in the bargain basement section." Another joked: "Bloody hell… it's just like Birmingham," in a jibe to the city's ongoing bin strike chaos. Mountains of full rubbish bags and overflowing wheelie bins are lining residential strikes there amid the turmoil. Dettori, who was born in Milan, announced he was filing for bankruptcy in March after a tax dispute. The racing legend, made an MBE in 2001, had been attempting to untangle his tax arrangements in Britain after they were challenged by HMRC after moving to the US. But fans and pundits said this shouldn't detract from Dettori's impressive career and fury around the bins. His "Magnificent Seven" triumphs at odds of more than 25,000/1 at the Festival of British Racing in September 1996 cleaned the bookies out of £1million - and has never been matched since. A spokesman for a major bookmaker said: "It does seem just a little bit trashy of Ascot at Britain's showpiece meeting to place the bins in front of Frankie after the Italian stallion smashed us for millions with his 25,000/1 Magnificent Seven." Daily Star and the Mirror has approached Ascot for comment. Dettori has not responded to requests for comment.


Business News Wales
5 hours ago
- Business News Wales
Welsh National Theatre Sets Up Home in Swansea
The Welsh National Theatre has set up its first headquarters in Swansea. Founded by Michael Sheen earlier this year, the company's headquarters will be in the city's civic centre. Its first production, Our Town, debuts at Swansea Grand Theatre between 16 and 31 January 2026. The play, which later tours Wales before closing at co-production partner the Rose Theatre in Kingston-upon-Thames, is directed by Swansea-born Francesca Goodridge with Swansea native Russell T Davies as creative associate. Michael Sheen, artistic director of Welsh National Theatre, said: 'My theatrical journey began on the stage in Swansea as a member of the West Glamorgan Youth Theatre, so it feels fitting to come full circle to base Welsh National Theatre in the city. Swansea is a place of creativity, resilience and inspiration and I'm excited by the possibilities this presents not just for artists, but for the people of Wales. 'This isn't about just an office space, but a cultural hub which welcomes creatives in, and we're working on plans to make the space come alive with actors, directors, producers and writers before the work meets audiences. In just seven months, a Swansea audience will be the first anywhere in the world to see a Welsh National Theatre production live; the countdown is truly on.' Sharon Gilburd, founding chief executive of Welsh National Theatre, added: 'We see Swansea as an integral part of our future. There's genuine heartfelt passion and commitment from the Swansea Council team to work with us so we can all help to create a thriving and innovative cultural scene — both for today and for generations to come.' After taking to the stage in Swansea in Our Town, Sheen will play Owain Glyndŵr in Gary Owen's epic new play, Owain & Henry, in a Welsh National Theatre and Wales Millennium Centre co-production in November 2026. The decision by Welsh National Theatre to set up in the city has been welcomed by Council Leader Rob Stewart, who said: 'This is a proud moment for Swansea. Having Welsh National Theatre based here shows how far we've come as a creative city. The creation of Welsh National Theatre marks a bold step in raising the profile of Welsh storytelling on a global stage — and by choosing Swansea as its home, it strengthens the city's role as a hub for national and international creative talent. 'This brings real opportunities for those working across the performance sector — from actors to musicians, artists and writers to designers, producers and technicians — to be part of something world-class, creating new intellectual property, rooted in Swansea and rooted in Wales. Wales deserves an English language national theatre company — and we're thrilled that, through the vision of its artistic director Michael Sheen, Welsh National Theatre has chosen Swansea as its home. The impact of hosting world-class theatre in Swansea will be transformative. It has the potential to stimulate a new generation of local talent and inspire even more visitors to come to our city.' The announcement follows months of collaboration between Welsh National Theatre and Swansea Council to shape this partnership. Elliott King, the Council's Cabinet Member for Culture, Human Rights and Equalities, said the theatre's decision reflects years of investment and collaboration that has unveiled key initiatives, such as the Creative Swansea network for professionals and businesses in the creative and cultural industries, and Grand Ambition, which creates theatre with and for local communities. He said: 'From the Swansea Building Society Arena to grassroots music and performance spaces, the many creative people who help make our local culture so vibrant, innovative and diverse also ensure it's the best place for audiences to enjoy. Welsh National Theatre being based in Swansea will help attract even more attention to our creative industries and cultural sector. Working with schools, universities, digital trend-setters and businesses, our ambition for Swansea to make its mark on an international stage has never looked brighter.'


Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Comfort reading for the interwar years
A prospective reader who chanced upon Recommended! without its subtitle might be forgiven for thinking that the six grim-looking portraits on the cover depict the Watch Committee of an exceptionally puritanical interwar-era seaside town. This would be a misjudgment, as, rather than being charged with censoring films or evicting courting couples from cinema back rows, Nicola Wilson's galère – Hugh Walpole, Clemence Dane, George Gordon, Edmund Blunden, Sylvia Lynd and J.B. Priestley – turn out to have made up the selection panel of the early 1930s Book Society. The subtitle is, of course, a wild exaggeration. Even at its high-water mark, the Society's membership was in the low five figures. Victor Gollancz's propagandising Left Book Club had many more subscribers and shifted thousands more copies. On the other hand, the bestselling Walpole, Priestley and their colleagues had undeniable cachet. Gordon was the Oxford Merton Professor of English; Blunden a poet-don; and mesdames Lynd and Dane well-known figures of their time. To the average middle-class subscriber of middlebrow tastes they offered a failsafe route into the mainstream literary culture of the day. Wilson, who teaches publishing studies at the University of Reading, where many of the relevant archives are stored, might have been expected to take an academic tone. On the contrary, her style is informal to the point of chatty. Everyone is referred to by their Christian names, and James Joyce and Nora Barnacle's wedding party is described as a 'proper do'. Happily, when she isn't coming across like a guest on The One Show, she offers a fascinating guide to bygone concepts of 'taste' and how you went about bringing them to the wider public. Naturally, the tocsin of commerce sounds loudly. While the Society tried very hard not to look like a publishers' cartel, there were bitter disputes about the panel's keenness on books issued by Gollancz, William Heinemann and Jonathan Cape. At the same time, all those present were conscious of their duty to broaden their subscribers' sensibilities, and genuinely left-field choices such as Kate O'Brien's Without My Cloak (1931) could sometimes be found rubbing shoulders with less challenging work by A.J. Cronin and the popular historian Arthur Bryant. That said, E.M. Delafield's The Diary of a Provincial Lady and its sequels looks far more representative of the Society's approach than, say, J.M. Denwood and S. Fowler Wright's Red Ike: A Novel of Cumberland. There were times, as Wilson acknowledges, when a selection could save a writer's career. Graham Greene, in lowish water after the failure of his second and third novels, had his prospects transformed by the surprisingly narrow (three votes to two) emergence of Stamboul Train (1932). Even then there was a corking row when Priestley, by this point no longer a selector, read a proof copy and imagined himself libelled by the portrait of the bluff, pipe-smoking, Dickens-obsessed northern novelist Mr Savory. Thirteen thousand bound copies had to be unstitched so that Greene could make the necessary changes. Wilson is careful to salt her history with biographical sketches of the major players. Lynd was always obliged to balance the demands of her professional life with looking after her hard-drinking journalist husband Robert; Blunden frequently had to take the measure of an increasingly complex emotional round. Much of the tension which enveloped the Society as the 1930s wore on had a political subtext: Cecil Day-Lewis, who joined the committee in 1937, was a paid-up communist; Blunden, once war was declared, found his pacifist sympathies seriously in question and had his college rooms turned over by MI5. The postwar years were less hospitable to the kind of literary culture that Walpole & Co had peddled in the era of Stanley Baldwin. Daniel George caught something of the changing atmosphere in his review of Brideshead Revisited in the Society's newsletter of May 1945. Evelyn Waugh, he noted, seemed 'determined to wring our hearts with lamentations for a past shared by a precious few'. Recommended! is an engaging piece of publishing history, even if Wilson has an irritating habit of scrambling the names by which her subjects were known at the time. Thus Heinemann's majordomo A.S. Frere appears as 'Arthur S. Frere'; Margaret, Lady Rhondda, the feminist proprietor of Time and Tide, is 'Lady Margaret Rhondda'; and F.R. Leavis's redoubtable wife Q.D. masquerades as 'Queenie D. Leavis'. Critics often complain that books of this kind are too soberly academic for the general taste. This one could have done with more sepia and less gloss.