Thai Airways shares to resume trading after exit from restructuring
The move marks the flag carrier's return to normal business operations after it had accumulated more than 400 billion baht (S$16 billion) of debt in the lead-up to the pandemic that ravaged the global travel industry. The company in June exited a court-supervised debt rehabilitation as the post-Covid-19 travel demand boom enabled it to achieve an earnings turnaround and sell new shares to raise capital.
'Thai Air's valuation deserves a premium due to its successful business rehabilitation,' said Raweenuch Piyakriengkai, InnovestX Securities analyst, who gives the stock an 'outperform' rating. The company's restructuring 'has firmly established a high earnings baseline and significantly enhanced future competitiveness', she said.
InnovestX has a price target of 7.8 baht on the shares, while CGS International Securities sets it at 10.80 baht, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Thai Air late last year sold new shares to its existing shareholders at 4.48 baht each. The shares were last traded in May 2021.
Thai Air reported first-quarter net income jumping fourfold year on year as the number of its passengers rose more than 11 per cent. The airline sees strong bookings in the second quarter, led by rising demand for flights to Europe, Australia and India, chief executive officer Chai Eamsiri said in May.
As part of the rescue plan, the carrier's creditors agreed to convert about 53 billion baht of debt into shares. It raised about 23 billion baht from the sale of new shares to boost capital. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
In figuring out why the US tariff shock has not sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook – and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and US President Donald Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They did not, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' respective currencies. But to some extent, sterling's steep drop after the referendum vote and the US dollar's plunge on Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact – at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no 'big bang' economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right – even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. Slow burn In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020, and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly gross domestic product print – confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. FTSE 100 stocks, helped by the weaker pound, kept pace with the S&P 500 and world indexes for about a year after the referendum before chronic underperformance set in. Since 2018, the UK market has lagged MSCI's all-country index by some 35 per cent. What is more, it has taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy – even if blame for that gets sprayed in multiple directions – and oceans of ink have been spilled trying to disentangle the precise impacts. One academic study by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalised. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell 3 per cent and overall exports fell 6.4 per cent, largely because of the 13 per cent hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared to the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. Additionally, these findings exclude the Brexit hit to services and London's finance sector, which registered a much bigger economic dent. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector over the next 10 years continues to worry the city. 'Lighting a fire' The US tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5 per cent to 1 per cent off US GDP over time. That is a US$150 billion to US$300 billion hit which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that is growing at a roughly 2 per cent annualised rate, where imported goods represent just 11 per cent of GDP, and where tech and artificial intelligence trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman pointed out in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5 per cent of GDP, he argued, is 'the equivalent of every household in America taking around US$1,000 and lighting it on fire – then doing it again every year. Forever.' In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes do not necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex modern economies. The upshot is there is rarely a big crash to prove a point. And that in itself is unnerving if politically-motivated policies then appear workable on the surface and resist instant pushback – only to act as a drain on the economy over a protracted period. Many observers reasonably argue that sovereign democratic politics should always trump economic conventions and even directions. But do people eventually notice when it goes wrong? The latest YouGov opinion poll shows 56 per cent of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU – some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out. REUTERS
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Thai Airways' share price soars more than 200% after trading resumption
BANGKOK :Thai Airways International's stock price had risen 216 per cent when the market closed on Monday after shares in the airline resumed trading following a hiatus of nearly five years Shares rose as much as 231 per cent higher in early trade and ended the day at 10.5 baht from around 3 baht before trading was suspended. The national carrier went into bankruptcy-protected restructuring in 2020 at the onset of the pandemic. The airline had been in trouble well before the pandemic, reporting losses nearly every year since 2012 after low-cost carriers eroded its market share, especially in short haul routes in Southeast Asia. When COVID struck, Thai Airways was granted bankrupt-protected debt restructuring worth 400 billion baht. It brought top executives into its restructuring committee chaired by former energy minister Piyasvasti Amranand, who was also the company's chief executive in 2009 to 2012 when it was profitable. Over the five years from 2020, the airline reduced debt to 190 billion baht and reported operational profits in 2023. In the first quarter of this year, net profits reached $9.8 billion, up 300 per cent from the the same period last year. It currently flies 78 jets and reported a cabin factor - the percentage of seats filled with passengers - of 83.3 per cent. The airline hailed the resumption of trade as "a pivotal new chapter for the airline, which stands as a profound source of national pride for the Thai people." "THAI is now strategically positioned for robust, stable, and sustainable growth. This is driven by a steadfast commitment to elevating operational standards and service quality, coupled with a strong emphasis on corporate governance," it said in a statement. The committee launched debt to equity plans and went on to slash half of its support staff to 16,000. It also initiated plans to cut its fleet from 103 to 85 aircraft and shed its budget carrier, Thai Smile. Last year, the carrier ordered 45 Boeing 787-9 wide-body jets with an option for 35 more. In July, it said it could exercise the option as part of Thailand's tariff negotiations with the United States. ($1 = 32.4500 baht)
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Thai Airways' share price soars more than 200% after trading resumption
[BANGKOK] Thai Airways International's stock price had risen 216 per cent when the market closed on Monday (Aug 4) after shares in the airline resumed trading following a hiatus of nearly five years. Shares rose as much as 231 per cent higher in early trade and ended the day at 10.5 baht from around three baht before trading was suspended. The national carrier went into bankruptcy-protected restructuring in 2020 at the onset of the pandemic. The airline had been in trouble well before the pandemic, reporting losses nearly every year since 2012 after low-cost carriers eroded its market share, especially in short haul routes in South-east Asia. When Covid struck, Thai Airways was granted bankrupt-protected debt restructuring worth 400 billion baht (S$16 billion). It brought top executives into its restructuring committee chaired by former energy minister Piyasvasti Amranand, who was also the company's chief executive in 2009 to 2012 when it was profitable. Over the five years from 2020, the airline reduced debt to 190 billion baht and reported operational profits in 2023. In the first quarter of this year, net profits reached US$9.8 billion, up 300 per cent from the the same period last year. It currently flies 78 jets and reported a cabin factor – the percentage of seats filled with passengers – of 83.3 per cent. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The airline hailed the resumption of trade as 'a pivotal new chapter for the airline, which stands as a profound source of national pride for the Thai people.' 'THAI is now strategically positioned for robust, stable, and sustainable growth. This is driven by a steadfast commitment to elevating operational standards and service quality, coupled with a strong emphasis on corporate governance,' it said in a statement. The committee launched debt to equity plans and went on to slash half of its support staff to 16,000. It also initiated plans to cut its fleet from 103 to 85 aircraft and shed its budget carrier, Thai Smile. Last year, the carrier ordered 45 Boeing 787-9 wide-body jets with an option for 35 more. In July, it said it could exercise the option as part of Thailand's tariff negotiations with the United States.
