logo
What is the crop-killing fungus that was smuggled into the U.S. by a Chinese couple?

What is the crop-killing fungus that was smuggled into the U.S. by a Chinese couple?

Time of India2 days ago

Credit: X
Two Chinese nationals are facing serious federal charges after allegedly smuggling a destructive crop fungus into the United States. Yunqing Jian, 33, and Zunyong Liu, 34, were arrested in connection with a case that federal prosecutors say raises critical concerns about national security and food safety.
According to a criminal complaint filed in the U.S. District Court in Detroit, the two scientists have been charged with conspiracy, smuggling goods into the United States, false statements, and visa fraud. Prosecutors allege that the pair "illegally imported"
Fusarium graminearum
, a crop-infecting fungus known to cause head blight—a disease that targets key grains like wheat, barley, maize, and rice.
'This case involves a fungus that poses a serious risk to global food security and public health,' said Jerome F.
Gorgon, Jr., United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. 'The alleged smuggling of this biological agent into an American research institution by foreign nationals is a matter of grave national security concern.'
Who are Yunqing Jian and Zunyong Liu?
According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Michigan, 'The FBI arrested Jian in connection with allegations related to Jian's and Liu's smuggling into America a fungus called
Fusarium graminearum
, which scientific literature classifies as a potential agroterrorism weapon.'
The complaint reveals that Jian and Liu have been in a romantic relationship since July 2024, the same month Liu arrived in the United States, allegedly carrying small bags of the crop-damaging fungus. Liu later told investigators he intended to use the samples for research at the University of Michigan, where Jian was employed as a visiting research fellow.
Jian, whose academic focus is molecular, cellular, and developmental biology, reportedly received Chinese government funding to support her work involving
Fusarium graminearum
.
Her partner, Liu, conducts similar research in China.
When initially questioned at Detroit Metropolitan Airport in July 2024, Liu claimed he had no knowledge of the fungus in his luggage. He later admitted to the FBI that he had brought the samples into the country for scientific research purposes.
What is Fusarium graminearum?
Fusarium graminearum is a fungus that causes Fusarium head blight, a serious disease affecting cereal crops like wheat, barley, maize, and rice.
In the U.S. alone, it's responsible for around $1 billion in crop losses every year, according to the Department of Agriculture.
While other fungi can cause the same disease, Fusarium graminearum is the most common one in the U.S. It infects crops early in the season, damaging grain heads and turning them a pale, whitish color. It also produces a toxin in the grains that's harmful to both people and animals.
This toxin, often called vomitoxin, can cause vomiting in livestock and symptoms like diarrhea, abdominal pain, headache, and fever in both animals and humans.
Because of this, grain crops are carefully tested before they're used for food or animal feed. If the fungus is found, the crops must be discarded—causing heavy losses for farmers.
It's not unusual for researchers to import foreign plants, animals, or fungi to study how they behave in different conditions. However, doing so legally requires specific permits. For example, scientists might study a foreign strain of this fungus to understand how it survives heat, resists fungicides, or evolves over time. What remains unclear is why the researchers wanted to bring this particular strain of Fusarium graminearum into the U.S.
, and why they didn't follow the legal steps to do so.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US hiring likely slowed to 1,30,000 new jobs last month amid uncertainty over Trumps policies
US hiring likely slowed to 1,30,000 new jobs last month amid uncertainty over Trumps policies

Mint

time24 minutes ago

  • Mint

US hiring likely slowed to 1,30,000 new jobs last month amid uncertainty over Trumps policies

Washington, The American job market likely continued to slow last month, hobbled by worries over President Donald Trump's trade wars, deportations and purges of the federal workforce. The Labour Department's numbers on May hiring Friday are expected to show that businesses, government agencies and nonprofits added 1,30,000 jobs last month. That would be down from 1,77,000 in April but enough to stay ahead of people entering the workforce and keep the unemployment rate at a low 4.2 per cent, according to a survey of forecasters by the data firm FactSet. Mainstream economists expect Trump's policies to take a toll on America's economy, the world's largest. His massive taxes on imports – tariffs – are expected to raise costs for US companies that buy raw materials, equipment and components from overseas and force them to cut back hiring or even lay workers off. Billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency has slashed federal workers and cancelled government contracts. Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration is expected to make it harder for businesses to find enough workers. For the most part, though, any damage has yet to show up in the government's economic data. The US economy and job market have proven surprisingly resilient in recent years. When the inflation fighters at the Federal Reserve raised their benchmark interest rate 11 times in 2022 and 2023, the higher borrowing costs were widely expected to tip the United States into a recession. Instead, the economy kept growing and employers kept hiring. But former Fed economist Claudia Sahm warns that the job market of 2025 isn't nearly as durable as the two or three years ago when immigrants were pouring into the US job market and employers were posting record job openings. 'Any signs of weakness in the data this week would stoke fears of a recession again,' Sahm, now chief economist at New Century Advisors, wrote in a Substack post this week. 'It's too soon to see the full effects of tariffs, DOGE, or other policies on the labour market; softening now would suggest less resilience to those later effects, raising the odds of a recession.' Recent economic reports have sent mixed signals. The Labour Department reported Tuesday that US job openings rose unexpectedly to 7.4 million in April – seemingly a good sign. But the same report showed that layoffs ticked up and the number of Americans quitting their jobs fell, a sign they were less confident they could find something better elsewhere. Surveys by the Institute for Supply Management, a trade group of purchasing managers, found that both American manufacturing and services businesses were contracting last month. And the number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits rose last week to the highest level in eight months. Jobless claims — a proxy for layoffs — still remain low by historical standards, suggesting that employers are reluctant to cut staff despite uncertainty over Trump's policies. They likely remember how hard it was to bring people back from the massive but short-lived layoffs of the 2020 COVID-19 recession as the US economy bounced back with unexpected strength. Still, the job market has clearly decelerated. So far this year, American employers have added an average 1,44,000 jobs a month. That is down from 1,68,000 last year; 2,16,000 in 2023; 3,80,000 in 2022, and a record 6,03,000 in 2021 in the rebound from COVID-19 layoffs. Trump's tariffs — and the erratic way he rolls them out, suspends them and conjures up new ones — have already buffeted the economy. America's gross domestic product — the nation's output of goods and services — fell at a 0.2 per cent annual pace from January through March this year. A surge of imports shaved 5 percentage points off growth during the first quarter as companies rushed to bring in foreign products ahead of Trump's tariffs. Imports plunged by a record 16 per cent in April as Trump's levies took effect. The drop in foreign goods could mean fewer jobs at the warehouses that store them and the trucking companies that haul them around, wrote Michael Madowitz, an economist at the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute. NPK NPK This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

The world's auto supply chain is in the hands of a few Chinese bureaucrats
The world's auto supply chain is in the hands of a few Chinese bureaucrats

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

The world's auto supply chain is in the hands of a few Chinese bureaucrats

In a hulking grey building just east of Tiananmen square in Beijing, a small team in China's Ministry of Commerce is deciding the fate of the global auto industry , one rare earth magnet export permit at a time. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets - a crucial component in electric vehicle motors - and it added them to an export control list in April as part of its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licenses. It falls to the Bureau of Industrial Security and Import and Export Control - which is part of China's Ministry of Commerce - to review export permits for the rare earth magnets, which are vital for car motors, wind turbines and even U.S. F-35 fighter jets. While dozens of licences have been issued since late April, executives, lobbyists and diplomats say they are only a small fraction of the applications that have flooded in from automakers, semiconductor companies and aerospace firms around the world since the tougher export controls were introduced. Washington says delays in issuing export licences show China is reneging on commitments made during trade talks in Geneva last month and it has retaliated with export curbs on plane engine parts and other equipment. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks by phone on Thursday as the escalating dispute over China's rare earth stranglehold threatened to derail the fragile trade truce agreed between the two superpowers. When the new rare earth magnet measures came in, the export control bureau had a total of just 30 staff, though this has since been doubled to around 60, according to two sources who were briefed on a meeting between the ministry and Chinese and European semiconductor firms last week. "We appreciate that MOFCOM has increased its resources to address demand and they're working hard and long hours on these issues," said Adam Dunnett, Secretary General of the European Chamber of Commerce in China, referring to the ministry. "But the reality is this is having a huge impact on a wide variety of sectors. It's something that could have been better planned and rolled out," he said. According to personnel records posted to the Ministry of Commerce's website in June 2024, there are only three senior officials within the bureau who can approve the export permits. The ministry's website lists the export licence bureau's office hours as: Weekdays, 8:30-11:30 a.m., 14:00-17:00 p.m. Reuters was unable to determine current staffing levels or whether more officials are now able to approve applications. The Ministry of Commerce did not respond to questions from Reuters on this subject. Chokepoint The global alarm over shortages underscores the enormous leverage China has acquired through its near-monopoly on rare earth production. It also reveals a complex bureaucratic process that has gone from checkpoint to chokepoint. "The process for our suppliers to apply for export licences for various rare earths ... since April, is complex and time-consuming, partly due to the need to collect and provide a lot of information," a spokesperson for Bosch, the German engineering and technology multinational, said last month. A Chinese-language guide to the process published by the Ministry in late March runs to almost 14,000 Mandarin characters. European auto suppliers alone have filed hundreds of requests since early April, with only about a quarter granted. These applications can range from dozens to hundreds of pages, according to sources who have either filed requests or been briefed about them. Public Ministry of Commerce guidelines require information including technical product descriptions, signed contracts. Descriptions of production facilities and photos of products are also encouraged. China's stated aim is to ensure dual-use items don't end up in military equipment, but officials are often overly cautious even though many applications clearly state commercial use, Dunnett said. "Another concern we have heard from some companies is that they are being asked for sensitive and excessive information that is part of their intellectual property which has led to delays in their applications," Dunnett added. While applications are meant to be processed in 45 working days, the ministry says applications related to national security will take longer, without defining how long. Strategic excuse Cory Combs, head of critical mineral and supply chain research at Trivium China, a policy research group, said it was not clear whether the delays were due to bureaucratic inertia or intentional weaponisation. "We do expect these applications to U.S. end-users to be reviewed on par with other countries and approved whenever they're not for military use," he said. "The issue here is that, is it quick enough for the Trump administration to believe that Beijing has not reneged on the Geneva agreement?" Some U.S. industry figures believe that the bureaucratic backlog is a "strategic excuse". "China can staff up as fast as they want, if they wanted to," said a source from the U.S. rare earths industry who declined to be named for sensitivity reasons. In public, Chinese officials have said the export controls apply to all countries, the implication being that they do not count as a U.S.-specific countermeasure under the Geneva agreement. Foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on May 30 that the rare earth export controls are "non-discriminatory and not targeted at any specific country". During the Geneva talks, however, China privately admitted that the rare earth export controls qualified as non-tariff countermeasures, according to a source briefed on the talks. Rare earths remain a core part of ongoing U.S.-China discussions, the person said. China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for clarification. Chinese scholars openly admit that the rare earth export controls are retaliation for U.S. chip curbs. "It's a short-term form of leverage which doesn't hurt China, as the rare earths in question have relatively low monetary value," said Zhu Junwei, an international relations scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Chinese think-tank.

Elon Musk and Donald Trump fight in public, talk of ingratitude and Epstein files: Full story in 10 points
Elon Musk and Donald Trump fight in public, talk of ingratitude and Epstein files: Full story in 10 points

India Today

time32 minutes ago

  • India Today

Elon Musk and Donald Trump fight in public, talk of ingratitude and Epstein files: Full story in 10 points

What began as one of the most high-profile alliances in American politics and business has now exploded into a bitter public feud. Elon Musk and Donald Trump, have gone from being vocal admirers of each other to trading personal attacks and explosive allegations across their social media platforms. The fallout began after Musk denounced Trump's flagship spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' prompting Trump to accuse the billionaire of 'betrayal' and 'ingratitude'.advertisementBut the drama didn't end there – Musk hit back with claims that Trump owes him for winning the election, and then dropped a bombshell allegation about Trump's name being in the sealed Epstein files. Trump, in turn, threatened to revoke federal contracts from Musk's companies, which also caused Tesla shares to nosedive. The whole event has now turned into one of the most public political clashes in recent memory – with real-world consequences for Washington, Wall Street, and Silicon this story, we will break down the big, big fight into quick 10-points.1. Once allies, now bitter foes From being the most popular political partners in the world just months ago, Donald Trump and Elon Musk are now fighting, and it is very public. Musk has been supporting Trump and working closely with him through his short stint as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk even declared: 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man.' But on Thursday, the alliance crumbled dramatically, as both men launched personal attacks against one another across their social media platforms – Truth Social and X. advertisement 2. Fallout over a 'disgusting' billThe fight was sparked by Musk's sharp criticism of Trump's key domestic policy – the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', a tax and spending proposal currently awaiting Senate approval. Musk labelled the bill a 'disgusting abomination' on X, slamming it for being bloated with 'pork' (a US political term for wasteful spending) and for adding to national debt. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong,' he wrote, urging citizens to call their lawmakers and oppose it. 3. Trump publicly expresses disappointmentAt a news conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump responded: 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' he said. Trump suggested Musk only turned against the bill when it became clear that subsidies and mandates for electric vehicles – critical to Tesla's business – were being cut. 'He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem,' Trump added. 4. Musk says he never saw the bill, blames 'pork'Musk pushed back, saying he never even saw the bill before it passed and insisted his criticism had nothing to do with Tesla subsidies. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK,' he wrote. He argued oil and gas subsidies were untouched while clean energy support was removed, calling it 'very unfair!!' 5. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'Musk claimed Trump is being ungrateful, especially considering Musk's financial backing and endorsement during last year's elections. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote. He said he spent around $277 million to support Trump and other Republicans. 'Such ingratitude,' he added. advertisement6. Epstein files bombshellThings escalated when Musk accused Trump of being mentioned in unreleased documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk posted on X, without providing evidence. The White House called the claim 'an unfortunate episode.' Trump previously admitted he had known Epstein but claimed they had a 'falling out a long time ago.' 7. Trump hits back with threatsIn response, Trump attacked Musk on Truth Social, accusing him of having 'gone CRAZY' and being 'ungrateful.' He claimed he asked Musk to leave the administration and threatened to cancel his companies' government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote. Shares of Tesla dropped by up to 18 per cent following the threat. advertisement8. Musk retaliates with drastic moves – then backtracksMusk replied on X that SpaceX would start decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft, used by NASA to transport astronauts. But hours later, he reversed course, writing, 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' The move reflected rising tensions, and how the feud was beginning to affect not just politics but key business operations tied to government partnerships. 9. Musk suggests forming a new political partyFrustrated with both Trump and traditional party lines, Musk floated the idea of starting a new political party. He ran a poll asking if it's time for a party that 'actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle.' He also endorsed a post suggesting Trump should be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance. This marked a significant shift from Musk's previous support and hints at a deeper rift within conservative politics. 10. Political and financial consequencesThe feud has exposed cracks between Silicon Valley's technocrats and Trump's populist base. Tesla investors voiced concerns, with former Musk supporter Ross Gerber writing: 'Can someone please take the phone away from him! wtf! Tesla is getting destroyed.' Others feared long-term damage to Musk's businesses and credibility. Meanwhile, Trump's meme coin also dropped in value, showing how the personal feud may have wider repercussions across politics, tech, and In

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store