
From Defeat To Denial: Rahul Gandhi's Misdirected War On Democracy
Last Updated:
Democracy demands robust opposition, not reckless obstruction. Rahul Gandhi's article, if anything, is a manual on how not to lose gracefully
Rahul Gandhi wrote a piece titled Match-Fixing Maharashtra on June 7, 2025, in The Indian Express, which caught my attention. This article, riddled with speculative accusations and selective facts, demanded a serious response, not because it was grounded in democratic concern, but because it was laced with contempt for constitutional institutions.
Gandhi's allegations, already covered by the Election Commission in extensive detail, deserve critical scrutiny. Not for the sake of rebutting every unfounded claim, but to highlight a dangerous trend: persistent delegitimisation of India's democratic architecture to cover political inadequacy.
The Article That Confuses, Not Convinces
The central motif of Rahul Gandhi's article is clear: if he cannot win electorally, the system must be rigged. This isn't new. When institutions don't echo his voice, he brands them as compromised. It is the same philosophy that fuels his campaign against the judiciary, the Election Commission, and even the growing voter base. His article, while camouflaged as a democratic concern, plays into the narrative of confusion and distrust. It is a textbook case of the fallacy: if you can't convince them, confuse them.
In his haste to cry foul over the Maharashtra Assembly elections, Gandhi overlooked facts already on public record. These facts, when properly understood, dismantle his claims and show that nothing extraordinary occurred except perhaps the electorate's rejection of his politics.
Myth 1: Match-Fixing Elections
Rahul Gandhi's use of the term 'match-fixing" is not only irresponsible, it is inflammatory. By insinuating that elections were rigged without substantiating those claims with legally admissible evidence, he undermined the very institutions that uphold democracy. The Election Commission had, in fact, already addressed the concerns raised. Gandhi's article made no mention of the 60-page letter dated December 24, 2024, sent to his party's legal representative, which responded to all allegations with data.
Moreover, the consistent participation of the opposition in the electoral process, from campaigning to counting, negates the idea of match-fixing. Elections are conducted under the vigilant eyes of polling agents, observers, and the media. Suggesting manipulation without credible proof is not dissent, it's disruption.
Myth 2: Bogus Voters
Gandhi's next point, voter roll inflation, is neither new nor unique to Maharashtra. He finds suspicious the increase of 31 lakh voters in five years and 41 lakh in five months. But these figures fall well within historical trends. Between 2004 and 2009, 1 crore voters were added; between 2014 and 2019, 63 lakh more were enrolled. In 2024, 40.8 lakh new voters were added, including 26.4 lakh young voters, a logical rise given India's demographic dynamics.
Accusing these voters of being bogus is not only defamatory, it is also dismissive of youth participation in democracy. Instead of encouraging voter engagement, Gandhi's statements cast aspersions on millions of first-time voters. That is not a critique; it is contempt.
Myth 3: Last-Hour Voting Surge
Gandhi claimed that a suspicious voting surge occurred in the last hour of polling, suggesting manipulation. But here's the reality: the average polling rate throughout the day was 5.83 per cent per hour. A spike to 7.83 per cent in the last hour is within the bounds of statistical probability, especially since voters present at the booth by 6 pm are legally entitled to vote.
This isn't peculiar to Maharashtra. In the second phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, a 5.75 per cent increase was recorded after 5 pm. Why was this not a problem then? Because the Congress won those seats. What Rahul Gandhi calls an 'issue" arises only when the outcome doesn't suit him.
Myth 4: Constituency-Level Fixing
Rahul Gandhi cherry-picked 12,000 polling stations across 85 constituencies to claim targeted rigging. But if you look deeper, you find a more nuanced reality. In constituencies like Madha, Wani, and Shrirampur, which showed voter surges, candidates from Sharad Pawar's NCP, Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena, and the Congress itself won.
Hence, the data doesn't support his hypothesis that a high last-hour turnout favoured only the BJP-led NDA. The selective use of constituency data is a classic case of misdirection. It is not the data that's flawed, it's the analysis, or rather, the lack of it.
Myth 5: ECI's Complicity
Perhaps the most alarming of all Gandhi's claims is that the Election Commission of India is compromised. Ironically, it was the Congress-led government that, until 2024, unilaterally appointed Chief Election Commissioners. Under Modi, a new committee involving the Leader of the Opposition was constituted as a democratic upgrade.
Rahul Gandhi's angst seems to lie in the very democratisation of a process his party previously monopolised. In his world, reform is acceptable only if it serves the Congress party. Anything else is betrayal.
Politics Of Perpetual Excuses
Rahul Gandhi has, once again, chosen the easier path of blaming systems instead of introspecting on failures. He questions the mandate because he failed to secure it. But elections are not won by slogans or marches; they are won by connection, credibility, and conviction.
His refusal to accept defeat gracefully and to instead vilify every institution that upholds our democracy is dangerous. This is not leadership; it is a tantrum disguised as a revolution.
Conclusion: From Fiction To Fact
Democracy demands robust opposition, not reckless obstruction. Rahul Gandhi's article, if anything, is a manual on how not to lose gracefully. While he fashions himself as a defender of democracy, his words serve only to degrade it.
It is time Rahul Gandhi respects the people's verdict instead of mocking it. And if he wants to be taken seriously as a political leader, he must rise above rhetorical sabotage and begin the difficult journey of real introspection. Until then, his speeches and writings will continue to sound less like statesmanship and more like sour grapes.
The writer is a technocrat, political analyst, and author. He pens national, geopolitical, and social issues. His social media handle is @prosenjitnth. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
About the Author
Prosenjit Nath
The writer is an Indian technocrat, political analyst, and author.
tags :
election commission Maharashtra elections Rahul Gandhi
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 09, 2025, 13:52 IST
News opinion Opinion | From Defeat To Denial: Rahul Gandhi's Misdirected War On Democracy
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Tharoor, Owaisi, Sule defended India abroad, Rahul Gandhi betrayed': Himanta
In a rare show of appreciation for their political opponents, Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Monday praised Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, AIMIM supremo Asaduddin Owaisi and NCP(SCP) leader Supriya Sule for defending India with dignity abroad. The BJP leader also launched a sharp attack on Congress MP Rahul Gandhi for "tarnishing India's image on international platforms, while contrasting him with these other opposition leaders. Also Read | 'World now knows the truth': Shashi Tharoor-led delegation on Operation Sindoor wraps up US visit "I am thankful to Congress and other opposition leaders, especially Shashi Tharoor, who have strongly defended India's position on foreign soil. Not only him, but leaders like Asaduddin Owaisi and Supriya Sule also represented India on foreign soil and defended the nation," Himanta was quoted as saying by PTI. "They all stood for India. But the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, did not. He has betrayed the nation. He has betrayed the armed forces," Sarma further alleged. Also Read | 19 Brahmos, Crystal Maze missiles: How India brought Pakistan to its knees during Op Sindoor Himanta Biswa Sarma was referring to the all-party delegations that recently toured several countries, carrying out an anti-terror drive on behalf of the central government. Sarma further accused Rahul Gandhi of repeatedly raising doubts about India's military strength and questioning the government's response to Pakistan. During a discussion on a resolution in the state assembly over the success of 'Operation Sindoor', Sarma said Gandhi has been constantly asking about India's losses, but never wanted to know the damage incurred by Pakistan in the military conflict. Also Read | Gen Ghai, face of army during Op Sindoor, promoted as dy chief of army staff "Asking about the losses after the military conflict is a different thing, but he asked about India's losses when it was ongoing. However, he never asked about Pakistan's losses," Sarma claimed. Rahul Gandhi often stirred controversies with his remarks abroad, the most recent being his speech at the University of Texas in the United States last year. Addressing the gathering there, Gandhi said, "The West has an employment problem. India has an employment problem... But many countries in the world don't have an employment problem. China certainly doesn't have an employment problem. Vietnam doesn't have an employment problem." Also Read | Did Pakistan hit Adampur, Bhuj air bases during Operation Sindoor? Satellite images show otherwise Recently, Gandhi called out External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar for his "damning silence" on the number of aircraft India lost under Operation Sindoor. The Congress MP also accused the EAM of informing Pakistan of the start of India's response in Operation Sindoor.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Free of cost': EC counters Rahul Gandhi's voter roll demand; says polls details already provided
NEW DELHI: After repeated attacks on the Election Commission by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi , the chief electoral officer of Maharashtra on Monday advised the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha to download the voter rolls of the Maharashtra legislative elections from its website — "free of cost". Hours after Rahul asked the EC to specify the exact date by which it would furnish the voter rolls, the Commission said it maintains the practice of sharing the details with recognised political parties — first at the draft stage and again after finalisation. "Electoral Rolls are revised annually through a participatory exercise. During this annual exercise, the Electoral Rolls are shared, free of cost, with recognised political parties, including the INC — first at the draft stage and again after finalisation. A similar exercise was carried out in 2009, 2014, 2019, and 2024, and copies of such Electoral Rolls were then shared with the INC as well as other political parties," the EC said in a statement. "A complete copy of the Electoral Roll used in the General Elections to the Legislative Assembly, Maharashtra–2024 is also available on the website for the public to freely download. Even for earlier electoral rolls, a copy of the finalised Electoral Rolls is retained by the District Election Officer. Under Rule 33 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, any person, including the INC, can apply to the concerned District Election Officer and obtain a copy of the retained Electoral Rolls on payment of the prescribed fee. The CEO, Maharashtra, reiterated this statutory position on 22nd May 2025 to a Hon'ble Member of Parliament from the INC who sought a copy of electoral rolls that had already been provided to the INC during revisions in 2009, 2014, 2019, and 2024," it added. Earlier, Rahul had asked the Election Commission to specify the exact date by which it would furnish the voter rolls of the Maharashtra and Haryana legislative elections. In a social media post on X, Rahul welcomed the EC's decision and said, "Good first step taken by EC to hand over voter rolls." "Can the EC please announce the exact date by which this data will be handed over in a digital, machine-readable format?" he asked. The Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha also shared a screenshot of a media report claiming that the EC had cleared the way for sharing electoral-roll data for Haryana and Maharashtra from 2009 to 2024, following an assurance it gave to the Delhi High Court earlier this year. This development came a day after Rahul, in an article, outlined a "step-by-step manipulation" of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections. "My article shows how this happened, step by step: Step 1: Rig the panel for appointing the Election Commission. Step 2: Add fake voters to the 3: Inflate voter turnout. Step 4: Target the bogus voting exactly where BJP needs to 5: Hide the evidence," Gandhi wrote in a post on X. "It's not hard to see why the BJP was so desperate in Maharashtra. But rigging is like match-fixing — the side that cheats might win the game, but damages institutions and destroys public faith in the result. All concerned Indians must see the evidence, judge for themselves, and demand answers," Gandhi had said. "Because the match-fixing of Maharashtra will come to Bihar next, and then anywhere the BJP is losing," the Leader of Opposition claimed. Later, the poll body issued a statement calling Rahul's allegations of "match-fixing" in the electoral process "completely absurd." "The entire nation is aware that each election process — including the preparation of electoral rolls, polling, and counting — is held by government staff, and that too in the presence of authorised representatives formally appointed by political parties/candidates from polling station up to constituency level," the EC said. "Any misinformation being spread, by anyone, is not only a sign of disrespect towards the law, but also brings disrepute to the thousands of representatives appointed by their own political party and demotivates lakhs of election staff who work untiringly and transparently during elections," it added. "After any unfavourable verdict by the voters, trying to defame the Election Commission by saying that it is compromised is completely absurd," the statement by the ECI read. In the 2024 Assembly elections, the Mahayuti coalition of BJP, Shiv Sena, and NCP won 235 of the 288 seats, with BJP securing 132 alone. Shinde's Sena secured 57 seats, and Ajit Pawar's NCP got 41 seats. On the other hand, it was a disappointing show by the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), which had hoped for a grand comeback. Uddhav's Sena got 20 seats, Congress 16, and Sharad Pawar's NCP secured 10 seats.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Electoral rolls were provided to Congress twice, office of CEO
Two days after Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi wrote an article in The Indian Express, raising questions over the conduct and alleged malpractices in the Maharashtra the legislative Assembly elections, the office of Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) on Monday issued an official statement saying electoral rolls are shared with all recognised political parties, including the Congress, twice. 'Electoral rolls are revised annually through a participatory exercise. During this annual exercise, the electoral rolls are shared, free of cost, with recognised political parties, including the INC, first at draft stage and second time after its finalisation. The similar exercise was done in 2009, 2014, 2019, and 2024 and copies of such electoral rolls were then shared with INC, as well as with other political parties,' said the statement. After his article in The Indian Express, Gandhi also raised the demand of publishing consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra. The demand was also for releasing all post-5pm CCTV footage from Maharashtra polling booths. The statement added that a complete copy of electoral roll used in General Elections to Legislative Assembly, Maharashtra-2024, is also available on website for free download. 'Even for earlier electoral rolls, a copy of finalised electoral rolls is retained by District Election Officer as well. Under Rule 33 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, any person, including INC, can apply to the concerned District Election Officer and get a copy of such retained electoral rolls, on payment of prescribed fee,' it said. It claimed that the CEO, Maharashtra, had reiterated this statutory position on May 22, 2025, to a Congress MP who sought a copy of electoral rolls, which were already provided to the INC at the time of revision in 2009, 2014, 2019, and 2024.