Kite flying ban
Lahore's new law that prohibits kite flying because it associates traditional kite events with criminal behaviour is debatable. The Punjab administration's prevention strategy presents a confusing approach by attempting to eliminate cultural traditions while neglecting to eliminate the core elements that threaten public safety.
Lahore's Basant festival attracted worldwide tourists who promoted travel while celebrating the city's cultural legacy. Metal-coated strings led to catastrophic accidents prompting the government to impose a total ban instead of creating balanced regulations. Several countries around the world have created designated safe spaces for kite flying while ensuring safety and protecting cultural traditions. Both India and Japan successfully hold festivals celebrating flying kites: India hosts an International Kite Festival and Japan holds its Hamamatsu Festival. Why don't we follow their example?
The real solution lies in holding string producers accountable rather than levying excessive penalties starting at Rs50,000 against kite enthusiasts and children. Targeting producers instead of banning this traditional custom would create a more equitable and effective approach.
This ban threatens the economic survival of festival workers who build kites and guide tourists through the event. Our national identity and economic stability are at risk when we eliminate Basant from our cultural heritage. A better approach would combine designated kite zones with usage regulations and strict string manufacturing restrictions.
The Punjabi government must reconsider their current approach and develop strategies to ensure public safety and cultural heritage preservation. The answer lies in responsible regulations instead of eliminating recreational fireworks altogether.
Ayesha Fatima
Lahore
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Fertiliser firms fined for price fixing
Listen to article The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has cracked down on alleged collusion in the fertiliser sector, imposing Rs375 million in penalties for creating a monopoly and extracting billions from farmers. In response, the Fertiliser Manufacturers of Pakistan Advisory Council (FMPAC) has announced it will challenge the CCP order in court. Interestingly, these fertiliser barons had previously refused to pay multi-billion rupee dues on account of the Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC), instead obtaining stay orders from the courts. They had collected billions from farmers but failed to deposit these funds in the national exchequer — a matter that remains unresolved. The CCP, a watchdog for anti-competitive practices, launched a suo motu inquiry and imposed a penalty of Rs50 million on each of the six major urea manufacturers, along with a Rs75 million fine on FMPAC, totalling Rs375 million. The penalised companies include Fatima Fertiliser Limited, Fauji Fertiliser Company Limited, Fauji Fertiliser Bin Qasim Limited, Fatima Fertiliser Company Limited, Engro Fertiliser Company Limited, and Agritech Limited. According to the CCP's findings, these firms, in coordination with their trade association FMPAC, ran an 'awareness campaign' that effectively amounted to fixing urea prices nationwide. The Bench, comprising Dr Kabir Ahmed Sidhu and Salam Amin, concluded that this activity violated Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010. While the manufacturers claimed to be setting prices independently, they failed to justify the remarkably synchronised pricing strategy. The CCP investigation revealed that the practice distorted competition and harmed farmers — particularly during the critical Rabi and Kharif seasons — by artificially inflating fertiliser prices and limiting market choices. The companies' attempt to shield themselves under the 'state action doctrine' was also dismissed. The CCP Bench found no formal government directive, or compulsion, to justify their collusive behaviour. Instead, the firms exploited a government instruction about raising awareness among farmers regarding urea prices. They used this as cover to jointly announce uniform urea prices across the country. The bench held that such "actions, taken under the pretext of complying with government instructions, effectively undermined market dynamics and distorted competitive pricing mechanisms." The CCP expressed concern that despite differences in input costs, economies of scale, market size, and gas prices, all six companies were selling a urea bag for the identical price of Rs1,768. The bench remarked that in a market where each company's production capacity and market share are publicly known, such coordinated disclosures cannot be viewed as incidental or competitively benign. Rather, the joint announcement amounted to overt collusion. Repeated directives from the Fertiliser Review Committee (FRC) also went unheeded, with companies failing to address supply imbalances. Notably, the CCP had earlier warned fertiliser manufacturers and FMPAC in 2010, 2012, and 2014warnings that did not lead to lasting change. The CCP chairman reiterated that trade associations should not serve as platforms for sharing price-sensitive information or coordinating pricing strategies. The Commission reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring competitive markets, protecting consumer welfare, and holding violators accountable. In response to the CCP's order, FMPAC issued a statement asserting it had no role in pricing decisions. It clarified that it does not determine or coordinate the pricing of urea or any other fertiliser product. As a non-commercial advisory body, FMPAC claimed it has never engaged in price-setting activities, and any implication otherwise is factually incorrect. FMPAC stated that the controversial advertisement was published under a formal directive from the federal government, communicated via the Fertiliser Review Committee (FRC). During the FRC's meeting on November 25, 2021 — held amid concerns about urea hoarding and market manipulation — it was resolved to initiate a public awareness campaign. FMPAC was directed to publicise the prevailing market price, which had already been acknowledged during the proceedings. FMPAC insisted that it acted in good faith to implement the government's directive, without involvement in setting or proposing the published price. The intent, it said, was to ensure transparency and protect farmers from exploitative practices — not to distort market dynamics. FMPAC plans to contest the CCP's interpretation and pursue legal remedy through the appropriate appellate forum. The Council expressed confidence that a fair and comprehensive review would confirm its actions were lawful and transparent.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
IMF rejects wealth tax, chicken duty
Listen to article The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has objected to the government's contentious proposals to impose a capital value tax on moveable assets and to slap a 5% federal excise duty on one-day-old chicks — measures that underscore the business-as-usual approach of the tax machinery. While the IMF did not endorse the tax on moveable assets and one-day-old chicks, it did agree to the imposition of a tax on digital services aimed at raising Rs10 billion in revenue, according to sources in the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). There is also a budget proposal to increase the tax on dividend income of mutual funds from 15% to 20%. The withholding tax on interest income may also go up from 15% to 20%, according to officials of the FBR. Among the proposals that may be announced on budget day is the withdrawal of income tax exemption for venture capital companies and funds, according to senior FBR officials. The income tax exemption for the cinema business may also be withdrawn. There has so far been no relief in reducing the income tax rates for the highest slab of 35%, and the 10% surcharge on monthly incomes exceeding Rs500,000 may also remain, said FBR sources. However, the IMF has agreed to reduce the income tax rates for the remaining four slabs, providing some relief on monthly incomes below Rs500,000. It has not agreed to increase the income tax exemption threshold to Rs1.2 million but has approved cutting the rate from 5% to 1%. The sources said that the government wanted to reintroduce the wealth tax in the form of a capital value tax on all moveable assets, excluding shares of listed companies. The proposal had also been presented at the level of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, said FBR officials. The proposal to impose tax on moveable assets such as cash and gold was also shared with the IMF, said the officials. However, the IMF did not endorse the proposal on the grounds that the government should tax income instead of taxing wealth. The FBR wanted to target cash balances in banks to raise revenue, according to FBR officials. Through the Finance Act 2022, the government had introduced a 1% CVT on foreign assets worth over Rs100 million owned by resident Pakistanis, but it has been challenged in the courts. The finance ministry and the FBR on Tuesday gave a briefing to PM Sharif about the budget contours, including measures that the IMF has cleared so far, the sources added. Some issues were still outstanding, including the relief for the real estate sector and the capital value tax. President Asif Ali Zardari on Tuesday convened a National Assembly session for June 10, where Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb will deliver his second budget speech. The Economic Survey of Pakistan is expected to be unveiled on June 9, the third day of Eid. The FBR also wanted to introduce a 5% federal excise duty on one-day-old chicks, but the IMF did not support the idea. It pointed out that, on one hand, the FBR claims there are high taxes on food in Pakistan, and on the other hand, it recommends such proposals. Proposals like the tax on one-day-old chicks and moveable assets indicate that the FBR has run out of ideas. The IMF's concern was that taxing one-day-old chicks was not aimed at broadening the tax base; rather, it targeted a specific industry, said the sources. The FBR did not conduct any study before proposing the tax on chicks, which are an essential food item. The measure was rooted in a tax case involving just one company among hundreds, revealing the shallowness of the proposal. Last month, President Zardari issued the Tax Laws Amendment Ordinance, 2025, and one of the reasons was a poultry sector company. The government inserted a new section, 175C, in the Income Tax Ordinance through ad hoc legislation. The sources said that proposals to impose a 5% federal excise duty on all processed foods — including chips and biscuits — were also considered. Effectively, the 5% FED means the sales tax rate will increase to 23%, and after adding further tax and withholding taxes, the overall cost of taxation will jump to 29%. The prime minister was not in favour of doubling the federal excise duty on fertiliser and raised the issue with the IMF at the highest level. However, during last month's talks, the IMF asked the government to fulfil its commitment to increase the tax, said the sources. The sources said there was still a likelihood that the government may double the federal excise duty on fertiliser to 10% and introduce a 5% excise duty on pesticides in the budget. The sources said the prime minister was told that the budget numbers had been locked with the IMF. The FBR's annual target is likely to be Rs14.130 trillion, and the non-tax revenue target is Rs4 trillion. This brings the total tax and non-tax revenue target to Rs17.1 trillion. The federal government has been allowed to allocate Rs1.186 trillion in budget subsidies, including Rs1.036 trillion for the power sector. For IMF programme purposes, the federal development budget may be Rs873 billion, while provincial budgets are estimated at Rs2.1 trillion — about Rs700 billion less than what the four provincial governments indicated in the Annual Plan Coordination Committee meeting. The IMF has allowed all federal and provincial governments to spend Rs22 trillion on current expenditures. The total expenditures by all five governments for IMF programme purposes are estimated at Rs25 trillion for the fiscal year 2025-26.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Two witnesses record testimonies in gifts case
The Toshakhana is a repository which stores precious gifts given to rulers, parliamentarians, bureaucrats and other officials by heads of other governments and foreign dignitaries. PHOTO: FILE Two more prosecution witnesses on Tuesday gave their testimonies in a case related to alleged misuse of the official gift repository rules by PTI founder Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi during the former's term as the prime minister. Special Judge Central Shahrukh Arjumand conducted the hearing of the case in a courtroom inside Rawalpindi's Central Prison popularly known as Adiala Jail. Both Imran and Bushrawho are detained in the prison facility — attended the hearing. After the testimonies, the counsel for Imran, Arshad Tabriz, cross-examined both the witnesses. Lawyer of Bushra Bibi, Qosain Faisal Mufti, will cross examine the witnesses at the next hearing. Bushra Bibi had refused to attend the last hearing of the case — also called the Toshakhana II casedespite repeated summonses by the court. The judge had later warned of cancelling her bail in the case. The court will resume hearing on June 11. According to the charge-sheet, Imran misused his position to acquire a Bulgari jewelry set that the Saudi crown prince presented as a gift during the couple's visit to Saudi Arabia between May 7 and 10, 2021. The set included a ring, bracelet, necklace, and a pair of earrings. According to the evidence gathered during the investigation, Imran and Bushra unlawfully retained the set. On May 18, 2021, the deputy military secretary informed the section officer of Toshakhana about the need to assess and declare the price of the gift, but it was not deposited. Bulgari sold the necklace for 300,000 euros and the earrings for 80,000 euros to a Saudi franchise on May 25, 2018. However, the price of the bracelet and ring could not be determined. As of May 28, 2021, the total estimated value of the Bulgari jewelry set was approximately Rs75,661,600. The necklace alone was valued at Rs56,496,000, and the earrings at Rs15,065,600.
