
‘We paid £150,000 to upsize in our 80s'
Unlike most 80-somethings, who look to downsize to more manageable properties as they get older, just under two years ago Rosemary, 82, and her husband, 83, swapped their two-bedroom apartment in Bangor, Northern Ireland, for a four-bedroom, detached property on the other side of town.
The primary reason for their significant upsize? Having their family to stay – even though it doesn't happen often.
'Our girls don't live in Northern Ireland, so we needed somewhere for them to stay,' Rosemary explains.
The couple have two daughters and four young grandchildren who live in mainland UK and France, and visit Northern Ireland for a couple of weeks at a time. 'They come over once or twice a year. The rooms are just there for them when they visit. We don't use them for anything else when they're not here.'
It's a decision that a growing number of older homeowners are taking, says Claire Whisker, founder of First In The Door, a property adviser platform that matches home buyers with buying agents.
'In recent years, we've seen a clear shift in how many retirees are approaching their next move. Rather than downsizing, a growing number are now upsizing, actively seeking homes with enough space to host visiting grandchildren and extended family,' she says.
' Rising childcare costs have led more grandparents to take on a hands-on role in family life, and their property choices are reflecting that.'
Last year, Whisker did not receive any enquiries from older upsizers – this year, she's already had five. 'This trend is particularly evident in suburban and semi-rural locations, well-connected coastal areas and larger market towns, where space and accessibility go hand-in-hand,' she says.
Older upsizing clients include a retiree from Yorkshire relocating to London to help care for her grandsons, and a woman in her 60s looking for a four-bedroom house in Wimbledon to accommodate her growing number of grandchildren. 'It's a new kind of upsizing – not just about square footage but about creating a home that supports intergenerational living and deeper family connections,' Whisker adds.
For the Scott Browns, the move was a pricey one. Their larger home cost £150,000 more than the sale price of the couple's apartment. Fortunately, they had enough savings to cover the extra amount. Bills in the new house are more expensive too; council tax, gas, water and electricity work out at £2,500 extra annually, but Rosemary says they were careful to budget for this beforehand.
'I'm absolutely glad we made the move. The apartment was in a converted house and the family could only come individually – one family at a time – and we'd squash them in. But here everyone can come together for Christmas and birthdays.' They also appreciate having a good-sized private garden and no neighbours above them.
While they don't know how long they will stay in their current home, Rosemary says she has no desire to downsize or move into a retirement village. 'I look at the ads for them in the paper and the people always look so happy, but you're very much tied to a group of people there, and I don't know if that's for me.'
'Most people we know are looking after their grandchildren'
Family also influenced the 2023 move that Lorraine, 66, and Michael Shorter, 72, made to a David Wilson Home in Sturry, near Canterbury.
The pair had spent the previous 39 years living in a semi in Crayford, which had three bedrooms – one of which was a box room. 'The guy [from David Wilson] showed us around a two-bedroom at first, and I thought 'This is too small; I have two children with partners and two granddaughters',' Lorraine says.
Instead, they opted for a 1,089 sq ft, three-bedroom, end-of-terrace house, upsizing so they could host visiting relatives.
'In our old house, our main bedroom was extremely small – a very stark difference [to here],' she says. '[Our new home is] on three storeys and what appealed to us was that there was a master bedroom on the top floor and the second floor had two double bedrooms… I said to my husband recently how great it is having the second floor – people can come and stay and have their own bathroom.'
Even though their current property is larger, it was £40,000 cheaper than the Shorters' previous home, and bills are broadly the same. However, they do have to pay a £40 monthly service charge to cover the general maintenance of shared green space (although the house comes with its own private garden).
Lorraine previously worked at a law firm, while her husband owned a hair salon in Blackheath. Now they're both retired, the couple regularly help out with the childcare of their two grandchildren and, as both live over an hour away, having the space for them to stay overnight was crucial.
'While their parents are working, we help look after the kids,' she says. 'During the school holidays, Sophia, who's 11, comes to stay and, if it's nice weather, our daughter will come for the weekend. Our granddaughter, Angel, who's three, calls it 'Nanny's holiday home', as it feels like they're on holiday when they come.'
Like the Scott Browns, they also don't use the rooms when their family aren't staying, as it's such a regular occurrence: 'They come and stay more than once a month. In the past few weeks, my daughter has been having work done to her house, so she's been here a lot… Being able to put people up easily was important for us.'
Lorraine says a lot of their friends have similar caring commitments. 'Most people we know are looking after their grandchildren… Our friends have got children and it's a big consideration,' she says.
She feels like this multi-generational approach to bringing up children harks back to her own childhood. 'I come from the East End and my dad was one of seven. Relying on family is coming back round. Our family all lived in the same street or house; I had an aunt upstairs and one next door, and everyone lived near each other,' she says.
Again like the Scott Browns, Lorraine isn't sure how long they'll remain 'upsized' for, saying she'll have to see what the future brings.
'I don't know how long we will stay for – certainly a few years, while the grandchildren are coming.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car loans: Why could drivers still get compensation after court ruling?
Millions of UK motorists could be eligible for payouts worth hundreds of pounds after regulators announced an industry-wide compensation scheme. It came after a landmark Supreme Court ruling over whether motor finance firms complied with rules related to commission paid by lenders to dealers selling car loans. The ruling on Friday was widely considered a victory for finance firms potentially affected, after it was judged that two key cases were did not break the law. Here the PA news agency looks at why consumers could still be able to make claims for compensation payments. What was the court case and why was it important? The UK's highest court was considering an appeal against a Court of Appeal ruling made in October last year, relating to three claimants who had each bought cars on credit. In each case, the car dealer made a profit on the sale of the car but also received a commission from the lender for introducing the business to them, which the three claimants argued they did not know about. The Court of Appeal originally found that 'secret' commission payments, as part of finance arrangements made before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent, were unlawful. The lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, challenged the decision. If the case confirmed that these three cases were all still unlawful, then consumers who bought cars with similar finance deals could make claims to potentially secure compensation. What was the result? On Friday, Lords Reed, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones, Briggs and Hamblen ruled that car dealers did not have a relationship with their customers that would require them to act only in the customers' interest, and that the Court of Appeal was wrong. But they said that some customers could still receive payouts by bringing claims under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). It upheld one of the three claims and stressed that it was still broadly considered 'unfair'. What does it mean for consumers? Consumers who are concerned that they were not told about commission and think they may have paid too much could therefore still be eligible for compensation. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) watchdog said not all claims will receive payouts however. The FCA had launched its own process to look at discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) on motor finance deals in 2024 but had put this on hold until the outcome of the Supreme Court case. Some 80,000 open cases on this issue were effectively paused for the ruling. Who is eligible for compensation? The case specifically relates to people who took out car loans between 2007 and 2021. Consumer champion Martin Lewis said in a video posted to X that millions of people are still likely to be due payments. He told Sky News the consultation is 'likely to mean 40% of people who got a car finance deal between 2007 and 2021 will be due some form of redress'. How much could I receive? The FCA said it is consulting on a redress scheme which is expected to cost between £9 billion and £18 billion. This is expected to mean victims could receive up to £950 in compensation. The regulator stressed that it was 'hard to estimate precisely at this stage the total cost to industry of the scheme'. What will the compensation process be? Currently, a lot is still not known about who exactly is eligible and how it will take place. The FCA has said that those who have already complained do not need to do anything and advised that others with potential claims contact their car loan provider, rather than use a claims management company. The regulator added that its consultation will be launched by early October. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026. What does that mean for car finance firms? The motor finance industry is expected to cover the costs of the compensation, including administrative costs. Over the past few years, lenders and motor finance firms have been setting aside money to cover potential compensation payments. Why has the sector reacted positively to this? On Monday, shares in lender Lloyds and Close Brothers moved firmly higher after the ruling appeared to be more favourable than expected. Lloyds told shareholders on Monday morning that further financial provisions are 'unlikely to be material' in order to cover likely redress payments. While there is still some uncertainty over the cost of redress for the industry, positive outcomes in two of the cases mean they are likely to face fewer claims than previously expected. AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould said: 'While this issue could still cause some damage, it looks unlikely to be a repeat of the PPI scandal which blighted the banking industry in the 2010s.'


The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes to stand down as MSP in 2026
Scotland's Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes has announced she will not be running for re-election as an MSP next year. The MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch said she does not wish to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. She is one of the SNP's most significant politicians, having finished second in the 2023 leadership election, which saw Humza Yousaf succeed Nicola Sturgeon as party leader. When John Swinney became First Minister last year, he appointed Ms Forbes to his cabinet as his deputy, also taking charge of the Government's economy portfolio. In a statement shared on Monday, Ms Forbes said she had reflected over recess and decided not to run again in 2026. She said she had been 'privileged' to serve her various roles in government. Ms Forbes said: 'I remain wholly supportive of the First Minister just as when I backed him to be leader of the SNP and I look forward to campaigning for the SNP at the next election – to lead Scotland to independence. 'I was first elected in my mid-20s, dedicating my most formative adult years to public service. In that time, I presented multiple budgets, supported thousands of businesses and workers during Covid-19 and launched Scotland's most ambitious business start up network TechScaler. 'I now wish to step back from my public duties and focus on new opportunities to serve people. 'I have grown up in the public eye, getting married, having a baby and raising a young family. 'I have consistently put the public's needs ahead of my family's during that time. I am grateful to them for accommodating the heavy demands of being a political figure. 'Looking ahead to the future, I do not want to miss any more of the precious early years of family life – which can never be rewound.' The First Minister wrote back to Ms Forbes, saying he understood her decision and thanking her for her contributions. Mr Swinney said: ''You have made a huge contribution to public life in Scotland and have been instrumental in making progress on economic issues for my Government. 'You have much to be proud of in all of the work you have undertaken but I am especially heartened by the effect of your leadership on advancing support for the Gaelic language. 'We all wrestle with the inevitable conflicts between family and public life and I sympathise with the dilemmas you have faced. 'I wish you, Ali and your family well and much happiness in the years ahead.' Scottish Labour's deputy leader Jackie Baillie said she wished Ms Forbes well, but said she was part of a 'tired government with no vision'. She said: 'It is a great honour for us all to represent our constituents in Parliament, and I am sure that those living in Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch will be grateful for her work during that time. 'Of course, as much as being an MSP is a privilege, it is also a demanding job which can make for a difficult balance between our working and personal lives.' She added: 'But it cannot have escaped the notice of voters that many of the SNP's former rising stars are abandoning the stage, often to be replaced by defeated names of yesteryears and anonymous party apparatchiks.'


Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Don't be fobbed off': Readers back Telegraph campaign for prostate cancer screening
Michael, David, Paul – the names of just three of our readers who have had to take matters into their own hands when it comes to prostate cancer tests. In the hundreds of replies The Telegraph has received in response to our campaign, there are countless stories where men have had to insist on PSA tests when GPs dismissed their concerns. Prostate cancer kills 12,000 men in this country every year, with one in eight prostate cancer cases being caught at stage 4, when the disease is incurable. If the PSA test were proactively offered to men as part of a targeted screening programme, lives would be saved because more cases would be caught at an earlier stage, when treatment is more successful. That is why The Telegraph is campaigning for a targeted national screening programme for prostate cancer, focused on men who are at the greatest risk of developing the disease. This includes men over 50, black men (whose risk is twice that of white men) and those with a family history of prostate cancer. Following the launch of the campaign, readers who have had prostate cancer in the past or are currently undergoing treatment have shared their stories in the hope it will bring about change for others. 'It's my right to have a test' Paul Harvey, 75, believes he would be dead now if he had not insisted on knowing what his PSA levels were. 'My father died with prostate cancer, so I knew I was a higher risk,' he shares. Mr Harvey, who works part-time for the North Yorkshire Police, asked his GP for a PSA test but was told the test wasn't very accurate and not to bother. 'I insisted. I told her it was my right to have a test, and two weeks later she made me a fast-track referral,' he explains. Mr Harvey was soon diagnosed with a PSA of 10.2 and a Gleason score of 3+4. Gleason is a system used to grade prostate cancer based on the appearance of cancer cells. 'At this point, I joined a local support group and found the Macmillan nurse very helpful in bringing my fears down in size,' he shares. The NHS 'stepped up speed', and Mr Harvey had a robotic prostatectomy followed by radiation therapy a few years later. 'Yes, there are still side effects, but at least I am alive to experience them.' 'I am a strong advocate of testing, and am witheringly blunt with men who say ' I do not want to know what my PSA is,'' Mr Harvey states. 'I was told a PSA test was not needed' Telegraph reader David, 67, an aircraft engineer, received PSA tests in the past with all low numbers, but had cause for concern when he experienced urethral bleeds on two occasions, six months apart. His bladder was medically examined with a camera, but he was told he was all clear. 'Each time I questioned my PSA levels, but was told a PSA test was not needed,' he says. He then went to a different GP with a separate issue, who asked, with all the intervention, why he had not requested a PSA test. 'I pointed out I had, on numerous occasions, but was refused.' The GP sent him for a PSA test the next day, and found he had hugely increased numbers. A CT scan followed, revealing he had stage 3 prostate cancer. He is currently undergoing treatment at Weston Park Hospital in Sheffield. 'The answer is not to be fobbed off' Michael Evans had annual PSA checks for ten years until 2005, when he noticed the level had risen from 2.2 to 3.4 in one year. Although the level was still low, he admits, he was concerned about the rapid rate of increase, which he knew to be an indicator of cancer. But his doctor dismissed his concerns and later told him that a PSA level of four was the lowest for an NHS referral at the time. So Mr Evans insisted on a private referral, and as a result he was diagnosed with prostate cancer within a week. Two weeks later, he had the gland removed, although he had been offered alternative therapies. The cancer had not spread, and his PSA level has remained undetectable for 20 years. The reader says the PSA test 'is not clear proof and, of course, a high score can also indicate benign conditions. But it's a start, and warrants further investigation. 'Prostate cancer is eminently curable if you catch it early, as I did. The answer is not to be fobbed off and insist on investigation, especially since MRI scans are now safer than the biopsy, which was all that was available in 2005.' 'Astonished' Geraldine Davies's late husband, Ivor Gunton, took part in Bristol University's ProtecT study around the age of 60, close to the time he was winding down his gardening business. He was tested every year and saw a consultant after receiving a PSA of four. The study results provided strong evidence there was a small increased risk of progression and cancer spread from active monitoring, compared to risks of harms to sexual, urinary and bowel function caused by radical treatments. Upon finding a small tumour, the study looked into which treatments were most successful. Mr Gunton had regular monitoring, and after ten years, the tumour had not grown. 'I am astonished that the results of this comprehensive study are not directing action to prevent so many men from dying of this disease. Why have its findings been ignored?' Mr Gunton died of bowel cancer in 2022, but it was in no way related to the prostate cancer, Ms Davies shares. 'My only symptom was backache' Paul Beal was diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer four years ago – his only symptom was a backache. 'Thankfully, my doctor picked it up at a routine asthma test visit after asking about my general health.' 'The Queen Elizabeth Hospital in King's Lynn were fantastic, and I can't praise the Macmillan Centre enough,' Mr Beal says. However, 'the strangest and best thing that came out of the whole thing is that my friend Brian Hallard had the same diagnosis as me, and we went through the whole treatment as a team.' 'We are pleased to tell you that we are both fine and in remission, both with very low PSAs,' Mr Beal adds. The friends are both invited back to the Macmillan Centre every two months or so, to meet with other men with prostate cancer. 'And I have to say what a great bunch of men, and it's good to talk,' Mr Beal shares. The pair also promote getting the PSA test through their separate businesses – World Of Fun, a joke shop, and the Princess Theatre, both in Hunstanton. 'We are very open about getting the message out.'