logo
Trump says Israel-Iran ceasefire in effect, please don't violate it

Trump says Israel-Iran ceasefire in effect, please don't violate it

TimesLIVE4 hours ago

US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday a ceasefire between Israel and Iran was in place and asked the two countries not to violate it hours after Iran launched waves of missiles, which Israel's ambulance service said killed four people.
'The ceasefire is in effect. Please don't violate it,' Trump said in a Truth Social post.
When Trump announced on Monday what he called a complete ceasefire to end the 12-day war, he appeared to suggest Israel and Iran would have time to complete missions that were under way, at which point the ceasefire would begin in a staged process.
Witnesses said they heard explosions near Tel Aviv and Beersheba in southern Israel before Trump's statement.
Israel's military said six waves of missiles were launched by Iran and Israel's national ambulance service said four people were killed in Beersheba, the first reported deaths in Israel since Trump announced the ceasefire.
Iran's semi-official SNN news agency reported on Tuesday that Tehran fired its last round of missiles before the ceasefire came into effect.
A senior White House official said Trump had brokered a ceasefire deal in a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel had agreed so long as Iran did not launch further attacks.
'On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate Israel and Iran on having the stamina, courage, and intelligence to end what should be called 'the 12-day war',' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site.
An Iranian official earlier confirmed Tehran had agreed to a ceasefire, but the country's foreign minister said there would be no cessation of hostilities unless Israel stopped its attacks.
Abbas Araqchi said early on Tuesday that if Israel stopped its 'illegal aggression' against the Iranian people no later than 4am Tehran time on Tuesday, Iran had no intention of continuing its response afterwards.
'The final decision on the cessation of our military operations will be made later,' Araqchi added in a post on X.
Israel, joined by the US on the weekend, has carried out attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities after alleging Tehran was close to obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Iran denies ever having a nuclear weapons programme, but Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has said if it wanted to, world leaders 'wouldn't be able to stop us'.
Israel, which is not a party to the international Non-Proliferation Treaty, is the only country in the Middle East believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that.
Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani secured Tehran's agreement during a call with Iranian officials, an official briefed on the negotiations told Reuters on Tuesday.
US vice-president JD Vance, secretary of state Marco Rubio and US special envoy Steve Witkoff were in direct and indirect contact with the Iranians, a White House official said.
Iran's UN mission and the Israeli embassy in Washington did not respond to separate requests for comment from Reuters.
Hours earlier, three Israeli officials signalled Israel was looking to wrap up its campaign in Iran soon and had passed the message to the US.
Netanyahu had told government ministers whose discussions ended early on Tuesday not to speak publicly, Israel's Channel 12 television reported.
Markets reacted favourably to the news.
S&P 500 futures rose 0.4% late on Monday, suggesting traders expect the US stock market to open with gains on Tuesday.
US crude futures fell in early Asian trading hours on Tuesday to their lowest level in more than a week after Trump said a ceasefire had been agreed, relieving worries of supply disruption in the region.
Earlier on Monday, Trump said he would encourage Israel to proceed towards peace after dismissing Iran's attack on an American airbase that caused no injuries and thanking Tehran for early notice of the strikes.
He said Iran fired 14 missiles at the US airbase, calling it 'a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered'.
Iran's handling of the attack recalled earlier clashes with the US and Israel, with Tehran seeking a balance between saving face with a military response but without provoking a cycle of escalation it can't afford.
Iran's attack came after US bombers dropped bunker-buster bombs on Iranian underground nuclear facilities at the weekend, joining Israel's air war.
Much of Tehran's population of 10-million has fled after days of bombing.
The Trump administration maintains its aim was solely to destroy Iran's nuclear programme, not to open a wider war.
'Iran was very close to having a nuclear weapon,' Vance said in an interview on Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier.
'Now Iran is incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they have because we destroyed it,' Vance said.
Trump has cited intelligence reports that Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon, without elaborating. However, US intelligence agencies said earlier this year they assessed Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and a source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters last week that assessment hadn't changed.
In a social media post on Sunday, Trump spoke of toppling the hardline clerical rulers who have been Washington's principal foes in the Middle East since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Israel, however, had made clear its strikes on Evin prison, a notorious jail for housing political prisoners, and other targets in Tehran were intended to hit the Iranian ruling apparatus broadly and its ability to sustain power.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Democrats introduce resolution to check Trump's use of military against Iran
US Democrats introduce resolution to check Trump's use of military against Iran

TimesLIVE

time33 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

US Democrats introduce resolution to check Trump's use of military against Iran

Three Democratic legislators from the US House of Representatives introduced a war powers resolution on Monday to check President Donald Trump's use of military force against Iran after US strikes on Tehran's nuclear sites over the weekend. Trump's Republican Party holds a majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate and it is unlikely a resolution restricting Trump's actions could pass the two chambers. Iran targeted a US base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation. The Israel-Iran war, which began on June 13 when Israel attacked its regional rival, further raised tensions in a region on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. The joint statement issued late on Monday by Democratic US representatives Jim Himes, Gregory Meeks and Adam Smith came hours after Trump claimed on social media Israel and Iran had agreed to a ceasefire. 'President Trump must not be allowed to start a war with Iran, or any country, without Congressional approval,' the legislators said, adding Trump ordered the strikes 'without meaningful consultation or Congressional authorisation'. Some Democratic and Republican legislators had called on Congress to rein in Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent US involvement in the conflict. Many Democratic legislators said Trump's actions were unconstitutional and it was Congress that has the power to declare war on foreign countries.

US judge blocks Trump plan to close Harvard's doors to international students
US judge blocks Trump plan to close Harvard's doors to international students

TimesLIVE

time34 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

US judge blocks Trump plan to close Harvard's doors to international students

A federal judge on Monday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from implementing his plan to bar foreigners from entering the US to study at Harvard University. US district judge Allison Burroughs in Boston issued an injunction barring Trump's administration from carrying out its latest bid to curtail Harvard's ability to host international students amid an escalating fight pitting the Republican president against the prestigious Ivy League university. The preliminary injunction extends a temporary order the judge issued on June 5 that prevented the administration from enforcing a proclamation Trump signed a day earlier that cited national security concerns to justify why Harvard could no longer be trusted to host international students. She ruled after Trump's Friday announcement that his administration could announce a deal with Harvard 'over the next week or so' to resolve the White House's campaign against the university, which has waged a legal battle against the administration's various actions against the school. Trump signed the proclamation after his administration had already frozen billions of dollars in funding to the oldest and wealthiest US university, threatened Harvard's tax-exempt status and launched several investigations into the institution. The proclamation prohibited foreigners from entering the US to study at Harvard or participate in exchange visitor programmes for an initial six months and directed secretary of state Marco Rubio to consider whether to revoke visas of international students already enrolled at Harvard. Burroughs said Trump's administration was probably violating Harvard's free speech rights under the US constitution's First Amendment by retaliating against it for refusing to meet its demands to cede control over the university's curriculum and admissions and by targeting it based on what officials viewed as the university's left-leaning orientation. The judge said 'at its root, this case is about core constitutional rights that must be safeguarded: freedom of thought, freedom of expression and freedom of speech, each of which is a pillar of a functioning democracy and an essential hedge against authoritarianism'. 'Here, the government's misplaced efforts to control a reputable academic institution and squelch diverse viewpoints seemingly because they are, in some instances, opposed to this administration's views, threaten these rights,' she wrote.

‘We're not here to save the ANC' - DA sharpens its stance in GNU
‘We're not here to save the ANC' - DA sharpens its stance in GNU

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

‘We're not here to save the ANC' - DA sharpens its stance in GNU

Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen's says the GNU has experienced ups and downs since its formation. Image: Ayanda Ndamane Independent Newspapers Democratic Alliance leader John Steenhuisen has admitted that the Government of National Unity (GNU) has experienced a 'tough' first year, but said progress is being made and many priorities are on track. 'Yes, it's been a tough year - a year of many ups and downs, but I think the GNU has survived a year. Many people never thought it would last more than a few months, yet here we are,' Steenhuisen said. He was speaking in Hanover Park, Cape Town, where the DA celebrated its 25th anniversary since its formation. The GNU, formed following the May 2024 general elections, came after the African National Congress (ANC) failed to secure a majority for the first time since the advent of democracy in 1994. The coalition includes the ANC, the DA, Freedom Front Plus and several smaller parties, some of whom were former rivals. However, the unity government has been marred by internal tensions, particularly over policy implementation, leadership disputes, and allegations of corruption and a lack of accountability. The DA, which is the second-largest party in the GNU, has clashed with its partners on multiple legislative fronts. It has challenged the Expropriation Without Compensation Act and the Employment Equity Amendment Act in court. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In April, the party successfully contested the passage of the fiscal framework in Parliament, a bill the ANC pushed through with support from non-GNU parties such as ActionSA and Build One South Africa (BOSA). Steenhuisen, who is also the Minister of Agriculture, said the GNU has faced numerous political tests, including disputes over a controversial 0.2% increase in VAT. 'We have been battle-tested in the VAT debate. We now have a budget that will be passed this week,' he said. 'We've got a medium-term development plan that has been passed. We have a fiscal framework, I think we are well on track.' Despite tensions, Steenhuisen emphasised that the coalition must deliver on its promises to the public. 'I think the GNU has to accelerate at a whop speed our initiatives to grow the economy,' he said. South Africa continues to grapple with major challenges, including high unemployment, rampant crime, poverty, a water and electricity crisis, pothole-riddled roads, sewer spills, and poor sanitation. GNU leaders had pledged to address these issues, but have so far made limited progress. 'The GDP growth for the first quarter this year is not a good story,' Steenhuisen said. 'We've got to do far more - and far quicker, to stimulate the economy and drive the reforms needed to lift South Africa off its current trajectory of high debt and unemployment.' With the 2029 general election on the distant horizon, Steenhuisen said the GNU has four years left to prove itself. 'We cannot wait any longer. The GNU must show South Africans why they should back the builders, not the breakers,' he said. 'And we can only do that if we demonstrate to citizens that we've grown the economy, created jobs, reduced poverty, and lowered the cost of living - the issues that really affect ordinary people on the ground.' IOL News previously reported that political analyst, Professor Sipho Seepe questioned the DA's motives in the coalition. 'DA federal chair Helen Zille has been very clear that she didn't join the GNU to save the ANC. She's only there to keep Ramaphosa in power because he serves the interests of certain elites,' he said. 'You can't have a coalition where one party has publicly vowed to destroy another. That's not a partnership, that's sabotage...' Seepe added that the DA is pursuing its own policy direction and will continue opposing key ANC legislative efforts, including NHI and the BELA Bill. 'The DA is not in the GNU to help. They're in it to advance their own goals.' IOL Politics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store