Hanford Mills is hit by federal cost-cutting
Federal budget freezes have hit a local museum.
According to a news release from Hanford Mills Museum, museum officials learned late Wednesday, April 9, from the Institute of Museum and Library Services that Hanford's two IMLS-funded grants had been terminated, effective April 8.
"The grants totaled $238,475 ($82,516 of which not yet disbursed) of essential funding for programs offered to area visitors, residents and children and the preservation of items and information with local historical significance," a news release from the museum stated.
The termination letters, signed by acting IMLS director Keith Sonderling, state that 'IMLS has determined that your grant is unfortunately no longer consistent with the agency's priorities and no longer serves the interest of the United States and the IMLS Program.'
Hanford Mills Museum, in East Meredith, preserves an operational water- and steam-powered sawmill and gristmill as well as a historic manufacturing, retail and agricultural site. With a staff of five full time employees and some part-time employees, the museum "offers 3-4 special events, serves thousands of visitors, and provides over 250 educational programs to area schools each year," the release stated.
IMLS had awarded HMM two grants for multi-year projects to help complete critical work that would enhance their service to the public: one to improve the management and care of its historic objects to ensure that they last for current and future generations (2022-2025), and the other to create an interpretive master plan informed by community participation that would guide the museum's activities into the future (2024-2026), the release stated.
With the termination, the museum loses $34,187 that was already allocated to cover work on these projects in 2025. That means about 8% of the museum's total budget for the year has been unexpectedly cut, according to the release. One of the grant projects included a professional development workshop that was open to other local museums, and that training will now be canceled.
'This unfortunate news arrived as I returned from the annual conference of the Museum Association of New York,' Executive Director Kajsa Harley said. 'I had just heard many stories of canceled federal funds from colleagues across the state. Ours is one of hundreds of similar situations unfolding across the country right now, in rural communities and cities alike.'
IMLS awarded the grants to Hanford Mills after a competitive process "that acknowledged HMM's outstanding integrity and interpretive work among small historic sites," the release stated. Grant applications are awarded based on review not only by IMLS agency staff, but also by panels of museum professionals from across the country "who understand the nature of the field's work, the need for museums to directly serve the public, and the measurable positive impacts museums have on local economies and community preservation," the release stated.
Most museums and libraries have to match every federal dollar they receive with money from their own operating budgets in order to get the funding support, according to the release. 'The impact of these federal grants far exceed investment, both in terms of public education and enrichment and what museums contribute to their local economies as tourism drivers and employers,' Harley said. 'As a small rural museum, we stretched every dollar from this federal funding so that we could do our best work in providing fantastic programs and preserving the site and our historic artifacts. We leverage grants like these to help us with our efforts to provide low-cost or no-cost experiences to local families, visitors to the area and our neighboring schools.'
Despite the funding terminations, "HMM remains committed to its mission to inspire audiences of all ages to explore connections among energy, technology, natural resources, and entrepreneurship in rural communities," the release stated.
'The work that museums and libraries do is essential to our communities,' Harley said. 'Our hope is that our communities value our work enough to support us, financially, of course, but also as ambassadors who are willing to advocate for us to state and federal officials.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
2 days ago
- Vox
The big reason why Republicans should worry about an angry Elon Musk
In the November 2026 midterm elections, Elon Musk could have much more impact for much less money. Allison Robbert/AFP via Getty Images How the Musk-Trump blowup ends, nobody knows. Most commentary gives President Donald Trump the advantage. But Elon Musk's willingness to spend his fortune on elections gives him one distinct advantage — the ability to drive a brittle party system into chaos and loosen Trump's hold on it. Thus far, Musk has raised two electoral threats. First, his opposition to Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill has raised the specter of his funding primary challenges against Republicans who vote to support the legislation. Second, he has raised the possibility of starting a new political party. There are limits to how much Musk can actually reshape the political landscape — but the underlying conditions of our politics make it uniquely vulnerable to disruption. The threat of Musk-funded primaries might ring a little hollow. Trump will almost certainly still be beloved by core Republican voters in 2026. Musk can fund primary challengers, but in a low-information, low-turnout environment of mostly Trump-loving loyal partisans, he is unlikely to succeed. However, in the November 2026 midterm elections, Musk could have much more impact for much less money. All he needs to do is fund a few spoiler third-party candidates in a few key swing states and districts. In so doing, he would exploit the vulnerability that has been hiding in plain sight for a while — the wafer-thin closeness of national elections. The Logoff The email you need to stay informed about Trump — without letting the news take over your life, from senior editor Patrick Reis. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. In a straight-up battle for the soul of the Republican Party, Trump wins hands down. Not even close. Trump has been the party's leader and cult of personality for a decade. But in a battle for the balance of power, Musk might hold the cards. Currently, the US political system is 'calcified.' That's how the political scientists John Sides, Chris Tausanovitch, and Lynn Vavreck described it in their 2022 book, The Bitter End: The 2020 Presidential Campaign and the Challenge to American Democracy. Partisans keep voting for their side, seeing only the reality that makes them the heroes; events may change, but minds don't. In a 48-48 country, that means little opportunity for either party to make big gains. It also means a small disruption could have massive implications. Elon Musk doesn't have a winning coalition — but he may not need one to hurt Trump Let's imagine, for a moment, that Musk is serious about starting a new political party and running candidates. He will quickly find that despite his X poll, a party that 'actually represents the 80 percent in the middle' is a fantasy. That mythical center? Being generous here, that's maybe 15 percent of politically checked-out Americans. Realistically, the coalition for Musk's politics — techno-libertarian-futurist, anti-system, very online, Axe-level bro-vibes — would be small. But even so, a Musk-powered independent party — call it the 'Colonize Mars' Party — would almost certainly attract exactly the voters completely disenchanted with both parties, mostly the disillusioned young men who went to Trump in the 2024 election. Imagine Musk funds his Colonize Mars Party in every competitive race, recruiting energetic candidates. He gives disenchanted voters a chance to flip off the system: Vote for us, and you can throw the entire Washington establishment into a panic! Practically, not many seats in the midterms will be up for grabs. Realistically, about 40 or so House seats will be genuine swing seats. In the Senate, there are realistically only about seven competitive races. But that means a small party of disruption could multiply the targeted impact of a precision blast with a well-chosen 5 percent of the electorate in less than 10 percent of the seats. Quite a payoff. The short-term effect would be to help Democrats. Musk used to be a Democrat, so this is not so strange. If Musk and his tech allies care about immigration, trade, and investment in domestic science, supporting Democrats may make more sense. And if Musk mostly cares about disruption and sending Trump spiraling, this is how he would do it. Musk is an engineer at heart. His successes have emerged from him examining existing systems, finding their weak points, and asking, What if we do something totally different? From an engineer's perspective, the American political system has a unique vulnerability. Every election hangs on a narrow margin. The balance of power is tenuous. Since 1992, we've been in an extended period in which partisan control of the White House, Senate, and the House has continually oscillated between parties. National electoral margins remain wickedly tight (we haven't had a landslide national election since 1984). And as elections come to depend on fewer and fewer swing states and districts, a targeted strike on these pivotal elections could completely upend the system. A perfectly balanced and completely unstable system It's a system ripe for disruption. So why has nobody disrupted it? First, it takes money — and Musk has a lot of it. Money has its limits — Musk's claim that his money helped Trump win the election is dubious. Our elections are already saturated with money. In an era of high partisan loyalty, the vast majority of voters have made up their minds before the candidate is even announced. Most money is wasted. It hits decreasing marginal returns fast. The very thing that makes our politics feel so stuck is exactly what makes it so susceptible to Musk's threat. But where money can make a difference is in reaching angry voters disenchanted with both parties with a protest option. Money buys awareness more than anything else. For $300 million (roughly what Musk spent in 2024), a billionaire could have leverage in some close elections. For $3 billion (about 1 percent of Musk's fortune) the chance of success goes up considerably. Second, disruption is possible when there are enough voters who are indifferent to the final outcome. The reason Ross Perot did so well in 1992? Enough voters saw no difference between the parties that they felt fine casting a protest vote. Election after election, we've gone through the same pattern. Throw out the old bums, bring in the new bums — even if 90-plus percent of the electorate votes for the same bums, year in and year out. But in a 48-48 country, with only a few competitive states and districts, a rounding-error shift of 10,000 votes across a few states (far fewer than a typical Taylor Swift concert) can bestow full control of the government. Think of elections as anti-incumbent roulette. The system is indeed 'calcified,' as Sides, Tausanovitch, and Vavreck convincingly argue. Calcified can mean immovable. But it can also mean brittle. Indeed, the very thing that makes our politics feel so stuck is exactly what makes it so susceptible to Musk's threat.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
'Italian genius' Inzaghi to coach Saudi Arabia's Al Hilal
Al Hilal's new coach Simone Inzaghi took Inter Milan to two Champions League finals in three seasons but lost both. (Marco BERTORELLO) Simone Inzaghi was revealed as the new coach of Saudi Arabia's Al Hilal on Thursday, days after he led Inter Milan to a heavy defeat in the Champions League final. "The Italian genius is here," Al Hilal posted on X, with a slickly produced video of the Italian coach. "Welcome, Simone Inzaghi." Advertisement Inzaghi joins the Riyadh club, a mainstay of the oil-funded Saudi Pro League, weeks before it takes part in the new-look Club World Cup in the United States. "I am Simone Inzaghi and today begins my story with Al Hilal," he said in the video message to fans, in which he sips Arabian coffee and pins an Al Hilal lapel badge on his suit. Inzaghi's Inter slumped 5-0 to Qatar-funded Paris Saint-Germain in Saturday's Champions League final. His departure was confirmed on Tuesday. The 49-year-old guided Inter to one Serie A title and two Italian Cups since joining in 2021. He took them to two Champions League finals in three seasons but lost both. Advertisement On track to repeat the treble heroics of 2010 just a few weeks ago, Inter ended the season trophyless after falling away in each competition. Last month, Inzaghi played down rumours of a two-year deal with Al Hilal worth 50 million euros. bur/th/kir
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Orange County awards $5.5 million from tourist tax to cultural groups
More than $5.5 million will go toward major projects at six cultural organizations, after Orange County commissioners unanimously approved the annual cultural facilities grants. The grants come as a relief to jittery arts groups grappling with increased uncertainty about public funding. This year's state budget, which in 2024 eliminated four major cultural grants programs via a veto from Gov. Ron DeSantis, is still under debate. And the Tourist Development Tax — which funds multiple local arts-grant programs, including those approved this week — is currently under the microscope as politicians discuss changing its purpose. Revenue from the Tourist Development Tax, a 6% levy on hotel and other overnight stays, currently is directed by statute to tourism-marketing efforts, the convention center and sports and cultural uses. Discussion recently has heated up about permitting it to fund other needs, including transportation and affordable housing, while state lawmakers have floated the idea of using the money to offset cuts in property taxes. The debate has arts leaders worried that cultural organizations will be left out in the cold. 'The TDT debate could be a crisis for the arts,' United Arts of Central Florida president Jennifer Evins told the Sentinel last month. 'We are all very nervous about it.' June arts events: Nat Zegree, 'Stomp,' 'Hamlet' and more The six organizations receiving funding for facilities projects this week are the Orlando Museum of Art, Orlando Science Center, Orlando Family Stage, Albin Polasek Museum & Sculpture Garden, Blue Bamboo Center for the Arts and the Orlando Philharmonic Plaza Foundation. At the county commissioners' meeting, Mayor Jerry Demings underscored the importance of the TDT-funded grants. 'This is truly a community benefit that will pay a return for years to come,' said Demings, pointing out none of the projects would be possible without the funding. Cathryn Mattson, executive director of Orlando Museum of Art, said she 'completely agreed' with the mayor's remarks. In Sanford, an intriguing 'Jesus Christ Superstar' for our times | Review 'There is no way that we could raise millions of dollars so quickly without the county's strong support through TDT funding,' she said. 'Small and medium-sized arts and cultural organizations simply do not have reserves large enough to take on major capital expenditures in a timely way — and, in our case, time is of the essence, given the extent of capital improvements needed to protect the extensive, valuable and irreplaceable art collection that OMA holds in the public trust.' The art museum, in Loch Haven Park, is in the midst of a multimillion-dollar project to replace its leaking roof and aging air-handling system. This latest facilities grant, for $970,000, will help update the technology that runs the air-handling system, linking it with lighting control, security and fire alarms. To receive funding, cultural organizations must show they have raised $1 for every $2 granted by the county. Groups also go through an extensive vetting process, in which a review panel scores them on their project's concept and the organization's management and financial strength. To qualify for funding, organizations must score 80 out of 100 possible points. The county's Arts & Cultural Advisory Council then reviews the panel's recommendations, and the county commissioners have the final say. The five other projects approved for funding are: Albin Polasek Museum & Sculpture Gardens: $200,000 for renovations and upgrades to the Winter Park facility's roof, air-handling system, windows and doors in preparation for its 65th anniversary. Blue Bamboo Center for the Arts: $1,000,000 toward construction of its new facility in the former Winter Park Library, which will also provide a home to Central Florida Vocal Arts. This funding will specifically be used for a greenroom, jazz garden, signage, lighting and elevator renovations. The venue opens June 22. Orlando Family Stage: $350,000 for energy-efficient LED lighting and signage at its building in Loch Haven Park as it approaches its 100th anniversary. Orlando Philharmonic Plaza Foundation: $1,040,187 for an expansion of The Plaza Live on Bumby Avenue, by adding a Patrons' Room. The money will go toward laying foundations and slabs, moving HVAC equipment and new landscaping in preparation for the addition. Orlando Science Center: $2,000,000 for a renovation of the Loch Haven Park facility's CineDome. The funds will aid in the transition from film to digital movie projection and expand seating in the theater. Follow me at or email me at mpalm@ Find more entertainment news and reviews at or sign up to receive our weekly emailed Entertainment newsletter.
