Hanford Mills is hit by federal cost-cutting
According to a news release from Hanford Mills Museum, museum officials learned late Wednesday, April 9, from the Institute of Museum and Library Services that Hanford's two IMLS-funded grants had been terminated, effective April 8.
"The grants totaled $238,475 ($82,516 of which not yet disbursed) of essential funding for programs offered to area visitors, residents and children and the preservation of items and information with local historical significance," a news release from the museum stated.
The termination letters, signed by acting IMLS director Keith Sonderling, state that 'IMLS has determined that your grant is unfortunately no longer consistent with the agency's priorities and no longer serves the interest of the United States and the IMLS Program.'
Hanford Mills Museum, in East Meredith, preserves an operational water- and steam-powered sawmill and gristmill as well as a historic manufacturing, retail and agricultural site. With a staff of five full time employees and some part-time employees, the museum "offers 3-4 special events, serves thousands of visitors, and provides over 250 educational programs to area schools each year," the release stated.
IMLS had awarded HMM two grants for multi-year projects to help complete critical work that would enhance their service to the public: one to improve the management and care of its historic objects to ensure that they last for current and future generations (2022-2025), and the other to create an interpretive master plan informed by community participation that would guide the museum's activities into the future (2024-2026), the release stated.
With the termination, the museum loses $34,187 that was already allocated to cover work on these projects in 2025. That means about 8% of the museum's total budget for the year has been unexpectedly cut, according to the release. One of the grant projects included a professional development workshop that was open to other local museums, and that training will now be canceled.
'This unfortunate news arrived as I returned from the annual conference of the Museum Association of New York,' Executive Director Kajsa Harley said. 'I had just heard many stories of canceled federal funds from colleagues across the state. Ours is one of hundreds of similar situations unfolding across the country right now, in rural communities and cities alike.'
IMLS awarded the grants to Hanford Mills after a competitive process "that acknowledged HMM's outstanding integrity and interpretive work among small historic sites," the release stated. Grant applications are awarded based on review not only by IMLS agency staff, but also by panels of museum professionals from across the country "who understand the nature of the field's work, the need for museums to directly serve the public, and the measurable positive impacts museums have on local economies and community preservation," the release stated.
Most museums and libraries have to match every federal dollar they receive with money from their own operating budgets in order to get the funding support, according to the release. 'The impact of these federal grants far exceed investment, both in terms of public education and enrichment and what museums contribute to their local economies as tourism drivers and employers,' Harley said. 'As a small rural museum, we stretched every dollar from this federal funding so that we could do our best work in providing fantastic programs and preserving the site and our historic artifacts. We leverage grants like these to help us with our efforts to provide low-cost or no-cost experiences to local families, visitors to the area and our neighboring schools.'
Despite the funding terminations, "HMM remains committed to its mission to inspire audiences of all ages to explore connections among energy, technology, natural resources, and entrepreneurship in rural communities," the release stated.
'The work that museums and libraries do is essential to our communities,' Harley said. 'Our hope is that our communities value our work enough to support us, financially, of course, but also as ambassadors who are willing to advocate for us to state and federal officials.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Swiss Economy Slows Sharply as Tariffs Weigh
Switzerland's economic growth slowed sharply in the second quarter, as strong frontrunning of U.S. tariffs in the early part of the year unwound, raising the chance that the Swiss central bank will cut interest rates to below zero later this year. Gross domestic product rose 0.1% in the three months to the end of June, down from the 0.8% growth of the first quarter, statistical agency SECO said in a flash estimate on Friday. Nobody's Buying Homes, Nobody's Switching Jobs—and America's Mobility Is Stalling The U.S. Alcohol Industry Is Reeling From Canada's Booze Boycott Are You a Stock Market Genius? Take Our Quiz. Rivian Says It Faces $100 Million Hole After Relaxation of Fuel Economy Rules Warren Buffett's Berkshire Further Pares Stake in Apple, Adds UnitedHealth Position Growth in the first three months of 2025 was led by U.S. stockpiling of Swiss goods exports, especially pharmaceuticals, a key sector for Swiss industry. Much of that has unraveled since as exports declined after President Trump's tariff announcements in early April. Contraction in industry was counterbalanced by gains in the services sector in the second quarter, SECO said. The agency said it would release more details on the breakdown on Aug. 28. The outlook for the future has grown more pessimistic. The Trump administration at the end of July said it would impose a 39% tariff rate on most Swiss imports, making Switzerland a rare country to be threatened with higher levies than originally announced. That tariff rate, one of the highest in the world, would cut the Alpine nation's GDP by about 0.5% over the next year, according to Goldman Sachs analysis. Industry association Swissmem called the outcome a 'horror scenario' and that it could cost Switzerland tens of thousands of jobs. However, there remain questions about the level of pharmaceutical tariffs yet to be decided by the U.S. In addition to pharmaceutical majors Roche and Novartis, Switzerland is also home to famed luxury watchmakers and the consumer-goods giant Nestle. 'The economy is likely to expand only slowly the next couple of quarters as high U.S. tariffs and elevated business uncertainty weigh on exports and investment,' Adrian Prettejohn, Europe economist at Capital Economics said in a note to clients. Alongside near-zero inflation, that will likely persuade the Swiss National Bank to cut its key rate below zero later this year, he added. The interest rate was last below zero for around eight years until 2022. The central bank has reduced its main interest rate to zero as it attempts to curtail the appreciating franc, which makes Swiss exports even less attractive. The franc has risen this year as investors flocked to the safe-haven currency amid choppy geopolitical waters. Write to Ed Frankl at The U.S. Is Discussing Taking a Stake in Intel What Musk, Altman and Others Say About AI-Funded 'Universal Basic Income' Mortgage Rates Slip to Lowest Level of 2025 China's Economy Shows Signs of Slowing, Raising Pressure on Beijing Americans' 401(k)s Are More Tied to Stocks Than Ever Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Wire
2 days ago
- Business Wire
Xsolla Elevates Game Monetization and Distribution With Unified Web Shop and Offerwall
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Xsolla, a global commerce company helping developers launch, grow and monetize their games, announces today the expansion of its Offerwall solution with full integration into Xsolla Web Shop, providing game developers with a fully unified and robust monetization stack. This marks the next phase of the Xsolla Offerwall's evolution, which officially launched in March. Additionally, the company announced the launch of the Xsolla Incentive Program, providing game developers with free user acquisition credits to help accelerate game growth by leveraging Xsolla's commerce infrastructure. As game developers continue to face challenges monetizing non-paying players, the Xsolla Offerwall offers a new way to unlock value from their entire user base, by allowing players to earn in-game rewards by completing quests, app trials, surveys, and more directly within a developer's branded Web Shop, without ever leaving the storefront or compromising the player experience. Unlock Incremental Revenue From Every Player The integration of Xsolla Offerwall into Web Shop gives developers a unified monetization and distribution platform, with key benefits including: New Revenue from Non-Paying Users: Reward users in-game for completing offers. Seamless Storefront Experience: Players complete actions and redeem rewards without leaving the game or Web Shop. Increased Retention and Conversion: Offerwall users show 7x higher retention by Day 30 and are 10–14x more likely to convert into paying users. Flexible Monetization at Scale: With up to 90% revenue share, developers retain more earnings and gain flexibility across global markets. Seamless Integration: Xsolla Offerwall can be added to the Web Shop within minutes, with zero coding required. Sustainable Growth, Backed by the Xsolla Incentive Program To maximize scale and user engagement, the new Xsolla Incentive Program gives developers who enable both Web Shop and Offerwall: Access to Xsolla-funded UA budget to drive traffic and engagement Performance-based bonus incentives tied to offerwall usage and storefront purchases Full onboarding and marketing support for a fast, effective launch Proven Impact Games that integrate offerwalls see a meaningful uplift in both monetization and engagement*: 30–40% increase in ad revenue 3–5% overall revenue growth 7x higher Day 30 retention 10–14x higher conversion to in-app purchases Up to 120% LTV increase among daily offerwall users Further enhancing the outcomes that game developers experience through integrating the Web Shop**: 40% conversion rate from visit to purchase 60% repeat purchase rate 15% LTV growth * Industry stats, July 2025 ** Xsolla internal metrics, July 2025 Expand Xsolla further supports developers by offering a free User Acquisition budget through its Incentive Program, helping teams re-engage non-paying players and convert them into paying users directly through their Web Shop. 'The integration of Offerwall into Web Shop marks an important evolution in how we support developers,' said Chris Hewish, President at Xsolla. 'It's not just about unlocking new revenue, it's about giving teams a toolkit to convert engagement into value, reach new audiences, and grow sustainably, all from one unified storefront.' 'We were looking for a way to monetize our non-spending users, without disrupting the player experience,' said Founder and CEO, Jorge Lorenzon, at Buldogo Games. 'Implementing the Xsolla Offerwall into our existing Web Shop provides us with a new revenue stream, while driving player engagement. The integration was fast and straightforward, and the Xsolla team provided excellent support along the way.' Xsolla Offerwall is now available globally through Web Shop, enabling developers a new way to monetize non-paying players: Looking to maximize impact? Join the Xsolla Incentive Program to unlock free UA support and grow your Web Shop: For a complete list of enhancements and developer tools, visit: About Xsolla Xsolla is a global commerce company with robust tools and services to help developers solve the inherent challenges of the video game industry. From indie to AAA, companies partner with Xsolla to help them fund, distribute, market, and monetize their games. Grounded in the belief in the future of video games, Xsolla is resolute in the mission to bring opportunities together, and continually make new resources available to creators. Headquartered and incorporated in Los Angeles, California, Xsolla operates as the merchant of record and has helped over 1,500+ game developers to reach more players and grow their businesses around the world. With more paths to profits and ways to win, developers have all the things needed to enjoy the game. For more information, visit
Newsweek
06-08-2025
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Suffers Legal Loss Over Billions of FEMA Funds
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge has temporarily halted the Trump administration's plan to reallocate more than $4 billion in federal disaster preparedness funds, marking a legal victory for 20 states that challenged the move. U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday, August 5, preventing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from diverting money allocated to its Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program. The program funds projects designed to strengthen infrastructure against natural disasters. Why It Matters The ruling temporarily safeguards $4 billion in FEMA funds that support 2,000+ projects nationwide. BRIC is central to helping states and cities prepare for floods, wildfires, hurricanes, and other disasters that are becoming more frequent and severe. The program finances major infrastructure improvements—such as coastal flood defenses, stormwater and levee upgrades, sewage protection systems, and critical drainage projects. Local officials warn that without these funds, communities—particularly those in flood-prone or economically vulnerable regions—face delays or cancellations of safety projects leaving those areas facing greater risks and higher future recovery costs. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) building is seen on May 15, 2025 in Washington, D.C. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) building is seen on May 15, 2025 in Washington, To Know What is the BRIC program? The BRIC program has been a cornerstone of America's strategy to build long-term resilience. From flood barriers to sewage overhaul and levee upgrades, BRIC has funded essential improvements that save lives, reduce recovery costs, and strengthen community preparedness. Examples of BRIC-funded mitigation projects include: Bridgeport, Connecticut : $42 million coastal flood defense system with walls and elevated streets; funding cuts risk years of safety planning. : $42 million coastal flood defense system with walls and elevated streets; funding cuts risk years of safety planning. Austin, Texas : ~$50 million stormwater and levee upgrades near key energy and wastewater facilities; grant cancellation jeopardizes regional flood protection. : ~$50 million stormwater and levee upgrades near key energy and wastewater facilities; grant cancellation jeopardizes regional flood protection. Detroit, Michigan : Sewage system improvements shielding 600+ homes in vulnerable Jefferson Chalmers neighborhood; halted BRIC support threatens ongoing flood mitigation. : Sewage system improvements shielding 600+ homes in vulnerable Jefferson Chalmers neighborhood; halted BRIC support threatens ongoing flood mitigation. Mount Pleasant, North Carolina : $4 million stormwater management project for flood-prone areas paused after funding freeze. : $4 million stormwater management project for flood-prone areas paused after funding freeze. Nationwide Projects: Typical BRIC rounds fund 53 projects (~$796 million total) for disaster resilience across multiple states, including CA, NY, WA, and NC. FEMA stated in a June 2018 fact sheet that: "Natural hazard mitigation saves $6 on average for every $1 spent on federal mitigation grants." making these funds essential to public safety and long-term resilience. States Challenge FEMA Decision The lawsuit was brought in July 2025, by 20 Democratic-led states, including Washington, Massachusetts, California, and New York, as well as Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro in his official capacity. The plaintiffs argue that FEMA acted unlawfully when it announced it was ending BRIC and redirecting more than $4 billion in unspent funds to other federal accounts without congressional approval. With projects in jeopardy following termination of the BRIC program, local leaders and state attorneys general have emphasized the real-world consequences facing flood-prone and climate-vulnerable areas. Judge's Reasoning In his order, U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of Massachusetts found that FEMA had taken, "affirmative steps" to implement the program's termination, including canceling funding opportunities and notifying states that unobligated funds would no longer be available. The judge noted that FEMA's monthly report to Congress in June showed a $4.07 billion reduction in BRIC funds, labeled a "reversal" of prior set-asides. The court concluded that this presented an imminent threat of harm to states that rely on BRIC funding for mitigation projects, such as stormwater management and the relocation of buildings in flood-prone areas. "The funds, if spent on other purposes, will be lost forever," Stearns wrote, adding that there is "an inherent public interest in ensuring that the government follows the law." FEMA's Position According to reporting by Reduceflooding, citing an April 4, 2025, press release—which has since been removed from FEMA's website—the BRIC program was described as, "yet another example of a wasteful and ineffective FEMA program." It accused the program of being, "more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters." However, David Richardson, FEMA's acting administrator, stated in the court filing that the BRIC program had not officially ended and that no grants had been canceled as of July. But Judge Stearns found these assurances inconsistent with FEMA's actions, concluding that the program's termination appeared to be a preordained outcome. According to the states' lawsuit, more than 2,000 approved resilience projects could be jeopardized if BRIC funding were diverted. These include initiatives like California's $21 million flood prevention project in Sacramento and New York City's $50 million project to address rising sea levels and extreme heat. Broader Context The Trump administration has sought to reallocate funds across several federal agencies, including FEMA. While it has recently downplayed earlier statements about eliminating FEMA entirely, officials have described efforts to reform and streamline the agency. What People Are Saying David Richardson, FEMA's acting administrator, stated: "The BRIC program provides technical and financial assistance to States and local governments for cost-effective pre-disaster hazard mitigation measures that reduce injuries, loss of life, and damage and destruction of property," adding that: "The Secretary of Homeland Security [Kristi Noem] has not made a final decision to end the BRIC program," and "no grants have yet been canceled." U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of Massachusetts wrote in his 15-page ruling, August 5: "The BRIC program is designed to protect against natural disasters and save lives. The potential hardship to the government, in contrast, is minimal." He emphasized that " … the order maintains the status quo while the court considers the merits of the lawsuit." California Attorney General, Rob Bonta, one of the lead plaintiffs, said in a statement, July 16: "The president keeps breaking the law, and we keep holding him accountable in court. Shuttering this program would do nothing to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse or improve government efficiency. This is a program with bipartisan support that is focused on protecting lives and livelihoods from flooding, wildfires, earthquakes, and other natural disasters." What Happens Next With this ruling, the BRIC program—created in 2019 to support infrastructure resilience projects nationwide—remains funded while legal proceedings continue. Judge Stearns' order does not immediately release funds to states but prevents FEMA from spending them on other programs, while leaving open the possibility for FEMA to request emergency access to the funds if a major disaster occurs during the injunction period. The order is intended to preserve the contested funds until the court issues a final decision on whether the administration had the legal authority to dismantle BRIC.
