The tax grab about to destroy the middle-class second home dream
Mag Humphreys does not consider herself a typical second home owner. The 71-year-old inherited a four-bedroom bungalow in Rock, Cornwall, along with her four siblings after their parents died two years ago.
The property was built by her family in the 1960s, and she insists it is occupied for nine months of the year.
And yet, from April 1, Ms Humphreys will be charged £6,000 a year by Cornwall Council, as she is swept up in a punitive country-wide clampdown on second home owners whom, she claims, are wrongly vilified.
For the first time ever, more than 150 local authorities in England are introducing a 100pc premium on council tax for second homes after being given the green light from the Government to do so. It can be charged on properties which are furnished, but not used as someone's main home.
The move comes on top of inflation-busting increases to basic council tax rates, confirmed by authorities this week. It means average bills for second homes will double from £2,171 to £4,342, and will affect as many as 130,000 properties.
The crisis has sparked a race among owners to sell up, estate agents have claimed, with holiday homes now flooding the market.
Meanwhile, local authorities are worried the move will not bring in the expected revenue, as shrewd owners deploy creative tactics to avoid the tax raid.
Ms Humphreys is one of dozens of owners who have contacted The Telegraph to complain of exorbitant, four-figure council bills landing on their doorsteps.
While the bill on her parents' home will be shared between her and her siblings, she will still find 17pc of her pension income eaten up by her two council tax bills from next month.
She said: 'If you've got a house in Rock, they assume you're a millionaire, but we're a normal family. My parents invested in bricks and mortar, as everyone did.'
Ms Humphreys, who lives in nearby Wadebridge, said she considers the property her 'family' home which her relatives have occupied long before the seaside village became what she describes as 'London-on-Sea'.
Town halls were given the power to impose premiums on second homes in the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023.
Cornwall Council chose to apply a 100pc premium from next month. Authorities in Derby, Watford, North Yorkshire and South Hams are also set to introduce their own premiums, as well as councils across the capital.
But, it comes as basic council tax rates also rise. Nearly 90pc of bills on main homes are increasing by the maximum amount, and one in 10 are being charged more than £3,000 a year. Windsor and Maidenhead council is hiking tax by 9pc, as well as introducing the levy on second homes from April.
It is little wonder that second home owners are considering creative ways to get around the raid.
Tactics include transferring properties into their children's name, turning the property into a holiday let or putting it on the market, with no plan to sell.
Cornwall councillor, Steve Arthur, said: 'The council is banking on this double council tax to bring in so many millions to shore up the finances. But they shouldn't spend this money before they've got it because there are ways around paying it.'
Jo Ashby, of John Bray Estate Agents in Cornwall, said that successive government policies, such as stamp duty changes and council tax premiums, meant 'there are more second homes on the market than we've seen in a long time'.
Property website, Zoopla, has found that council tax changes have had negative impacts on house prices in coastal and rural areas.
In Scotland and Wales, councils already have the power to add premiums to second homes, with rates as high as 300pc in the latter.
One reader told The Telegraph that the council tax on her childhood home in Denbighshire had rocketed to £10,900.
Like Ms Humphreys, Rob Perrie inherited a home from his parents. The IT worker decided to let the property in Thanet, but it was left in a 'shocking state' by tenants.
After being repeatedly let down by builders, the 53-year-old doesn't 'have the funds to employ another', meaning the flat doesn't have a working bathroom, kitchen or heating.
But he has received a shock email from Thanet District Council, explaining that his property is subject to 200pc tax, despite it not fulfilling the requirement to be 'substantially furnished', according to the authority's website.
The father of two was billed £3,127: 'I honestly cannot afford it. I only kept the house as a promise to my parents.
'My mum told me to work hard and invest in property and it will look after you. That's far from the truth now,' he said.
Mr Perrie lives in Cheshunt, Hertfordshire with his family, where his council tax bills already amount to £2,600.
Elliot Keck, of lobby group the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'The second home premium goes against one of the core principles of council tax, which is the link between the amount a household uses services and how much it pays.
'This is embodied in the single person discount yet for second home owners they will bizarrely pay more for less. But it also forces taxpayers to pay for the miserable failure of local authorities to build enough housing in their area.'
The Local Government Association, which represents councils, said: 'Charging a council tax premium, for long-term empty and second homes, is one way of encouraging owners to bring these properties back into permanent use.'
A spokesman for the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'We are determined to fix the housing crisis we have inherited, and we know that having too many second homes in an area can drive up housing costs for local people and damage public services.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


E&E News
an hour ago
- E&E News
EPA employees stream for the exit
More than 1,300 EPA employees are poised to leave the agency in what may be the single largest exodus in its history. As of Friday morning, 1,334 staffers had followed through on 'early out' offers that require them to start paid administrative leave Monday, according to figures provided by the agency. That number is about half of those who initially applied in April for early retirement as well as a second deferred resignation offer. Employees older than 40 have more time to mull their options. Those leaving make up more than 8 percent of EPA's current workforce of almost 15,700 employees, which includes about 550 who are already on leave following an earlier deferred resignation offer. The latest wave reportedly includes numerous mid-level and senior managers who will take decades of experience with them as they go out the door. Advertisement 'It's a tremendous loss for the agency and for ORD,' said Chris Frey, who served as assistant administrator of the Office of Research and Development during President Joe Biden's administration, adding that he's been 'gobsmacked' at the names of some of those who are exiting.


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel , so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fans may have to prove migration status at World Cup-linked match
Fans attending the inaugural FIFA World Club Cup match in Miami have been told to carry proof they are in the country legally. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be at the Hard Rock Stadium where Inter Miami, whose team includes Lionel Messi, will be playing against Egypt's Al Ahly on Saturday. Fear among fans was heightened when CBP said on social media that its officers would be 'suited and booted' at the fixture, before deleting the post. 'They are insisting that attendees bring proof of legal status to the games,' Thomas Kennedy, deputy director of the Florida Immigrant Coalition, told The Telegraph. 'It would be logistically a nightmare to check immigration status as a single person. They could be checking randomly, or it could just be general guidance to tell people to bring their immigration status. 'The problem is of clarity superimposed on the political tension gripping the country. 'This just provokes more tension,' he added. 'I would certainly say that people have to be wary and cautious.' NBC Florida also reported that fans could be asked to prove their immigration status on Saturday. CBP has confirmed it will be at all the matches. ICE declined to comment on its deployment plans. Ostensibly, both organisations will be on hand to provide added security at a major sporting event, as they have in the past. But such is the mistrust of ICE many fans are staying away. 'What I can tell you is there are multiple reports and stats tracking how overseas travel to the United States has already plummeted since the beginning of the year because of the action by the current administration,' Mr Kennedy added. 'And FIFA has had to lower prices for these club World Cup tickets a couple of times.' With more than 70 per cent of the Miami population being Hispanic, the presence of ICE at the inaugural game is particularly sensitive. 'The presence of ICE, CBP and other law enforcement agencies at major sporting events is not unusual,' John Sandweg, who was acting director of ICE from August 2013 to February 2014, told The Telegraph. But sounding a note of caution, he added: 'I could see them maybe potentially looking at something like this as an opportunity to do a lot of enforcement. 'On the other hand, I think the administration is obviously promoting the World Cup. And wants these things to be a success, and it's certainly not lost on ICE. 'If there's a perception out there that they're going to be doing enforcement operations at events like this, it can really depress attendance. And it can really just scare people off, not just people who are immigrants.' Tension was further heightened earlier this week when the US coastguard boarded a boat taking people – including the mayor of Miami Dade – to a World Cup party and checked the immigration status of staff on board. Another potential flashpoint is on Monday when LAFC, one of the leading teams in the USA, whose supporters have been vocal in their opposition to ICE, plays Chelsea in Atlanta. Against the backdrop of the National Guard being called in to quell violent anti-ICE protests in the club's home city of Los Angeles, feelings have been running high. Fans displayed banners calling for ICE's abolition, and, somewhat pointedly, they have been backed by the club, which wrote on social media that it stood 'shoulder to shoulder with all members of our community'. Gianni Infantino, FIFA's president, played down the potential problems at a press conference earlier this week. 'No, I don't have any concerns about anything in the sense that we are very attentive on any security question. Of course, the most important thing for us is to guarantee security for all the fans who come to the games. 'This is our priority. This is the priority of all the authorities who are here. And we want everyone who comes to the games to pass a good moment.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.