Ex-NBA player Patrick Beverley sued by two fans after balls he threw into stands hit them
Former NBA player Patrick Beverley has been sued by two Indiana Pacers fans who say they suffered "physical, mental and emotional damage" after being struck by a ball he threw into the stands twice during a game last year.
Indiana residents Jessica Simmons and Katie Lanciotti filed the lawsuit Friday in Marion County Superior Court in Indianapolis. In it, they separately bring counts of battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy by false light and defamation against Beverley, who was playing for the Milwaukee Bucks during Game 6 of a first-round playoff series against the host Indiana Pacers at the time of the May 2 incident.
As a result of Beverley's actions, the lawsuit states, the women suffered injuries and damages that include physical pain and suffering, emotional and mental distress, humiliation, anguish, medical expenses and lost work hours/wages.
Beverley briefly mentioned the lawsuit at the beginning of this week's episode of "The Pat Bev Podcast with Rone," which was recorded Tuesday and posted Wednesday.
'I woke up this morning, found out I was getting sued first. Yeah, that's what my first thing was," said Beverley, who played four seasons with the Clippers and had a brief stint with the Lakers during his 12-year NBA career. "I'm out here looking for an NBA job and found out I was getting sued so that didn't make me feel a little type of way.'
Read more: NBA suspends Patrick Beverley for hitting fan in stands with ball, kicking ESPN journalist out
Asked how he learned about the lawsuit, Beverley said: 'I found out through — like, I felt like it was a trade. I seen my name. 'I signed somewhere?' 'No, you've been sued.' 'Ah, OK, got it.' That's all I'm gonna speak about on that side though.'
'I thought it was over with though. I sent my apologies and ... wanted to do a free basketball camp in Indy," he added. "Thought it was over with but … like a year later, sued. Wow.'
The incident took place at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. Standing in front of his seat on the Bucks bench, Beverley threw the ball with two hands into the stands. It hit a woman in the head, although she did not appear to have been the intended target.
"Beverley threw the basketball directly at and into the side of Katie Lanciotti's head, hard enough that it broke the necklace that she was wearing," the lawsuit states. "Ms. Lanciotti experienced immediate pain and soreness as a result of being struck by the basketball."
Another fan tossed the ball back to Beverley, who immediately fired it right back at him. The ball deflected off the fan and hit another woman, identified in the lawsuit as Simmons.
"On this next occasion, the basketball struck Jessica Simmons in her chest and face, causing immediate pain and soreness as a result of being struck by the basketball," the complaint states.
Read more: LeBron and Bronny James file response to car crash lawsuit, denying 'each and every allegation'
After the game, Beverley kicked an ESPN reporter out of his interview for not subscribing to his podcast. He received a four-game suspension from the NBA for both incidents, although he has yet to serve it because he hasn't played in the league this season.
Later that night on X, Beverley suggested that he and his teammates had been provoked by Pacers fans throughout Indiana's series-clinching victory.
'Not Fair at all,' wrote Beverley, who most recently played for Hapoel Tel Aviv of the Israeli Basketball Premier League before the sides parted ways earlier this month. 'Exchanged between a fan and our ball club all night. We warned and asked for help all night. Not fair.'
'But,' he added in a separate post hours later, 'I have to be better. And I will.'
Beverley also addressed the situation days later on his podcast, saying there were "four or five fans" who "took it a little bit too far."
'I've been called a ton of stuff," he said. "I haven't been called that one.'
Read more: LaVar Ball says 'everyone heard' about his amputated foot: 'If I wanted to, I'd grow it back!'
The lawsuit states that "Beverley's social media and Podcast comments implied that" Simmons and Lanciotti "used derogatory language and /or racial slurs toward Mr. Beverley."
"Beverley's comments proximately caused [the plaintiffs] to suffer damage to [their] reputation, esteem, respect, and good will and caused publicly negative feelings, accusations, and opinions about [them]," the lawsuit added.
Simmons and Lanciotti are seeking unspecified damages.
Then-Bucks assistant coach Josh Oppenheimer, who is now an assistant coach at the University of Oklahoma, is also named as a defendant. He is accused of incitement by both plaintiffs. The Bucks are also named as co-defendants, with all 10 counts against their former employees also brought against the team.
Oppenheimer declined to comment Tuesday. The Bucks did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
OKC Thunder vs. Indiana Pacers live updates: Where to watch NBA Finals, predictions, odds
OKC Thunder vs. Indiana Pacers live updates: Where to watch NBA Finals, predictions, odds Show Caption Hide Caption Pacers and Thunder NBA Finals is better than it's 'small-market' billing USA TODAY Sports' Jeff Zillgitt breaks down the star-studded NBA Finals between the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder. Sports Pulse The Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy is up for grabs. Will the Indiana Pacers win the NBA Finals for the first time in franchise history? Or will the Oklahoma City Thunder reign victorious for the first time since 1979, when the team was still the Seattle SuperSonics? Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, the 202 NBA MVP, led the Thunder to the team's first NBA Finals appearance since 2012 after averaging 31.4 points, 8.2 assists and 5.2 rebounds through five games in the Western Conference Finals against the Minnesota Timberwolves. Meanwhile, the Pacers are back in the NBA Finals for the first time since 2000, thanks in part to All-NBA Third Team guard Tyrese Haliburton, who averaged 21.0 points, 10.5 assists and 6.0 rebounds in six games vs. the New York Knicks in the Eastern Conference Finals. The Thunder swept the Pacers in the regular season, winning both matchups. Gilgeous-Alexander had 45 points in the Thunder's 120-114 win over the Pacers in Indiana on Dec. 26 and dropped 33 at home in Oklahoma City's 132-111 win over Indiana on March 29. It all adds up to a must-see Game 1. USA TODAY Sports will provide the latest updates, highlights, wild plays, analysis and more throughout the game. Follow along. The Oklahoma City Thunder host the Indiana Pacers for Game 1 of the NBA Finals at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City. The game is scheduled for 8:30 p.m. ET. How to watch Indiana Pacers vs. Oklahoma City Thunder Game 1 Time: 8:30 p.m. ET 8:30 p.m. ET Location: Paycom Center (Oklahoma City) Paycom Center (Oklahoma City) TV: ABC ABC Stream: Fubo, Sling TV Watch the NBA Finals with Fubo Where is Game 1 between Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder? The Oklahoma City Thunder host the Indiana Pacers at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City for Game 1 of the NBA Finals.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can Small-Market NBA Finals Teams Punch Above Their Weight in the Ratings?
In the world of TV markets and sports ratings, the expression 'Bigger is better' usually applies. Yet after a pretty thrilling round of playoffs, the NBA Finals — a showdown between teams representing two of the smallest cities in the league — will put that assumption to the test. Tipping off Thursday, the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder both bring young superstars to the party, including recently anointed league MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. But they also hail from Indianapolis and Oklahoma City, which rank No. 25 and 47, respectively, out of the more than 200 individually measured designated market areas (or DMAs) in the U.S., placing them among the bottom seven of the NBA's 30 teams. (Top-ranked New York, whose Knicks were just bounced from the playoffs, boasts a pair of franchises, as does No. 2 market Los Angeles.) Historically, major sporting events benefit from having larger-market teams squaring off, cashing in on the rooting interest in the home cities to boost the most recent examples, last year's World Series, pitting the New York Yankees against the L.A. Dodgers, delivered an average 15.8 million viewers, per Nielsen, Major League Baseball's most-watched Fall Classic since 2017, despite running only five games. That marked a 67% increase over 2023, the lowest-rated World Series ever, in which the Texas Rangers (considered part of the No. 4 Dallas-Fort Worth DMA) defeated the Arizona Diamondbacks (a.k.a. Phoenix, No. 12). Last year's NBA Finals, with the Boston Celtics edging the Dallas Mavericks, averaged 11.3 million viewers on ABC/ESPN, the league's worst performance since 2021. After a slow start, though, the NBA rebounded thanks to a slew of midseason trades, finishing just below overall regular-season results for the previous year. So are there any potential rays of hope for this year's matchup? one equalizer for any sports championship determined by a series (in the NBA and MLB's cases, a best-of-seven format) is for the contests to be competitive, with the series coming down to a Game 7 to determine the winner. Heading into the Finals, the playoffs have also put up solid results, up 3% overall, although that comes with a disclaimer: The Eastern Conference finals, featuring the Knicks, were up 10%, while the Western Conference (Oklahoma City vs. Minnesota) declined. Beyond the NBA and its TV partners (a roster that will shift, incidentally, with NBC taking a major package of games next season), several other entertainment players have a vested interest in the series, given that the NBA playoffs provide a platform to reach male viewers, especially, promoting blockbusters like 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' and 'Superman' heading into the summer movie season. Obviously, the interested parties can't make the host cities any bigger, but they can root for the series to be longer — and decided in the closing moments — in a way that might help a size-challenged Finals, to borrow from another sport, punch above its weight. Netflix's campy five-episode series 'Sirens' maintained its spot as Netflix's most-watched English-language show of the week with 18.2 million views during the week of May 26, up 9% from the 16.7 million it logged in its first four days on the platform last week. Meanwhile, buzzy U.K. crime series 'Adolescence,' which first debuted in March, finally surpassed 'Stranger Things 4' on Netflix's all-time most-popular TV English-language list, with 'Adolescence' standing in the No. 2 spot with 141.2 million views to date — behind just 'Wednesday' — while 'Stranger Things 4' ranks third with 140.7 million views. It's worth noting that viewers for 'Stranger Things 4' are likely to surge again ahead of the new season of 'Stranger Things' releasing this fall, as could views for 'Adolescence' given its potential Emmys buzz. The 2025 American Music Awards tacked on a considerable amount of delayed viewers to its original May 26 telecast, growing to reach over 10 million unique viewers across its CBS premiere, as well as encores on MTV, CMT and BET. After bringing in an initial live-plus-same-day viewership of 4.86 million, the Jennifer Lopez-hosted awards scored 5.2 million viewers after seven days of viewing, ranking as the show's biggest audience since 2019 and a 38% uptick from its last live telecast in 2022. Monday's finale of 'La Casa de los Famosos All-Stars' boosted Telemundo to rank as the most-watched primetime broadcast network, regardless of language, in the key demo among adults 18-49 as the network scored 559,000 viewers in that age bracket, according to Nielsen. The news comes as Telemundo celebrates its 14th consecutive week as the No. 1 most-watched Spanish-language broadcast network in weekday primetime among total viewers, as well as its third consecutive week winning the 18-49 demo. The post Can Small-Market NBA Finals Teams Punch Above Their Weight in the Ratings? appeared first on TheWrap.


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
The Knicks fired coach ‘Thibs.' That's just wrong.
I know there are many bigger outrages in the world, but today I would like to share with you the frustration that gnaws at me as a fan of the New York Knicks following the firing on Tuesday of our gruff but beloved — and widely respected — head coach, Tom Thibodeau. 'Thibs,' as he is universally known to the Knickerbocker faithful, had just taken the team to its first Eastern Conference finals in a quarter-century. Sure, they lost to the Indiana Pacers in six games, and that was deeply disappointing — particularly after a historic Game 1 meltdown in which the Knicks somehow blew a 14-point lead with less than three minutes to go. But in the previous round, the Knicks had knocked off the defending champions, the Boston Celtics, and that was a result almost no one saw coming. (The Knicks had not beaten the Celtics once during the regular season.) The Knicks were on a good trajectory — and worlds removed from the chaos and mediocrity in which they had been mired when Thibs was hired in 2020. Since Jeff Van Gundy stepped down in 2002, the Knicks have had 13 head coaches. Only two of them have delivered winning records, and none could match Thibs's postseason success: He has taken them to the playoffs in four out of five seasons. This year's roster was the best Thibs ever had, anchored by two All-Stars: the clutch point guard Jalen Brunson and the sweet-shooting big man Karl-Anthony Towns. But Towns had been traded to New York just before the start of the season, while another key player, center Mitchell Robinson, was injured for most of the season. It often takes a team time to jell, and the Knicks appeared to find a new level in the playoffs. There was every reason to give Thibs an opportunity try to build on the Knicks' success next season. But no. After helping to turn Madison Square Garden once again into the mecca of the hardcourt, Thibs has been sent packing. The decision was said to be made by team president Leon Rose, but looming in the background is the Knicks' mercurial owner, James Dolan, who has been blamed by fans for their long years of suffering. To me, this seems to violate the fundamental compact of sports: You win and you get rewarded; you lose and you get punished. Thibs won — and he was punished just the same. Granted, he didn't 'win the chip,' short for championship. No Knicks team has since 1973, but they were heading in the right direction, with a talented roster and a veteran, skilled coach to lead them. Notably, Thibs appeared to have a rock-solid relationship with Brunson, the team captain. There were, of course, complaints about Thibs. There always are with any coach — or any human being, for that matter. He was often criticized for playing his starters too many minutes and wearing them down by playoff time. But, despite their heavy usage, all of the Knicks starters were healthy in the playoffs. Another complaint was that Thibs was inflexible in his rotations, that he stuck with his five starters no matter what, despite evidence that the starters were getting outscored when on the floor together. It's a legitimate criticism, but part of the problem was the lack of bench depth. Knicks management dealt away key role players to assemble a fearsome five led by Brunson and Towns. It would be instructive to see how Thibs would do next season if team president Rose, who has done a superb job so far of upgrading the roster, managed to restock the team with better role players. Now we will never know. Instead a new head coach will be tasked with meeting the high standards set by Thibs — which include back-to-back seasons with more than 50 wins for the first time since the Pat Riley era in the 1990s. Thibs's firing, unfortunately, is part of a bizarre trend in the NBA of getting rid of successful, experienced head coaches. Every winner of the NBA Coach of the Year award between 2018 and 2023 has been fired. That includes Thibs, who earned the honor with the Knicks in 2021. (He had previously won it in 2011 with the Chicago Bulls.) Even coaches who win the title aren't safe: Los Angeles Lakers coach Frank Vogel won in 2020 and was fired in 2022. Milwaukee Bucks coach Mike Budenholzer won in 2021 and was fired in 2023. Denver Nuggets coach Michael Malone won in 2023 and was fired in April, before the end of the regular season. All three are now considered contenders for the Knicks job. The holy grail that all these teams are chasing is what the Golden State Warriors did in 2014: They fired a winning head coach, Mark Jackson, and replaced him with Steve Kerr, who went on to win even more: Kerr led the team to three titles. But for every Jackson-to-Kerr switch, there are plenty of changes such as the one when the Bulls got rid of Thibs in 2015 and replaced him with Fred Hoiberg. Thibs had a winning percentage of .647; Hoiberg, .426. I remain enthusiastic about a Knicks team that has become one of the best in the league. I just hope Rose and Dolan know what they are doing. Because what they have done to Thibodeau feels wrong. All will be forgiven if Thibs's successor brings home a title — but there will be hell to pay if the new coach squanders what he built.