Vance to urge Indiana to redraw map to help Republicans tighten House grip
Republicans already control seven of Indiana's nine congressional seats, but Republicans have complete control of state government, which would allow them to redraw the map to pick up more seats. Donald Trump is also pushing Missouri to redraw its congressional map to add more GOP seats. Republicans in Ohio, where Republicans already control 10 of 15 districts, are also likely to reconfigure their map later this year to add more Republican seats.
Republicans have an extremely slim margin in the US House and Democrats need to net just three seats to flip control of Congress next year. The president's party typically loses US House seats in a midterm election, which is why Republicans are pushing to redraw districts in their favor.
Vance will meet with Indiana Republican governor Mike Braun and state legislative leaders on Thursday. To redraw the maps in Indiana Braun would need to call a special session.
The effort comes as Democratic lawmakers have fled Texas to halt a Republican attempt there to redraw the map to add five more Republican seats. Texas governor Greg Abbott has launched a long shot legal effort to get the top Democrat who fled, Gene Wu, removed from office.
US Senator John Cornyn of Texas also said on Wednesday that the FBI had agreed to his request to assist with returning the lawmakers. The FBI did not immediately return a request for comment and legal experts have questioned how the federal law enforcement agency could legitimately play a role in returning the lawmakers.
Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general, also announced on Wednesday he had launched an investigation into a group run by former congressman Beto O'Rourke that has been covering the costs of Texas lawmakers as they remain in Illinois. Each lawmaker that breaks quorum is fined $500 per day.
The governors of California and New York, where Democrats have complete control of state government, have pledged to retaliate against Republicans' redistricting efforts by adding Democratic seats, though both states face state legal requirements that make aggressive gerrymandering more difficult.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
28 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Zelensky thanks European allies for support ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has thanked European nations who have rallied behind his country ahead of a planned meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin. Mr Trump has said Friday's meeting in Alaska with his Russian counterpart was to discuss ending the more than three-year war. Advertisement Mr Zelensky responded by thanking European allies and wrote on X on Sunday: 'The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people.' The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations. Ukraine values and fully supports the statement by President… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 10, 2025 Saturday's statement by top European leaders emphasising that peace cannot be achieved without Kyiv's involvement came after the White House confirmed the US president was willing to grant Mr Putin the one-on-one meeting Russia has long pushed for, and suggestions from Mr Trump that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories'. This raised fears Kyiv may be pressured into giving up land or accepting other curbs on its sovereignty. A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they are not allowed to speak publicly, told The Associated Press that Mr Trump remained open to a trilateral summit with both the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, but for now, he will have a bilateral meeting requested by Mr Putin. Advertisement Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance on Saturday met top European and Ukrainian officials at the UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy's weekend residence to discuss how to end the war. Foreign Secretary David Lammy welcomed JD Vance to Chevening House in Kent on Friday (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) Mr Trump had earlier said he would meet Mr Putin even if the Russian leader would not meet with Mr Zelensky. The Trump-Putin meeting may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbour and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there is no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Saturday's statement, signed by the president of the European Union and leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Finland, stressed the need for a 'just and lasting peace' for Kyiv, including 'robust and credible' security guarantees. Advertisement 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities,' the statement said. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,' the Europeans added. A month-long US-led push to achieve a truce in Ukraine has so far proved fruitless, with Kyiv agreeing in principle while the Kremlin has held out for terms more to its liking. Mr Trump had also moved up an ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement. The deadline was Friday. The White House did not answer questions on Saturday about possible sanctions. Advertisement The Kremlin earlier this week reiterated demands that Ukraine gives up territory, abandons its bid to join Nato, and accepts limits on its military, in exchange for a withdrawal of Russian troops from the rest of the country. Mr Zelensky said on Saturday that Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier'. Ukrainian officials previously told the AP privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognise Ukraine's inability to regain lost territories militarily. But Mr Zelensky on Saturday insisted that formally ceding land was out of the question.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Trump killed off woke ads
When Nike picked Colin Kaepernick to front its new campaign in 2018, it marked the high water mark for social justice advertising. Kaepernick, the former NFL star who began taking the knee in protest against racial injustice, was out of work and had accused the NFL of blacklisting him for his political protests on the field. Nike ran posters saying: 'Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything.' At the time, brands were racing to hitch their wagons to causes and crusades as 'purpose-driven' marketing took over adland. Seven years on, the backdrop could hardly be more different. 'Woke' adverts are fading from relevance in the US. Instead, an all-American, red-blooded spirit has taken hold – aimed squarely at the tastes of one Republican man. Donald Trump this week proclaimed that actor Sydney Sweeney had the ' hottest' advert in the world as he waded into a row over The White Lotus actor's new campaign for fashion brand American Eagle. Sweeney's statement that she had 'good jeans' has become a culture war flashpoint. It hasn't mattered – Sweeney's endorsement has helped American Eagle's stock soar, with Trump's comments only fuelling the rally. Nike, meanwhile, appears to have swapped advocating for the Black Lives Matter movement for a more conservative campaign promoting family values with golfer Scottie Scheffler. The growing reluctance of brands to take a campaigning stance on social justice issues comes as consumers tire of virtue-signalling and empty slogans. 'Advertising's role is not really to lead culture, but to reflect it,' says Richard Pinder, chief executive of creative agency The Hunger. 'And so as culture moves, it's kind of weird if advertising doesn't.' The most obvious signs of this culture shift has been the swing to the Right in the US that powered Trump to the White House. Yet the president is not just a reflection of culture, but a shaper of it too. Earlier this year, the president signed a string of executive orders clamping down on 'radical and wasteful' diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies. A number of major US companies – including Google, Amazon, Walmart and McDonald's – have rolled back their initiatives as a result. Trump has also taken aim at Jaguar following what he called a 'woke' marketing campaign that featured an eclectic cast of diverse models and a Barbie-pink aesthetic. 'Who wants to buy a Jaguar after looking at that disgraceful ad,' he fumed on Truth Social. The Sydney Sweeney controversy began after American Eagle released a new campaign that featured an image of the blonde-haired, blue-eyed actor dressed all in denim, accompanied by the slogan: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' The advert triggered discussions about beauty standards and even accusations that the company was promoting eugenics. American Eagle has insisted the ad 'is and always was about the jeans', adding: 'Great jeans look good on everyone.' The controversy appears to have done little to perturb Americans, suggesting the ad did not run counter to wider public opinion. Research by Kantar and industry magazine The Drum showed the majority of US consumers would still buy from American Eagle after the saga. Meanwhile, shares in the retailer surged 24pc following Trump's intervention – their biggest daily gain in 25 years. Whilst the US is leading the backlash against woke ads, there are signs that Britain is starting to follow suit. Many in London's adland acknowledge that Britons are growing tired of advertising campaigns that put virtue-signalling do-goodery and tokenism ahead of authentic messages. 'Audiences don't respect the companies that are jumping on a 'brand-wagon' and are fatigued by superficial virtue-signalling and generic manifestos,' says Ajaz Ahmed, founder of ad agency AKQA. 'Consumers want less preaching and a move towards more jokes and less woke, a more original point of view.' When soap brand Dove released a range of body-shaped bottles to reflect the 'one of a kind' body shapes of its customers, the company was mocked online. 'There's less room for ads that just associate themselves with a cause,' says one industry source. The most notorious recent example of public backlash was Jaguar's highly contentious rebrand, which many in the industry felt was cack-handed. 'Tonally, they seem to have missed the boat,' says Pinder. 'That was an idea that would have looked good three, four years earlier, but suddenly looked very, very much an outlier.' Value-led advertising can take on a more sinister bent, too. In 2022, an advert for Persil was banned for making unsubstantiated claims about the detergent's environmental benefits as part of a wider crackdown on greenwashing. 'Woke' advertising in Britain has at least in part been killed off by the cost of living crisis. A recent YouGov survey found that cost and quality were the most important factors for the vast majority of Britons when choosing what to buy. By contrast, just 5pc said social or ethical considerations were most important. Campaigning advertising is not entirely dead. The winner of the prestigious Grand Prix award at the Cannes Lions festival was French insurer AXA for a campaign highlighting how it had updated its home insurance policies to help women escape domestic violence. However, Mark Read, the outgoing chief executive of WPP, acknowledges that the amount of 'purpose-driven' advertising has declined over the last few years, with brands increasingly turning to humour instead. Regardless of what approach they take, it is clear that advertisers have to be more alert to potential backlashes in the age of social media pile-ons, boycotts and cancellations. 'With advertising, you used to be able to control your messaging,' says one industry source. 'Now you're almost like a conductor of trust in your brand as part of a bigger social conversation. As a brand, you're no longer in complete control.' Jaguar is a clear example of this phenomenon: public outcry was so great in large part because people had a clear idea of what the car company's brand should be about. The maxim that all publicity is good publicity, it seems, is a thing of the past. 'I think there is a general view across business leaders that they would like to stay more out of politics today than perhaps three or four years ago, and that's probably sensible,' says Read. Many advertisers are looking to take a more risk-averse approach. Brands are also increasingly turning to non-paid-for marketing – known as earned media – in a bid to sidestep controversy. The ultimate example of earned media? An endorsement from the Donald. 'Go get 'em Sydney!,' Trump wrote as American Eagle's stock soared.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's sweeping bill looms large over Democrats and Republican as they head for recess
Earlier this summer, Republican lawmakers gathered around Donald Trump and applauded as he sat before a desk outside the White House and put his signature on what he calls his 'one, big, beautiful bill'. But there were few claps for Mike Flood this week when the Republican congressman appeared before an auditorium of his Nebraska constituents to extol the tax and spending legislation's benefits – just boos and jeers. 'From where I sit, there's been a lot of misinformation out there about the bill,' Flood said, as the audience – some of whom had been encouraged to attend by local Democrats – howled. 'If you are able to work, and you're able-bodied, you have to work. If you choose not to work, you do not get free healthcare,' Flood later said, diving into the bill's controversial imposition of work requirements for many enrollees of Medicaid, the healthcare program for poor and disabled Americans. The heckling only intensified. Trump's bill is looming large over senators and representative of both parties as they disperse across the country for Congress's August recess. Signed by Trump on the Fourth of July holiday, the sprawling piece of legislation extends lower tax rates enacted during his first term, creates new exemptions aimed at working-class voters, and funds his plans for mass deportations of immigrants. Republicans see it as the epitome of the president's 'promises made, promises kept' mantra, while for Democrats, it presents an opportunity to return from the political wilderness voters banished them to in last year's elections. Central to their pitch is the bill's cuts to Medicaid and other safety net programs, its enactment of tax provisions from which the wealthy are expected to see the most benefit, and its overall price tag, which is expected to rise to $3.4tn over the next 10 years. Democrats also plan to campaign on what the bill does not do. The Republicans who wrote it declined to use the opportunity to extend subsidies for premiums paid by people who receive insurance through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) – meaning millions of Americans may find healthcare unaffordable when they expire at the end of the year. 'Between the Medicaid cuts and the ACA cuts, our hospitals are looking at a real phenomenon of people walking into their ERs with no insurance,' the Democratic senator Elissa Slotkin said this week during a town hall in Michigan – a state Trump won last year. 'When you get that letter, when it arrives in your post box, I want you to understand that that increase to your private insurance is because of the cuts that Donald Trump has decided to make just in the past month here, OK. There is a cause and effect.' Republicans, only a handful of whom have held town halls since the recess began, argue that it is Democrats who will be facing tough questions back home for their unanimous rejection of the bill. Voters will be won over by the legislation's tax relief for tips, overtime and interest on American cars, larger deductions for taxpayers aged 65 and up, and expansion of immigration enforcement, the party believes, while Medicaid and Snap will ultimately benefit because the measure, they claim, weeds out 'waste, fraud and abuse' through stricter work requirements and eligibility checks. 'Republicans are putting working-class Americans first. The one big beautiful bill set that image in concrete for the 2026 midterms, putting Republicans on offense and giving voters a clear, commonsense contrast,' the National Republican Congressional Committee said in a memo. The group has named 26 House districts where it believes Republicans can win, while its adversary, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), is targeting 35 seats. The main battle next year will be for control of the House of Representatives, which the GOP controls by a margin that is expected to shrink to just three seats once recently created vacancies are filled. Democrats see reasons to believe their strategy of campaigning against the bill is sound. Recent polls from KFF and Quinnipiac University show that the legislation is unpopular, while Trump is seeing his own approval ratings slump. The GOP is also grappling from the messy fallout caused by Trump supporters' demands for the release of files related to the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Yet some in the party say making their case will be tricky because of how the measure is written. While it mandates the largest cuts in history to Medicaid and to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), those mostly go into effect only after election day next year. 'Mission number one for us as Democrats is to be educating voters on the actual impacts of the bill and continuing to call out the Republicans that if it was so important to make these cuts to Medicaid and other programs that are happening basically in two years, why aren't they doing it now? Why don't they make it now?' said Jane Kleeb, a vice-chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the party's leader in Nebraska, where the House seat around Omaha is expected to be the site of a fervid race to replace the retiring Republican Don Bacon. 'We all know the answer, right, because they want to win some of these races in '26.' Brian Jackson, the Democratic party chair in Ingham county, Michigan, said he was not concerned about the bill's timing undermining their case against Tom Barrett, a first-term Republican congressman. In an interview, he described an atmosphere of uncertainty in the swing district created by the looming benefit cuts, Trump's tariffs and his administration's freeze of research funding, which has affected the local Michigan State University. 'The concern goes back to the overall culture of fear and unknown, and that just is horrible for the economy, it's horrible for jobs, the auto industry. So, you know, Medicaid is just one of many symptoms of an out-of-touch Washington and how it impacts people's day-to-day lives,' he said. In California's Kern county, Democrats are gearing up for a campaign against David Valadao, a Republican congressman and resilient opponent whose district has one of the highest rates of Medicaid enrollment in the nation. Though he voted for Trump's bill after giving mixed messages about its cuts to Medicaid, the local Democratic party chair, Christian Romo, warned that their delayed impact could frustrate the party's efforts. 'This is going to devastate this community,' Romo said. But with the provisions not taking effect until after the election, 'will people actually feel the implications of that? No. So will they remember that Valadao voted yes on that bill? You know, it's up in the air, and we'll have to see.' Top congressional Democrats argue that even if the cuts themselves are delayed, voters will feel their disruptions coming. 'Companies are making decisions because they know there's going to be less revenue as a result of a trillion dollars in cuts to Medicaid, the largest Medicaid cut in history of this country,' said Pete Aguilar, the House Democratic caucus chair. 'So, healthcare premiums will rise, that will happen early, insurers will make these decisions as well, and hospitals are going to have to face difficult decisions on what their future looks like.' Christopher Nicholas, a veteran Republican political consultant based in Pennsylvania, where the DCCC is looking to oust four Republicans, warned that Democrats can't count on just the Medicaid cuts to get them back to the majority. 'As America continues to stratify, self-select into separate neighborhoods and communities, you're going to have a lot of those represented by Republicans that don't have as much exposure to the Medicaid program, and you're going to have lots of them represented by Democrats in more urban areas that have more exposure to the Medicaid program,' he said. 'I think Democrats are way out of over their skis, thinking that that alone will get them to the promised land next year.'
