logo
False posts share AI-generated news report about Iran 'surrendering' to Israel

False posts share AI-generated news report about Iran 'surrendering' to Israel

Yahoo7 days ago
"Breaking news, Iran has officially surrendered to Israel," says a supposed CNN anchor in a Facebook reel shared June 26, 2025.
"A path to peace may finally be in sight between the two nations," he adds before the clip cuts to a group of protesters holding Iranian flags while appearing to apologise to Israel.
The Middle East foes traded devastating missile attacks after Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign on June 13 targeting Iran's nuclear and military facilities.
The strikes left more than 900 people dead in Iran and 28 people dead in Israel (archived link).
A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took effect on June 24.
The fabricated CNN video surfaced elsewhere on Facebook, YouTube and TikTok, racking up more than a million views in total.
Several users seemed to believe the report was genuine.
"Very good Iran. Peace. God bless Iran and Israel," one commented.
"Good job Iran. Better to be humble," another said.
CNN's senior vice president of communications Emily Kuhn dismissed the posts.
"This is a fake video and never aired on CNN," Kuhn told AFP on July 2.
The footage also bears signs it was AI-generated.
Compared to genuine CNN coverage of Iranians at a pro-government rally on June 25, the "live" label above the CNN logo is misspelled and the usual timestamp and name of the news programme are instead made up of jumbled characters.
Additionally, the news anchor's mouth does not move in accordance with his speech, another hallmark of AI-altered footage.
Despite the meteoric progress in Generative AI, errors still show up in AI-generated content. These defects are the best way to recognise a fabricated image.
The overly smooth skin and hair of the protesters suggest the video was AI-generated, as AFP previously noted in its video tutorial on spotting inauthentic visuals.
A reverse image search on Google using keyframes from the video found the clip was earlier shared on TikTok on June 24.
The post shows the video was taken from another user whose account is named "Ai VIDEOS".
While the circulating clip does not appear on the user's profile, a review of the account shows similar AI-generated news reports (archived link).
The clips bear an identical "AI VIDEO" text at the lower right corner of the frame.
AFP has debunked a wave of AI-generated visuals being falsely linked to the Iran-Israel conflict (archived link).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The U.S. and EU Are Fighting Over Who Controls Big Tech
The U.S. and EU Are Fighting Over Who Controls Big Tech

Gizmodo

time2 hours ago

  • Gizmodo

The U.S. and EU Are Fighting Over Who Controls Big Tech

President Trump just slapped 30% tariffs on goods coming from the European Union, escalating a long-simmering conflict over who gets to write the rules for Big Tech. The move came just after Brussels moved forward with more regulations, this time targeting the booming field of artificial intelligence. The latest flashpoint is the EU's new 'Code of Practice' for AI, a set of voluntary guidelines released Thursday aimed at addressing public safety concerns. While not legally binding, the code builds on the EU's landmark AI Act, and companies that don't sign on by the August 2 deadline risk intense regulatory scrutiny. OpenAI announced its intention to sign the code on Friday, while the tech lobby group CCIA, whose members include Google and Meta, has criticized the guidelines. The Trump administration has been openly hostile to the EU's attempts to regulate American tech companies. Trump has described the bloc's hefty fines as 'overseas extortion,' while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has claimed they function as backdoor tariffs. This view has been amplified by Silicon Valley. In a January announcement, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said his company was 'going to work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American companies,' specifically calling out European regulators. These tensions have crippled trade negotiations; in May, Trump administration officials told the New York Post that talks had stalled over the EU's refusal to abandon its multi-million dollar fines against U.S. tech giants. Under the 2022 Digital Markets Act (DMA), a landmark European antitrust law, Apple, Google, Amazon, and Meta were all deemed 'gatekeepers.' This designation brought with it a wave of fines and forced changes to their EU operations. Most recently, Meta was hit with a more than $200 million fine after the European Commission found its 'pay-or-consent' model breached the DMA. According to a Reuters report from Friday, Meta has decided to fight the findings and will not propose changes, meaning more fines are likely on the way. Despite Trump's pressure, the EU seems intent on maintaining its regulatory independence. Earlier this month, the European Commission's tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, told Politico that the bloc's rules on digital competition and AI were not up for negotiation. However, the EU has shown some willingness to compromise. The bloc recently dropped a proposed tax on digital companies from its upcoming budget, a move seen as a win for the Trump administration. The question now is whether these new tariffs will backfire and provoke an even tougher crackdown. In response to the first round of tariffs in April, EU President Ursula von der Leyen was open about targeting Big Tech with countermeasures if talks failed. While the bloc delayed a set of retaliatory measures that were set to go into effect this past Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron has made it clear that the EU's most feared weapon is still on the table: the anti-coercion instrument. 'With European unity, it is more than ever up to the Commission to assert the Union's determination to resolutely defend European interests,' Macron wrote on X. 'This implies speeding up the preparation of credible countermeasures, by mobilizing all the instruments at its disposal, including anti-coercion, if no agreement is reached by August 1st.' Along with the President of the European Commission, France shares the same very strong disapproval at the announcement of horizontal 30% tariffs on EU exports to the United States from August 1st. This announcement comes after weeks of intense engagement by the Commission in… — Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) July 12, 2025The anti-coercion instrument is considered the 'bazooka' in the EU's arsenal. While traditional tariffs hit physical goods, this tool allows the EU to impose trade restrictions on services from a country it deems is using economic coercion. If the U.S. is found to fit the bill, American tech giants that provide digital services, like Apple, Google, and Meta, could be uniquely vulnerable. Ultimately, both sides are fighting to protect their own interests: the Trump administration wants to defend American dominance in the global tech industry, while the EU wants to regulate digital platforms on its own terms. As negotiations continue, they will not only decide the fate of the tech companies caught in the middle but will also set the rules for global tech sovereignty for years to come. But for Big Tech companies caught in the crossfire, the message is clear: this is a war over digital sovereignty, and the rules of the internet's next era may be written in Brussels as much as in Washington.

IDF announces deaths of senior Hamas, PIJ terrorists in Gaza over past two weeks
IDF announces deaths of senior Hamas, PIJ terrorists in Gaza over past two weeks

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

IDF announces deaths of senior Hamas, PIJ terrorists in Gaza over past two weeks

Eight of the terrorists were from Hamas's Izzadin al-Qassam Brigades and one was from Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The IDF and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) have conducted joint operations to kill terrorists from Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Gaza over the past two weeks, naming nine senior terrorists who were killed during this period in an announcement by the military on Sunday. Eight of the terrorists were from Hamas, and one was a PIJ member. The nine terrorists who were killed ran units which operated to rebuild their military capabilities, including Hamas's Weapons Production Headquarters and their Military Intelligence Unit, the military added. The Weapons Production Headquarters is responsible for restoring and expanding the terror group's weapons arsenal, and the Military Intelligence Unit provides intelligence in an attempt to maintain the operational control of Hamas's military wing, Izzadin al-Qassam Brigades, and to advance terror activities against Israel, the military noted. Muhammad Abu Awwad was a senior terrorist in Hamas's Weapons Production Headquarters, specifically the Projects and Development Department. He was responsible for developing and advancing Hamas's precision missile project, and served as head of Production and Technical Control, the military said. Mustafa Dababesh was the deputy head of a department in the Weapons Production Headquarters. Bilal Abu Shikha and Tayseer Shareem were both section commanders in the Weapons Production Headquarters. Mundhir Salami was a production site commander in the Weapons Production Headquarters who oversaw the production of various types of weapons, including significantly contributing to the terror group's military buildup in Gaza, the military announced. Bilal Musallam was a section commander in Hamas's Military Intelligence Unit, and Ahmad Abu Shamala was a squad commander in the same unit. Rabi' Mustafa Rabi' Sukhweil was a financial operative in the Izzadin al-Qassam Brigades who was involved in transferring millions of dollars in terror funds to Hamas, thus financing its continued terror activities and reestablishment, the military announced. Muhammad al-Bayouk was a senior terrorist in the PIJ's Weapons Production Apparatus.

Nassau County will allow cops to wear face masks for ICE raids, undercover work: ‘We have their back'
Nassau County will allow cops to wear face masks for ICE raids, undercover work: ‘We have their back'

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Nassau County will allow cops to wear face masks for ICE raids, undercover work: ‘We have their back'

Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman has carved out a key exemption to the county's controversial mask ban — allowing local cops involved in ICE raids and working undercover to still wear face coverings. The existing law only exempts public mask-wearing for religious or health reasons, but Blakeman's new executive order now gives federal, state and local law-enforcement officers the option to wear masks during operations such as drug and gang raids and soon, immigration enforcement alongside ICE. 5 The existing law only exempts public mask-wearing for religious or health reasons. Brigitte Stelzer 'Here in Nassau County, we respect our law enforcement officers,' Blakeman said at the signing inside the legislative building in Mineola on Friday. 'And we have their back.' The executive order comes as Nassau is gearing up to fully launch its partnership with ICE. Ten detectives have been deputized for the work and are already trained and waiting for the green light. Blakeman said the purpose of the order is to allow cops to mask up during certain police operations 'when deemed necessary' to conceal their identity to 'protect the integrity of their mission' and to limit any possibility of retaliation against them or their families. 5 The executive order comes as Nassau is gearing up to fully launch its partnership with ICE. Brigitte Stelzer The county executive first signed the mask ban into law in August, after the GOP-majority local legislature passed the bill in response to anti-Israel protests across college campuses. The law makes it a misdemeanor crime to wear any face covering unless for religious or health reasons, punishable by a $1,000 fine or up to a year in jail. The law immediately sparked multiple lawsuits that have so far been unsuccessful at shutting it down, with courts citing the existing exemptions written within the legislation as valid. 5 Ten detectives have been deputized for the work and are already trained and waiting for the green light. Kyle Mazza/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Blakeman's executive order is effectively the opposite of a bill proposed Wednesday in neighboring New York City that would prevent any federal agents from wearing masks and other face coverings while on the job. Blakeman said he signed his executive order with the city's bill in mind — wanting to make clear that he will continue to be a partner in ICE's operations in the area despite pushback from the state, the five boroughs and pending lawsuits from civil-rights groups. 5 The law immediately sparked multiple lawsuits that have so far been unsuccessful at shutting it down. Brigitte Stelzer 'I think they're out of their mind,' Blakeman said about the city's proposal. 'I think that they will destroy the city, and I think they will make law enforcement in the metropolitan area, including Nassau County, much more difficult.' The suburb signed an agreement with ICE in February to deputize 10 detectives so they can work federally alongside ICE in helping detain and deport undocumented immigrants. Nassau Democrats slammed Blakeman's partnership with ICE and his executive order as politically motivated and called the carve-out for police an admission of guilt. 5 Blakeman said he signed his executive order with the city's bill in mind — wanting to make clear that he will continue to be a partner in ICE's operations. Brigitte Stelzer 'This executive order is a quiet admission that his original law is most likely illegal,' Nassau County Legislator Delia DeRiggi-Whitton told The Post. 'Democrats warned from Day One that Blakeman's mask ban was vague, over-broad and more focused on politics than public good. 'We proposed a clear, constitutional alternative focused on actual criminal conduct. Instead, the county executive chose a political headline over sound policy, and now he's scrambling to patch the consequences.' Blakeman fired back, 'What I find troubling is the very same people that criticized our mask law are the same people that are saying law enforcement officers in the performance of their duty can't wear a mask to protect their identity if they're involved in a sensitive investigation.' The county executive said the mask ban was never meant to target law enforcement but to deter agitators, who he previously called 'cowards' and claimed were using face coverings to avoid accountability during protests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store