logo
India cannot resolve its food challenge without fixing how it uses water

India cannot resolve its food challenge without fixing how it uses water

Indian Express10 hours ago

Written by Anushka Bandyopadhyay, Raktimava Bose and Saurabh Bandyopadhyay
Water underpins nearly every aspect of human well-being, from food security and sanitation to clean energy and public health. Yet, as cities expand, industries grow, and agriculture continues to dominate water use, we are confronting a sobering reality. In many parts of the world, water demand now exceeds what nature can sustainably supply. In India, farming remains the largest consumer, but domestic and industrial use is rising fast. Although India supports nearly 18 per cent of the global population, it possesses only 4 per cent of the world's freshwater resources. A significant portion of this limited supply, ranging from 78 to 90 per cent, depending on the source, is consumed by agriculture alone. The result is a widening gap between what we need and what we have.
India's emergence as a global agricultural leader is undeniable. It is the world's largest producer of milk and spices, and the second-largest producer of fruits, vegetables, and fish. But this success hides a deeper crisis: Our water resources are being depleted faster than they can be replenished.
Over 80 per cent of India's freshwater withdrawals go to agriculture, much of it lost to inefficient and unsustainable use. In Punjab, groundwater levels are falling by more than one metre every year, driven by the expansion of paddy cultivation and free electricity. According to the Central Ground Water Board, 78 per cent of Punjab's administrative blocks are now over-exploited, up from 50 per cent in 2004. India is, quite literally, eating its way into a groundwater emergency.
What makes this worse is that our input-intensive, water-thirsty model isn't even delivering on its core promise, that is, nutrition. Despite achieving food self-sufficiency, nutrition outcomes remain poor. NFHS-5 data show that 35.5 per cent of children under five are stunted, 32.1 per cent are underweight, and 16.6 per cent of the population remains undernourished. This mismatch between food security and nutritional security reflects a deeper flaw: Our incentives prioritise calorie-rich crops like rice and wheat, backed by water subsidies, at the cost of more nutritious, climate-resilient alternatives.
Irrigation, often seen as part of the problem, can also be part of the solution, if managed right. Beyond boosting yields, smart irrigation allows diversification into pulses, vegetables, and oilseeds, which improves household nutrition. It ensures fodder for livestock, raises rural incomes, and reduces distress migration. If used wisely, irrigation can help India grow not just more food, but better food.
The roots of the imbalance lie in flawed policy choices. In Punjab, the Green Revolution displaced traditional crops with paddy, and free electricity drove indiscriminate use of deep tubewells. In Maharashtra, sugarcane, grown on just 4 per cent of agricultural land, uses over 70 per cent of the state's irrigation water. The impact is especially severe in drought-prone districts like Solapur. Gujarat, however, offers a model of reform. The Jyotigram Yojana, launched in the early 2000s, separated agricultural and domestic power feeders and introduced metered irrigation supply. The result — a 20 per cent drop in groundwater extraction and wider adoption of micro-irrigation in water-scarce regions like Saurashtra and Kutch.
India needs a two-pronged approach: Increase water availability in underused regions like eastern India, and sharply reduce demand in over-extracted zones, especially the northwest.
First, we must rethink incentives. Minimum support prices (MSPs) should be aligned with agro-ecological realities. Supporting millets, pulses, and oilseeds through procurement in rainfed areas can align sustainability with dietary diversity. The 2023 declaration of the International Year of Millets was a welcome step, but it must be backed by consistent fiscal support, market access, and consumer awareness.
Second, we need smarter pricing of water and electricity. Though politically difficult, pilot projects suggest farmers do respond to price signals if better options are available. In Andhra Pradesh, prepaid smart meters on pumps led to a 15 per cent drop in electricity use and greater adoption of drip systems. When paired with efficient technology, pricing can nudge behaviour without coercion.
Third, India must scale up micro-irrigation. Despite 74 million hectares under irrigation, only 12 per cent is covered by drip and sprinkler systems. These can save 30 to 70 per cent of water depending on the crop and terrain. The main barriers, high upfront costs and limited awareness, can be overcome with public-private models, equipment leasing, and targeted subsidies for small and marginal farmers.
Fourth, and perhaps most crucial, is investing in farmer-led water literacy. Reforms will fail unless farmers change how they perceive and value water. Many still equate abundance with security, unaware that overuse today threatens tomorrow's resilience. Community-led initiatives like water user associations, participatory irrigation management, and groundwater audits, as in Maharashtra's Jalyukta Shivar Abhiyan, can embed conservation into daily practice and foster collective action.
India cannot resolve its food challenge without fixing how it uses water. Water must be treated as a finite economic resource, not a limitless political entitlement. This requires tough but essential reforms — rethinking subsidies, realigning procurement, pricing inputs rationally, and building trust with farmers.
In an era of rising climate uncertainty, India must shift from growing crops based on political arithmetic to those based on hydrological logic and nutritional need.
The writers are associated with the National Council of Applied Economic Research. Views are personal

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India cannot resolve its food challenge without fixing how it uses water
India cannot resolve its food challenge without fixing how it uses water

Indian Express

time10 hours ago

  • Indian Express

India cannot resolve its food challenge without fixing how it uses water

Written by Anushka Bandyopadhyay, Raktimava Bose and Saurabh Bandyopadhyay Water underpins nearly every aspect of human well-being, from food security and sanitation to clean energy and public health. Yet, as cities expand, industries grow, and agriculture continues to dominate water use, we are confronting a sobering reality. In many parts of the world, water demand now exceeds what nature can sustainably supply. In India, farming remains the largest consumer, but domestic and industrial use is rising fast. Although India supports nearly 18 per cent of the global population, it possesses only 4 per cent of the world's freshwater resources. A significant portion of this limited supply, ranging from 78 to 90 per cent, depending on the source, is consumed by agriculture alone. The result is a widening gap between what we need and what we have. India's emergence as a global agricultural leader is undeniable. It is the world's largest producer of milk and spices, and the second-largest producer of fruits, vegetables, and fish. But this success hides a deeper crisis: Our water resources are being depleted faster than they can be replenished. Over 80 per cent of India's freshwater withdrawals go to agriculture, much of it lost to inefficient and unsustainable use. In Punjab, groundwater levels are falling by more than one metre every year, driven by the expansion of paddy cultivation and free electricity. According to the Central Ground Water Board, 78 per cent of Punjab's administrative blocks are now over-exploited, up from 50 per cent in 2004. India is, quite literally, eating its way into a groundwater emergency. What makes this worse is that our input-intensive, water-thirsty model isn't even delivering on its core promise, that is, nutrition. Despite achieving food self-sufficiency, nutrition outcomes remain poor. NFHS-5 data show that 35.5 per cent of children under five are stunted, 32.1 per cent are underweight, and 16.6 per cent of the population remains undernourished. This mismatch between food security and nutritional security reflects a deeper flaw: Our incentives prioritise calorie-rich crops like rice and wheat, backed by water subsidies, at the cost of more nutritious, climate-resilient alternatives. Irrigation, often seen as part of the problem, can also be part of the solution, if managed right. Beyond boosting yields, smart irrigation allows diversification into pulses, vegetables, and oilseeds, which improves household nutrition. It ensures fodder for livestock, raises rural incomes, and reduces distress migration. If used wisely, irrigation can help India grow not just more food, but better food. The roots of the imbalance lie in flawed policy choices. In Punjab, the Green Revolution displaced traditional crops with paddy, and free electricity drove indiscriminate use of deep tubewells. In Maharashtra, sugarcane, grown on just 4 per cent of agricultural land, uses over 70 per cent of the state's irrigation water. The impact is especially severe in drought-prone districts like Solapur. Gujarat, however, offers a model of reform. The Jyotigram Yojana, launched in the early 2000s, separated agricultural and domestic power feeders and introduced metered irrigation supply. The result — a 20 per cent drop in groundwater extraction and wider adoption of micro-irrigation in water-scarce regions like Saurashtra and Kutch. India needs a two-pronged approach: Increase water availability in underused regions like eastern India, and sharply reduce demand in over-extracted zones, especially the northwest. First, we must rethink incentives. Minimum support prices (MSPs) should be aligned with agro-ecological realities. Supporting millets, pulses, and oilseeds through procurement in rainfed areas can align sustainability with dietary diversity. The 2023 declaration of the International Year of Millets was a welcome step, but it must be backed by consistent fiscal support, market access, and consumer awareness. Second, we need smarter pricing of water and electricity. Though politically difficult, pilot projects suggest farmers do respond to price signals if better options are available. In Andhra Pradesh, prepaid smart meters on pumps led to a 15 per cent drop in electricity use and greater adoption of drip systems. When paired with efficient technology, pricing can nudge behaviour without coercion. Third, India must scale up micro-irrigation. Despite 74 million hectares under irrigation, only 12 per cent is covered by drip and sprinkler systems. These can save 30 to 70 per cent of water depending on the crop and terrain. The main barriers, high upfront costs and limited awareness, can be overcome with public-private models, equipment leasing, and targeted subsidies for small and marginal farmers. Fourth, and perhaps most crucial, is investing in farmer-led water literacy. Reforms will fail unless farmers change how they perceive and value water. Many still equate abundance with security, unaware that overuse today threatens tomorrow's resilience. Community-led initiatives like water user associations, participatory irrigation management, and groundwater audits, as in Maharashtra's Jalyukta Shivar Abhiyan, can embed conservation into daily practice and foster collective action. India cannot resolve its food challenge without fixing how it uses water. Water must be treated as a finite economic resource, not a limitless political entitlement. This requires tough but essential reforms — rethinking subsidies, realigning procurement, pricing inputs rationally, and building trust with farmers. In an era of rising climate uncertainty, India must shift from growing crops based on political arithmetic to those based on hydrological logic and nutritional need. The writers are associated with the National Council of Applied Economic Research. Views are personal

Securing groundwater: A critical step towards sustainability
Securing groundwater: A critical step towards sustainability

Hindustan Times

time2 days ago

  • Hindustan Times

Securing groundwater: A critical step towards sustainability

India stands at a critical juncture in its water journey. Groundwater—invisible, quiet and dependable—has long powered our agriculture and daily life. But as we face the growing demands of the 21st century, it's time to rethink how we manage this vital resource and secure its future. Though it constitutes part of the utilisable water resources of India, groundwater is central to India's water system. It meets nearly 62% of irrigation needs and over 85% of our rural drinking water demand. With much of Jal Jeevan Mission schemes being groundwater fed, the dependence on groundwater is only deepening. Globally as well as in India, water stress is escalating. According to a UNICEF report, nearly two-thirds of the world's population faces severe water scarcity at least one month a year. The dependence on groundwater has exponentially increased since the advent of the Green Revolution to achieve food security since the mid-60s. As per the latest estimation by GoI in 2024, India extracts about 245.64 billion cubic meters of groundwater annually—more than any other country in the world. About 14% of the country's geography is under or precariously close to groundwater overexploitation, where annual extraction is more than the recharge. This scale underscores both our reliance and the urgent need for sustainable use. Agriculture is the largest consumer of groundwater in India, using 90% of total annual extraction. The Green Revolution, while ensuring food security of the country has also led to indiscriminate withdrawal of groundwater in several parts of India, across diverse aquifer typologies. The primary reasons for low water productivity of our crops are suboptimal irrigation efficiency, growing water guzzling crops even in stressed areas, and not adopting proper agronomic practices. Encouragingly, change is taking root. Across states, agriculture and its irrigation are getting reshaped. Farmers are adopting micro irrigation, are encouraged to grow low-water intensive crops and adopting climate-suitable cropping calendars. Policy support is being extended not just to incentivize these shifts but also adopt other mechanisms for water use efficiency by domestic and industrial users. However, India's agro-climatic diversity means that a single solution to solve all contexts will not work. Punjab and Haryana, shaped by decades of intensive farming, face challenges distinct from those in Karnataka, having completely two different aquifer types. In the eastern states, with smaller mean land holdings and less rural electricity penetration, the situation is different. On the other hand, the vast areas in western India, covering primarily Rajasthan and Gujarat perennially suffers from scanty rainfall. In places like West Bengal, efforts to restore ponds, improve recharge of groundwater, and promote water-efficient farming are beginning to show promise. With 60% of groundwater used in agriculture, the road to sustainability in this and other states starts on the farm. Sustainable groundwater management begins with local ownership. Village-level water budgets help communities understand their water availability, monitor usage, forecast shortage and plan better. It helps in promoting equity among farmers in spite of disparate land holdings. But such approaches must be a scientific understanding of the local groundwater regime, based on local-scale data. In the Atal Bhujal Yojona Scheme, water security plans are being made for villages with support from the communities, before adopting supply and demand-side interventions with consent from the villagers. Efforts like the Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP) are helping embed water planning into broader rural development. Water for People India has positively impacted over 1.2 million lives through community-led efforts in water, sanitation, and hygiene, supporting more than 150 gram panchayats and peri-urban areas. Groundwater being a common pool resource, its management requires all its stakeholders to come together. It calls for a shared commitment across government, civil society, scientists, farmers, and citizens. Since the resource is invisible, De-mystification of the science of groundwater is needed through public awareness and by building local stewardship. Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater should be promoted, and an all-out effort to be made to improve water productivity of the crops. India's groundwater story is at a crossroads. Looking for newer sources is no longer a viable solution. The way forward lies in sustainable management of the annually replenishable resource. Adopting supply side interventions like rainwater harvesting, artificial recharge, and the revival of traditional water systems. Equally critical is the need to enhance irrigation use efficiency. And adopting a cropping pattern commensurate with the local climate and terrain. Since groundwater is a decentralised, common-pool resource, stakeholders' involvement is a must for its sustainable management. The future of water security depends on both collective restraint and smarter planning. It's time to treat water not as an endlessly replenishable resource, but as our collective responsibility to protect this intergenerational resource. This article is authored by Bishwadeep Ghose, country director and Dipankar Saha, president, Water for People India Trust.

Caste, dynasty and state capital: Three factors that have shaped Andhra Pradesh politics
Caste, dynasty and state capital: Three factors that have shaped Andhra Pradesh politics

Indian Express

time4 days ago

  • Indian Express

Caste, dynasty and state capital: Three factors that have shaped Andhra Pradesh politics

In Andhra Pradesh, three factors have shaped the contours of contemporary politics: the Capitalist economy, dynastic politics and the question of the state capital. These factors influenced the dominant castes' role in politics and the formation of political parties. Broadly, there are three phases in the political process of Andhra Pradesh: One, the consolidation of the Telugu identity from the early 20th century, resulting in separation from the Madras state in 1953; two, the phase of dominant caste politics from the 1950s right until the bifurcation of the composite state into Telangana and residual AP in 2014; three, the rise of dynastic politics from 2014. In the last phase, political power in the state has been in the hands of three families. The growing phenomenon of dynastic politics needs to be explained in the historical context of the political economy. The building of irrigation infrastructure from the late 19th century onwards by the colonial rulers in coastal Andhra, like the Dhavaleswaram project across the Godavari, and the Nagarjuna Sagar and Srisailam dams across the Krishna after Independence, turned drought-prone areas into rice bowls. Subsequently, the Green Revolution contributed immensely towards the rise of rich capitalist farmers from dominant castes such as Kamma, Kapu, Rajus and Reddys. With the spread of Western education during the colonial period, the educated Brahmin community took the lead in creating awareness about the importance of nationalism and the Telugu regional identity. The Andhra Mahasabha came into existence in 1930 to advocate for the rights of the Telugus in the Madras state. In 1937, the Sri Bagh pact was signed with the feudal lords of Rayalaseema, which was more backward compared to the prosperous coastal region. Over time, the linguistic movement intensified, and the prominent Gandhian Potti Sriramulu went on a fast unto death to carve Andhra out from the multilingual Madras state. Andhra State was created in 1953, and the Reddy community prevailed upon Jawaharlal Nehru to make Kurnool in Rayalaseema the state capital. However, the move was opposed by N G Ranga, a veteran freedom fighter-cum-Congress leader from the Kamma caste of Guntur district. He demanded that Vijayawada be made the capital of Andhra. By 1956, political conditions favoured the creation of Vishalandhra by merging the Telugu-speaking parts of Hyderabad State (Telangana) through the Gentleman's Agreement. Initially, the electoral fray saw a Congress vs Communists contest, both controlled by the Reddys and Kammas. In fact, from 1956-1983 until the emergence of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), Congress was in power. After matinee idol NT Rama Rao floated the TDP, Congress was defeated for the first time in composite AP, and from the 1980s onwards, the state swung between Congress and TDP. From 1956 to 2014, Reddys, who formed 6.5 per cent of the population, held 27 per cent of the political representation and the Kammas, who were 4.5 per cent of the population, held 13 per cent of the political representation. For more than 30 years, the chief minister's position was captured by the Reddys and more than 20 years by Kammas and the rest of the period by the Brahmins, Vaishyas, Velamas and a Dalit. As a result of the dominant and upper-caste rule of more than five decades, the regional fragmentation was aggravated by the bifurcation of the state, while class and caste politics were suppressed. Elections became costly affairs, with a social deficit of representation created due to the disproportionate representation of the landed dominant castes in political power and the conversion of Hyderabad into a centre of global capital at the cost of opportunities for the local population. With the bifurcation of AP, the TDP and Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party (YSRCP) have emerged as the contenders for political domination in the residual state, with both dominated, in turn, by the dynasty. In 1995, TDP was captured by NTR's son-in-law Chandrababu Naidu, who has been the party president for the last three decades and is now promoting his son Lokesh as the future of the party. YS Jagan Mohan Reddy (Jagan) is the son of the former chief minister YS Rajasekhara Reddy, who died in a helicopter accident in 2009. When the Congress party refused to make him the chief minister, he floated the YSRCP in 2011. The party contested in the 2014 election to encash YSR's political legacy, but that only resulted in opposition status. The TDP, as a ruling party from 2014 to 2019 and 2024 onwards, has been concentrating on building a highly centralised capital at Amaravati, which is located in the green belt of coastal Andhra, with 34,000 acres of land already acquired. When it was in power from 2019 to 2024, the YSRCP proposed three capitals at Amaravati, Visakhapatnam and Kurnool. However, Jagan's proposal failed in the 2024 election, and Naidu's plan to build a global city is back in full swing. Thanks to TDP joining the NDA coalition, Amaravati is getting support from the centre. Therefore, the entire exercise of global capital has been characterised by Carol Upadhya as the 'reterritorialisation of the deterritorialised Kamma caste' in the form of building a world-class capital. The writer teaches in the department of Political Science, University of Hyderabad

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store